Sark play calling....
Comments
-
No shit. I wanted to kick that fat cunt in his face for that call.GrundleStiltzkin said:
That's among his worst play calls ever.RoadDawg55 said:1st and goal from the 3. Stanford DL huffing an puffing. Instead of giving it to Sankey, Sark calls a pass. Trent Murphy doesn't even blitz. Puts his hand up and deflects Price's pass. Ball gets picked off.
I think it took a dozen beezers to get past it, and that's just because I fell asleep after that.
-
This thread serves as a strong reminder that bashing Sark's playcalling with other people who understand what a horrendously shitty play-caller he is was the best thing about his time here. I will thank him for the moments of pleasure I've had talking to people about what a fucktarded wad of Patron he was calling plays. He was goddamn awful at it.
He ran out of obligation. Even worse, while he was here we had two amazing backs that put up great numbers and he STILL didn't center gameplans around them.
There are at least six West African countries where I could've legally killed him for his play calling in the 2012 Apple Cup.
I'm glad I didn't though. Everything worked out well. -
This thread is worthless without @OZONE's thoughts on American's trophy hunting big game in Africa.Dennis_DeYoung said:This thread serves as a strong reminder that bashing Sark's playcalling with other people who understand what a horrendously shitty play-caller he is was the best thing about his time here. I will thank him for the moments of pleasure I've had talking to people about what a fucktarded wad of Patron he was calling plays. He was goddamn awful at it.
He ran out of obligation. Even worse, while he was here we had two amazing backs that put up great numbers and he STILL didn't center gameplans around them.
There are at least six West African countries where I could've legally killed him for his play calling in the 2012 Apple Cup.
I'm glad I didn't though. Everything worked out well.
-
The part of that play that I enjoyed the most was the commentators afterwards talking about how fucking smart Trent Murphy was ...RoadDawg55 said:1st and goal from the 3. Stanford DL huffing an puffing. Instead of giving it to Sankey, Sark calls a pass. Trent Murphy doesn't even blitz. Puts his hand up and deflects Price's pass. Ball gets picked off.
FYFMFE -
I love the hurry up offense to end the second quarter. Run, hurry up, run, hurry up, run, halftime.whatshouldicareabout said:Video of UW playcalling against OSU in 2012
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NZCyCQugh-o
Enjoy!! -
Hard to not watch large portions of that OSU video and see that when running plays were called that were north/south there was a ton of success. It also is far from the best video to use as Keith Price's highlight video. Not only was he particularly terrible at recognizing when the rush was coming from, but particularly in his junior year when he had to have had post-traumatic stress you'd see instances where when he'd escape the pocket, he'd never go to a spot that was safe, reset, and then drive a throw. Instead, you'd see him run backwards as far as he could before he could throw off his back foot either out of pounds to a check down receiver.
My favorite Sark game from a play calling perspective was last year's Apple Cup. On the surface, Price's 15 of 20 wouldn't look like a bad game and when you combine his 185 in the air with Sankey's 200 on the ground, you'd like to think that it was a great called game plan. That totally misses on Price having 14 carries for 23 yards (including the game winning TD run from 2 yards out) ... because how many designed runs were ever called for Price?
-
Probably not. I like Cyrus Miley at QB. If he had been following string out of town, it might be different. Eastern should be able to pass on the huskie D, though, returning their starting QB from last year's team that went undefeated in the BigSky and to the semi finals of the nat'l championship. But last time, it was a similar situation, too, I mean the 2011 game. The difference was eastern was slightly better and the huskys slightly worse. For all the hoopla re Peterman, keep in mind he is still unproven at this level and and will be on his first ever home game here.dnc said:
Won't be necessary.ApostleofGrief said:What excuse do you doogs assign to the dismal performance in the 2011 Eastern game? It ws Sark's fault? Are you going to roll out the same excuses this year?
hth -
You're the worst.ApostleofGrief said:
Probably not. I like Cyrus Miley at QB. If he had been following string out of town, it might be different. Eastern should be able to pass on the huskie D, though, returning their starting QB from last year's team that went undefeated in the BigSky and to the semi finals of the nat'l championship. But last time, it was a similar situation, too, I mean the 2011 game. The difference was eastern was slightly better and the huskys slightly worse. For all the hoopla re Peterman, keep in mind he is still unproven at this level and and will be on his first ever home game here.dnc said:
Won't be necessary.ApostleofGrief said:What excuse do you doogs assign to the dismal performance in the 2011 Eastern game? It ws Sark's fault? Are you going to roll out the same excuses this year?
hth -
I have to apologize. All this time I thought you were serious. Clearly this is one elaborate whoosh. No one could be this stupid. Bravo, sir.ApostleofGrief said:
Probably not. I like Cyrus Miley at QB. If he had been following string out of town, it might be different. Eastern should be able to pass on the huskie D, though, returning their starting QB from last year's team that went undefeated in the BigSky and to the semi finals of the nat'l championship. But last time, it was a similar situation, too, I mean the 2011 game. The difference was eastern was slightly better and the huskys slightly worse. For all the hoopla re Peterman, keep in mind he is still unproven at this level and and will be on his first ever home game here.dnc said:
Won't be necessary.ApostleofGrief said:What excuse do you doogs assign to the dismal performance in the 2011 Eastern game? It ws Sark's fault? Are you going to roll out the same excuses this year?
hth
-
uhh.... dude, Eastern stuffied the huskees last time, total yards 500 - 250 or so. THis year's team is about as good. What is your problemo with my analysis? Everything is totally different with Peterman?
-
I like Petersen to beat Eastern ...
Petersen 152
Eastern 3 -
Fucking idiot.ApostleofGrief said:uhh.... dude, Eastern stuffied the huskees last time, total yards 500 - 250 or so. THis year's team is about as good. What is your problemo with my analysis? Everything is totally different with Peterman?
-
Actually with the Huskees having VIRTUALLY NO EXPERIENCE IN THE D BACKFIELD and HAVING NOT MOUNTED A CONSISTENT PASS RUSH THIS MILLENIUM I am more inclined to take Eastern, which will be just as effective as the 2011 game. Not only that, but WASHINGTON HAS LOST ALL OF ITS OFFENSIVE WEAPONS from last year.
-
(I'm an idiot -- but I present facts not insults)
-
Don't feed the troll.ApostleofGrief said:Actually with the Huskees having VIRTUALLY NO EXPERIENCE IN THE D BACKFIELD and HAVING NOT MOUNTED A CONSISTENT PASS RUSH THIS MILLENIUM I am more inclined to take Eastern, which will be just as effective as the 2011 game. Not only that, but WASHINGTON HAS LOST ALL OF ITS OFFENSIVE WEAPONS from last year.
-
not a troll. Lay some facts on me, jack. What did I miss.
-
NO ASJ, NO SANKEY.
-
Insults aren't a counterargument
-
I think you've arrived in a place where you can't tell when you're being serious or not, what you believe and don't believe. I end up there sometimes in political discussions. It happens.ApostleofGrief said:not a troll. Lay some facts on me, jack. What did I miss.
-
Pass rush? UW was 2nd in the conference in sacks in 2013 and brings back everyone in the front 7 (ex Fuimaono) and second year guys (Qualls, Mathis, Farria, Bierra,etc) will add excellent depth. The front 7 will abuse Easterns offense.
-
All caps is not a way to win an argument on this board. Time to take a step back from the keyboard and walk off the 1AA butthurt that you've kept bottled up.
-
How is that not a troll?ApostleofGrief said:NO ASJ, NO SANKEY.
-
You missed the whole concept of sample sizes and how one game it 2011 means absolutely nothing in 2014.ApostleofGrief said:not a troll. Lay some facts on me, jack. What did I miss.
You're basing your whole argument on "well look what happened three years ago".
But even you know you're just trolling, which is why you're simply getting insults and not replies. You can't give an intelligent reply to a joke of an argument. -
All right, this is at least some kind of argument. I don't think Eastern will win, by the way.HeretoBeatmyChest said:Pass rush? UW was 2nd in the conference in sacks in 2013 and brings back everyone in the front 7 (ex Fuimaono) and second year guys (Qualls, Mathis, Farria, Bierra,etc) will add excellent depth. The front 7 will abuse Easterns offense.
-
In fairness, if Eastern runs a ton of 3 step drops w/ quick throws, that would neutralize the front 7.HeretoBeatmyChest said:Pass rush? UW was 2nd in the conference in sacks in 2013 and brings back everyone in the front 7 (ex Fuimaono) and second year guys (Qualls, Mathis, Farria, Bierra,etc) will add excellent depth. The front 7 will abuse Easterns offense.
That being said, a secondary or LB corps paying attention to that should be able to go jump a route or two. -
I'll bite even though AOG is being a trolling cunt. UW will dominate up front on both sides of the ball. Eastern can't cover Kasen, Mickens, and Ross. UW has Peters to guard Eastern's star WR.
Of UW's 85 scholarship players, at least 40 (Being very generous, probably 50-60) would start at Eastern. Eastern might have 3 or 4 who would start at UW. "Well, they beat Oregon State!" They also lost to Toledo two weeks later. It's a home game versus a good FCS team that would be Cal or Colorado if they played in the Pac 12. Compared to UW, Eastern is trash. I'm worried about beating Stanford and UCLA at home. Not Eastern. -
We shouldn't worry about beating Eastern.
But it wouldn't shock me if it was at least a semi-competitive game for a bit. You are right that we should dominate on the line.
Something like 45-20 makes sense to me. -
The huskies were a pretty good team in 2011 too. There was that whoop-up of Nebraska I saw in the bowl. Eastern had just won the national championship and schooled the huskies on all fundamentals with the severe exception of turnovers, like 0 -5. Peterman is a good coach. But, he may still need to work out the kinks of coaching at BCS mighty PAC-12 UW. Miley Cyler will be starting his first game of the year. He should be fine, but who knows? I am a little worried about the defensive backfield. I mean, look, teams are going to throw at the new guys.
ONe other thing to keep in mind, just for thought, is that EWU has far more guys as a % of team from this state than "Washington". -
And?ApostleofGrief said:The huskies were a pretty good team in 2011 too. There was that whoop-up of Nebraska I saw in the bowl. Eastern had just won the national championship and schooled the huskies on all fundamentals with the severe exception of turnovers, like 0 -5. Peterman is a good coach. But, he may still need to work out the kinks of coaching at BCS mighty PAC-12 UW. Miley Cyler will be starting his first game of the year. He should be fine, but who knows? I am a little worried about the defensive backfield. I mean, look, teams are going to throw at the new guys.
ONe other thing to keep in mind, just for thought, is that EWU has far more guys as a % of team from this state than "Washington".
-
so it means the visiting team has more guys on the field from your state than the purple team.dnc said:
And?ApostleofGrief said:The huskies were a pretty good team in 2011 too. There was that whoop-up of Nebraska I saw in the bowl. Eastern had just won the national championship and schooled the huskies on all fundamentals with the severe exception of turnovers, like 0 -5. Peterman is a good coach. But, he may still need to work out the kinks of coaching at BCS mighty PAC-12 UW. Miley Cyler will be starting his first game of the year. He should be fine, but who knows? I am a little worried about the defensive backfield. I mean, look, teams are going to throw at the new guys.
ONe other thing to keep in mind, just for thought, is that EWU has far more guys as a % of team from this state than "Washington".
