I'd be perfectly happy if good old Boy Joe and his son Hunter were subpoenaed to testify in the Senate about Burisma like they would have been if the Republicans were allowed to play by the same rules in the House as the Dems were. Sure. And let’s have Daddy testify as well. Why would the GOP feel required to do that? Because Schiff wants it? The House Dems played partisan politics and are now crying about partisan politics. It's Hard. Just thought Daddy would want to explain the timing of his sudden interest in a statement Joe made three years prior. It's not your daddy's responsibility to testify to his innocence. The burden of proof lies on the prosecution. Did you not learn that at some point in law school?This is why you're a partisan shill. I just assumed there was an innocent explanation and that it had nothing to do with the fact Joe had become his chief competitor for the presidency. I thought Daddy would want to clear things up. People can be so cynical about his motives, you know. Trump cleared it up when he released the transcript.He was making sure the aid wasn't going down a rat hole and that the corrupt Ukraine government that Obama and Biden used as an ATM was really any different. They got the aid. The military industrial complex got paid. More weapons of death are on the groundBiden is crooked. Running for president doesn't give you a pass. Just partisan hacks like you have no interest in your frontrunner being a piece of shit Chi Com asset Partisan hack? I just proposed Joe and Daddy testify. Read gooder!
I'd be perfectly happy if good old Boy Joe and his son Hunter were subpoenaed to testify in the Senate about Burisma like they would have been if the Republicans were allowed to play by the same rules in the House as the Dems were. Sure. And let’s have Daddy testify as well. Why would the GOP feel required to do that? Because Schiff wants it? The House Dems played partisan politics and are now crying about partisan politics. It's Hard. Just thought Daddy would want to explain the timing of his sudden interest in a statement Joe made three years prior. It's not your daddy's responsibility to testify to his innocence. The burden of proof lies on the prosecution. Did you not learn that at some point in law school?This is why you're a partisan shill. I just assumed there was an innocent explanation and that it had nothing to do with the fact Joe had become his chief competitor for the presidency. I thought Daddy would want to clear things up. People can be so cynical about his motives, you know. Trump cleared it up when he released the transcript.He was making sure the aid wasn't going down a rat hole and that the corrupt Ukraine government that Obama and Biden used as an ATM was really any different. They got the aid. The military industrial complex got paid. More weapons of death are on the groundBiden is crooked. Running for president doesn't give you a pass. Just partisan hacks like you have no interest in your frontrunner being a piece of shit Chi Com asset
I'd be perfectly happy if good old Boy Joe and his son Hunter were subpoenaed to testify in the Senate about Burisma like they would have been if the Republicans were allowed to play by the same rules in the House as the Dems were. Sure. And let’s have Daddy testify as well. Why would the GOP feel required to do that? Because Schiff wants it? The House Dems played partisan politics and are now crying about partisan politics. It's Hard. Just thought Daddy would want to explain the timing of his sudden interest in a statement Joe made three years prior. It's not your daddy's responsibility to testify to his innocence. The burden of proof lies on the prosecution. Did you not learn that at some point in law school?This is why you're a partisan shill. I just assumed there was an innocent explanation and that it had nothing to do with the fact Joe had become his chief competitor for the presidency. I thought Daddy would want to clear things up. People can be so cynical about his motives, you know.
I'd be perfectly happy if good old Boy Joe and his son Hunter were subpoenaed to testify in the Senate about Burisma like they would have been if the Republicans were allowed to play by the same rules in the House as the Dems were. Sure. And let’s have Daddy testify as well. Why would the GOP feel required to do that? Because Schiff wants it? The House Dems played partisan politics and are now crying about partisan politics. It's Hard. Just thought Daddy would want to explain the timing of his sudden interest in a statement Joe made three years prior. It's not your daddy's responsibility to testify to his innocence. The burden of proof lies on the prosecution. Did you not learn that at some point in law school?This is why you're a partisan shill.
I'd be perfectly happy if good old Boy Joe and his son Hunter were subpoenaed to testify in the Senate about Burisma like they would have been if the Republicans were allowed to play by the same rules in the House as the Dems were. Sure. And let’s have Daddy testify as well. Why would the GOP feel required to do that? Because Schiff wants it? The House Dems played partisan politics and are now crying about partisan politics. It's Hard. Just thought Daddy would want to explain the timing of his sudden interest in a statement Joe made three years prior.
I'd be perfectly happy if good old Boy Joe and his son Hunter were subpoenaed to testify in the Senate about Burisma like they would have been if the Republicans were allowed to play by the same rules in the House as the Dems were. Sure. And let’s have Daddy testify as well. Why would the GOP feel required to do that? Because Schiff wants it? The House Dems played partisan politics and are now crying about partisan politics. It's Hard.
I'd be perfectly happy if good old Boy Joe and his son Hunter were subpoenaed to testify in the Senate about Burisma like they would have been if the Republicans were allowed to play by the same rules in the House as the Dems were. Sure. And let’s have Daddy testify as well.
I'd be perfectly happy if good old Boy Joe and his son Hunter were subpoenaed to testify in the Senate about Burisma like they would have been if the Republicans were allowed to play by the same rules in the House as the Dems were.
I'd be perfectly happy if good old Boy Joe and his son Hunter were subpoenaed to testify in the Senate about Burisma like they would have been if the Republicans were allowed to play by the same rules in the House as the Dems were. Sure. And let’s have Daddy testify as well. Why would the GOP feel required to do that? Because Schiff wants it? The House Dems played partisan politics and are now crying about partisan politics. It's Hard. Just thought Daddy would want to explain the timing of his sudden interest in a statement Joe made three years prior. It's not your daddy's responsibility to testify to his innocence. The burden of proof lies on the prosecution. Did you not learn that at some point in law school?This is why you're a partisan shill. I just assumed there was an innocent explanation and that it had nothing to do with the fact Joe had become his chief competitor for the presidency. I thought Daddy would want to clear things up. People can be so cynical about his motives, you know. Trump cleared it up when he released the transcript.He was making sure the aid wasn't going down a rat hole and that the corrupt Ukraine government that Obama and Biden used as an ATM was really any different. They got the aid. The military industrial complex got paid. More weapons of death are on the groundBiden is crooked. Running for president doesn't give you a pass. Just partisan hacks like you have no interest in your frontrunner being a piece of shit Chi Com asset Partisan hack? I just proposed Joe and Daddy testify. Read gooder! HH thinks that witnesses just need to testify to their innocence and that the prosecution isn't required to present a case. Even @creepycoug makes a better pretend lawyer.
I'd be perfectly happy if good old Boy Joe and his son Hunter were subpoenaed to testify in the Senate about Burisma like they would have been if the Republicans were allowed to play by the same rules in the House as the Dems were. Sure. And let’s have Daddy testify as well. Why would the GOP feel required to do that? Because Schiff wants it? The House Dems played partisan politics and are now crying about partisan politics. It's Hard. Just thought Daddy would want to explain the timing of his sudden interest in a statement Joe made three years prior. It's not your daddy's responsibility to testify to his innocence. The burden of proof lies on the prosecution. Did you not learn that at some point in law school?This is why you're a partisan shill. I just assumed there was an innocent explanation and that it had nothing to do with the fact Joe had become his chief competitor for the presidency. I thought Daddy would want to clear things up. People can be so cynical about his motives, you know. Trump cleared it up when he released the transcript.He was making sure the aid wasn't going down a rat hole and that the corrupt Ukraine government that Obama and Biden used as an ATM was really any different. They got the aid. The military industrial complex got paid. More weapons of death are on the groundBiden is crooked. Running for president doesn't give you a pass. Just partisan hacks like you have no interest in your frontrunner being a piece of shit Chi Com asset Partisan hack? I just proposed Joe and Daddy testify. Read gooder! HH thinks that witnesses just need to testify to their innocence and that the prosecution isn't required to present a case. Even @creepycoug makes a better pretend lawyer. There are no trial settings in which the defendant can successfully block the testimony of material witnesses. Isn’t civics still required to graduate high school?
I'd be perfectly happy if good old Boy Joe and his son Hunter were subpoenaed to testify in the Senate about Burisma like they would have been if the Republicans were allowed to play by the same rules in the House as the Dems were. Sure. And let’s have Daddy testify as well. Why would the GOP feel required to do that? Because Schiff wants it? The House Dems played partisan politics and are now crying about partisan politics. It's Hard. Just thought Daddy would want to explain the timing of his sudden interest in a statement Joe made three years prior. It's not your daddy's responsibility to testify to his innocence. The burden of proof lies on the prosecution. Did you not learn that at some point in law school?This is why you're a partisan shill. I just assumed there was an innocent explanation and that it had nothing to do with the fact Joe had become his chief competitor for the presidency. I thought Daddy would want to clear things up. People can be so cynical about his motives, you know. Trump cleared it up when he released the transcript.He was making sure the aid wasn't going down a rat hole and that the corrupt Ukraine government that Obama and Biden used as an ATM was really any different. They got the aid. The military industrial complex got paid. More weapons of death are on the groundBiden is crooked. Running for president doesn't give you a pass. Just partisan hacks like you have no interest in your frontrunner being a piece of shit Chi Com asset Partisan hack? I just proposed Joe and Daddy testify. Read gooder! Knowing full well that the morons you follow will never let Joe testifyTrump has no reason to testify since there is no case against himAll the shit you idiots have talked for three years and here we are with you crying about the refs like fucking coogs
I'd be perfectly happy if good old Boy Joe and his son Hunter were subpoenaed to testify in the Senate about Burisma like they would have been if the Republicans were allowed to play by the same rules in the House as the Dems were. Sure. And let’s have Daddy testify as well. Why would the GOP feel required to do that? Because Schiff wants it? The House Dems played partisan politics and are now crying about partisan politics. It's Hard. Just thought Daddy would want to explain the timing of his sudden interest in a statement Joe made three years prior. It's not your daddy's responsibility to testify to his innocence. The burden of proof lies on the prosecution. Did you not learn that at some point in law school?This is why you're a partisan shill. I just assumed there was an innocent explanation and that it had nothing to do with the fact Joe had become his chief competitor for the presidency. I thought Daddy would want to clear things up. People can be so cynical about his motives, you know. Trump cleared it up when he released the transcript.He was making sure the aid wasn't going down a rat hole and that the corrupt Ukraine government that Obama and Biden used as an ATM was really any different. They got the aid. The military industrial complex got paid. More weapons of death are on the groundBiden is crooked. Running for president doesn't give you a pass. Just partisan hacks like you have no interest in your frontrunner being a piece of shit Chi Com asset Partisan hack? I just proposed Joe and Daddy testify. Read gooder! Knowing full well that the morons you follow will never let Joe testifyTrump has no reason to testify since there is no case against himAll the shit you idiots have talked for three years and here we are with you crying about the refs like fucking coogs I understand you’re going to win and that Daddy’s guilt isn’t relevant. But I thought you girls were looking for exoneration.
I'd be perfectly happy if good old Boy Joe and his son Hunter were subpoenaed to testify in the Senate about Burisma like they would have been if the Republicans were allowed to play by the same rules in the House as the Dems were. Sure. And let’s have Daddy testify as well. Why would the GOP feel required to do that? Because Schiff wants it? The House Dems played partisan politics and are now crying about partisan politics. It's Hard. Just thought Daddy would want to explain the timing of his sudden interest in a statement Joe made three years prior. It's not your daddy's responsibility to testify to his innocence. The burden of proof lies on the prosecution. Did you not learn that at some point in law school?This is why you're a partisan shill. I just assumed there was an innocent explanation and that it had nothing to do with the fact Joe had become his chief competitor for the presidency. I thought Daddy would want to clear things up. People can be so cynical about his motives, you know. Trump cleared it up when he released the transcript.He was making sure the aid wasn't going down a rat hole and that the corrupt Ukraine government that Obama and Biden used as an ATM was really any different. They got the aid. The military industrial complex got paid. More weapons of death are on the groundBiden is crooked. Running for president doesn't give you a pass. Just partisan hacks like you have no interest in your frontrunner being a piece of shit Chi Com asset Partisan hack? I just proposed Joe and Daddy testify. Read gooder! Knowing full well that the morons you follow will never let Joe testifyTrump has no reason to testify since there is no case against himAll the shit you idiots have talked for three years and here we are with you crying about the refs like fucking coogs I understand you’re going to win and that Daddy’s guilt isn’t relevant. But I thought you girls were looking for exoneration. What guilt? Prove it bitch
I would say im surprised the Dems are calling foul at the process immediately after running a sham process, but I'm not.Beginning to think Nancy withholding the articles of impeachment were done specifically to let the stench of a complete partisan hack job by the house wear off so they could push this "unfair" narrative on the Senate.Way to go Lefty's, you completely weaponized the impeachment process because you couldn't handle the results of the election.
Trump lawyer Patrick Philbin says it is "stunning admission" that the Democrats have shown up and said they need more time for evidence and subpoenas and discovery.He says if a litigant showed up in court on day of trial and said they needed more time to build a case, "they'd be thrown out of court and the lawyers would probably be sanctioned."He accuses the House managers of asking the Senate "to do their job for them."As we see here the democrat's incredibly moronic base is all in on going down to defeat and then crying about a cover up and the refs being against them. Even coogs think that is stupid.You had no case as you are making so abundantly clear.
I'd be perfectly happy if good old Boy Joe and his son Hunter were subpoenaed to testify in the Senate about Burisma like they would have been if the Republicans were allowed to play by the same rules in the House as the Dems were. Sure. And let’s have Daddy testify as well. Why would the GOP feel required to do that? Because Schiff wants it? The House Dems played partisan politics and are now crying about partisan politics. It's Hard. Just thought Daddy would want to explain the timing of his sudden interest in a statement Joe made three years prior. It's not your daddy's responsibility to testify to his innocence. The burden of proof lies on the prosecution. Did you not learn that at some point in law school?This is why you're a partisan shill. I just assumed there was an innocent explanation and that it had nothing to do with the fact Joe had become his chief competitor for the presidency. I thought Daddy would want to clear things up. People can be so cynical about his motives, you know. Trump cleared it up when he released the transcript.He was making sure the aid wasn't going down a rat hole and that the corrupt Ukraine government that Obama and Biden used as an ATM was really any different. They got the aid. The military industrial complex got paid. More weapons of death are on the groundBiden is crooked. Running for president doesn't give you a pass. Just partisan hacks like you have no interest in your frontrunner being a piece of shit Chi Com asset Partisan hack? I just proposed Joe and Daddy testify. Read gooder! Knowing full well that the morons you follow will never let Joe testifyTrump has no reason to testify since there is no case against himAll the shit you idiots have talked for three years and here we are with you crying about the refs like fucking coogs I understand you’re going to win and that Daddy’s guilt isn’t relevant. But I thought you girls were looking for exoneration. What guilt? Prove it bitch It’s been proven. Hell, it’s been admitted. No one doubts acquittal will follow.
https://twitter.com/scottadamssays/status/1219721923778641920?s=21
