Who Do You Side With...?
Comments
-
Well duh.Fenderbender123 said:
I didn't miss it, I just figured that there wasn't a team of political science experts at hand ready to read, analyze, and apply a score to what I wrote in.TheGlove said:
Apparently you missed the write in option.Fenderbender123 said:
I also found that a lot of the questions weren't really answerable because they pertained to certain government concepts and roles that I don't believe should exist in the first place, so if there's no option to choose that, I can't answer how we should handle that particular situation.
If these answers are not satisfactory, you can “submit your own stance”. Submitting your own stance will not match any candidates but will allow us to review popular stances, match them to the candidates, and add them as an official stance. -
Sorry, no. I assume I scored so well with Bernie (and Paul was my top GOP) because I think the NSA is shitting on our privacy rights (for no gain), our foreign policy is retarded, and that corporate campaign contributions and gerrymandering are corrupt and undemocratic.DuckHHunterisafag said:
So you're a lazy gubermint saggy tit sucker. Fuck youThomasFremont said:95% Feelin the Bern.
Also, I have a LOT more money than you do.
Is it Friday yet? -
We should start a 7 page argument in honor of @collegdoogallpurpleallgold said:
Yes we desperately need to prevent those cases of voter fraud that don't exist.GrundleStiltzkin said:Cruz, Paul, Rubio.
Ps, ISAFNRC.
-
You promise people aren't breaking the law? Works for meallpurpleallgold said:
Yes we desperately need to prevent those cases of voter fraud that don't exist.GrundleStiltzkin said:Cruz, Paul, Rubio.
Ps, ISAFNRC.
-
I believe kids should get vaccinated because kids, if not coat-hangered in the third trimester, should be given a chance to live. I don't need the fucking government to tell me that.Fenderbender123 said:
I get this argument. But think about it...violence and coersion aren't the only means of influencing people to do something. Easily more than 80% of libertarians believe that children should be vaccinated.doogsinparadise said:Lol at the ~80% of Libertarians against mandatory vaccinations.
But I do need the fucking government to make all those dumbfucks who SHOULD have coathangered their babies and don't like their kids living longer to get theirs vaccinated so I"m not just paying for their WIC program AND their healthcare more than absolutely necessary.
-
Not surprising that a frustrated liberal like yourself would like Trump, but Cruz?RaceBannon said:My hits may be the least surprising. I did go strongly in favor of photo ID to vote in honor of collegdoog
89% Cruz
88% Trump
87% Rubio
82% Rand
80% Carson
78% Jeb
31% Hilary
30% Feeling the Bern
Flip Cruz and Trump and you pretty much have my preference in order
I just want to see the current political world burn -
Is the NSA not gaining because it is infringing on privacy or because we're not utilizing it effectively?ThomasFremont said:
Sorry, no. I assume I scored so well with Bernie (and Paul was my top GOP) because I think the NSA is shitting on our privacy rights (for no gain), our foreign policy is retarded, and that corporate campaign contributions and gerrymandering are corrupt and undemocratic.DuckHHunterisafag said:
So you're a lazy gubermint saggy tit sucker. Fuck youThomasFremont said:95% Feelin the Bern.
Also, I have a LOT more money than you do.
Is it Friday yet?
Although we all have our own skeletons one way or another, I guess I look at privacy as the type of thing that it's not a huge issue if you have nothing to hide. And in a world where "the enemy" is completely changing the way in which the game is played, you have to change the way that you think about the game as well.
I guess what I'm saying is that I don't have a problem standing in line at the airport for an hour to go through security if it is being done effectively. And likewise, I don't have a problem with people scanning through my phone records for messages or calls that I may make. I don't have anything to hide in that regard and if somehow I am in communication with someone that does have something to hide and get contacted, then I'd be interested in doing what I could do to my part. -
Sounds like you love Big Brother.Tequilla said:
Is the NSA not gaining because it is infringing on privacy or because we're not utilizing it effectively?ThomasFremont said:
Sorry, no. I assume I scored so well with Bernie (and Paul was my top GOP) because I think the NSA is shitting on our privacy rights (for no gain), our foreign policy is retarded, and that corporate campaign contributions and gerrymandering are corrupt and undemocratic.DuckHHunterisafag said:
So you're a lazy gubermint saggy tit sucker. Fuck youThomasFremont said:95% Feelin the Bern.
Also, I have a LOT more money than you do.
Is it Friday yet?
Although we all have our own skeletons one way or another, I guess I look at privacy as the type of thing that it's not a huge issue if you have nothing to hide. And in a world where "the enemy" is completely changing the way in which the game is played, you have to change the way that you think about the game as well.
I guess what I'm saying is that I don't have a problem standing in line at the airport for an hour to go through security if it is being done effectively. And likewise, I don't have a problem with people scanning through my phone records for messages or calls that I may make. I don't have anything to hide in that regard and if somehow I am in communication with someone that does have something to hide and get contacted, then I'd be interested in doing what I could do to my part. -
allpurpleallgold said:
Yes we desperately need to prevent those cases of voter fraud that don't exist. </GrundleStiltzkin said:Cruz, Paul, Rubio.
Ps, ISAFNRC.
https://youtu.be/ROj18U56iE4 -
I got 100% Fuck All These Assholes








