Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

Supreme Court does something it should have done 40 years ago

13567…14

Comments

  • WestlinnDuck
    WestlinnDuck Member Posts: 17,905 Standard Supporter
    hardhat said:

    Thomas along with Scalia are the two best Supreme Court justices in the last 80 years. Both could define a woman and both could read for understanding. The most recent "black" justice can't do either. I don't define that as some sort of societal improvement.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • HHusky
    HHusky Member Posts: 24,335
    hardhat said:

    One of the predictable and actually predicted outcomes of AA was that some people would be labeled as undeserving beneficiaries of the policy in the future, whether fairly or unfairly. I'm sure I'm not the only one arguing against AA who pointed this out 40+ years ago.

    The legal argument against AA is that it can't be squared with the Constitution. There are multiple practical problems with the policy as well.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • HHusky
    HHusky Member Posts: 24,335
    Race disagrees
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • MelloDawg
    MelloDawg Member Posts: 6,917
    WestlinnDuck said:

    hardhat said:

    Thomas along with Scalia are the two best Supreme Court justices in the last 80 years. Both could define a woman and both could read for understanding. The most recent "black" justice can't do either. I don't define that as some sort of societal improvement.
    But can they be heard over dog whistles like that?
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • Bob_C
    Bob_C Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 13,257 Founders Club
    GrundleStiltzkin said:

    hardhat said:

    If I'm not mistaken, Harvard can discriminate or preference in any way they like. They only have to reject federal funding.
    That part will never happen.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • SFGbob
    SFGbob Member Posts: 33,188
    edited June 2023
    HHusky said:

    WestlinnDuck said:

    Very disappointing to the dazzler. While the dementia patient has tightened up NATO, we still have some conservative judges that actually can read and follow the Constitution and that is unacceptable to a leftard. We have three leftard justices that can't define a woman and think that colleges should be allowed to discriminate based on skin color. I didn't see where the dem justices defined "black" for purposes of college discrimination. I'd ask the dazzler for a definition but that's beyond his mythical legal education.

    You have very little room to label anyone a "dementia patient", Gasbag. I am opposed to affirmative action as I have stated many times during the 20+ years we have "known" each other. Your meds are failing you.
    Another policy the Dazzler doesn't support, but he votes for people that do.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • SFGbob
    SFGbob Member Posts: 33,188
    HHusky said:

    WestlinnDuck said:

    HHusky said:

    WestlinnDuck said:

    Very disappointing to the dazzler. While the dementia patient has tightened up NATO, we still have some conservative judges that actually can read and follow the Constitution and that is unacceptable to a leftard. We have three leftard justices that can't define a woman and think that colleges should be allowed to discriminate based on skin color. I didn't see where the dem justices defined "black" for purposes of college discrimination. I'd ask the dazzler for a definition but that's beyond his mythical legal education.

    You have very little room to label anyone a "dementia patient", Gasbag. I am opposed to affirmative action as I have stated many times during the 20+ years we have "known" each other. Your meds are failing you.
    Sure, just not a voting issue for you unlike tightening up NATO and unlimited abortion. Never doubt that the dazzler is an issue driven voter.
    Who had "just not a voting issue for you" in the Gasbag Defensive Retort pool? (I did.)
    Dazzler marches into the middle of the town square, drops him pants and paints his ass red and predicts that people will notice.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • SFGbob
    SFGbob Member Posts: 33,188
    HHusky said:

    RaceBannon said:

    HHusky said:

    RaceBannon said:

    HHusky said:

    WestlinnDuck said:

    Very disappointing to the dazzler. While the dementia patient has tightened up NATO, we still have some conservative judges that actually can read and follow the Constitution and that is unacceptable to a leftard. We have three leftard justices that can't define a woman and think that colleges should be allowed to discriminate based on skin color. I didn't see where the dem justices defined "black" for purposes of college discrimination. I'd ask the dazzler for a definition but that's beyond his mythical legal education.

    You have very little room to label anyone a "dementia patient", Gasbag. I am opposed to affirmative action as I have stated many times during the 20+ years we have "known" each other. Your meds are failing you.
    You sure vote for what you're against a lot
    It's called the "two party system", I'm told.

    You don't agree with Daddy on everything either, allegedly.
    Yeah and you keep voting for the party you don't agree with

    Allegedly
    You and Gasbag are just going to have to accept that I am the world's foremost expert on what my views are.

    Once you defined anyone with a functioning brain as a "leftist", you were bound to be unable to draw meaningful distinctions between poasters.
    You're an expert on being a liar. I've seen little if any evidence on any other area of your expertise.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter