Shutdown 1B

Comments
-
DeSantis: Florida 'not going back' on coronavirus reopening, despite new case surge
https://www.foxnews.com/politics/desantis-florida-not-going-back-coronavirus-reopening-despite-new-cases -
Texas bar owners sue Gov. Abbott over coronavirus restrictions: 'It's discrimination'
https://www.foxnews.com/lifestyle/texas-bar-owners-sue-abbott-over-coronavirus-restrictions -
Go ahead, make my day.
-
What a shit article. I want to be informed on the situation. Cases don't mean shit to me. Is there a correlation with more cases to the ratio of increased testing in the area? How many are in critical condition? How many are dieing?
Literally in a mass exodus of the middle class to stop a virus that does most of its killing of people over the average age of death in the country. -
Yeah. Why do you think only the large grocery chains and stores were deemed “essential” over local meat markets or Farmer’s Markets.Gwad said:What a shit article. I want to be informed on the situation. Cases don't mean shit to me. Is there a correlation with more cases to the ratio of increased testing in the area? How many are in critical condition? How many are dieing?
Literally in a mass exodus of the middle class to stop a virus that does most of its killing of people over the average age of death in the country. -
Ducey caved in to the hysterics and internet Karen's. Very sad. Lamestream media said a couple hospitals were near capacity. Well hey numb nuts, they usually run near capacity in order to make money.
The scorched earth orange man take down continues. AZ was supposed to peak later anyhow -
How'd south Dakota did it without shutting down?
-
Grammar aside, South Dakota ain’t done that good.Sledog said:How'd south Dakota did it without shutting down?
-
SD = 1% death rate among active cases. Washington's is 4%.
SD = 800 active cases. Washington's has 21.7k.
SD is doing just terrible! -
But Race didn't feel like we needed the first shutdown, so having to shut down again wasn't a concern.
-
-
They can try but not everyone is a scared little bootlicker like youincremetal_progress said:But Race didn't feel like we needed the first shutdown, so having to shut down again wasn't a concern.
Its called resistance
-
What are the testing capabilities in SD like? If you're testing less, there won't be as many cases, I heard that once.TurdBomber said:SD = 1% death rate among active cases. Washington's is 4%.
SD = 800 active cases. Washington's has 21.7k.
SD is doing just terrible!
To be fair, I honestly don't know how it is out there, but I'd imagine few enough people live or transit around out there to spread it as quickly. -
Apples and apricots for sure.MelloDawg said:
What are the testing capabilities in SD like? If you're testing less, there won't be as many cases, I heard that once.TurdBomber said:SD = 1% death rate among active cases. Washington's is 4%.
SD = 800 active cases. Washington's has 21.7k.
SD is doing just terrible!
To be fair, I honestly don't know how it is out there, but I'd imagine few enough people live or transit around out there to spread it as quickly.
Butt still they got shit on for staying open and it was almost certainly the right call for them.
-
It is still good busine$$ to hospitalize patients for Covid related causes, pair that with people that didn't have that mole looked at or ignored that bloody stool for a few extra months and yeah, the hospitals are filling up with patients. It could also be argued that some of the states struggling right now are in their first wave of Covid. The whole reason they stayed open in. the first place was that their case percentage was so low.
-
I heard AZ was up to a whopping 88% of ICU capacity. Never mind most hospitals in the country operate at somewhere around 80-85%.Fire_Marshall_Bill said:Ducey caved in to the hysterics and internet Karen's. Very sad. Lamestream media said a couple hospitals were near capacity. Well hey numb nuts, they usually run near capacity in order to make money.
The scorched earth orange man take down continues. AZ was supposed to peak later anyhow
Grim statistic -
-
SD has a much higher rate of infection than Washington. I love how you gals define this as no big deal unless you die from it. That’s not reality.TurdBomber said:SD = 1% death rate among active cases. Washington's is 4%.
SD = 800 active cases. Washington's has 21.7k.
SD is doing just terrible! -
Movinggoalposts.gifHHusky said:
SD has a much higher rate of infection than Washington. I love how you gals define this as no big deal unless you die from it. That’s not reality.TurdBomber said:SD = 1% death rate among active cases. Washington's is 4%.
SD = 800 active cases. Washington's has 21.7k.
SD is doing just terrible! -
It's not a big deal unless you die from it.HHusky said:
SD has a much higher rate of infection than Washington. I love how you gals define this as no big deal unless you die from it. That’s not reality.TurdBomber said:SD = 1% death rate among active cases. Washington's is 4%.
SD = 800 active cases. Washington's has 21.7k.
SD is doing just terrible!
And, preemptively, like we say, Fuck Off.
-
Case numbers are irrelevant says the poaster who alerted us to the humor in the pandemic.MikeDamone said:
Movinggoalposts.gifHHusky said:
SD has a much higher rate of infection than Washington. I love how you gals define this as no big deal unless you die from it. That’s not reality.TurdBomber said:SD = 1% death rate among active cases. Washington's is 4%.
SD = 800 active cases. Washington's has 21.7k.
SD is doing just terrible! -
-
https://www.sciencemag.org/news/2020/04/survivors-severe-covid-19-beating-virus-just-beginningPurpleThrobber said:
It's not a big deal unless you die from it.HHusky said:
SD has a much higher rate of infection than Washington. I love how you gals define this as no big deal unless you die from it. That’s not reality.TurdBomber said:SD = 1% death rate among active cases. Washington's is 4%.
SD = 800 active cases. Washington's has 21.7k.
SD is doing just terrible!
And, preemptively, like we say, Fuck Off. -
Nobody says thisHHusky said:
https://www.sciencemag.org/news/2020/04/survivors-severe-covid-19-beating-virus-just-beginningPurpleThrobber said:
It's not a big deal unless you die from it.HHusky said:
SD has a much higher rate of infection than Washington. I love how you gals define this as no big deal unless you die from it. That’s not reality.TurdBomber said:SD = 1% death rate among active cases. Washington's is 4%.
SD = 800 active cases. Washington's has 21.7k.
SD is doing just terrible!
And, preemptively, like we say, Fuck Off. -
Thank you Doctor.RaceBannon said:
Nobody says thisHHusky said:
https://www.sciencemag.org/news/2020/04/survivors-severe-covid-19-beating-virus-just-beginningPurpleThrobber said:
It's not a big deal unless you die from it.HHusky said:
SD has a much higher rate of infection than Washington. I love how you gals define this as no big deal unless you die from it. That’s not reality.TurdBomber said:SD = 1% death rate among active cases. Washington's is 4%.
SD = 800 active cases. Washington's has 21.7k.
SD is doing just terrible!
And, preemptively, like we say, Fuck Off. -
It's not a big deal unless you die from it.HHusky said:
SD has a much higher rate of infection than Washington. I love how you gals define this as no big deal unless you die from it. That’s not reality.TurdBomber said:SD = 1% death rate among active cases. Washington's is 4%.
SD = 800 active cases. Washington's has 21.7k.
SD is doing just terrible!
That's reality.
-
Can you take a breathe for a second and explain in your own words why you think cases have completely decoupled from both previously understood hospitalization and death ratios?HHusky said:
Thank you Doctor.RaceBannon said:
Nobody says thisHHusky said:
https://www.sciencemag.org/news/2020/04/survivors-severe-covid-19-beating-virus-just-beginningPurpleThrobber said:
It's not a big deal unless you die from it.HHusky said:
SD has a much higher rate of infection than Washington. I love how you gals define this as no big deal unless you die from it. That’s not reality.TurdBomber said:SD = 1% death rate among active cases. Washington's is 4%.
SD = 800 active cases. Washington's has 21.7k.
SD is doing just terrible!
And, preemptively, like we say, Fuck Off.
Does the reported percent positive antigen testing accurately reflect current infection rates in the general population? If so, and given that states like Florida are now reporting 12-20% positive in their testing, what does that likely reflect as the percent CURRENTLY infected in the general population of the state. Surely you aren’t suggesting 12-20% of Florida residents are sick/infected with covid, right now?
Don’t you think it’s likely, with both the decoupling of previously understood ratios AND an impossibly high percent positive test rate that there is some sort of selection bias occurring in the raw data? -
There's question marks in your poast. You'll get no reply from the Dazzler.Houhusky said:
Can you take a breathe for a second and explain in your own words why you think cases have completely decoupled from both previously understood hospitalization and death ratios?HHusky said:
Thank you Doctor.RaceBannon said:
Nobody says thisHHusky said:
https://www.sciencemag.org/news/2020/04/survivors-severe-covid-19-beating-virus-just-beginningPurpleThrobber said:
It's not a big deal unless you die from it.HHusky said:
SD has a much higher rate of infection than Washington. I love how you gals define this as no big deal unless you die from it. That’s not reality.TurdBomber said:SD = 1% death rate among active cases. Washington's is 4%.
SD = 800 active cases. Washington's has 21.7k.
SD is doing just terrible!
And, preemptively, like we say, Fuck Off.
Does the reported percent positive antigen testing accurately reflect current infection rates in the general population? If so, and given that states like Florida are now reporting 12-20% positive in their testing, what does that likely reflect as the percent CURRENTLY infected in the general population of the state. Surely you aren’t suggesting 12-20% of Florida residents are sick/infected with covid, right now?
Don’t you think it’s likely, with both the decoupling of previously understood ratios AND an impossibly high percent positive test rate that there is some sort of selection bias occurring in the raw data?
Know what I mean? Which - since there is a question mark here- means the Dazzler bot can't reply to this poast either.
-
Heartland people aren't so government-dependent on the Nanny state like the crowds of people on the coasts. They tend to make sensible adjustments and decisions on their own, instead of hero-worshipping idiots like Inslee and Newsom solely because they spew anti-Trump rhetoric to hide their own incompetence and spinelessness.dnc said:
Apples and apricots for sure.MelloDawg said:
What are the testing capabilities in SD like? If you're testing less, there won't be as many cases, I heard that once.TurdBomber said:SD = 1% death rate among active cases. Washington's is 4%.
SD = 800 active cases. Washington's has 21.7k.
SD is doing just terrible!
To be fair, I honestly don't know how it is out there, but I'd imagine few enough people live or transit around out there to spread it as quickly.
Butt still they got shit on for staying open and it was almost certainly the right call for them.