Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.
Ginsberg Sells the Couch
Comments
-
-
Fast forward 4 years and there’s a double standard level of hypocrisyGrundleStiltzkin said:
Mitch’s maneuver 4 years ago was one of canniest, duplicitous political moves of my lifetim. I called it a gamble then, but I was wrong. He wasn’t going to lose anything, only win or draw.GreenRiverGatorz said:
I wouldn't count them out. Besides democrats trying to hold Mitch to a purity standard that he may or may not have set himself, there's no legitimate reason to not have a nominee. A justice died, time to pick a new one. Whether there's 40 months left in a term, or 2, it shouldn't matter.Goduckies said:Collins and Murkowski are our, probably Mittens too, so will happen after the election probably
-
I don’t have so much faith in these fuckers to accuse of hypocrisy. It’s pure, power created political rules. Not legal. They are shameless people.Tequilla said:
Fast forward 4 years and there’s a double standard level of hypocrisyGrundleStiltzkin said:
Mitch’s maneuver 4 years ago was one of canniest, duplicitous political moves of my lifetim. I called it a gamble then, but I was wrong. He wasn’t going to lose anything, only win or draw.GreenRiverGatorz said:
I wouldn't count them out. Besides democrats trying to hold Mitch to a purity standard that he may or may not have set himself, there's no legitimate reason to not have a nominee. A justice died, time to pick a new one. Whether there's 40 months left in a term, or 2, it shouldn't matter.Goduckies said:Collins and Murkowski are our, probably Mittens too, so will happen after the election probably
-
Tequilla said:
Fast forward 4 years and there’s a double standard level of hypocrisyGrundleStiltzkin said:
Mitch’s maneuver 4 years ago was one of canniest, duplicitous political moves of my lifetim. I called it a gamble then, but I was wrong. He wasn’t going to lose anything, only win or draw.GreenRiverGatorz said:
I wouldn't count them out. Besides democrats trying to hold Mitch to a purity standard that he may or may not have set himself, there's no legitimate reason to not have a nominee. A justice died, time to pick a new one. Whether there's 40 months left in a term, or 2, it shouldn't matter.Goduckies said:Collins and Murkowski are our, probably Mittens too, so will happen after the election probably
-
-
It’s power, simple as that.Emoterman said:Tequilla said:
Fast forward 4 years and there’s a double standard level of hypocrisyGrundleStiltzkin said:
Mitch’s maneuver 4 years ago was one of canniest, duplicitous political moves of my lifetim. I called it a gamble then, but I was wrong. He wasn’t going to lose anything, only win or draw.GreenRiverGatorz said:
I wouldn't count them out. Besides democrats trying to hold Mitch to a purity standard that he may or may not have set himself, there's no legitimate reason to not have a nominee. A justice died, time to pick a new one. Whether there's 40 months left in a term, or 2, it shouldn't matter.Goduckies said:Collins and Murkowski are our, probably Mittens too, so will happen after the election probably
-
On a certain moral level, Pelosi’s visit to a hair doo was worse because that was proscribed from everyone else.
-
Not really. The other times were with a lake duck President, and not one up for a second term. Why are you lying? This would be a weighed political move for Trump to have a new SCOTUS member. Obama wasn’t going to have a third-term.Tequilla said:
Fast forward 4 years and there’s a double standard level of hypocrisyGrundleStiltzkin said:
Mitch’s maneuver 4 years ago was one of canniest, duplicitous political moves of my lifetim. I called it a gamble then, but I was wrong. He wasn’t going to lose anything, only win or draw.GreenRiverGatorz said:
I wouldn't count them out. Besides democrats trying to hold Mitch to a purity standard that he may or may not have set himself, there's no legitimate reason to not have a nominee. A justice died, time to pick a new one. Whether there's 40 months left in a term, or 2, it shouldn't matter.Goduckies said:Collins and Murkowski are our, probably Mittens too, so will happen after the election probably
-
The idiots not understanding the politics of this vacancy with a president up for re-election versus an outgoing president should not vote. Do you morons understand elections?
-
Don’t make it anymore complicated than what it is.NorthwestFresh said:The idiots not understanding the politics of this vacancy with a president up for re-election versus an outgoing president should not vote. Do you morons understand elections?
