Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.
Shutdown 1B
Comments
-
So dying is no longer important? Okay.HHusky said:
SD has a much higher rate of infection than Washington. I love how you gals define this as no big deal unless you die from it. That’s not reality.TurdBomber said:SD = 1% death rate among active cases. Washington's is 4%.
SD = 800 active cases. Washington's has 21.7k.
SD is doing just terrible! -
Less susceptible populations are getting more of the cases and testing has improved.Houhusky said:
Can you take a breathe for a second and explain in your own words why you think cases have completely decoupled from both previously understood hospitalization and death ratios?HHusky said:
Thank you Doctor.RaceBannon said:
Nobody says thisHHusky said:
https://www.sciencemag.org/news/2020/04/survivors-severe-covid-19-beating-virus-just-beginningPurpleThrobber said:
It's not a big deal unless you die from it.HHusky said:
SD has a much higher rate of infection than Washington. I love how you gals define this as no big deal unless you die from it. That’s not reality.TurdBomber said:SD = 1% death rate among active cases. Washington's is 4%.
SD = 800 active cases. Washington's has 21.7k.
SD is doing just terrible!
And, preemptively, like we say, Fuck Off.
Does the reported percent positive antigen testing accurately reflect current infection rates in the general population? If so, and given that states like Florida are now reporting 12-20% positive in their testing, what does that likely reflect as the percent CURRENTLY infected in the general population of the state. Surely you aren’t suggesting 12-20% of Florida residents are sick/infected with covid, right now?
Don’t you think it’s likely, with both the decoupling of previously understood ratios AND an impossibly high percent positive test rate that there is some sort of selection bias occurring in the raw data?
If your death/disability from infection rate decreases but your total cases explode, you're still going to have huge death/disability numbers. -
No. But long term/permanent disability is also important. As is consumption of finite resources.TurdBomber said:
So dying is no longer important? Okay.HHusky said:
SD has a much higher rate of infection than Washington. I love how you gals define this as no big deal unless you die from it. That’s not reality.TurdBomber said:SD = 1% death rate among active cases. Washington's is 4%.
SD = 800 active cases. Washington's has 21.7k.
SD is doing just terrible! -
So you're still rooting for the virus is what you're saying. Okay.HHusky said:
Less susceptible populations are getting more of the cases and testing has improved.Houhusky said:
Can you take a breathe for a second and explain in your own words why you think cases have completely decoupled from both previously understood hospitalization and death ratios?HHusky said:
Thank you Doctor.RaceBannon said:
Nobody says thisHHusky said:
https://www.sciencemag.org/news/2020/04/survivors-severe-covid-19-beating-virus-just-beginningPurpleThrobber said:
It's not a big deal unless you die from it.HHusky said:
SD has a much higher rate of infection than Washington. I love how you gals define this as no big deal unless you die from it. That’s not reality.TurdBomber said:SD = 1% death rate among active cases. Washington's is 4%.
SD = 800 active cases. Washington's has 21.7k.
SD is doing just terrible!
And, preemptively, like we say, Fuck Off.
Does the reported percent positive antigen testing accurately reflect current infection rates in the general population? If so, and given that states like Florida are now reporting 12-20% positive in their testing, what does that likely reflect as the percent CURRENTLY infected in the general population of the state. Surely you aren’t suggesting 12-20% of Florida residents are sick/infected with covid, right now?
Don’t you think it’s likely, with both the decoupling of previously understood ratios AND an impossibly high percent positive test rate that there is some sort of selection bias occurring in the raw data?
If your death/disability from infection rate decreases but your total cases explode, you're still going to have huge death/disability numbers. -
Just in time for the long weekend! May as well just permanently close them. Protesting is still OK, though.
-
We're all going to die someday too. Acknowledging that reality doesn't mean I'm rooting for it.TurdBomber said:
So you're still rooting for the virus is what you're saying. Okay.HHusky said:
Less susceptible populations are getting more of the cases and testing has improved.Houhusky said:
Can you take a breathe for a second and explain in your own words why you think cases have completely decoupled from both previously understood hospitalization and death ratios?HHusky said:
Thank you Doctor.RaceBannon said:
Nobody says thisHHusky said:
https://www.sciencemag.org/news/2020/04/survivors-severe-covid-19-beating-virus-just-beginningPurpleThrobber said:
It's not a big deal unless you die from it.HHusky said:
SD has a much higher rate of infection than Washington. I love how you gals define this as no big deal unless you die from it. That’s not reality.TurdBomber said:SD = 1% death rate among active cases. Washington's is 4%.
SD = 800 active cases. Washington's has 21.7k.
SD is doing just terrible!
And, preemptively, like we say, Fuck Off.
Does the reported percent positive antigen testing accurately reflect current infection rates in the general population? If so, and given that states like Florida are now reporting 12-20% positive in their testing, what does that likely reflect as the percent CURRENTLY infected in the general population of the state. Surely you aren’t suggesting 12-20% of Florida residents are sick/infected with covid, right now?
Don’t you think it’s likely, with both the decoupling of previously understood ratios AND an impossibly high percent positive test rate that there is some sort of selection bias occurring in the raw data?
If your death/disability from infection rate decreases but your total cases explode, you're still going to have huge death/disability numbers. -
Oh, so it doesn't matter when or what from. Okay.HHusky said:
We're all going to die someday too. Acknowledging that reality doesn't mean I'm rooting for it.TurdBomber said:
So you're still rooting for the virus is what you're saying. Okay.HHusky said:
Less susceptible populations are getting more of the cases and testing has improved.Houhusky said:
Can you take a breathe for a second and explain in your own words why you think cases have completely decoupled from both previously understood hospitalization and death ratios?HHusky said:
Thank you Doctor.RaceBannon said:
Nobody says thisHHusky said:
https://www.sciencemag.org/news/2020/04/survivors-severe-covid-19-beating-virus-just-beginningPurpleThrobber said:
It's not a big deal unless you die from it.HHusky said:
SD has a much higher rate of infection than Washington. I love how you gals define this as no big deal unless you die from it. That’s not reality.TurdBomber said:SD = 1% death rate among active cases. Washington's is 4%.
SD = 800 active cases. Washington's has 21.7k.
SD is doing just terrible!
And, preemptively, like we say, Fuck Off.
Does the reported percent positive antigen testing accurately reflect current infection rates in the general population? If so, and given that states like Florida are now reporting 12-20% positive in their testing, what does that likely reflect as the percent CURRENTLY infected in the general population of the state. Surely you aren’t suggesting 12-20% of Florida residents are sick/infected with covid, right now?
Don’t you think it’s likely, with both the decoupling of previously understood ratios AND an impossibly high percent positive test rate that there is some sort of selection bias occurring in the raw data?
If your death/disability from infection rate decreases but your total cases explode, you're still going to have huge death/disability numbers. -
Again deaths are going to be a lagging indicator. If the spread is mostly among younger people right now it will take longer for that to reach older, more vulnerable individuals. The idea that a second shutdown isn't coming is simply delusional. All these red states got what they wanted, a premature opening which included completely reckless and unnecessary shit like opening bars.
King County is beginning to spike a little bit, far from exponentially like Arizona and Texas, but if actions are not taken that's where it will be in a month. Closing bars and in-person dining until the unemployment insurance expires at the end of July wouldn't be a bad idea along with of course people just wearing masks. Sacrificing a little bit of freedom to prevent a crisis that would mean potentially sacrificing a lot of freedom. -
No wonder you use links all the tim. You are really bad at this.HHusky said:
Less susceptible populations are getting more of the cases and testing has improved.Houhusky said:
Can you take a breathe for a second and explain in your own words why you think cases have completely decoupled from both previously understood hospitalization and death ratios?HHusky said:
Thank you Doctor.RaceBannon said:
Nobody says thisHHusky said:
https://www.sciencemag.org/news/2020/04/survivors-severe-covid-19-beating-virus-just-beginningPurpleThrobber said:
It's not a big deal unless you die from it.HHusky said:
SD has a much higher rate of infection than Washington. I love how you gals define this as no big deal unless you die from it. That’s not reality.TurdBomber said:SD = 1% death rate among active cases. Washington's is 4%.
SD = 800 active cases. Washington's has 21.7k.
SD is doing just terrible!
And, preemptively, like we say, Fuck Off.
Does the reported percent positive antigen testing accurately reflect current infection rates in the general population? If so, and given that states like Florida are now reporting 12-20% positive in their testing, what does that likely reflect as the percent CURRENTLY infected in the general population of the state. Surely you aren’t suggesting 12-20% of Florida residents are sick/infected with covid, right now?
Don’t you think it’s likely, with both the decoupling of previously understood ratios AND an impossibly high percent positive test rate that there is some sort of selection bias occurring in the raw data?
If your death/disability from infection rate decreases but your total cases explode, you're still going to have huge death/disability numbers. -
Well it matters to me, and I thought Gallipoli was kind of a sad movie. Apparently you are using it as a model for your covid response.TurdBomber said:
Oh, so it doesn't matter when or what from. Okay.HHusky said:
We're all going to die someday too. Acknowledging that reality doesn't mean I'm rooting for it.TurdBomber said:
So you're still rooting for the virus is what you're saying. Okay.HHusky said:
Less susceptible populations are getting more of the cases and testing has improved.Houhusky said:
Can you take a breathe for a second and explain in your own words why you think cases have completely decoupled from both previously understood hospitalization and death ratios?HHusky said:
Thank you Doctor.RaceBannon said:
Nobody says thisHHusky said:
https://www.sciencemag.org/news/2020/04/survivors-severe-covid-19-beating-virus-just-beginningPurpleThrobber said:
It's not a big deal unless you die from it.HHusky said:
SD has a much higher rate of infection than Washington. I love how you gals define this as no big deal unless you die from it. That’s not reality.TurdBomber said:SD = 1% death rate among active cases. Washington's is 4%.
SD = 800 active cases. Washington's has 21.7k.
SD is doing just terrible!
And, preemptively, like we say, Fuck Off.
Does the reported percent positive antigen testing accurately reflect current infection rates in the general population? If so, and given that states like Florida are now reporting 12-20% positive in their testing, what does that likely reflect as the percent CURRENTLY infected in the general population of the state. Surely you aren’t suggesting 12-20% of Florida residents are sick/infected with covid, right now?
Don’t you think it’s likely, with both the decoupling of previously understood ratios AND an impossibly high percent positive test rate that there is some sort of selection bias occurring in the raw data?
If your death/disability from infection rate decreases but your total cases explode, you're still going to have huge death/disability numbers. -
100% this. You've got people being tested that wouldn't have been before(workers getting tested who are asymptomatic) and you have selectivity in testing(only test people with a temperature).Houhusky said:
Can you take a breathe for a second and explain in your own words why you think cases have completely decoupled from both previously understood hospitalization and death ratios?HHusky said:
Thank you Doctor.RaceBannon said:
Nobody says thisHHusky said:
https://www.sciencemag.org/news/2020/04/survivors-severe-covid-19-beating-virus-just-beginningPurpleThrobber said:
It's not a big deal unless you die from it.HHusky said:
SD has a much higher rate of infection than Washington. I love how you gals define this as no big deal unless you die from it. That’s not reality.TurdBomber said:SD = 1% death rate among active cases. Washington's is 4%.
SD = 800 active cases. Washington's has 21.7k.
SD is doing just terrible!
And, preemptively, like we say, Fuck Off.
Does the reported percent positive antigen testing accurately reflect current infection rates in the general population? If so, and given that states like Florida are now reporting 12-20% positive in their testing, what does that likely reflect as the percent CURRENTLY infected in the general population of the state. Surely you aren’t suggesting 12-20% of Florida residents are sick/infected with covid, right now?
Don’t you think it’s likely, with both the decoupling of previously understood ratios AND an impossibly high percent positive test rate that there is some sort of selection bias occurring in the raw data? -
Your answer to why is the data decoupled is basically that the IFR and hospitalization ratio that drove the lockdowns in the first place was/is greatly inflated due to the disease, somehow, disproportionately infecting more susceptible people in the population and the data not being reflective of the general population...? What a self defeating argument for the lockdowns...HHusky said:
Less susceptible populations are getting more of the cases and testing has improved.Houhusky said:
Can you take a breathe for a second and explain in your own words why you think cases have completely decoupled from both previously understood hospitalization and death ratios?HHusky said:
Thank you Doctor.RaceBannon said:
Nobody says thisHHusky said:
https://www.sciencemag.org/news/2020/04/survivors-severe-covid-19-beating-virus-just-beginningPurpleThrobber said:
It's not a big deal unless you die from it.HHusky said:
SD has a much higher rate of infection than Washington. I love how you gals define this as no big deal unless you die from it. That’s not reality.TurdBomber said:SD = 1% death rate among active cases. Washington's is 4%.
SD = 800 active cases. Washington's has 21.7k.
SD is doing just terrible!
And, preemptively, like we say, Fuck Off.
Does the reported percent positive antigen testing accurately reflect current infection rates in the general population? If so, and given that states like Florida are now reporting 12-20% positive in their testing, what does that likely reflect as the percent CURRENTLY infected in the general population of the state. Surely you aren’t suggesting 12-20% of Florida residents are sick/infected with covid, right now?
Don’t you think it’s likely, with both the decoupling of previously understood ratios AND an impossibly high percent positive test rate that there is some sort of selection bias occurring in the raw data?
If your death/disability from infection rate decreases but your total cases explode, you're still going to have huge death/disability numbers.
If current cases are now to be believed then you must be anti lockdown? As the data from the last two weeks indicates a IFR and hospitalization rate likely even lower than the seasonal flu?
You dodged the question on percent positive...
Focus on large raw numbers are for the statistically illiterate...
-
Arithmetic is so confusing . . . to you.UW_Doog_Bot said:
No wonder you use links all the tim. You are really bad at this.HHusky said:
Less susceptible populations are getting more of the cases and testing has improved.Houhusky said:
Can you take a breathe for a second and explain in your own words why you think cases have completely decoupled from both previously understood hospitalization and death ratios?HHusky said:
Thank you Doctor.RaceBannon said:
Nobody says thisHHusky said:
https://www.sciencemag.org/news/2020/04/survivors-severe-covid-19-beating-virus-just-beginningPurpleThrobber said:
It's not a big deal unless you die from it.HHusky said:
SD has a much higher rate of infection than Washington. I love how you gals define this as no big deal unless you die from it. That’s not reality.TurdBomber said:SD = 1% death rate among active cases. Washington's is 4%.
SD = 800 active cases. Washington's has 21.7k.
SD is doing just terrible!
And, preemptively, like we say, Fuck Off.
Does the reported percent positive antigen testing accurately reflect current infection rates in the general population? If so, and given that states like Florida are now reporting 12-20% positive in their testing, what does that likely reflect as the percent CURRENTLY infected in the general population of the state. Surely you aren’t suggesting 12-20% of Florida residents are sick/infected with covid, right now?
Don’t you think it’s likely, with both the decoupling of previously understood ratios AND an impossibly high percent positive test rate that there is some sort of selection bias occurring in the raw data?
If your death/disability from infection rate decreases but your total cases explode, you're still going to have huge death/disability numbers. -
Statistically, mathematically and arithmetically speaking, good luck if you need healthcare in Miami or Houston today. Lots of smaller communities too.Houhusky said:
Your answer to why is the data decoupled is basically that the IFR and hospitalization ratio that drove the lockdowns in the first place was/is greatly inflated due to the disease, somehow, disproportionately infecting more susceptible people in the population and the data not being reflective of the general population...? What a self defeating argument for the lockdowns...HHusky said:
Less susceptible populations are getting more of the cases and testing has improved.Houhusky said:
Can you take a breathe for a second and explain in your own words why you think cases have completely decoupled from both previously understood hospitalization and death ratios?HHusky said:
Thank you Doctor.RaceBannon said:
Nobody says thisHHusky said:
https://www.sciencemag.org/news/2020/04/survivors-severe-covid-19-beating-virus-just-beginningPurpleThrobber said:
It's not a big deal unless you die from it.HHusky said:
SD has a much higher rate of infection than Washington. I love how you gals define this as no big deal unless you die from it. That’s not reality.TurdBomber said:SD = 1% death rate among active cases. Washington's is 4%.
SD = 800 active cases. Washington's has 21.7k.
SD is doing just terrible!
And, preemptively, like we say, Fuck Off.
Does the reported percent positive antigen testing accurately reflect current infection rates in the general population? If so, and given that states like Florida are now reporting 12-20% positive in their testing, what does that likely reflect as the percent CURRENTLY infected in the general population of the state. Surely you aren’t suggesting 12-20% of Florida residents are sick/infected with covid, right now?
Don’t you think it’s likely, with both the decoupling of previously understood ratios AND an impossibly high percent positive test rate that there is some sort of selection bias occurring in the raw data?
If your death/disability from infection rate decreases but your total cases explode, you're still going to have huge death/disability numbers.
If current cases are now to be believed then you must be anti lockdown? As the data from the last two weeks indicates a IFR and hospitalization rate likely even lower than the seasonal flu?
You dodged the question on percent positive...
Focus on large raw numbers are for the statistically illiterate...
Sorry that treatable condition killed you. But you were going to die anyway. Who gives a fuck? It's just cases. -
Houhusky said:
Your answer to why is the data decoupled is basically that the IFR and hospitalization ratio that drove the lockdowns in the first place was/is greatly inflated due to the disease, somehow, disproportionately infecting more susceptible people in the population and the data not being reflective of the general population...? What a self defeating argument for the lockdowns...HHusky said:
Less susceptible populations are getting more of the cases and testing has improved.Houhusky said:
Can you take a breathe for a second and explain in your own words why you think cases have completely decoupled from both previously understood hospitalization and death ratios?HHusky said:
Thank you Doctor.RaceBannon said:
Nobody says thisHHusky said:
https://www.sciencemag.org/news/2020/04/survivors-severe-covid-19-beating-virus-just-beginningPurpleThrobber said:
It's not a big deal unless you die from it.HHusky said:
SD has a much higher rate of infection than Washington. I love how you gals define this as no big deal unless you die from it. That’s not reality.TurdBomber said:SD = 1% death rate among active cases. Washington's is 4%.
SD = 800 active cases. Washington's has 21.7k.
SD is doing just terrible!
And, preemptively, like we say, Fuck Off.
Does the reported percent positive antigen testing accurately reflect current infection rates in the general population? If so, and given that states like Florida are now reporting 12-20% positive in their testing, what does that likely reflect as the percent CURRENTLY infected in the general population of the state. Surely you aren’t suggesting 12-20% of Florida residents are sick/infected with covid, right now?
Don’t you think it’s likely, with both the decoupling of previously understood ratios AND an impossibly high percent positive test rate that there is some sort of selection bias occurring in the raw data?
If your death/disability from infection rate decreases but your total cases explode, you're still going to have huge death/disability numbers.
If current cases are now to be believed then you must be anti lockdown? As the data from the last two weeks indicates a IFR and hospitalization rate likely even lower than the seasonal flu?
You dodged the question on percent positive...
Focus on large raw numbers are for the statistically illiterate...HHusky said:
Arithmetic is so confusing . . . to you.UW_Doog_Bot said:
No wonder you use links all the tim. You are really bad at this.HHusky said:
Less susceptible populations are getting more of the cases and testing has improved.Houhusky said:
Can you take a breathe for a second and explain in your own words why you think cases have completely decoupled from both previously understood hospitalization and death ratios?HHusky said:
Thank you Doctor.RaceBannon said:
Nobody says thisHHusky said:
https://www.sciencemag.org/news/2020/04/survivors-severe-covid-19-beating-virus-just-beginningPurpleThrobber said:
It's not a big deal unless you die from it.HHusky said:
SD has a much higher rate of infection than Washington. I love how you gals define this as no big deal unless you die from it. That’s not reality.TurdBomber said:SD = 1% death rate among active cases. Washington's is 4%.
SD = 800 active cases. Washington's has 21.7k.
SD is doing just terrible!
And, preemptively, like we say, Fuck Off.
Does the reported percent positive antigen testing accurately reflect current infection rates in the general population? If so, and given that states like Florida are now reporting 12-20% positive in their testing, what does that likely reflect as the percent CURRENTLY infected in the general population of the state. Surely you aren’t suggesting 12-20% of Florida residents are sick/infected with covid, right now?
Don’t you think it’s likely, with both the decoupling of previously understood ratios AND an impossibly high percent positive test rate that there is some sort of selection bias occurring in the raw data?
If your death/disability from infection rate decreases but your total cases explode, you're still going to have huge death/disability numbers.
-
LmfaoHHusky said:
No. But long term/permanent disability is also important. As is consumption of finite resources.TurdBomber said:
So dying is no longer important? Okay.HHusky said:
SD has a much higher rate of infection than Washington. I love how you gals define this as no big deal unless you die from it. That’s not reality.TurdBomber said:SD = 1% death rate among active cases. Washington's is 4%.
SD = 800 active cases. Washington's has 21.7k.
SD is doing just terrible!
"Finite resources " -
Yet you seem angry.PostGameOrangeSlices said:
LmfaoHHusky said:
No. But long term/permanent disability is also important. As is consumption of finite resources.TurdBomber said:
So dying is no longer important? Okay.HHusky said:
SD has a much higher rate of infection than Washington. I love how you gals define this as no big deal unless you die from it. That’s not reality.TurdBomber said:SD = 1% death rate among active cases. Washington's is 4%.
SD = 800 active cases. Washington's has 21.7k.
SD is doing just terrible!
"Finite resources " -
White flag of deflectionHHusky said:
Statistically, mathematically and arithmetically speaking, good luck if you need healthcare in Miami or Houston today. Lots of smaller communities too.Houhusky said:
Your answer to why is the data decoupled is basically that the IFR and hospitalization ratio that drove the lockdowns in the first place was/is greatly inflated due to the disease, somehow, disproportionately infecting more susceptible people in the population and the data not being reflective of the general population...? What a self defeating argument for the lockdowns...HHusky said:
Less susceptible populations are getting more of the cases and testing has improved.Houhusky said:
Can you take a breathe for a second and explain in your own words why you think cases have completely decoupled from both previously understood hospitalization and death ratios?HHusky said:
Thank you Doctor.RaceBannon said:
Nobody says thisHHusky said:
https://www.sciencemag.org/news/2020/04/survivors-severe-covid-19-beating-virus-just-beginningPurpleThrobber said:
It's not a big deal unless you die from it.HHusky said:
SD has a much higher rate of infection than Washington. I love how you gals define this as no big deal unless you die from it. That’s not reality.TurdBomber said:SD = 1% death rate among active cases. Washington's is 4%.
SD = 800 active cases. Washington's has 21.7k.
SD is doing just terrible!
And, preemptively, like we say, Fuck Off.
Does the reported percent positive antigen testing accurately reflect current infection rates in the general population? If so, and given that states like Florida are now reporting 12-20% positive in their testing, what does that likely reflect as the percent CURRENTLY infected in the general population of the state. Surely you aren’t suggesting 12-20% of Florida residents are sick/infected with covid, right now?
Don’t you think it’s likely, with both the decoupling of previously understood ratios AND an impossibly high percent positive test rate that there is some sort of selection bias occurring in the raw data?
If your death/disability from infection rate decreases but your total cases explode, you're still going to have huge death/disability numbers.
If current cases are now to be believed then you must be anti lockdown? As the data from the last two weeks indicates a IFR and hospitalization rate likely even lower than the seasonal flu?
You dodged the question on percent positive...
Focus on large raw numbers are for the statistically illiterate...
Sorry that treatable condition killed you. But you were going to die anyway. Who gives a fuck? It's just cases. -
HHusky said:
Statistically, mathematically and arithmetically speaking, good luck if you need healthcare in Miami or Houston today. Lots of smaller communities too.Houhusky said:
Your answer to why is the data decoupled is basically that the IFR and hospitalization ratio that drove the lockdowns in the first place was/is greatly inflated due to the disease, somehow, disproportionately infecting more susceptible people in the population and the data not being reflective of the general population...? What a self defeating argument for the lockdowns...HHusky said:
Less susceptible populations are getting more of the cases and testing has improved.Houhusky said:
Can you take a breathe for a second and explain in your own words why you think cases have completely decoupled from both previously understood hospitalization and death ratios?HHusky said:
Thank you Doctor.RaceBannon said:
Nobody says thisHHusky said:
https://www.sciencemag.org/news/2020/04/survivors-severe-covid-19-beating-virus-just-beginningPurpleThrobber said:
It's not a big deal unless you die from it.HHusky said:
SD has a much higher rate of infection than Washington. I love how you gals define this as no big deal unless you die from it. That’s not reality.TurdBomber said:SD = 1% death rate among active cases. Washington's is 4%.
SD = 800 active cases. Washington's has 21.7k.
SD is doing just terrible!
And, preemptively, like we say, Fuck Off.
Does the reported percent positive antigen testing accurately reflect current infection rates in the general population? If so, and given that states like Florida are now reporting 12-20% positive in their testing, what does that likely reflect as the percent CURRENTLY infected in the general population of the state. Surely you aren’t suggesting 12-20% of Florida residents are sick/infected with covid, right now?
Don’t you think it’s likely, with both the decoupling of previously understood ratios AND an impossibly high percent positive test rate that there is some sort of selection bias occurring in the raw data?
If your death/disability from infection rate decreases but your total cases explode, you're still going to have huge death/disability numbers.
If current cases are now to be believed then you must be anti lockdown? As the data from the last two weeks indicates a IFR and hospitalization rate likely even lower than the seasonal flu?
You dodged the question on percent positive...
Focus on large raw numbers are for the statistically illiterate...
Sorry that treatable condition killed you. But you were going to die anyway. Who gives a fuck? It's just cases.
-
No just amused by your cheerleadingHHusky said:
Yet you seem angry.PostGameOrangeSlices said:
LmfaoHHusky said:
No. But long term/permanent disability is also important. As is consumption of finite resources.TurdBomber said:
So dying is no longer important? Okay.HHusky said:
SD has a much higher rate of infection than Washington. I love how you gals define this as no big deal unless you die from it. That’s not reality.TurdBomber said:SD = 1% death rate among active cases. Washington's is 4%.
SD = 800 active cases. Washington's has 21.7k.
SD is doing just terrible!
"Finite resources " -
Ignoring personnel.MikeDamone said:HHusky said:
Statistically, mathematically and arithmetically speaking, good luck if you need healthcare in Miami or Houston today. Lots of smaller communities too.Houhusky said:
Your answer to why is the data decoupled is basically that the IFR and hospitalization ratio that drove the lockdowns in the first place was/is greatly inflated due to the disease, somehow, disproportionately infecting more susceptible people in the population and the data not being reflective of the general population...? What a self defeating argument for the lockdowns...HHusky said:
Less susceptible populations are getting more of the cases and testing has improved.Houhusky said:
Can you take a breathe for a second and explain in your own words why you think cases have completely decoupled from both previously understood hospitalization and death ratios?HHusky said:
Thank you Doctor.RaceBannon said:
Nobody says thisHHusky said:
https://www.sciencemag.org/news/2020/04/survivors-severe-covid-19-beating-virus-just-beginningPurpleThrobber said:
It's not a big deal unless you die from it.HHusky said:
SD has a much higher rate of infection than Washington. I love how you gals define this as no big deal unless you die from it. That’s not reality.TurdBomber said:SD = 1% death rate among active cases. Washington's is 4%.
SD = 800 active cases. Washington's has 21.7k.
SD is doing just terrible!
And, preemptively, like we say, Fuck Off.
Does the reported percent positive antigen testing accurately reflect current infection rates in the general population? If so, and given that states like Florida are now reporting 12-20% positive in their testing, what does that likely reflect as the percent CURRENTLY infected in the general population of the state. Surely you aren’t suggesting 12-20% of Florida residents are sick/infected with covid, right now?
Don’t you think it’s likely, with both the decoupling of previously understood ratios AND an impossibly high percent positive test rate that there is some sort of selection bias occurring in the raw data?
If your death/disability from infection rate decreases but your total cases explode, you're still going to have huge death/disability numbers.
If current cases are now to be believed then you must be anti lockdown? As the data from the last two weeks indicates a IFR and hospitalization rate likely even lower than the seasonal flu?
You dodged the question on percent positive...
Focus on large raw numbers are for the statistically illiterate...
Sorry that treatable condition killed you. But you were going to die anyway. Who gives a fuck? It's just cases. -
Poor H, you'd think he'd at least deflect or focus on something more suited to his *strengths.PostGameOrangeSlices said:
No just amused by your cheerleadingHHusky said:
Yet you seem angry.PostGameOrangeSlices said:
LmfaoHHusky said:
No. But long term/permanent disability is also important. As is consumption of finite resources.TurdBomber said:
So dying is no longer important? Okay.HHusky said:
SD has a much higher rate of infection than Washington. I love how you gals define this as no big deal unless you die from it. That’s not reality.TurdBomber said:SD = 1% death rate among active cases. Washington's is 4%.
SD = 800 active cases. Washington's has 21.7k.
SD is doing just terrible!
"Finite resources "
-
Fucking School sounds fun!UW_Doog_Bot said:
Poor H, you'd think he'd at least deflect or focus on something more suited to his *strengths.PostGameOrangeSlices said:
No just amused by your cheerleadingHHusky said:
Yet you seem angry.PostGameOrangeSlices said:
LmfaoHHusky said:
No. But long term/permanent disability is also important. As is consumption of finite resources.TurdBomber said:
So dying is no longer important? Okay.HHusky said:
SD has a much higher rate of infection than Washington. I love how you gals define this as no big deal unless you die from it. That’s not reality.TurdBomber said:SD = 1% death rate among active cases. Washington's is 4%.
SD = 800 active cases. Washington's has 21.7k.
SD is doing just terrible!
"Finite resources " -
Fuck offHHusky said:
Ignoring personnel.MikeDamone said:HHusky said:
Statistically, mathematically and arithmetically speaking, good luck if you need healthcare in Miami or Houston today. Lots of smaller communities too.Houhusky said:
Your answer to why is the data decoupled is basically that the IFR and hospitalization ratio that drove the lockdowns in the first place was/is greatly inflated due to the disease, somehow, disproportionately infecting more susceptible people in the population and the data not being reflective of the general population...? What a self defeating argument for the lockdowns...HHusky said:
Less susceptible populations are getting more of the cases and testing has improved.Houhusky said:
Can you take a breathe for a second and explain in your own words why you think cases have completely decoupled from both previously understood hospitalization and death ratios?HHusky said:
Thank you Doctor.RaceBannon said:
Nobody says thisHHusky said:
https://www.sciencemag.org/news/2020/04/survivors-severe-covid-19-beating-virus-just-beginningPurpleThrobber said:
It's not a big deal unless you die from it.HHusky said:
SD has a much higher rate of infection than Washington. I love how you gals define this as no big deal unless you die from it. That’s not reality.TurdBomber said:SD = 1% death rate among active cases. Washington's is 4%.
SD = 800 active cases. Washington's has 21.7k.
SD is doing just terrible!
And, preemptively, like we say, Fuck Off.
Does the reported percent positive antigen testing accurately reflect current infection rates in the general population? If so, and given that states like Florida are now reporting 12-20% positive in their testing, what does that likely reflect as the percent CURRENTLY infected in the general population of the state. Surely you aren’t suggesting 12-20% of Florida residents are sick/infected with covid, right now?
Don’t you think it’s likely, with both the decoupling of previously understood ratios AND an impossibly high percent positive test rate that there is some sort of selection bias occurring in the raw data?
If your death/disability from infection rate decreases but your total cases explode, you're still going to have huge death/disability numbers.
If current cases are now to be believed then you must be anti lockdown? As the data from the last two weeks indicates a IFR and hospitalization rate likely even lower than the seasonal flu?
You dodged the question on percent positive...
Focus on large raw numbers are for the statistically illiterate...
Sorry that treatable condition killed you. But you were going to die anyway. Who gives a fuck? It's just cases.
Your bullshit gets exposed daily and what do you do - spout more bullshit
But its not political -
You girls are cheering for it to be political.RaceBannon said:
Fuck offHHusky said:
Ignoring personnel.MikeDamone said:HHusky said:
Statistically, mathematically and arithmetically speaking, good luck if you need healthcare in Miami or Houston today. Lots of smaller communities too.Houhusky said:
Your answer to why is the data decoupled is basically that the IFR and hospitalization ratio that drove the lockdowns in the first place was/is greatly inflated due to the disease, somehow, disproportionately infecting more susceptible people in the population and the data not being reflective of the general population...? What a self defeating argument for the lockdowns...HHusky said:
Less susceptible populations are getting more of the cases and testing has improved.Houhusky said:
Can you take a breathe for a second and explain in your own words why you think cases have completely decoupled from both previously understood hospitalization and death ratios?HHusky said:
Thank you Doctor.RaceBannon said:
Nobody says thisHHusky said:
https://www.sciencemag.org/news/2020/04/survivors-severe-covid-19-beating-virus-just-beginningPurpleThrobber said:
It's not a big deal unless you die from it.HHusky said:
SD has a much higher rate of infection than Washington. I love how you gals define this as no big deal unless you die from it. That’s not reality.TurdBomber said:SD = 1% death rate among active cases. Washington's is 4%.
SD = 800 active cases. Washington's has 21.7k.
SD is doing just terrible!
And, preemptively, like we say, Fuck Off.
Does the reported percent positive antigen testing accurately reflect current infection rates in the general population? If so, and given that states like Florida are now reporting 12-20% positive in their testing, what does that likely reflect as the percent CURRENTLY infected in the general population of the state. Surely you aren’t suggesting 12-20% of Florida residents are sick/infected with covid, right now?
Don’t you think it’s likely, with both the decoupling of previously understood ratios AND an impossibly high percent positive test rate that there is some sort of selection bias occurring in the raw data?
If your death/disability from infection rate decreases but your total cases explode, you're still going to have huge death/disability numbers.
If current cases are now to be believed then you must be anti lockdown? As the data from the last two weeks indicates a IFR and hospitalization rate likely even lower than the seasonal flu?
You dodged the question on percent positive...
Focus on large raw numbers are for the statistically illiterate...
Sorry that treatable condition killed you. But you were going to die anyway. Who gives a fuck? It's just cases.
Your bullshit gets exposed daily and what do you do - spout more bullshit
But its not political
Good luck with that. -
When in doubt of your ability to answer a simple question, shift the argument, even better if it’s to fake news that way their correction will shift the conversation even further from the original point.MikeDamone said:HHusky said:
Statistically, mathematically and arithmetically speaking, good luck if you need healthcare in Miami or Houston today. Lots of smaller communities too.Houhusky said:
Your answer to why is the data decoupled is basically that the IFR and hospitalization ratio that drove the lockdowns in the first place was/is greatly inflated due to the disease, somehow, disproportionately infecting more susceptible people in the population and the data not being reflective of the general population...? What a self defeating argument for the lockdowns...HHusky said:
Less susceptible populations are getting more of the cases and testing has improved.Houhusky said:
Can you take a breathe for a second and explain in your own words why you think cases have completely decoupled from both previously understood hospitalization and death ratios?HHusky said:
Thank you Doctor.RaceBannon said:
Nobody says thisHHusky said:
https://www.sciencemag.org/news/2020/04/survivors-severe-covid-19-beating-virus-just-beginningPurpleThrobber said:
It's not a big deal unless you die from it.HHusky said:
SD has a much higher rate of infection than Washington. I love how you gals define this as no big deal unless you die from it. That’s not reality.TurdBomber said:SD = 1% death rate among active cases. Washington's is 4%.
SD = 800 active cases. Washington's has 21.7k.
SD is doing just terrible!
And, preemptively, like we say, Fuck Off.
Does the reported percent positive antigen testing accurately reflect current infection rates in the general population? If so, and given that states like Florida are now reporting 12-20% positive in their testing, what does that likely reflect as the percent CURRENTLY infected in the general population of the state. Surely you aren’t suggesting 12-20% of Florida residents are sick/infected with covid, right now?
Don’t you think it’s likely, with both the decoupling of previously understood ratios AND an impossibly high percent positive test rate that there is some sort of selection bias occurring in the raw data?
If your death/disability from infection rate decreases but your total cases explode, you're still going to have huge death/disability numbers.
If current cases are now to be believed then you must be anti lockdown? As the data from the last two weeks indicates a IFR and hospitalization rate likely even lower than the seasonal flu?
You dodged the question on percent positive...
Focus on large raw numbers are for the statistically illiterate...
Sorry that treatable condition killed you. But you were going to die anyway. Who gives a fuck? It's just cases.
HH will now either drop the thread or double down on some other side point to shift away from the original questions he couldn’t address -
Fuck off hack. You entire posting history on it is to advance a political causeHHusky said:
You girls are cheering for it to be political.RaceBannon said:
Fuck offHHusky said:
Ignoring personnel.MikeDamone said:HHusky said:
Statistically, mathematically and arithmetically speaking, good luck if you need healthcare in Miami or Houston today. Lots of smaller communities too.Houhusky said:
Your answer to why is the data decoupled is basically that the IFR and hospitalization ratio that drove the lockdowns in the first place was/is greatly inflated due to the disease, somehow, disproportionately infecting more susceptible people in the population and the data not being reflective of the general population...? What a self defeating argument for the lockdowns...HHusky said:
Less susceptible populations are getting more of the cases and testing has improved.Houhusky said:
Can you take a breathe for a second and explain in your own words why you think cases have completely decoupled from both previously understood hospitalization and death ratios?HHusky said:
Thank you Doctor.RaceBannon said:
Nobody says thisHHusky said:
https://www.sciencemag.org/news/2020/04/survivors-severe-covid-19-beating-virus-just-beginningPurpleThrobber said:
It's not a big deal unless you die from it.HHusky said:
SD has a much higher rate of infection than Washington. I love how you gals define this as no big deal unless you die from it. That’s not reality.TurdBomber said:SD = 1% death rate among active cases. Washington's is 4%.
SD = 800 active cases. Washington's has 21.7k.
SD is doing just terrible!
And, preemptively, like we say, Fuck Off.
Does the reported percent positive antigen testing accurately reflect current infection rates in the general population? If so, and given that states like Florida are now reporting 12-20% positive in their testing, what does that likely reflect as the percent CURRENTLY infected in the general population of the state. Surely you aren’t suggesting 12-20% of Florida residents are sick/infected with covid, right now?
Don’t you think it’s likely, with both the decoupling of previously understood ratios AND an impossibly high percent positive test rate that there is some sort of selection bias occurring in the raw data?
If your death/disability from infection rate decreases but your total cases explode, you're still going to have huge death/disability numbers.
If current cases are now to be believed then you must be anti lockdown? As the data from the last two weeks indicates a IFR and hospitalization rate likely even lower than the seasonal flu?
You dodged the question on percent positive...
Focus on large raw numbers are for the statistically illiterate...
Sorry that treatable condition killed you. But you were going to die anyway. Who gives a fuck? It's just cases.
Your bullshit gets exposed daily and what do you do - spout more bullshit
But its not political
Good luck with that. -
We shouldn't be shutting down the economy because we can't afford it. This is like great granny on her death bed and the only way to save her is to spend $400,000 on complicated medical procedures, and bankrupt your family and lose your house and everything. You know what people do when that happens? They let granny die. Because it's not worth it.
-
Well the folks across the street pay 600 dollars a month for doggy meds. Corky 2 got the needleFenderbender123 said:We shouldn't be shutting down the economy because we can't afford it. This is like great granny on her death bed and the only way to save her is to spend $400,000 on complicated medical procedures, and bankrupt your family and lose your house and everything. You know what people do when that happens? They let granny die. Because it's not worth it.
-
Full speed ahead then . . . for you. Most people aren't on board so you need to do the economy three times as hard.Fenderbender123 said:We shouldn't be shutting down the economy because we can't afford it. This is like great granny on her death bed and the only way to save her is to spend $400,000 on complicated medical procedures, and bankrupt your family and lose your house and everything. You know what people do when that happens? They let granny die. Because it's not worth it.
No shit!RaceBannon said:
Fuck off hack. You entire posting history on it is to advance a political causeHHusky said:
You girls are cheering for it to be political.RaceBannon said:
Fuck offHHusky said:
Ignoring personnel.MikeDamone said:HHusky said:
Statistically, mathematically and arithmetically speaking, good luck if you need healthcare in Miami or Houston today. Lots of smaller communities too.Houhusky said:
Your answer to why is the data decoupled is basically that the IFR and hospitalization ratio that drove the lockdowns in the first place was/is greatly inflated due to the disease, somehow, disproportionately infecting more susceptible people in the population and the data not being reflective of the general population...? What a self defeating argument for the lockdowns...HHusky said:
Less susceptible populations are getting more of the cases and testing has improved.Houhusky said:
Can you take a breathe for a second and explain in your own words why you think cases have completely decoupled from both previously understood hospitalization and death ratios?HHusky said:
Thank you Doctor.RaceBannon said:
Nobody says thisHHusky said:
https://www.sciencemag.org/news/2020/04/survivors-severe-covid-19-beating-virus-just-beginningPurpleThrobber said:
It's not a big deal unless you die from it.HHusky said:
SD has a much higher rate of infection than Washington. I love how you gals define this as no big deal unless you die from it. That’s not reality.TurdBomber said:SD = 1% death rate among active cases. Washington's is 4%.
SD = 800 active cases. Washington's has 21.7k.
SD is doing just terrible!
And, preemptively, like we say, Fuck Off.
Does the reported percent positive antigen testing accurately reflect current infection rates in the general population? If so, and given that states like Florida are now reporting 12-20% positive in their testing, what does that likely reflect as the percent CURRENTLY infected in the general population of the state. Surely you aren’t suggesting 12-20% of Florida residents are sick/infected with covid, right now?
Don’t you think it’s likely, with both the decoupling of previously understood ratios AND an impossibly high percent positive test rate that there is some sort of selection bias occurring in the raw data?
If your death/disability from infection rate decreases but your total cases explode, you're still going to have huge death/disability numbers.
If current cases are now to be believed then you must be anti lockdown? As the data from the last two weeks indicates a IFR and hospitalization rate likely even lower than the seasonal flu?
You dodged the question on percent positive...
Focus on large raw numbers are for the statistically illiterate...
Sorry that treatable condition killed you. But you were going to die anyway. Who gives a fuck? It's just cases.
Your bullshit gets exposed daily and what do you do - spout more bullshit
But its not political
Good luck with that.
