Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. Sign in or register to get started.

Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

Brought a skateboard to a gun fight.

1356

Comments

  • creepycougcreepycoug Member Posts: 22,928
    Sledog said:

    Who would take their kid to a riot? I see a little child endangerment..................

    It wasn't a riot at that time.
  • SledogSledog Member Posts: 32,982 Standard Supporter

    Sledog said:

    Who would take their kid to a riot? I see a little child endangerment..................

    It wasn't a riot at that time.
    It's a constant riot. Constant problems, constant assaults. It's like going to a Hockey game. There is going to be a fight.
  • creepycougcreepycoug Member Posts: 22,928
    SFGbob said:

    SFGbob said:

    I'd want to see what caused the fight to break out. I don't think you should be able to start a fight with someone then shoot the guy when you start to get your ass kicked.

    But you do believe in beating a man unconscious and into a coma if he accidentally hits a kid that was playing in the street.
    He also thinks that Zimmerman started the fight with Saint Skittles and then shot him because he was losing.
    Well, ostensibly he did shoot him because he was losing. I think even the members of the Zimmerman Fan Club say as much.

    But I've never read anything in the transcript of that trial that established with any credible proof (in other words, more than George's version) who technically started the fight. Nobody was around for that besides George and Trayvon.

    And, that night at least, he was Saint Skittles. There has never even been an allegation that he was doing anything wrong when George ID'd him as one of those "assholes who always get away."
    See what I mean.

    No. Since you seem to know more about it, then just spit it out. Like my friend, NW, I'm happy to be set straight and admit I was wrong. And "if only we had a system where both sides could present evidence" isn't spitting it out.
  • SFGbobSFGbob Member Posts: 31,940

    SFGbob said:

    SFGbob said:

    I'd want to see what caused the fight to break out. I don't think you should be able to start a fight with someone then shoot the guy when you start to get your ass kicked.

    But you do believe in beating a man unconscious and into a coma if he accidentally hits a kid that was playing in the street.
    He also thinks that Zimmerman started the fight with Saint Skittles and then shot him because he was losing.
    Well, ostensibly he did shoot him because he was losing. I think even the members of the Zimmerman Fan Club say as much.

    But I've never read anything in the transcript of that trial that established with any credible proof (in other words, more than George's version) who technically started the fight. Nobody was around for that besides George and Trayvon.

    And, that night at least, he was Saint Skittles. There has never even been an allegation that he was doing anything wrong when George ID'd him as one of those "assholes who always get away."
    See what I mean.

    No. Since you seem to know more about it, then just spit it out. Like my friend, NW, I'm happy to be set straight and admit I was wrong. And "if only we had a system where both sides could present evidence" isn't spitting it out.
    Been there done that. You ignore everything I say and plough straight on with your fact free feelings.

    If only there had been a trial where all of the evidence could have been presented.
  • Fenderbender123Fenderbender123 Member Posts: 2,955

    Yeah I don't really have an opinion on that situation either way. Just noticed that the physical contact, based on that video, was initiated by the woman. I wouldn't have dragged her to the ground.

    I'd say otherwise. Watch it again. He arguably initiated the contact, and what she did in response was barely anything and for sure didn't warrant what he did. Her back was to him the entire time ... at least in the clip.
    Are you sure? I'm watching it and it looks like she is purposely moving in front of him to block him, resulting in contact.

    Though like I said, I agree...I don't think it warrants the reaction he had.
  • KaepskneeKaepsknee Member Posts: 14,823

    It's going to be a chinteresting adjudication.

    Many years ago when I played the blood sport of co Ed indoor soccer, I had a girl basically doing this to me for half of the game as I played keeper. Finally I had enough and let her drop step work and then hip checked her to the ground. She actually cried.

    Of course she ignored the 23 other warnings I Gave her and I was the bad guy.
  • TurdBomberTurdBomber Member Posts: 19,852 Standard Supporter
    dnc said:

    It's going to be a chinteresting adjudication.

    He deserved to get his ass beat
    You do realize that she's criminally assaulting him by pushing him, don't you? Whether his action was excessive or not, he had a right to push her away.
  • creepycougcreepycoug Member Posts: 22,928
    SFGbob said:

    SFGbob said:

    SFGbob said:

    I'd want to see what caused the fight to break out. I don't think you should be able to start a fight with someone then shoot the guy when you start to get your ass kicked.

    But you do believe in beating a man unconscious and into a coma if he accidentally hits a kid that was playing in the street.
    He also thinks that Zimmerman started the fight with Saint Skittles and then shot him because he was losing.
    Well, ostensibly he did shoot him because he was losing. I think even the members of the Zimmerman Fan Club say as much.

    But I've never read anything in the transcript of that trial that established with any credible proof (in other words, more than George's version) who technically started the fight. Nobody was around for that besides George and Trayvon.

    And, that night at least, he was Saint Skittles. There has never even been an allegation that he was doing anything wrong when George ID'd him as one of those "assholes who always get away."
    See what I mean.

    No. Since you seem to know more about it, then just spit it out. Like my friend, NW, I'm happy to be set straight and admit I was wrong. And "if only we had a system where both sides could present evidence" isn't spitting it out.
    Been there done that. You ignore everything I say and plough straight on with your fact free feelings.

    If only there had been a trial where all of the evidence could have been presented.
    You drastically overestimate my feelings. My heart and feelings are for my wife and kids. My balls are for business, and this is business.
  • RaceBannonRaceBannon Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 104,350 Founders Club

    Yeah I don't really have an opinion on that situation either way. Just noticed that the physical contact, based on that video, was initiated by the woman. I wouldn't have dragged her to the ground.

    I'd say otherwise. Watch it again. He arguably initiated the contact, and what she did in response was barely anything and for sure didn't warrant what he did. Her back was to him the entire time ... at least in the clip.
    Are you sure? I'm watching it and it looks like she is purposely moving in front of him to block him, resulting in contact.

    Though like I said, I agree...I don't think it warrants the reaction he had.
    I think she smirked at him
  • KaepskneeKaepsknee Member Posts: 14,823

    Post-script:

    A colleague of mine ... let's just say a guy with a lot to lose ... wanted to make a point I guess and took his son to a protest. I told him I thought that was a bad idea for a guy who lives on Lake Washington. Let's take the boat out instead eh buddy?.

    Of course, creep was right. Some asshole threw something ... forget what it was like a phone or thermos or some shit ... it his kid in the face and cracked an orbital bone. Not the end of the world, but not what he bargained for either.

    The people who spend day after day doing this shit ... whether it's antifa or proud boys or something else ... are the "other" people. One should always keep that in mind. They don't have the same stake in an ordered society that we all have and thus act accordingly with any stimulant.

    Only Liberal fucktards take their kids to protests that always eventually get violent.

    CSD needs to pay a visit. And you need less fucktarded friends.
  • SFGbobSFGbob Member Posts: 31,940

    SFGbob said:

    SFGbob said:

    SFGbob said:

    I'd want to see what caused the fight to break out. I don't think you should be able to start a fight with someone then shoot the guy when you start to get your ass kicked.

    But you do believe in beating a man unconscious and into a coma if he accidentally hits a kid that was playing in the street.
    He also thinks that Zimmerman started the fight with Saint Skittles and then shot him because he was losing.
    Well, ostensibly he did shoot him because he was losing. I think even the members of the Zimmerman Fan Club say as much.

    But I've never read anything in the transcript of that trial that established with any credible proof (in other words, more than George's version) who technically started the fight. Nobody was around for that besides George and Trayvon.

    And, that night at least, he was Saint Skittles. There has never even been an allegation that he was doing anything wrong when George ID'd him as one of those "assholes who always get away."
    See what I mean.

    No. Since you seem to know more about it, then just spit it out. Like my friend, NW, I'm happy to be set straight and admit I was wrong. And "if only we had a system where both sides could present evidence" isn't spitting it out.
    Been there done that. You ignore everything I say and plough straight on with your fact free feelings.

    If only there had been a trial where all of the evidence could have been presented.
    You drastically overestimate my feelings. My heart and feelings are for my wife and kids. My balls are for business, and this is business.
    Trust me, you confusing your feelings for facts isn't me overestimating the value of your feelings.
  • HoustonHuskyHoustonHusky Member Posts: 5,961
    I think this all goes back to proving why we just need to defund and disband the police.

    The next 150 days are going to be nuts.
  • NorthwestFreshNorthwestFresh Member Posts: 7,972
    SFGbob said:

    SFGbob said:

    I'd want to see what caused the fight to break out. I don't think you should be able to start a fight with someone then shoot the guy when you start to get your ass kicked.

    But you do believe in beating a man unconscious and into a coma if he accidentally hits a kid that was playing in the street.
    He also thinks that Zimmerman started the fight with Saint Skittles and then shot him because he was losing.
    Well, ostensibly he did shoot him because he was losing. I think even the members of the Zimmerman Fan Club say as much.

    But I've never read anything in the transcript of that trial that established with any credible proof (in other words, more than George's version) who technically started the fight. Nobody was around for that besides George and Trayvon.

    And, that night at least, he was Saint Skittles. There has never even been an allegation that he was doing anything wrong when George ID'd him as one of those "assholes who always get away."
    See what I mean.

    If only there had been a trial with witnesses and stuff and an acquittal.
  • dncdnc Member Posts: 56,614

    dnc said:

    It's going to be a chinteresting adjudication.

    He deserved to get his ass beat
    You do realize that she's criminally assaulting him by pushing him, don't you? Whether his action was excessive or not, he had a right to push her away.
    Criminal assault?

    This is the snowflakiest post ever.

    Holy shit pull your tampon out man.
  • NorthwestFreshNorthwestFresh Member Posts: 7,972
    When LARPing gets real. Hope the Antifa guy didn’t have kids. Mom will have a surplus of chicken tenders for the funeral.
  • creepycougcreepycoug Member Posts: 22,928

    dnc said:

    It's going to be a chinteresting adjudication.

    He deserved to get his ass beat
    You do realize that she's criminally assaulting him by pushing him, don't you? Whether his action was excessive or not, he had a right to push her away.
    Based solely on that one clip - freely admit I've not seen others - no, I don't agree she's criminally assaulting him with that little shoulder nudge to get him off of her jock. I get bumped harder by little Asian women at the Holiday Lane parade in Bellevue. If she did something more before that, then maybe. But like I said - I literally get that much contact at the meet freezer at Costco.
  • SFGbobSFGbob Member Posts: 31,940

    SFGbob said:

    SFGbob said:

    I'd want to see what caused the fight to break out. I don't think you should be able to start a fight with someone then shoot the guy when you start to get your ass kicked.

    But you do believe in beating a man unconscious and into a coma if he accidentally hits a kid that was playing in the street.
    He also thinks that Zimmerman started the fight with Saint Skittles and then shot him because he was losing.
    Well, ostensibly he did shoot him because he was losing. I think even the members of the Zimmerman Fan Club say as much.

    But I've never read anything in the transcript of that trial that established with any credible proof (in other words, more than George's version) who technically started the fight. Nobody was around for that besides George and Trayvon.

    And, that night at least, he was Saint Skittles. There has never even been an allegation that he was doing anything wrong when George ID'd him as one of those "assholes who always get away."
    See what I mean.

    If only there had been a trial with witnesses and stuff and an acquittal.
    Ignore all that, I have really strong feelings about what went down with that case and those feelings are more important than your pesky facts. Did you know the police ordered him not to chase Trademark?
  • creepycougcreepycoug Member Posts: 22,928
    edited June 2020
    SFGbob said:

    SFGbob said:

    SFGbob said:

    SFGbob said:

    I'd want to see what caused the fight to break out. I don't think you should be able to start a fight with someone then shoot the guy when you start to get your ass kicked.

    But you do believe in beating a man unconscious and into a coma if he accidentally hits a kid that was playing in the street.
    He also thinks that Zimmerman started the fight with Saint Skittles and then shot him because he was losing.
    Well, ostensibly he did shoot him because he was losing. I think even the members of the Zimmerman Fan Club say as much.

    But I've never read anything in the transcript of that trial that established with any credible proof (in other words, more than George's version) who technically started the fight. Nobody was around for that besides George and Trayvon.

    And, that night at least, he was Saint Skittles. There has never even been an allegation that he was doing anything wrong when George ID'd him as one of those "assholes who always get away."
    See what I mean.

    No. Since you seem to know more about it, then just spit it out. Like my friend, NW, I'm happy to be set straight and admit I was wrong. And "if only we had a system where both sides could present evidence" isn't spitting it out.
    Been there done that. You ignore everything I say and plough straight on with your fact free feelings.

    If only there had been a trial where all of the evidence could have been presented.
    You drastically overestimate my feelings. My heart and feelings are for my wife and kids. My balls are for business, and this is business.
    Trust me, you confusing your feelings for facts isn't me overestimating the value of your feelings.
    I don't trust you. And you do overestimate my emotional involvement - drastically so. And that's ok. It's a good rhetorical device to accuse the other guy of being hysterical. I use it with my wife all the tim, even when she's right.
Sign In or Register to comment.