Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.
Shutdown 1B
Comments
-
100% this. You've got people being tested that wouldn't have been before(workers getting tested who are asymptomatic) and you have selectivity in testing(only test people with a temperature).Houhusky said:
Can you take a breathe for a second and explain in your own words why you think cases have completely decoupled from both previously understood hospitalization and death ratios?HHusky said:
Thank you Doctor.RaceBannon said:
Nobody says thisHHusky said:
https://www.sciencemag.org/news/2020/04/survivors-severe-covid-19-beating-virus-just-beginningPurpleThrobber said:
It's not a big deal unless you die from it.HHusky said:
SD has a much higher rate of infection than Washington. I love how you gals define this as no big deal unless you die from it. That’s not reality.TurdBomber said:SD = 1% death rate among active cases. Washington's is 4%.
SD = 800 active cases. Washington's has 21.7k.
SD is doing just terrible!
And, preemptively, like we say, Fuck Off.
Does the reported percent positive antigen testing accurately reflect current infection rates in the general population? If so, and given that states like Florida are now reporting 12-20% positive in their testing, what does that likely reflect as the percent CURRENTLY infected in the general population of the state. Surely you aren’t suggesting 12-20% of Florida residents are sick/infected with covid, right now?
Don’t you think it’s likely, with both the decoupling of previously understood ratios AND an impossibly high percent positive test rate that there is some sort of selection bias occurring in the raw data? -
Your answer to why is the data decoupled is basically that the IFR and hospitalization ratio that drove the lockdowns in the first place was/is greatly inflated due to the disease, somehow, disproportionately infecting more susceptible people in the population and the data not being reflective of the general population...? What a self defeating argument for the lockdowns...HHusky said:
Less susceptible populations are getting more of the cases and testing has improved.Houhusky said:
Can you take a breathe for a second and explain in your own words why you think cases have completely decoupled from both previously understood hospitalization and death ratios?HHusky said:
Thank you Doctor.RaceBannon said:
Nobody says thisHHusky said:
https://www.sciencemag.org/news/2020/04/survivors-severe-covid-19-beating-virus-just-beginningPurpleThrobber said:
It's not a big deal unless you die from it.HHusky said:
SD has a much higher rate of infection than Washington. I love how you gals define this as no big deal unless you die from it. That’s not reality.TurdBomber said:SD = 1% death rate among active cases. Washington's is 4%.
SD = 800 active cases. Washington's has 21.7k.
SD is doing just terrible!
And, preemptively, like we say, Fuck Off.
Does the reported percent positive antigen testing accurately reflect current infection rates in the general population? If so, and given that states like Florida are now reporting 12-20% positive in their testing, what does that likely reflect as the percent CURRENTLY infected in the general population of the state. Surely you aren’t suggesting 12-20% of Florida residents are sick/infected with covid, right now?
Don’t you think it’s likely, with both the decoupling of previously understood ratios AND an impossibly high percent positive test rate that there is some sort of selection bias occurring in the raw data?
If your death/disability from infection rate decreases but your total cases explode, you're still going to have huge death/disability numbers.
If current cases are now to be believed then you must be anti lockdown? As the data from the last two weeks indicates a IFR and hospitalization rate likely even lower than the seasonal flu?
You dodged the question on percent positive...
Focus on large raw numbers are for the statistically illiterate...
-
Arithmetic is so confusing . . . to you.UW_Doog_Bot said:
No wonder you use links all the tim. You are really bad at this.HHusky said:
Less susceptible populations are getting more of the cases and testing has improved.Houhusky said:
Can you take a breathe for a second and explain in your own words why you think cases have completely decoupled from both previously understood hospitalization and death ratios?HHusky said:
Thank you Doctor.RaceBannon said:
Nobody says thisHHusky said:
https://www.sciencemag.org/news/2020/04/survivors-severe-covid-19-beating-virus-just-beginningPurpleThrobber said:
It's not a big deal unless you die from it.HHusky said:
SD has a much higher rate of infection than Washington. I love how you gals define this as no big deal unless you die from it. That’s not reality.TurdBomber said:SD = 1% death rate among active cases. Washington's is 4%.
SD = 800 active cases. Washington's has 21.7k.
SD is doing just terrible!
And, preemptively, like we say, Fuck Off.
Does the reported percent positive antigen testing accurately reflect current infection rates in the general population? If so, and given that states like Florida are now reporting 12-20% positive in their testing, what does that likely reflect as the percent CURRENTLY infected in the general population of the state. Surely you aren’t suggesting 12-20% of Florida residents are sick/infected with covid, right now?
Don’t you think it’s likely, with both the decoupling of previously understood ratios AND an impossibly high percent positive test rate that there is some sort of selection bias occurring in the raw data?
If your death/disability from infection rate decreases but your total cases explode, you're still going to have huge death/disability numbers. -
Statistically, mathematically and arithmetically speaking, good luck if you need healthcare in Miami or Houston today. Lots of smaller communities too.Houhusky said:
Your answer to why is the data decoupled is basically that the IFR and hospitalization ratio that drove the lockdowns in the first place was/is greatly inflated due to the disease, somehow, disproportionately infecting more susceptible people in the population and the data not being reflective of the general population...? What a self defeating argument for the lockdowns...HHusky said:
Less susceptible populations are getting more of the cases and testing has improved.Houhusky said:
Can you take a breathe for a second and explain in your own words why you think cases have completely decoupled from both previously understood hospitalization and death ratios?HHusky said:
Thank you Doctor.RaceBannon said:
Nobody says thisHHusky said:
https://www.sciencemag.org/news/2020/04/survivors-severe-covid-19-beating-virus-just-beginningPurpleThrobber said:
It's not a big deal unless you die from it.HHusky said:
SD has a much higher rate of infection than Washington. I love how you gals define this as no big deal unless you die from it. That’s not reality.TurdBomber said:SD = 1% death rate among active cases. Washington's is 4%.
SD = 800 active cases. Washington's has 21.7k.
SD is doing just terrible!
And, preemptively, like we say, Fuck Off.
Does the reported percent positive antigen testing accurately reflect current infection rates in the general population? If so, and given that states like Florida are now reporting 12-20% positive in their testing, what does that likely reflect as the percent CURRENTLY infected in the general population of the state. Surely you aren’t suggesting 12-20% of Florida residents are sick/infected with covid, right now?
Don’t you think it’s likely, with both the decoupling of previously understood ratios AND an impossibly high percent positive test rate that there is some sort of selection bias occurring in the raw data?
If your death/disability from infection rate decreases but your total cases explode, you're still going to have huge death/disability numbers.
If current cases are now to be believed then you must be anti lockdown? As the data from the last two weeks indicates a IFR and hospitalization rate likely even lower than the seasonal flu?
You dodged the question on percent positive...
Focus on large raw numbers are for the statistically illiterate...
Sorry that treatable condition killed you. But you were going to die anyway. Who gives a fuck? It's just cases. -
Houhusky said:
Your answer to why is the data decoupled is basically that the IFR and hospitalization ratio that drove the lockdowns in the first place was/is greatly inflated due to the disease, somehow, disproportionately infecting more susceptible people in the population and the data not being reflective of the general population...? What a self defeating argument for the lockdowns...HHusky said:
Less susceptible populations are getting more of the cases and testing has improved.Houhusky said:
Can you take a breathe for a second and explain in your own words why you think cases have completely decoupled from both previously understood hospitalization and death ratios?HHusky said:
Thank you Doctor.RaceBannon said:
Nobody says thisHHusky said:
https://www.sciencemag.org/news/2020/04/survivors-severe-covid-19-beating-virus-just-beginningPurpleThrobber said:
It's not a big deal unless you die from it.HHusky said:
SD has a much higher rate of infection than Washington. I love how you gals define this as no big deal unless you die from it. That’s not reality.TurdBomber said:SD = 1% death rate among active cases. Washington's is 4%.
SD = 800 active cases. Washington's has 21.7k.
SD is doing just terrible!
And, preemptively, like we say, Fuck Off.
Does the reported percent positive antigen testing accurately reflect current infection rates in the general population? If so, and given that states like Florida are now reporting 12-20% positive in their testing, what does that likely reflect as the percent CURRENTLY infected in the general population of the state. Surely you aren’t suggesting 12-20% of Florida residents are sick/infected with covid, right now?
Don’t you think it’s likely, with both the decoupling of previously understood ratios AND an impossibly high percent positive test rate that there is some sort of selection bias occurring in the raw data?
If your death/disability from infection rate decreases but your total cases explode, you're still going to have huge death/disability numbers.
If current cases are now to be believed then you must be anti lockdown? As the data from the last two weeks indicates a IFR and hospitalization rate likely even lower than the seasonal flu?
You dodged the question on percent positive...
Focus on large raw numbers are for the statistically illiterate...HHusky said:
Arithmetic is so confusing . . . to you.UW_Doog_Bot said:
No wonder you use links all the tim. You are really bad at this.HHusky said:
Less susceptible populations are getting more of the cases and testing has improved.Houhusky said:
Can you take a breathe for a second and explain in your own words why you think cases have completely decoupled from both previously understood hospitalization and death ratios?HHusky said:
Thank you Doctor.RaceBannon said:
Nobody says thisHHusky said:
https://www.sciencemag.org/news/2020/04/survivors-severe-covid-19-beating-virus-just-beginningPurpleThrobber said:
It's not a big deal unless you die from it.HHusky said:
SD has a much higher rate of infection than Washington. I love how you gals define this as no big deal unless you die from it. That’s not reality.TurdBomber said:SD = 1% death rate among active cases. Washington's is 4%.
SD = 800 active cases. Washington's has 21.7k.
SD is doing just terrible!
And, preemptively, like we say, Fuck Off.
Does the reported percent positive antigen testing accurately reflect current infection rates in the general population? If so, and given that states like Florida are now reporting 12-20% positive in their testing, what does that likely reflect as the percent CURRENTLY infected in the general population of the state. Surely you aren’t suggesting 12-20% of Florida residents are sick/infected with covid, right now?
Don’t you think it’s likely, with both the decoupling of previously understood ratios AND an impossibly high percent positive test rate that there is some sort of selection bias occurring in the raw data?
If your death/disability from infection rate decreases but your total cases explode, you're still going to have huge death/disability numbers.
-
LmfaoHHusky said:
No. But long term/permanent disability is also important. As is consumption of finite resources.TurdBomber said:
So dying is no longer important? Okay.HHusky said:
SD has a much higher rate of infection than Washington. I love how you gals define this as no big deal unless you die from it. That’s not reality.TurdBomber said:SD = 1% death rate among active cases. Washington's is 4%.
SD = 800 active cases. Washington's has 21.7k.
SD is doing just terrible!
"Finite resources " -
Yet you seem angry.PostGameOrangeSlices said:
LmfaoHHusky said:
No. But long term/permanent disability is also important. As is consumption of finite resources.TurdBomber said:
So dying is no longer important? Okay.HHusky said:
SD has a much higher rate of infection than Washington. I love how you gals define this as no big deal unless you die from it. That’s not reality.TurdBomber said:SD = 1% death rate among active cases. Washington's is 4%.
SD = 800 active cases. Washington's has 21.7k.
SD is doing just terrible!
"Finite resources " -
White flag of deflectionHHusky said:
Statistically, mathematically and arithmetically speaking, good luck if you need healthcare in Miami or Houston today. Lots of smaller communities too.Houhusky said:
Your answer to why is the data decoupled is basically that the IFR and hospitalization ratio that drove the lockdowns in the first place was/is greatly inflated due to the disease, somehow, disproportionately infecting more susceptible people in the population and the data not being reflective of the general population...? What a self defeating argument for the lockdowns...HHusky said:
Less susceptible populations are getting more of the cases and testing has improved.Houhusky said:
Can you take a breathe for a second and explain in your own words why you think cases have completely decoupled from both previously understood hospitalization and death ratios?HHusky said:
Thank you Doctor.RaceBannon said:
Nobody says thisHHusky said:
https://www.sciencemag.org/news/2020/04/survivors-severe-covid-19-beating-virus-just-beginningPurpleThrobber said:
It's not a big deal unless you die from it.HHusky said:
SD has a much higher rate of infection than Washington. I love how you gals define this as no big deal unless you die from it. That’s not reality.TurdBomber said:SD = 1% death rate among active cases. Washington's is 4%.
SD = 800 active cases. Washington's has 21.7k.
SD is doing just terrible!
And, preemptively, like we say, Fuck Off.
Does the reported percent positive antigen testing accurately reflect current infection rates in the general population? If so, and given that states like Florida are now reporting 12-20% positive in their testing, what does that likely reflect as the percent CURRENTLY infected in the general population of the state. Surely you aren’t suggesting 12-20% of Florida residents are sick/infected with covid, right now?
Don’t you think it’s likely, with both the decoupling of previously understood ratios AND an impossibly high percent positive test rate that there is some sort of selection bias occurring in the raw data?
If your death/disability from infection rate decreases but your total cases explode, you're still going to have huge death/disability numbers.
If current cases are now to be believed then you must be anti lockdown? As the data from the last two weeks indicates a IFR and hospitalization rate likely even lower than the seasonal flu?
You dodged the question on percent positive...
Focus on large raw numbers are for the statistically illiterate...
Sorry that treatable condition killed you. But you were going to die anyway. Who gives a fuck? It's just cases. -
HHusky said:
Statistically, mathematically and arithmetically speaking, good luck if you need healthcare in Miami or Houston today. Lots of smaller communities too.Houhusky said:
Your answer to why is the data decoupled is basically that the IFR and hospitalization ratio that drove the lockdowns in the first place was/is greatly inflated due to the disease, somehow, disproportionately infecting more susceptible people in the population and the data not being reflective of the general population...? What a self defeating argument for the lockdowns...HHusky said:
Less susceptible populations are getting more of the cases and testing has improved.Houhusky said:
Can you take a breathe for a second and explain in your own words why you think cases have completely decoupled from both previously understood hospitalization and death ratios?HHusky said:
Thank you Doctor.RaceBannon said:
Nobody says thisHHusky said:
https://www.sciencemag.org/news/2020/04/survivors-severe-covid-19-beating-virus-just-beginningPurpleThrobber said:
It's not a big deal unless you die from it.HHusky said:
SD has a much higher rate of infection than Washington. I love how you gals define this as no big deal unless you die from it. That’s not reality.TurdBomber said:SD = 1% death rate among active cases. Washington's is 4%.
SD = 800 active cases. Washington's has 21.7k.
SD is doing just terrible!
And, preemptively, like we say, Fuck Off.
Does the reported percent positive antigen testing accurately reflect current infection rates in the general population? If so, and given that states like Florida are now reporting 12-20% positive in their testing, what does that likely reflect as the percent CURRENTLY infected in the general population of the state. Surely you aren’t suggesting 12-20% of Florida residents are sick/infected with covid, right now?
Don’t you think it’s likely, with both the decoupling of previously understood ratios AND an impossibly high percent positive test rate that there is some sort of selection bias occurring in the raw data?
If your death/disability from infection rate decreases but your total cases explode, you're still going to have huge death/disability numbers.
If current cases are now to be believed then you must be anti lockdown? As the data from the last two weeks indicates a IFR and hospitalization rate likely even lower than the seasonal flu?
You dodged the question on percent positive...
Focus on large raw numbers are for the statistically illiterate...
Sorry that treatable condition killed you. But you were going to die anyway. Who gives a fuck? It's just cases.
-
No just amused by your cheerleadingHHusky said:
Yet you seem angry.PostGameOrangeSlices said:
LmfaoHHusky said:
No. But long term/permanent disability is also important. As is consumption of finite resources.TurdBomber said:
So dying is no longer important? Okay.HHusky said:
SD has a much higher rate of infection than Washington. I love how you gals define this as no big deal unless you die from it. That’s not reality.TurdBomber said:SD = 1% death rate among active cases. Washington's is 4%.
SD = 800 active cases. Washington's has 21.7k.
SD is doing just terrible!
"Finite resources "
