The huskies were a pretty good team in 2011 too. There was that whoop-up of Nebraska I saw in the bowl. Eastern had just won the national championship and schooled the huskies on all fundamentals with the severe exception of turnovers, like 0 -5. Peterman is a good coach. But, he may still need to work out the kinks of coaching at BCS mighty PAC-12 UW. Miley Cyler will be starting his first game of the year. He should be fine, but who knows? I am a little worried about the defensive backfield. I mean, look, teams are going to throw at the new guys.
ONe other thing to keep in mind, just for thought, is that EWU has far more guys as a % of team from this state than "Washington".
And?
so it means the visiting team has more guys on the field from your state than the purple team.
They don't even match up well against the huskies like they did osu.
The huskies were a pretty good team in 2011 too. There was that whoop-up of Nebraska I saw in the bowl. Eastern had just won the national championship and schooled the huskies on all fundamentals with the severe exception of turnovers, like 0 -5. Peterman is a good coach. But, he may still need to work out the kinks of coaching at BCS mighty PAC-12 UW. Miley Cyler will be starting his first game of the year. He should be fine, but who knows? I am a little worried about the defensive backfield. I mean, look, teams are going to throw at the new guys.
ONe other thing to keep in mind, just for thought, is that EWU has far more guys as a % of team from this state than "Washington".
And?
so it means the visiting team has more guys on the field from your state than the purple team.
What excuse do you doogs assign to the dismal performance in the 2011 Eastern game? It ws Sark's fault? Are you going to roll out the same excuses this year?
Won't be necessary.
hth
Probably not. I like Cyrus Miley at QB. If he had been following string out of town, it might be different. Eastern should be able to pass on the huskie D, though, returning their starting QB from last year's team that went undefeated in the BigSky and to the semi finals of the nat'l championship. But last time, it was a similar situation, too, I mean the 2011 game. The difference was eastern was slightly better and the huskys slightly worse. For all the hoopla re Peterman, keep in mind he is still unproven at this level and and will be on his first ever home game here.
You have a good point here. Coaching at this level after coaching in 2 BCS games is a huge leap for Peterman and I'm worried he won't be able to handle the stress.
This is probably the most idiotic statement you make. It's not like UW just hired Butch Goncharoff or whatever the fuck the last name is of the Bellevue HS coach. It's not even WSU bringing WULFF! up from EWU. UW took one of the most coveted coaches and hired him. The guy isn't going to wilt under the pressure of the PAC 12.
What excuse do you doogs assign to the dismal performance in the 2011 Eastern game? It ws Sark's fault? Are you going to roll out the same excuses this year?
Won't be necessary.
hth
Probably not. I like Cyrus Miley at QB. If he had been following string out of town, it might be different. Eastern should be able to pass on the huskie D, though, returning their starting QB from last year's team that went undefeated in the BigSky and to the semi finals of the nat'l championship. But last time, it was a similar situation, too, I mean the 2011 game. The difference was eastern was slightly better and the huskys slightly worse. For all the hoopla re Peterman, keep in mind he is still unproven at this level and and will be on his first ever home game here.
You have a good point here. Coaching at this level after coaching in 2 BCS games is a huge leap for Peterman and I'm worried he won't be able to handle the stress.
This is probably the most idiotic statement you make. It's not like UW just hired Butch Goncharoff or whatever the fuck the last name is of the Bellevue HS coach. It's not even WSU bringing WULFF! up from EWU. UW took one of the most coveted coaches and hired him. The guy isn't going to wilt under the pressure of the PAC 12.
It's also the most ironic statement, since he's "Eastern is going to give UW a game" guy. Eastern can hang with UW but Peterman is unproven "at this level"? Brilliant.
What excuse do you doogs assign to the dismal performance in the 2011 Eastern game? It ws Sark's fault? Are you going to roll out the same excuses this year?
Won't be necessary.
hth
Probably not. I like Cyrus Miley at QB. If he had been following string out of town, it might be different. Eastern should be able to pass on the huskie D, though, returning their starting QB from last year's team that went undefeated in the BigSky and to the semi finals of the nat'l championship. But last time, it was a similar situation, too, I mean the 2011 game. The difference was eastern was slightly better and the huskys slightly worse. For all the hoopla re Peterman, keep in mind he is still unproven at this level and and will be on his first ever home game here.
You have a good point here. Coaching at this level after coaching in 2 BCS games is a huge leap for Peterman and I'm worried he won't be able to handle the stress.
This is probably the most idiotic statement you make. It's not like UW just hired Butch Goncharoff or whatever the fuck the last name is of the Bellevue HS coach. It's not even WSU bringing WULFF! up from EWU. UW took one of the most coveted coaches and hired him. The guy isn't going to wilt under the pressure of the PAC 12.
It's also the most ironic statement, since he's "Eastern is going to give UW a game" guy. Eastern can hang with UW but Peterman is unproven "at this level"? Brilliant.
AOG has never been thought of an intellectual around these parts.
Peterman is good.... but it's like show-biz. Opening night in the first performance at home.... quarterback may have first game jitters.... staff not used to coaching under this particular set of circumstances.... might work, but might have kinks to iron out. Eastern has proven in recent years that it can contend (read: defeat) PAC teams. Washington has certain weaknesses. Can they be exploited? I don't know. I think most of you guys expect all I-AA to be identical. But, Idaho St and Portland St are not like Eastern. You just think it is all the same.
What excuse do you doogs assign to the dismal performance in the 2011 Eastern game? It ws Sark's fault? Are you going to roll out the same excuses this year?
Won't be necessary.
hth
Probably not. I like Cyrus Miley at QB. If he had been following string out of town, it might be different. Eastern should be able to pass on the huskie D, though, returning their starting QB from last year's team that went undefeated in the BigSky and to the semi finals of the nat'l championship. But last time, it was a similar situation, too, I mean the 2011 game. The difference was eastern was slightly better and the huskys slightly worse. For all the hoopla re Peterman, keep in mind he is still unproven at this level and and will be on his first ever home game here.
The huskies were a pretty good team in 2011 too. There was that whoop-up of Nebraska I saw in the bowl. Eastern had just won the national championship and schooled the huskies on all fundamentals with the severe exception of turnovers, like 0 -5. Peterman is a good coach. But, he may still need to work out the kinks of coaching at BCS mighty PAC-12 UW. Miley Cyler will be starting his first game of the year. He should be fine, but who knows? I am a little worried about the defensive backfield. I mean, look, teams are going to throw at the new guys.
ONe other thing to keep in mind, just for thought, is that EWU has far more guys as a % of team from this state than "Washington".
Jesus fucking Christ, part deux. Are you retarded?
Peterman is good.... but it's like show-biz. Opening night in the first performance at home.... quarterback may have first game jitters.... staff not used to coaching under this particular set of circumstances.... might work, but might have kinks to iron out. Eastern has proven in recent years that it can contend (read: defeat) PAC teams. Washington has certain weaknesses. Can they be exploited? I don't know. I think most of you guys expect all I-AA to be identical. But, Idaho St and Portland St are not like Eastern. You just think it is all the same.
I have a gift for rooting out doog groupthink... the Apostle was spot-on from day one when posters said Coach Willingham would be the next Don James, when posters said Gilby would restore DJ toughness to the team, when posters said Mora was the best candidate. I've only whiffed on Neuheisel, but then only partly. If you go back and read my comments here, they all are balanced and make sense. But that isn't what you want. You want your little groupthink to continue here, and if you can label somebody an idiot, then you think your argument and opinion is true. SO done with this thread.
I have a gift for rooting out doog groupthink... the Apostle was spot-on from day one when posters said Coach Willingham would be the next Don James, when posters said Gilby would restore DJ toughness to the team, when posters said Mora was the best candidate. I've only whiffed on Neuheisel, but then only partly. If you go back and read my comments here, they all are balanced and make sense. But that isn't what you want. You want your little groupthink to continue here, and if you can label somebody an idiot, then you think your argument and opinion is true. SO done with this thread.
Peterman is good.... but it's like show-biz. Opening night in the first performance at home.... quarterback may have first game jitters.... staff not used to coaching under this particular set of circumstances.... might work, but might have kinks to iron out. Eastern has proven in recent years that it can contend (read: defeat) PAC teams. Washington has certain weaknesses. Can they be exploited? I don't know. I think most of you guys expect all I-AA to be identical. But, Idaho St and Portland St are not like Eastern. You just think it is all the same.
I think you're the first to say all I-AA teams are the same. Most on here recognize Eastern is a good program but still only a I-AA program.
Yes, they a PAC 12 team but that doesn't mean they're special. It just means they played Oregon State.
At the end of the day, they've got a group of guys who mostly couldn't play at the BCS level.
Peterman is good.... but it's like show-biz. Opening night in the first performance at home.... quarterback may have first game jitters.... staff not used to coaching under this particular set of circumstances.... might work, but might have kinks to iron out. Eastern has proven in recent years that it can contend (read: defeat) PAC teams. Washington has certain weaknesses. Can they be exploited? I don't know. I think most of you guys expect all I-AA to be identical. But, Idaho St and Portland St are not like Eastern. You just think it is all the same.
I think you're the first to say all I-AA teams are the same. Most on here recognize Eastern is a good program but still only a I-AA program.
Yes, they a PAC 12 team but that doesn't mean they're special. It just means they played Oregon State.
At the end of the day, they've got a group of guys who mostly couldn't play at the BCS level.
Comments
This is probably the most idiotic statement you make. It's not like UW just hired Butch Goncharoff or whatever the fuck the last name is of the Bellevue HS coach. It's not even WSU bringing WULFF! up from EWU. UW took one of the most coveted coaches and hired him. The guy isn't going to wilt under the pressure of the PAC 12.
Yes, they a PAC 12 team but that doesn't mean they're special. It just means they played Oregon State.
At the end of the day, they've got a group of guys who mostly couldn't play at the BCS level.
And you're still a fucking idiot.