Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

Supreme Court does something it should have done 40 years ago

SFGbob
SFGbob Member Posts: 33,183
The only real "systemic racism" in America is finally outlawed.


«1345

Comments

  • SFGbob
    SFGbob Member Posts: 33,183
    I'd love to read some of those essays. Any 18 year old black kid today talking about how race negatively affected their life would be a hoot.
  • WestlinnDuck
    WestlinnDuck Member Posts: 17,542 Standard Supporter
    Very disappointing to the dazzler. While the dementia patient has tightened up NATO, we still have some conservative judges that actually can read and follow the Constitution and that is unacceptable to a leftard. We have three leftard justices that can't define a woman and think that colleges should be allowed to discriminate based on skin color. I didn't see where the dem justices defined "black" for purposes of college discrimination. I'd ask the dazzler for a definition but that's beyond his mythical legal education.
  • HHusky
    HHusky Member Posts: 23,885

    Very disappointing to the dazzler. While the dementia patient has tightened up NATO, we still have some conservative judges that actually can read and follow the Constitution and that is unacceptable to a leftard. We have three leftard justices that can't define a woman and think that colleges should be allowed to discriminate based on skin color. I didn't see where the dem justices defined "black" for purposes of college discrimination. I'd ask the dazzler for a definition but that's beyond his mythical legal education.

    You have very little room to label anyone a "dementia patient", Gasbag. I am opposed to affirmative action as I have stated many times during the 20+ years we have "known" each other. Your meds are failing you.
  • RaceBannon
    RaceBannon Member, Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 113,725 Founders Club
    Twitter is mad at Asians and white women

    Apparently arguing that white women benefitted more than blacks is a reason to keep affirmative action to keep benefitting white women
  • WestlinnDuck
    WestlinnDuck Member Posts: 17,542 Standard Supporter
    HHusky said:

    Very disappointing to the dazzler. While the dementia patient has tightened up NATO, we still have some conservative judges that actually can read and follow the Constitution and that is unacceptable to a leftard. We have three leftard justices that can't define a woman and think that colleges should be allowed to discriminate based on skin color. I didn't see where the dem justices defined "black" for purposes of college discrimination. I'd ask the dazzler for a definition but that's beyond his mythical legal education.

    You have very little room to label anyone a "dementia patient", Gasbag. I am opposed to affirmative action as I have stated many times during the 20+ years we have "known" each other. Your meds are failing you.
    Sure, just not a voting issue for you unlike tightening up NATO and unlimited abortion. Never doubt that the dazzler is an issue driven voter.
  • RaceBannon
    RaceBannon Member, Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 113,725 Founders Club
    HHusky said:

    Very disappointing to the dazzler. While the dementia patient has tightened up NATO, we still have some conservative judges that actually can read and follow the Constitution and that is unacceptable to a leftard. We have three leftard justices that can't define a woman and think that colleges should be allowed to discriminate based on skin color. I didn't see where the dem justices defined "black" for purposes of college discrimination. I'd ask the dazzler for a definition but that's beyond his mythical legal education.

    You have very little room to label anyone a "dementia patient", Gasbag. I am opposed to affirmative action as I have stated many times during the 20+ years we have "known" each other. Your meds are failing you.
    You sure vote for what you're against a lot
  • HHusky
    HHusky Member Posts: 23,885

    HHusky said:

    Very disappointing to the dazzler. While the dementia patient has tightened up NATO, we still have some conservative judges that actually can read and follow the Constitution and that is unacceptable to a leftard. We have three leftard justices that can't define a woman and think that colleges should be allowed to discriminate based on skin color. I didn't see where the dem justices defined "black" for purposes of college discrimination. I'd ask the dazzler for a definition but that's beyond his mythical legal education.

    You have very little room to label anyone a "dementia patient", Gasbag. I am opposed to affirmative action as I have stated many times during the 20+ years we have "known" each other. Your meds are failing you.
    Sure, just not a voting issue for you unlike tightening up NATO and unlimited abortion. Never doubt that the dazzler is an issue driven voter.
    Who had "just not a voting issue for you" in the Gasbag Defensive Retort pool? (I did.)
  • HHusky
    HHusky Member Posts: 23,885

    HHusky said:

    Very disappointing to the dazzler. While the dementia patient has tightened up NATO, we still have some conservative judges that actually can read and follow the Constitution and that is unacceptable to a leftard. We have three leftard justices that can't define a woman and think that colleges should be allowed to discriminate based on skin color. I didn't see where the dem justices defined "black" for purposes of college discrimination. I'd ask the dazzler for a definition but that's beyond his mythical legal education.

    You have very little room to label anyone a "dementia patient", Gasbag. I am opposed to affirmative action as I have stated many times during the 20+ years we have "known" each other. Your meds are failing you.
    You sure vote for what you're against a lot
    It's called the "two party system", I'm told.

    You don't agree with Daddy on everything either, allegedly.
  • RaceBannon
    RaceBannon Member, Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 113,725 Founders Club
    HHusky said:

    HHusky said:

    Very disappointing to the dazzler. While the dementia patient has tightened up NATO, we still have some conservative judges that actually can read and follow the Constitution and that is unacceptable to a leftard. We have three leftard justices that can't define a woman and think that colleges should be allowed to discriminate based on skin color. I didn't see where the dem justices defined "black" for purposes of college discrimination. I'd ask the dazzler for a definition but that's beyond his mythical legal education.

    You have very little room to label anyone a "dementia patient", Gasbag. I am opposed to affirmative action as I have stated many times during the 20+ years we have "known" each other. Your meds are failing you.
    You sure vote for what you're against a lot
    It's called the "two party system", I'm told.

    You don't agree with Daddy on everything either, allegedly.
    Yeah and you keep voting for the party you don't agree with

    Allegedly
  • HHusky
    HHusky Member Posts: 23,885

    HHusky said:

    HHusky said:

    Very disappointing to the dazzler. While the dementia patient has tightened up NATO, we still have some conservative judges that actually can read and follow the Constitution and that is unacceptable to a leftard. We have three leftard justices that can't define a woman and think that colleges should be allowed to discriminate based on skin color. I didn't see where the dem justices defined "black" for purposes of college discrimination. I'd ask the dazzler for a definition but that's beyond his mythical legal education.

    You have very little room to label anyone a "dementia patient", Gasbag. I am opposed to affirmative action as I have stated many times during the 20+ years we have "known" each other. Your meds are failing you.
    You sure vote for what you're against a lot
    It's called the "two party system", I'm told.

    You don't agree with Daddy on everything either, allegedly.
    Yeah and you keep voting for the party you don't agree with

    Allegedly
    You and Gasbag are just going to have to accept that I am the world's foremost expert on what my views are.

    Once you defined anyone with a functioning brain as a "leftist", you were bound to be unable to draw meaningful distinctions between poasters.
  • RaceBannon
    RaceBannon Member, Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 113,725 Founders Club
    edited June 2023
    HHusky said:

    HHusky said:

    HHusky said:

    Very disappointing to the dazzler. While the dementia patient has tightened up NATO, we still have some conservative judges that actually can read and follow the Constitution and that is unacceptable to a leftard. We have three leftard justices that can't define a woman and think that colleges should be allowed to discriminate based on skin color. I didn't see where the dem justices defined "black" for purposes of college discrimination. I'd ask the dazzler for a definition but that's beyond his mythical legal education.

    You have very little room to label anyone a "dementia patient", Gasbag. I am opposed to affirmative action as I have stated many times during the 20+ years we have "known" each other. Your meds are failing you.
    You sure vote for what you're against a lot
    It's called the "two party system", I'm told.

    You don't agree with Daddy on everything either, allegedly.
    Yeah and you keep voting for the party you don't agree with

    Allegedly
    You and Gasbag are just going to have to accept that I am the world's foremost expert on what my views are.

    Once you defined anyone with a functioning brain as a "leftist", you were bound to be unable to draw meaningful distinctions between poasters.
    This isn't about your views

    It's about what a stupid voter you are

    You sound defensive
  • HHusky
    HHusky Member Posts: 23,885

    HHusky said:

    HHusky said:

    HHusky said:

    Very disappointing to the dazzler. While the dementia patient has tightened up NATO, we still have some conservative judges that actually can read and follow the Constitution and that is unacceptable to a leftard. We have three leftard justices that can't define a woman and think that colleges should be allowed to discriminate based on skin color. I didn't see where the dem justices defined "black" for purposes of college discrimination. I'd ask the dazzler for a definition but that's beyond his mythical legal education.

    You have very little room to label anyone a "dementia patient", Gasbag. I am opposed to affirmative action as I have stated many times during the 20+ years we have "known" each other. Your meds are failing you.
    You sure vote for what you're against a lot
    It's called the "two party system", I'm told.

    You don't agree with Daddy on everything either, allegedly.
    Yeah and you keep voting for the party you don't agree with

    Allegedly
    You and Gasbag are just going to have to accept that I am the world's foremost expert on what my views are.

    Once you defined anyone with a functioning brain as a "leftist", you were bound to be unable to draw meaningful distinctions between poasters.
    This isn't about your views

    It's about what a stupid voter you are

    You sound defensive
    Don't take all the irony please.
  • WestlinnDuck
    WestlinnDuck Member Posts: 17,542 Standard Supporter
    hardhat said:
    Thomas along with Scalia are the two best Supreme Court justices in the last 80 years. Both could define a woman and both could read for understanding. The most recent "black" justice can't do either. I don't define that as some sort of societal improvement.
  • HHusky
    HHusky Member Posts: 23,885
    hardhat said:
    One of the predictable and actually predicted outcomes of AA was that some people would be labeled as undeserving beneficiaries of the policy in the future, whether fairly or unfairly. I'm sure I'm not the only one arguing against AA who pointed this out 40+ years ago.

    The legal argument against AA is that it can't be squared with the Constitution. There are multiple practical problems with the policy as well.
  • HHusky
    HHusky Member Posts: 23,885
    Race disagrees
  • MelloDawg
    MelloDawg Member Posts: 6,844

    hardhat said:
    Thomas along with Scalia are the two best Supreme Court justices in the last 80 years. Both could define a woman and both could read for understanding. The most recent "black" justice can't do either. I don't define that as some sort of societal improvement.
    But can they be heard over dog whistles like that?
  • Bob_C
    Bob_C Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 12,639 Founders Club

    hardhat said:
    If I'm not mistaken, Harvard can discriminate or preference in any way they like. They only have to reject federal funding.
    That part will never happen.
  • SFGbob
    SFGbob Member Posts: 33,183
    edited June 2023
    HHusky said:

    Very disappointing to the dazzler. While the dementia patient has tightened up NATO, we still have some conservative judges that actually can read and follow the Constitution and that is unacceptable to a leftard. We have three leftard justices that can't define a woman and think that colleges should be allowed to discriminate based on skin color. I didn't see where the dem justices defined "black" for purposes of college discrimination. I'd ask the dazzler for a definition but that's beyond his mythical legal education.

    You have very little room to label anyone a "dementia patient", Gasbag. I am opposed to affirmative action as I have stated many times during the 20+ years we have "known" each other. Your meds are failing you.
    Another policy the Dazzler doesn't support, but he votes for people that do.
  • SFGbob
    SFGbob Member Posts: 33,183
    HHusky said:

    HHusky said:

    Very disappointing to the dazzler. While the dementia patient has tightened up NATO, we still have some conservative judges that actually can read and follow the Constitution and that is unacceptable to a leftard. We have three leftard justices that can't define a woman and think that colleges should be allowed to discriminate based on skin color. I didn't see where the dem justices defined "black" for purposes of college discrimination. I'd ask the dazzler for a definition but that's beyond his mythical legal education.

    You have very little room to label anyone a "dementia patient", Gasbag. I am opposed to affirmative action as I have stated many times during the 20+ years we have "known" each other. Your meds are failing you.
    Sure, just not a voting issue for you unlike tightening up NATO and unlimited abortion. Never doubt that the dazzler is an issue driven voter.
    Who had "just not a voting issue for you" in the Gasbag Defensive Retort pool? (I did.)
    Dazzler marches into the middle of the town square, drops him pants and paints his ass red and predicts that people will notice.
  • SFGbob
    SFGbob Member Posts: 33,183
    HHusky said:

    HHusky said:

    HHusky said:

    Very disappointing to the dazzler. While the dementia patient has tightened up NATO, we still have some conservative judges that actually can read and follow the Constitution and that is unacceptable to a leftard. We have three leftard justices that can't define a woman and think that colleges should be allowed to discriminate based on skin color. I didn't see where the dem justices defined "black" for purposes of college discrimination. I'd ask the dazzler for a definition but that's beyond his mythical legal education.

    You have very little room to label anyone a "dementia patient", Gasbag. I am opposed to affirmative action as I have stated many times during the 20+ years we have "known" each other. Your meds are failing you.
    You sure vote for what you're against a lot
    It's called the "two party system", I'm told.

    You don't agree with Daddy on everything either, allegedly.
    Yeah and you keep voting for the party you don't agree with

    Allegedly
    You and Gasbag are just going to have to accept that I am the world's foremost expert on what my views are.

    Once you defined anyone with a functioning brain as a "leftist", you were bound to be unable to draw meaningful distinctions between poasters.
    You're an expert on being a liar. I've seen little if any evidence on any other area of your expertise.