Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.
Brought a skateboard to a gun fight.
Comments
-
It wasn't a riot at that time.Sledog said:Who would take their kid to a riot? I see a little child endangerment..................
-
It's a constant riot. Constant problems, constant assaults. It's like going to a Hockey game. There is going to be a fight.creepycoug said:
It wasn't a riot at that time.Sledog said:Who would take their kid to a riot? I see a little child endangerment..................
-
No. Since you seem to know more about it, then just spit it out. Like my friend, NW, I'm happy to be set straight and admit I was wrong. And "if only we had a system where both sides could present evidence" isn't spitting it out.SFGbob said:
See what I mean.creepycoug said:
Well, ostensibly he did shoot him because he was losing. I think even the members of the Zimmerman Fan Club say as much.NorthwestFresh said:
He also thinks that Zimmerman started the fight with Saint Skittles and then shot him because he was losing.SFGbob said:
But you do believe in beating a man unconscious and into a coma if he accidentally hits a kid that was playing in the street.HustlinOwl said:I'd want to see what caused the fight to break out. I don't think you should be able to start a fight with someone then shoot the guy when you start to get your ass kicked.
But I've never read anything in the transcript of that trial that established with any credible proof (in other words, more than George's version) who technically started the fight. Nobody was around for that besides George and Trayvon.
And, that night at least, he was Saint Skittles. There has never even been an allegation that he was doing anything wrong when George ID'd him as one of those "assholes who always get away." -
Let's not litigate Zimm for the millionth time and say we did
-
Been there done that. You ignore everything I say and plough straight on with your fact free feelings.creepycoug said:
No. Since you seem to know more about it, then just spit it out. Like my friend, NW, I'm happy to be set straight and admit I was wrong. And "if only we had a system where both sides could present evidence" isn't spitting it out.SFGbob said:
See what I mean.creepycoug said:
Well, ostensibly he did shoot him because he was losing. I think even the members of the Zimmerman Fan Club say as much.NorthwestFresh said:
He also thinks that Zimmerman started the fight with Saint Skittles and then shot him because he was losing.SFGbob said:
But you do believe in beating a man unconscious and into a coma if he accidentally hits a kid that was playing in the street.HustlinOwl said:I'd want to see what caused the fight to break out. I don't think you should be able to start a fight with someone then shoot the guy when you start to get your ass kicked.
But I've never read anything in the transcript of that trial that established with any credible proof (in other words, more than George's version) who technically started the fight. Nobody was around for that besides George and Trayvon.
And, that night at least, he was Saint Skittles. There has never even been an allegation that he was doing anything wrong when George ID'd him as one of those "assholes who always get away."
If only there had been a trial where all of the evidence could have been presented. -
Are you sure? I'm watching it and it looks like she is purposely moving in front of him to block him, resulting in contact.creepycoug said:
I'd say otherwise. Watch it again. He arguably initiated the contact, and what she did in response was barely anything and for sure didn't warrant what he did. Her back was to him the entire time ... at least in the clip.Fenderbender123 said:Yeah I don't really have an opinion on that situation either way. Just noticed that the physical contact, based on that video, was initiated by the woman. I wouldn't have dragged her to the ground.
Though like I said, I agree...I don't think it warrants the reaction he had. -
Many years ago when I played the blood sport of co Ed indoor soccer, I had a girl basically doing this to me for half of the game as I played keeper. Finally I had enough and let her drop step work and then hip checked her to the ground. She actually cried.GrundleStiltzkin said:It's going to be a chinteresting adjudication.
Of course she ignored the 23 other warnings I Gave her and I was the bad guy. -
You do realize that she's criminally assaulting him by pushing him, don't you? Whether his action was excessive or not, he had a right to push her away.dnc said:
He deserved to get his ass beatGrundleStiltzkin said:It's going to be a chinteresting adjudication.
-
You drastically overestimate my feelings. My heart and feelings are for my wife and kids. My balls are for business, and this is business.SFGbob said:
Been there done that. You ignore everything I say and plough straight on with your fact free feelings.creepycoug said:
No. Since you seem to know more about it, then just spit it out. Like my friend, NW, I'm happy to be set straight and admit I was wrong. And "if only we had a system where both sides could present evidence" isn't spitting it out.SFGbob said:
See what I mean.creepycoug said:
Well, ostensibly he did shoot him because he was losing. I think even the members of the Zimmerman Fan Club say as much.NorthwestFresh said:
He also thinks that Zimmerman started the fight with Saint Skittles and then shot him because he was losing.SFGbob said:
But you do believe in beating a man unconscious and into a coma if he accidentally hits a kid that was playing in the street.HustlinOwl said:I'd want to see what caused the fight to break out. I don't think you should be able to start a fight with someone then shoot the guy when you start to get your ass kicked.
But I've never read anything in the transcript of that trial that established with any credible proof (in other words, more than George's version) who technically started the fight. Nobody was around for that besides George and Trayvon.
And, that night at least, he was Saint Skittles. There has never even been an allegation that he was doing anything wrong when George ID'd him as one of those "assholes who always get away."
If only there had been a trial where all of the evidence could have been presented. -
I think she smirked at himFenderbender123 said:
Are you sure? I'm watching it and it looks like she is purposely moving in front of him to block him, resulting in contact.creepycoug said:
I'd say otherwise. Watch it again. He arguably initiated the contact, and what she did in response was barely anything and for sure didn't warrant what he did. Her back was to him the entire time ... at least in the clip.Fenderbender123 said:Yeah I don't really have an opinion on that situation either way. Just noticed that the physical contact, based on that video, was initiated by the woman. I wouldn't have dragged her to the ground.
Though like I said, I agree...I don't think it warrants the reaction he had.
