Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

Stoops

1356

Comments

  • MikeSeaver
    MikeSeaver Member Posts: 5,800
    edited November 2021
    PostGameOrangeSlices said:

    MikeSeaver said:

    PostGameOrangeSlices said:

    MikeSeaver said:

    UW_Doog_Bot said:

    TXDawg said:

    UW_Doog_Bot said:

    The idea that Seattle is a shithole coaches wouldn't want to live in but LA isn't is laughable.

    But there's more talent in LA. Better recruits in the area too.
    There's also more competition, more scrutiny, and an AD currently in chaos.

    USC has its issues. UW has its issues. The point is neither city itself is a differentiator from the other.
    Utter nonsense.

    You really shouldn’t underestimate how much people hate rain and what LA has to offer the rich and famous.

    If you’re the multi-millionaire head coach of USC living in Los Angeles you don’t live in the “shit hole” part and never even see it except to hoover up all the players who live two blocks from campus.

    Not saying that’s a fit for everyone, but you’re nuts if you think “It’s a tie!!!” on any level whatsoever.

    What's the crabbing scene like down in LA, Mike?
    You get the maid to do it while three cheerleaders rattle you senseless.

    No wonder you don't understand why a coach would prefer UW and Seattle over USC and LA

    You better pray to Phil Knight before bed every fucking day, because without Nike no one wants to coach or play in Eugene and your school is Indiana without the hoops success
    You seem upset about something(s).
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • PostGameOrangeSlices
    PostGameOrangeSlices Member Posts: 27,145
    DoogmanRefund said:

    PostGameOrangeSlices said:

    MikeSeaver said:

    PostGameOrangeSlices said:

    MikeSeaver said:

    UW_Doog_Bot said:

    TXDawg said:

    UW_Doog_Bot said:

    The idea that Seattle is a shithole coaches wouldn't want to live in but LA isn't is laughable.

    But there's more talent in LA. Better recruits in the area too.
    There's also more competition, more scrutiny, and an AD currently in chaos.

    USC has its issues. UW has its issues. The point is neither city itself is a differentiator from the other.
    Utter nonsense.

    You really shouldn’t underestimate how much people hate rain and what LA has to offer the rich and famous.

    If you’re the multi-millionaire head coach of USC living in Los Angeles you don’t live in the “shit hole” part and never even see it except to hoover up all the players who live two blocks from campus.

    Not saying that’s a fit for everyone, but you’re nuts if you think “It’s a tie!!!” on any level whatsoever.

    What's the crabbing scene like down in LA, Mike?
    You get the maid to do it while three cheerleaders rattle you senseless.

    No wonder you don't understand why a coach would prefer UW and Seattle over USC and LA

    You better pray to Phil Knight before bed every fucking day, because without Nike no one wants to coach or play in Eugene and your school is Indiana without the hoops success
    Disagree. Indiana is academically prowess.
    Butt still
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • Quietcowskee
    Quietcowskee Member Posts: 4,205 Standard Supporter
    Disagree.

    Bloomington>>>>>>>Springfield.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • UW_Doog_Bot
    UW_Doog_Bot Member Posts: 18,029
    MikeSeaver said:

    UW_Doog_Bot said:

    TXDawg said:

    UW_Doog_Bot said:

    The idea that Seattle is a shithole coaches wouldn't want to live in but LA isn't is laughable.

    But there's more talent in LA. Better recruits in the area too.
    There's also more competition, more scrutiny, and an AD currently in chaos.

    USC has its issues. UW has its issues. The point is neither city itself is a differentiator from the other.
    Utter nonsense.

    You really shouldn’t underestimate how much people hate rain and what LA has to offer the rich and famous.

    If you’re the multi-millionaire head coach of USC living in Los Angeles you don’t live in the “shit hole” part and never even see it except to hoover up all the players who live two blocks from campus.

    Not saying that’s a fit for everyone, but you’re nuts if you think “It’s a tie!!!” on any level whatsoever.
    I get that LA seems glamorous compared to a heroin house in Coburg but let me tell you that it's neck and neck in the race for West coast Detroit right there with SF and Seattle.

    There's a very good reason net migration is negative even with people streaming in from overseas.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • Kingdome_Urinals
    Kingdome_Urinals Member Posts: 2,777
    UW_Doog_Bot said:

    MikeSeaver said:

    UW_Doog_Bot said:

    TXDawg said:

    UW_Doog_Bot said:

    The idea that Seattle is a shithole coaches wouldn't want to live in but LA isn't is laughable.

    But there's more talent in LA. Better recruits in the area too.
    There's also more competition, more scrutiny, and an AD currently in chaos.

    USC has its issues. UW has its issues. The point is neither city itself is a differentiator from the other.
    Utter nonsense.

    You really shouldn’t underestimate how much people hate rain and what LA has to offer the rich and famous.

    If you’re the multi-millionaire head coach of USC living in Los Angeles you don’t live in the “shit hole” part and never even see it except to hoover up all the players who live two blocks from campus.

    Not saying that’s a fit for everyone, but you’re nuts if you think “It’s a tie!!!” on any level whatsoever.
    I get that LA seems glamorous compared to a heroin house in Coburg but let me tell you that it's neck and neck in the race for West coast Detroit right there with SF and Seattle.

    There's a very good reason net migration is negative even with people streaming in from overseas.
    Jesus, you've never been to Detroit obviously.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • backthepack
    backthepack Member Posts: 19,937
    UW_Doog_Bot said:

    MikeSeaver said:

    UW_Doog_Bot said:

    TXDawg said:

    UW_Doog_Bot said:

    The idea that Seattle is a shithole coaches wouldn't want to live in but LA isn't is laughable.

    But there's more talent in LA. Better recruits in the area too.
    There's also more competition, more scrutiny, and an AD currently in chaos.

    USC has its issues. UW has its issues. The point is neither city itself is a differentiator from the other.
    Utter nonsense.

    You really shouldn’t underestimate how much people hate rain and what LA has to offer the rich and famous.

    If you’re the multi-millionaire head coach of USC living in Los Angeles you don’t live in the “shit hole” part and never even see it except to hoover up all the players who live two blocks from campus.

    Not saying that’s a fit for everyone, but you’re nuts if you think “It’s a tie!!!” on any level whatsoever.
    I get that LA seems glamorous compared to a heroin house in Coburg but let me tell you that it's neck and neck in the race for West coast Detroit right there with SF and Seattle.

    There's a very good reason net migration is negative even with people streaming in from overseas.
    Have you ever been to Detroit? Because jesus christ dude. We have heroin and a fuck ton of money. They have heroin without the money
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • PostGameOrangeSlices
    PostGameOrangeSlices Member Posts: 27,145
    UW_Doog_Bot said:

    MikeSeaver said:

    UW_Doog_Bot said:

    TXDawg said:

    UW_Doog_Bot said:

    The idea that Seattle is a shithole coaches wouldn't want to live in but LA isn't is laughable.

    But there's more talent in LA. Better recruits in the area too.
    There's also more competition, more scrutiny, and an AD currently in chaos.

    USC has its issues. UW has its issues. The point is neither city itself is a differentiator from the other.
    Utter nonsense.

    You really shouldn’t underestimate how much people hate rain and what LA has to offer the rich and famous.

    If you’re the multi-millionaire head coach of USC living in Los Angeles you don’t live in the “shit hole” part and never even see it except to hoover up all the players who live two blocks from campus.

    Not saying that’s a fit for everyone, but you’re nuts if you think “It’s a tie!!!” on any level whatsoever.
    I get that LA seems glamorous compared to a heroin house in Coburg but let me tell you that it's neck and neck in the race for West coast Detroit right there with SF and Seattle.

    There's a very good reason net migration is negative even with people streaming in from overseas.
    Wat
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • MikeSeaver
    MikeSeaver Member Posts: 5,800
    backthepack said:

    UW_Doog_Bot said:

    MikeSeaver said:

    UW_Doog_Bot said:

    TXDawg said:

    UW_Doog_Bot said:

    The idea that Seattle is a shithole coaches wouldn't want to live in but LA isn't is laughable.

    But there's more talent in LA. Better recruits in the area too.
    There's also more competition, more scrutiny, and an AD currently in chaos.

    USC has its issues. UW has its issues. The point is neither city itself is a differentiator from the other.
    Utter nonsense.

    You really shouldn’t underestimate how much people hate rain and what LA has to offer the rich and famous.

    If you’re the multi-millionaire head coach of USC living in Los Angeles you don’t live in the “shit hole” part and never even see it except to hoover up all the players who live two blocks from campus.

    Not saying that’s a fit for everyone, but you’re nuts if you think “It’s a tie!!!” on any level whatsoever.
    I get that LA seems glamorous compared to a heroin house in Coburg but let me tell you that it's neck and neck in the race for West coast Detroit right there with SF and Seattle.

    There's a very good reason net migration is negative even with people streaming in from overseas.
    Have you ever been to Detroit? Because jesus christ dude. We have heroin and a fuck ton of money. They have heroin without the money
    You can try to imagine how bad you think Detroit is and it’s 10 times worse.

    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • rawestdawg
    rawestdawg Member Posts: 7
    Per sources Stoops is on the short list of 3. Initial contact says he’s interested but UW needs to talk big money
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • backthepack
    backthepack Member Posts: 19,937
    rawestdawg said:

    Per sources Stoops is on the short list of 3. Initial contact says he’s interested but UW needs to talk big money

    Ratio
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • rawestdawg
    rawestdawg Member Posts: 7
    PurpleBaze said:

    rawestdawg said:

    Per sources Stoops is on the short list of 3. Initial contact says he’s interested but UW needs to talk big money

    Who are you?


    ...and...


    LEAVE!!
    My father worked closely with the program
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • Bonedog
    Bonedog Member Posts: 650
    rawestdawg said:

    Per sources Stoops is on the short list of 3. Initial contact says he’s interested but UW needs to talk big money

    1st post with info! Now leave
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • PostGameOrangeSlices
    PostGameOrangeSlices Member Posts: 27,145
    The other two candidates are Mike and Mark
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • MikeSeaver
    MikeSeaver Member Posts: 5,800
    edited November 2021
    rawestdawg said:

    Bonedog said:

    rawestdawg said:

    Per sources Stoops is on the short list of 3. Initial contact says he’s interested but UW needs to talk big money

    1st post with info! Now leave
    I’ve been following HH for awhile, Ive only had my account for not that long. I don’t comment on stuff, I like to just see what fans are saying. But I felt the need to say something since most people know by now where there is smoke there is fire
    STAY! Will make it all the better when they get who they get.

    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • OneNipple
    OneNipple Member Posts: 186
    rawestdawg said:

    Per sources Stoops is on the short list of 3. Initial contact says he’s interested but UW needs to talk big money

    1 of 3? Who would be the other two?
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • CuntWaffle
    CuntWaffle Member Posts: 22,499
    OneNipple said:

    rawestdawg said:

    Per sources Stoops is on the short list of 3. Initial contact says he’s interested but UW needs to talk big money

    1 of 3? Who would be the other two?
    My guess is Wilcox and Deboer
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • fivehundredmileDAWG
    fivehundredmileDAWG Member Posts: 1,212
    rawestdawg...

    Please to be revealing the other two...?
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • rawestdawg
    rawestdawg Member Posts: 7
    fivehundredmileDAWG said:

    rawestdawg...

    Please to be revealing the other two...?

    There’s a name that’s hasn’t been floated around much, that is on the shortlist.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • bananasnblondes
    bananasnblondes Member Posts: 15,501
    rawestdawg said:

    fivehundredmileDAWG said:

    rawestdawg...

    Please to be revealing the other two...?

    There’s a name that’s hasn’t been floated around much, that is on the shortlist.
    Joe Salavea has been discussed a little bit
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • DoogDawg
    DoogDawg Member Posts: 129
    rawestdawg said:

    fivehundredmileDAWG said:

    rawestdawg...

    Please to be revealing the other two...?

    There’s a name that’s hasn’t been floated around much, that is on the shortlist.
    Get this man a membership to the Wam so he can let the truth be known.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • MontlakeBridgeTroll
    MontlakeBridgeTroll Member Posts: 925
    backthepack said:

    HairyBallsDawg said:

    Which fucking stoops are people talking about here? If it's Bob...

    Why would Bob Stoops come to Washington? This seems like a huge woosh.

    If he wanted to coach again he could go to a bigger name like USC or Texas or one of a half dozen openings that will be available this season.

    He'd probably hate Seattle more than Petersen does.


    If Petersen hated Seattle he still wouldn’t be living here hth
    Some people minimize moving for the sake of their kids.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter