Brought a skateboard to a gun fight.
Comments
-
He also thinks that Zimmerman started the fight with Saint Skittles and then shot him because he was losing.SFGbob said:
But you do believe in beating a man unconscious and into a coma if he accidentally hits a kid that was playing in the street.HustlinOwl said:I'd want to see what caused the fight to break out. I don't think you should be able to start a fight with someone then shoot the guy when you start to get your ass kicked.
-
That's a stretch. He should be able to defend himself against a 3 on 1 beating, I agree. But that girl did not instigate anything with him ... at least in that clip ... and she was clearly trying to keep people back (for whatever reason) and she, at most, nudged him while he was basically on top off her with with his head over or on her shoulder doing whatever he was doing.Fenderbender123 said:Girl was shoving him with her shoulder.
There's more to this guy than we know, but the dumbshits who tried to beat on him learned a lesson: shit's going to happen in these crowds. Be warned. You should assume everyone is armed and you should not assume everyone is on your side of things. These kinds of "public gatherings" draw all kinds of people ... including a lot of loons from all across the political spectrum. -
Post-script:
A colleague of mine ... let's just say a guy with a lot to lose ... wanted to make a point I guess and took his son to a protest. I told him I thought that was a bad idea for a guy who lives on Lake Washington. Let's take the boat out instead eh buddy?.
Of course, creep was right. Some asshole threw something ... forget what it was like a phone or thermos or some shit ... it his kid in the face and cracked an orbital bone. Not the end of the world, but not what he bargained for either.
The people who spend day after day doing this shit ... whether it's antifa or proud boys or something else ... are the "other" people. One should always keep that in mind. They don't have the same stake in an ordered society that we all have and thus act accordingly with any stimulant. -
Who would take their kid to a riot? I see a little child endangerment..................
-
Lots of misinformation is believed to be true by most people about that case. Initially Owl claimed that Zimmerman chased Trademark down a "dark alley" gun drawn.NorthwestFresh said:
He also thinks that Zimmerman started the fight with Saint Skittles and then shot him because he was losing.SFGbob said:
But you do believe in beating a man unconscious and into a coma if he accidentally hits a kid that was playing in the street.HustlinOwl said:I'd want to see what caused the fight to break out. I don't think you should be able to start a fight with someone then shoot the guy when you start to get your ass kicked.
-
Well, ostensibly he did shoot him because he was losing. I think even the members of the Zimmerman Fan Club say as much.NorthwestFresh said:
He also thinks that Zimmerman started the fight with Saint Skittles and then shot him because he was losing.SFGbob said:
But you do believe in beating a man unconscious and into a coma if he accidentally hits a kid that was playing in the street.HustlinOwl said:I'd want to see what caused the fight to break out. I don't think you should be able to start a fight with someone then shoot the guy when you start to get your ass kicked.
But I've never read anything in the transcript of that trial that established with any credible proof (in other words, more than George's version) who technically started the fight. Nobody was around for that besides George and Trayvon.
And, that night at least, he was Saint Skittles. There has never even been an allegation that he was doing anything wrong when George ID'd him as one of those "assholes who always get away." -
Yeah I don't really have an opinion on that situation either way. Just noticed that the physical contact, based on that video, was initiated by the woman. I wouldn't have dragged her to the ground.
-
I would expect we see more of this as tim goes on. As you say, shit happens in X of Y circumstances, and the denominator keeps growing.creepycoug said:
That's a stretch. He should be able to defend himself against a 3 on 1 beating, I agree. But that girl did not instigate anything with him ... at least in that clip ... and she was clearly trying to keep people back (for whatever reason) and she, at most, nudged him while he was basically on top off her with with his head over or on her shoulder doing whatever he was doing.Fenderbender123 said:Girl was shoving him with her shoulder.
There's more to this guy than we know, but the dumbshits who tried to beat on him learned a lesson: shit's going to happen in these crowds. Be warned. You should assume everyone is armed and you should not assume everyone is on your side of things. These kinds of "public gatherings" draw all kinds of people ... including a lot of loons from all across the political spectrum. -
See what I mean.creepycoug said:
Well, ostensibly he did shoot him because he was losing. I think even the members of the Zimmerman Fan Club say as much.NorthwestFresh said:
He also thinks that Zimmerman started the fight with Saint Skittles and then shot him because he was losing.SFGbob said:
But you do believe in beating a man unconscious and into a coma if he accidentally hits a kid that was playing in the street.HustlinOwl said:I'd want to see what caused the fight to break out. I don't think you should be able to start a fight with someone then shoot the guy when you start to get your ass kicked.
But I've never read anything in the transcript of that trial that established with any credible proof (in other words, more than George's version) who technically started the fight. Nobody was around for that besides George and Trayvon.
And, that night at least, he was Saint Skittles. There has never even been an allegation that he was doing anything wrong when George ID'd him as one of those "assholes who always get away."
-
I'd say otherwise. Watch it again. He arguably initiated the contact, and what she did in response was barely anything and for sure didn't warrant what he did. Her back was to him the entire time ... at least in the clip.Fenderbender123 said:Yeah I don't really have an opinion on that situation either way. Just noticed that the physical contact, based on that video, was initiated by the woman. I wouldn't have dragged her to the ground.
-
It wasn't a riot at that time.Sledog said:Who would take their kid to a riot? I see a little child endangerment..................
-
It's a constant riot. Constant problems, constant assaults. It's like going to a Hockey game. There is going to be a fight.creepycoug said:
It wasn't a riot at that time.Sledog said:Who would take their kid to a riot? I see a little child endangerment..................
-
No. Since you seem to know more about it, then just spit it out. Like my friend, NW, I'm happy to be set straight and admit I was wrong. And "if only we had a system where both sides could present evidence" isn't spitting it out.SFGbob said:
See what I mean.creepycoug said:
Well, ostensibly he did shoot him because he was losing. I think even the members of the Zimmerman Fan Club say as much.NorthwestFresh said:
He also thinks that Zimmerman started the fight with Saint Skittles and then shot him because he was losing.SFGbob said:
But you do believe in beating a man unconscious and into a coma if he accidentally hits a kid that was playing in the street.HustlinOwl said:I'd want to see what caused the fight to break out. I don't think you should be able to start a fight with someone then shoot the guy when you start to get your ass kicked.
But I've never read anything in the transcript of that trial that established with any credible proof (in other words, more than George's version) who technically started the fight. Nobody was around for that besides George and Trayvon.
And, that night at least, he was Saint Skittles. There has never even been an allegation that he was doing anything wrong when George ID'd him as one of those "assholes who always get away." -
Let's not litigate Zimm for the millionth time and say we did
-
Been there done that. You ignore everything I say and plough straight on with your fact free feelings.creepycoug said:
No. Since you seem to know more about it, then just spit it out. Like my friend, NW, I'm happy to be set straight and admit I was wrong. And "if only we had a system where both sides could present evidence" isn't spitting it out.SFGbob said:
See what I mean.creepycoug said:
Well, ostensibly he did shoot him because he was losing. I think even the members of the Zimmerman Fan Club say as much.NorthwestFresh said:
He also thinks that Zimmerman started the fight with Saint Skittles and then shot him because he was losing.SFGbob said:
But you do believe in beating a man unconscious and into a coma if he accidentally hits a kid that was playing in the street.HustlinOwl said:I'd want to see what caused the fight to break out. I don't think you should be able to start a fight with someone then shoot the guy when you start to get your ass kicked.
But I've never read anything in the transcript of that trial that established with any credible proof (in other words, more than George's version) who technically started the fight. Nobody was around for that besides George and Trayvon.
And, that night at least, he was Saint Skittles. There has never even been an allegation that he was doing anything wrong when George ID'd him as one of those "assholes who always get away."
If only there had been a trial where all of the evidence could have been presented. -
Are you sure? I'm watching it and it looks like she is purposely moving in front of him to block him, resulting in contact.creepycoug said:
I'd say otherwise. Watch it again. He arguably initiated the contact, and what she did in response was barely anything and for sure didn't warrant what he did. Her back was to him the entire time ... at least in the clip.Fenderbender123 said:Yeah I don't really have an opinion on that situation either way. Just noticed that the physical contact, based on that video, was initiated by the woman. I wouldn't have dragged her to the ground.
Though like I said, I agree...I don't think it warrants the reaction he had. -
Many years ago when I played the blood sport of co Ed indoor soccer, I had a girl basically doing this to me for half of the game as I played keeper. Finally I had enough and let her drop step work and then hip checked her to the ground. She actually cried.GrundleStiltzkin said:It's going to be a chinteresting adjudication.
Of course she ignored the 23 other warnings I Gave her and I was the bad guy. -
You do realize that she's criminally assaulting him by pushing him, don't you? Whether his action was excessive or not, he had a right to push her away.dnc said:
He deserved to get his ass beatGrundleStiltzkin said:It's going to be a chinteresting adjudication.
-
You drastically overestimate my feelings. My heart and feelings are for my wife and kids. My balls are for business, and this is business.SFGbob said:
Been there done that. You ignore everything I say and plough straight on with your fact free feelings.creepycoug said:
No. Since you seem to know more about it, then just spit it out. Like my friend, NW, I'm happy to be set straight and admit I was wrong. And "if only we had a system where both sides could present evidence" isn't spitting it out.SFGbob said:
See what I mean.creepycoug said:
Well, ostensibly he did shoot him because he was losing. I think even the members of the Zimmerman Fan Club say as much.NorthwestFresh said:
He also thinks that Zimmerman started the fight with Saint Skittles and then shot him because he was losing.SFGbob said:
But you do believe in beating a man unconscious and into a coma if he accidentally hits a kid that was playing in the street.HustlinOwl said:I'd want to see what caused the fight to break out. I don't think you should be able to start a fight with someone then shoot the guy when you start to get your ass kicked.
But I've never read anything in the transcript of that trial that established with any credible proof (in other words, more than George's version) who technically started the fight. Nobody was around for that besides George and Trayvon.
And, that night at least, he was Saint Skittles. There has never even been an allegation that he was doing anything wrong when George ID'd him as one of those "assholes who always get away."
If only there had been a trial where all of the evidence could have been presented. -
I think she smirked at himFenderbender123 said:
Are you sure? I'm watching it and it looks like she is purposely moving in front of him to block him, resulting in contact.creepycoug said:
I'd say otherwise. Watch it again. He arguably initiated the contact, and what she did in response was barely anything and for sure didn't warrant what he did. Her back was to him the entire time ... at least in the clip.Fenderbender123 said:Yeah I don't really have an opinion on that situation either way. Just noticed that the physical contact, based on that video, was initiated by the woman. I wouldn't have dragged her to the ground.
Though like I said, I agree...I don't think it warrants the reaction he had. -
Only Liberal fucktards take their kids to protests that always eventually get violent.creepycoug said:Post-script:
A colleague of mine ... let's just say a guy with a lot to lose ... wanted to make a point I guess and took his son to a protest. I told him I thought that was a bad idea for a guy who lives on Lake Washington. Let's take the boat out instead eh buddy?.
Of course, creep was right. Some asshole threw something ... forget what it was like a phone or thermos or some shit ... it his kid in the face and cracked an orbital bone. Not the end of the world, but not what he bargained for either.
The people who spend day after day doing this shit ... whether it's antifa or proud boys or something else ... are the "other" people. One should always keep that in mind. They don't have the same stake in an ordered society that we all have and thus act accordingly with any stimulant.
CSD needs to pay a visit. And you need less fucktarded friends. -
Trust me, you confusing your feelings for facts isn't me overestimating the value of your feelings.creepycoug said:
You drastically overestimate my feelings. My heart and feelings are for my wife and kids. My balls are for business, and this is business.SFGbob said:
Been there done that. You ignore everything I say and plough straight on with your fact free feelings.creepycoug said:
No. Since you seem to know more about it, then just spit it out. Like my friend, NW, I'm happy to be set straight and admit I was wrong. And "if only we had a system where both sides could present evidence" isn't spitting it out.SFGbob said:
See what I mean.creepycoug said:
Well, ostensibly he did shoot him because he was losing. I think even the members of the Zimmerman Fan Club say as much.NorthwestFresh said:
He also thinks that Zimmerman started the fight with Saint Skittles and then shot him because he was losing.SFGbob said:
But you do believe in beating a man unconscious and into a coma if he accidentally hits a kid that was playing in the street.HustlinOwl said:I'd want to see what caused the fight to break out. I don't think you should be able to start a fight with someone then shoot the guy when you start to get your ass kicked.
But I've never read anything in the transcript of that trial that established with any credible proof (in other words, more than George's version) who technically started the fight. Nobody was around for that besides George and Trayvon.
And, that night at least, he was Saint Skittles. There has never even been an allegation that he was doing anything wrong when George ID'd him as one of those "assholes who always get away."
If only there had been a trial where all of the evidence could have been presented. -
I think this all goes back to proving why we just need to defund and disband the police.
The next 150 days are going to be nuts. -
If only there had been a trial with witnesses and stuff and an acquittal.SFGbob said:
See what I mean.creepycoug said:
Well, ostensibly he did shoot him because he was losing. I think even the members of the Zimmerman Fan Club say as much.NorthwestFresh said:
He also thinks that Zimmerman started the fight with Saint Skittles and then shot him because he was losing.SFGbob said:
But you do believe in beating a man unconscious and into a coma if he accidentally hits a kid that was playing in the street.HustlinOwl said:I'd want to see what caused the fight to break out. I don't think you should be able to start a fight with someone then shoot the guy when you start to get your ass kicked.
But I've never read anything in the transcript of that trial that established with any credible proof (in other words, more than George's version) who technically started the fight. Nobody was around for that besides George and Trayvon.
And, that night at least, he was Saint Skittles. There has never even been an allegation that he was doing anything wrong when George ID'd him as one of those "assholes who always get away." -
Criminal assault?TurdBomber said:
You do realize that she's criminally assaulting him by pushing him, don't you? Whether his action was excessive or not, he had a right to push her away.dnc said:
He deserved to get his ass beatGrundleStiltzkin said:It's going to be a chinteresting adjudication.
This is the snowflakiest post ever.
Holy shit pull your tampon out man. -
This. Who in their right mind would go to these type of festivities?creepycoug said:Post-script:
A colleague of mine ... let's just say a guy with a lot to lose ... wanted to make a point I guess and took his son to a protest. I told him I thought that was a bad idea for a guy who lives on Lake Washington. Let's take the boat out instead eh buddy?.
Of course, creep was right. Some asshole threw something ... forget what it was like a phone or thermos or some shit ... it his kid in the face and cracked an orbital bone. Not the end of the world, but not what he bargained for either.
The people who spend day after day doing this shit ... whether it's antifa or proud boys or something else ... are the "other" people. One should always keep that in mind. They don't have the same stake in an ordered society that we all have and thus act accordingly with any stimulant. -
When LARPing gets real. Hope the Antifa guy didn’t have kids. Mom will have a surplus of chicken tenders for the funeral.
-
Based solely on that one clip - freely admit I've not seen others - no, I don't agree she's criminally assaulting him with that little shoulder nudge to get him off of her jock. I get bumped harder by little Asian women at the Holiday Lane parade in Bellevue. If she did something more before that, then maybe. But like I said - I literally get that much contact at the meet freezer at Costco.TurdBomber said:
You do realize that she's criminally assaulting him by pushing him, don't you? Whether his action was excessive or not, he had a right to push her away.dnc said:
He deserved to get his ass beatGrundleStiltzkin said:It's going to be a chinteresting adjudication.
-
Ignore all that, I have really strong feelings about what went down with that case and those feelings are more important than your pesky facts. Did you know the police ordered him not to chase Trademark?NorthwestFresh said:
If only there had been a trial with witnesses and stuff and an acquittal.SFGbob said:
See what I mean.creepycoug said:
Well, ostensibly he did shoot him because he was losing. I think even the members of the Zimmerman Fan Club say as much.NorthwestFresh said:
He also thinks that Zimmerman started the fight with Saint Skittles and then shot him because he was losing.SFGbob said:
But you do believe in beating a man unconscious and into a coma if he accidentally hits a kid that was playing in the street.HustlinOwl said:I'd want to see what caused the fight to break out. I don't think you should be able to start a fight with someone then shoot the guy when you start to get your ass kicked.
But I've never read anything in the transcript of that trial that established with any credible proof (in other words, more than George's version) who technically started the fight. Nobody was around for that besides George and Trayvon.
And, that night at least, he was Saint Skittles. There has never even been an allegation that he was doing anything wrong when George ID'd him as one of those "assholes who always get away." -
I don't trust you. And you do overestimate my emotional involvement - drastically so. And that's ok. It's a good rhetorical device to accuse the other guy of being hysterical. I use it with my wife all the tim, even when she's right.SFGbob said:
Trust me, you confusing your feelings for facts isn't me overestimating the value of your feelings.creepycoug said:
You drastically overestimate my feelings. My heart and feelings are for my wife and kids. My balls are for business, and this is business.SFGbob said:
Been there done that. You ignore everything I say and plough straight on with your fact free feelings.creepycoug said:
No. Since you seem to know more about it, then just spit it out. Like my friend, NW, I'm happy to be set straight and admit I was wrong. And "if only we had a system where both sides could present evidence" isn't spitting it out.SFGbob said:
See what I mean.creepycoug said:
Well, ostensibly he did shoot him because he was losing. I think even the members of the Zimmerman Fan Club say as much.NorthwestFresh said:
He also thinks that Zimmerman started the fight with Saint Skittles and then shot him because he was losing.SFGbob said:
But you do believe in beating a man unconscious and into a coma if he accidentally hits a kid that was playing in the street.HustlinOwl said:I'd want to see what caused the fight to break out. I don't think you should be able to start a fight with someone then shoot the guy when you start to get your ass kicked.
But I've never read anything in the transcript of that trial that established with any credible proof (in other words, more than George's version) who technically started the fight. Nobody was around for that besides George and Trayvon.
And, that night at least, he was Saint Skittles. There has never even been an allegation that he was doing anything wrong when George ID'd him as one of those "assholes who always get away."
If only there had been a trial where all of the evidence could have been presented.
