Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

Taking the temperature of the room

1679111218

Comments

  • RaceBannon
    RaceBannon Member, Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 115,502 Founders Club
    pawz said:

    HHusky said:

    46XiJCAB said:

    HHusky said:

    HHusky said:

    Overturning Roe vs Wade was just stupid for a plethora of reasons.

    Namely the poor being the people who have too many babies in the first place. Now they will have more.

    Just stupid. As a conservative I get upset when politicians let religion dictate policy.

    This only hurts the right in the long run and rightfully so.

    As a conservative, I get upset when ostensibly educated people can't read and understand a 4,440 word document which explicitly has a right to free speech and the right to bear arms but doesn't have a right to an abortion.
    The enumeration in the Constitution, of certain rights, shall not be construed to deny or disparage others retained by the people.
    By people, they meant the states. You suck at this. The Constitution was a restriction on the federal government. You should read the 10th amendment. There was no right to an abortion in 1789. It wasn't a right "retained" by the people. It was a super constitutional right created by whole cloth by leftards. I don't see "emantations" and "penumbras" anywhere in the document.

    Reproductive choice and personal decision making in connection therewith. Practiced by Americans in 1789 and for two-and-a-half centuries before any statutory restriction on abortion.
    Fuck off.
    pay Race his royalty.

    #trademark
    I'm sure Race will agree, telling you to fuck off is Open Source.

    Fuck off.

    Everyone says so
  • 46XiJCAB
    46XiJCAB Member Posts: 20,967
    Sledog said:

    Only the Dazzler would call murdering children reproductive choice.

    He adheres to the narrative and talking points.

    Like a good little Stooge.
  • 46XiJCAB
    46XiJCAB Member Posts: 20,967
    HHusky said:

    Sledog said:

    Only the Dazzler would call murdering children reproductive choice.

    If they were already "children", you could remove them and take them and take them on vacation to Disneyland.

    #FetusFetish
    Words games.

    What a sick fuck you are.
  • HHusky
    HHusky Member Posts: 24,334
    46XiJCAB said:

    Sledog said:

    Only the Dazzler would call murdering children reproductive choice.

    He adheres to the narrative and talking points.

    Like a good little Stooge.
    So, abortion is murder for you too?
  • 46XiJCAB
    46XiJCAB Member Posts: 20,967
    HHusky said:

    46XiJCAB said:

    Sledog said:

    Only the Dazzler would call murdering children reproductive choice.

    He adheres to the narrative and talking points.

    Like a good little Stooge.
    So, abortion is murder for you too?
    I don't do Y/N questions with a pathological liar.

    So.

    Fuck off.
  • HHusky
    HHusky Member Posts: 24,334
    46XiJCAB said:

    HHusky said:

    46XiJCAB said:

    Sledog said:

    Only the Dazzler would call murdering children reproductive choice.

    He adheres to the narrative and talking points.

    Like a good little Stooge.
    So, abortion is murder for you too?
    I don't do Y/N questions with a pathological liar.

    So.

    Fuck off.
    I didn't mean to frighten you.
  • HHusky
    HHusky Member Posts: 24,334
    hardhat said:
    Watched his 2:45 clip speaking at Stanford. Good speaker. Good timing and funny.

    Having said that, he tries to conflate two different things. Satire and humor always have an element of truth to them, and ideologues are definitely humorless. All good points. He could have left it there and made his protest.

    By arguing that "the truth is not hate speech", he removes himself from the satirist's role and takes the position that he is a "truth teller", a newsman. The satirist can take aim at things, but when he takes himself too seriously, he becomes one of the humorless as well.

  • hardhat
    hardhat Member Posts: 8,344
    HHusky said:

    hardhat said:
    Watched his 2:45 clip speaking at Stanford. Good speaker. Good timing and funny.

    Having said that, he tries to conflate two different things. Satire and humor always have an element of truth to them, and ideologues are definitely humorless. All good points. He could have left it there and made his protest.

    By arguing that "the truth is not hate speech", he removes himself from the satirist's role and takes the position that he is a "truth teller", a newsman. The satirist can take aim at things, but when he takes himself too seriously, he becomes one of the humorless as well.

    Only the left says things like this. Who are the ones that are upset when the light is shined on them? You're also conflating things. He's not daddy and he's not trying to censor you or prevent you from watching reruns of rachel maddow.
  • HHusky
    HHusky Member Posts: 24,334
    hardhat said:

    HHusky said:

    hardhat said:
    Watched his 2:45 clip speaking at Stanford. Good speaker. Good timing and funny.

    Having said that, he tries to conflate two different things. Satire and humor always have an element of truth to them, and ideologues are definitely humorless. All good points. He could have left it there and made his protest.

    By arguing that "the truth is not hate speech", he removes himself from the satirist's role and takes the position that he is a "truth teller", a newsman. The satirist can take aim at things, but when he takes himself too seriously, he becomes one of the humorless as well.

    Only the left says things like this. Who are the ones that are upset when the light is shined on them? You're also conflating things. He's not daddy and he's not trying to censor you or prevent you from watching reruns of rachel maddow.
    If you assumed I was upset by his presentation, then you might need to check yourself. And I didn’t accuse him of anything but taking himself too seriously, and thereby losing a little of the high ground.