Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.
Andrew Yang pulls out a shotgun
Comments
-
I get it. Just keep an eye on how the current and proposed "common sense controls" on a constitutionally-protected right are carried out.YellowSnow said:
Don't disagree. I just don't stress about it as much as my HH 2A bros. I am convinced there would be a major armed insurrection if the federales seriously tried to come for guns.GrundleStiltzkin said:
No BoR issue should be the primary to vote on. They should all be sacrosanct. However, 2A is the one most openly and directly attacked, followed by 1A and 4A.YellowSnow said:
2A shouldn't be the primary issue to vote on. No one's coming for your guns and you can't find me 38 state legislatures ready to amend the Constitution. American's love their guns and they are here to stay.GrundleStiltzkin said:Sorry Yang.
https://www.yang2020.com/policies/gun-safety/
Talks a strong game in privacy, data collection, etc in other areas. Not so much with lawful exercise of 2A.
As I've said, you want to make substantive changes to legal gun ownership, do it honestly and propose an amendment to alter. Eroding it piecemeal is not good, not just for 2A but for the Constitution and civil rights broadly. -
I think he means it, that’s his stance. Not arguing that.RaceBannon said:
He should be impeached for thatGrundleStiltzkin said:
Trump's unwitting legacy, in my book, is exposing real hypocrisies and reversals on both sides.RaceBannon said:I've been hearing recently that protecting the constitution is vital
I'm not a single issue guy and don't own guns but candidates that devote that much time to getting rid of our rights don't get my vote
Telling me he doesn't mean it makes it worse.
My point is he won’t prioritize it.
I mean, Trump promised a lot of things, and he hasn’t even attempted some of them. RIP Infrastructure Week... -
Of course, Trump has said lots of things that didn't happen. I doubt that decreased your opposition to him just because he couldn't pull it off.ThomasFremont said:
I think he means it, that’s his stance. Not arguing that.RaceBannon said:
He should be impeached for thatGrundleStiltzkin said:
Trump's unwitting legacy, in my book, is exposing real hypocrisies and reversals on both sides.RaceBannon said:I've been hearing recently that protecting the constitution is vital
I'm not a single issue guy and don't own guns but candidates that devote that much time to getting rid of our rights don't get my vote
Telling me he doesn't mean it makes it worse.
My point is he won’t prioritize it.
I mean, Trump promised a lot of things, and he hasn’t even attempted some of them. RIP Infrastructure Week...
-
He is God's judgement on the collective fucktardness Democratic and Republican parties circa 1992- 2016.GrundleStiltzkin said:
Trump's unwitting legacy, in my book, is exposing real hypocrisies and reversals on both sides.RaceBannon said:I've been hearing recently that protecting the constitution is vital
-
Trumps delivered on more promises than anyone in my memory. He's got 5 more years.GrundleStiltzkin said:
Of course, Trump has said lots of things that didn't happen. I doubt that decreased your opposition to him just because he couldn't pull it off.ThomasFremont said:
I think he means it, that’s his stance. Not arguing that.RaceBannon said:
He should be impeached for thatGrundleStiltzkin said:
Trump's unwitting legacy, in my book, is exposing real hypocrisies and reversals on both sides.RaceBannon said:I've been hearing recently that protecting the constitution is vital
I'm not a single issue guy and don't own guns but candidates that devote that much time to getting rid of our rights don't get my vote
Telling me he doesn't mean it makes it worse.
My point is he won’t prioritize it.
I mean, Trump promised a lot of things, and he hasn’t even attempted some of them. RIP Infrastructure Week... -
I support investment in our infrastructure and thought that was the one thing he could get bipartisan support for easily.GrundleStiltzkin said:
Of course, Trump has said lots of things that didn't happen. I doubt that decreased your opposition to him just because he couldn't pull it off.ThomasFremont said:
I think he means it, that’s his stance. Not arguing that.RaceBannon said:
He should be impeached for thatGrundleStiltzkin said:
Trump's unwitting legacy, in my book, is exposing real hypocrisies and reversals on both sides.RaceBannon said:I've been hearing recently that protecting the constitution is vital
I'm not a single issue guy and don't own guns but candidates that devote that much time to getting rid of our rights don't get my vote
Telling me he doesn't mean it makes it worse.
My point is he won’t prioritize it.
I mean, Trump promised a lot of things, and he hasn’t even attempted some of them. RIP Infrastructure Week...
He promised cheap healthcare for everyone.
He said he was gonna pull out of the ME.
These are all things I support that he said he would do.
0/3
I’m judging based on his actions. I’m not giving him credit for inheriting a strong economy and keeping the train on the track, which is his only “achievement” that I support. Although I hate strong economies, just ask @PGOS -
Shame. Yang's got some really good ideas, and he does this cool thing where he uses logic and statistics to create his policies. Which is weird, I'm pretty sure you're not allowed to be rational with your policies. He's a solid 5th place (or 6th if Bloomberg is in front) somehow, but it seems the establishment wing has decided Klobuchar is the way to go since their Mayor Pete attempt fell through. 2nd last on the debate stage in polling last night, 2nd most speaking time. Ridiculous. They tried their hardest to pump up a white centrist, failed, and now they're doing it again. Party of diversity!GrundleStiltzkin said:
It's important enough to have a lengthy policy statement on his campaign site. I mean, yeah, I don't think it's important to him either. But I've learned not to trust politicians on things important to me, especially when they have a public position contrary to my values.ThomasFremont said:
Me too. He has a stated position in everything. But has anything he’s said indicated that this is a priority for him?GrundleStiltzkin said:
I like my civil rights, and I'd like to keep them.ThomasFremont said:
I agree, which is why I’m trying to convince people that like him but disqualify him on that single issue to reconsider.YellowSnow said:
2A shouldn't be the primary issue to vote on. No one's coming for your guns and you can't find me 38 state legislatures ready to amend the Constitution. American's love their guns and they are here to stay.GrundleStiltzkin said:Sorry Yang.
https://www.yang2020.com/policies/gun-safety/
Talks a strong game in privacy, data collection, etc in other areas. Not so much with lawful exercise of 2A.
I mean, even with total control of Congress, we’ve had 3 straight admins struggle to get ONE major change through. For him it’s UBI. Not guns. Beto is proof that being an anti-gun nut isn’t viable.
All meaningless, of course. Yang's going nowhere in this race, which is too bad.
Yang makes a very valid point when he says Trump is a symptom of American issues, not himself the issue. He's the only one on the stage even pointing out non-Trump problems.
Last night, here is how the debate went. Yes, I watched some of it.
Biden: Impeach him!
Bernie: Duh!
Warren: It's just so unforgivable, impeach!
Pete: Man my wine cave agrees Trump is just unacceptable!
Steyer: I started impeachment!
Klobuchar: Trump must be handled, and I beat him in Minnesota based on polls so vote for me!
Yang: How about we stop obsessing over Trump and start problem solving?
Everyone on stage: *confused looks*
Blaming Trump for literally everything under the sun is stupid. But the DNC and MSNBC don't like that way of thinking I guess. Time to raise the requirements so Yang doesn't qualify but Klobuchar does despite Yang polling markedly higher nationally! -
FTFYjhfstyle24 said:
Shame. Yang's got some really good ideas, and he does this cool thing where he uses logic and statistics to create his policies. Which is weird, I'm pretty sure you're not allowed to be rational with your policies. He's a solid 5th place (or 6th if Bloomberg is in front) somehow, but it seems the establishment wing has decided Klobuchar is the way to go since their Mayor Pete attempt fell through. 2nd last on the debate stage in polling last night, 2nd most speaking time. Ridiculous. They tried their hardest to pump up a white centrist, failed, and now they're doing it again. Party of diversity!GrundleStiltzkin said:
It's important enough to have a lengthy policy statement on his campaign site. I mean, yeah, I don't think it's important to him either. But I've learned not to trust politicians on things important to me, especially when they have a public position contrary to my values.ThomasFremont said:
Me too. He has a stated position in everything. But has anything he’s said indicated that this is a priority for him?GrundleStiltzkin said:
I like my civil rights, and I'd like to keep them.ThomasFremont said:
I agree, which is why I’m trying to convince people that like him but disqualify him on that single issue to reconsider.YellowSnow said:
2A shouldn't be the primary issue to vote on. No one's coming for your guns and you can't find me 38 state legislatures ready to amend the Constitution. American's love their guns and they are here to stay.GrundleStiltzkin said:Sorry Yang.
https://www.yang2020.com/policies/gun-safety/
Talks a strong game in privacy, data collection, etc in other areas. Not so much with lawful exercise of 2A.
I mean, even with total control of Congress, we’ve had 3 straight admins struggle to get ONE major change through. For him it’s UBI. Not guns. Beto is proof that being an anti-gun nut isn’t viable.
All meaningless, of course. Yang's going nowhere in this race, which is too bad.
Yang makes a very valid point when he says Trump is a symptom of American issues, not himself the issue. He's the only one on the stage even pointing out non-Trump problems.
Last night, here is how the debate went. Yes, I watched some of it.
Biden: Impeach him!
Bernie: Duh!
Warren: It's just so unforgivable, impeach!
Pete: Man my wine cave agrees Trump is just unacceptable!
Steyer: I started impeachment!
Klobuchar: Trump must be handled, and I beat him in Minnesota based on polls so vote for me!
Yang: How about we stop obsessing over Trump and start problem solving?
Everyone on stage: *confused looks*
Blaming Trump for literally everything under the sun is stupid. But the @dnc and MSNBC don't like that way of thinking I guess. Time to raise the requirements so Yang doesn't qualify but Klobuchar does despite Yang polling markedly higher nationally! -
Solemn,man. Totally solemn.RaceBannon said:I've been hearing recently that protecting the constitution is vital
-
Im pretty sure the main issue is gender identityThomasFremont said:Obama talked TUFF on guns to and literally did nothing. Gun control is not gonna happen. The amount of political capital it would take to fight that fight would be insane. And potentially end in total failure. 2A has bipartisan support.
Besides, his main issue is the economy. I doubt gun legislation is even in his top 25 policy wish list. -
GrundleStiltzkin said:
Imagine being scare of a little Asian man.WilburHooksHands said:*Corso voice* Not so fast my friend!
Yes. And? -
We just might find out soon in Virginia.GrundleStiltzkin said:
I get it. Just keep an eye on how the current and proposed "common sense controls" on a constitutionally-protected right are carried out.YellowSnow said:
Don't disagree. I just don't stress about it as much as my HH 2A bros. I am convinced there would be a major armed insurrection if the federales seriously tried to come for guns.GrundleStiltzkin said:
No BoR issue should be the primary to vote on. They should all be sacrosanct. However, 2A is the one most openly and directly attacked, followed by 1A and 4A.YellowSnow said:
2A shouldn't be the primary issue to vote on. No one's coming for your guns and you can't find me 38 state legislatures ready to amend the Constitution. American's love their guns and they are here to stay.GrundleStiltzkin said:Sorry Yang.
https://www.yang2020.com/policies/gun-safety/
Talks a strong game in privacy, data collection, etc in other areas. Not so much with lawful exercise of 2A.
As I've said, you want to make substantive changes to legal gun ownership, do it honestly and propose an amendment to alter. Eroding it piecemeal is not good, not just for 2A but for the Constitution and civil rights broadly. -
They haven't even written and passed a law yet and they threaten turning the national guard out to take guns away.Swaye said:
We just might find out soon in Virginia.GrundleStiltzkin said:
I get it. Just keep an eye on how the current and proposed "common sense controls" on a constitutionally-protected right are carried out.YellowSnow said:
Don't disagree. I just don't stress about it as much as my HH 2A bros. I am convinced there would be a major armed insurrection if the federales seriously tried to come for guns.GrundleStiltzkin said:
No BoR issue should be the primary to vote on. They should all be sacrosanct. However, 2A is the one most openly and directly attacked, followed by 1A and 4A.YellowSnow said:
2A shouldn't be the primary issue to vote on. No one's coming for your guns and you can't find me 38 state legislatures ready to amend the Constitution. American's love their guns and they are here to stay.GrundleStiltzkin said:Sorry Yang.
https://www.yang2020.com/policies/gun-safety/
Talks a strong game in privacy, data collection, etc in other areas. Not so much with lawful exercise of 2A.
As I've said, you want to make substantive changes to legal gun ownership, do it honestly and propose an amendment to alter. Eroding it piecemeal is not good, not just for 2A but for the Constitution and civil rights broadly.
Gosh I wonder what kind of laws they're thinking about. -
Governor Blackface already walked back the whole "confiscate the AR's" thing when they realized there would be armed revolt in the hills. But ban on future sales of ARs, red flag law, and a ban on high capacity magazines are foregone conclusions. Virginia will become California overnight. Sad day for freedom. Great day for tyranny.Sledog said:
They haven't even written and passed a law yet and they threaten turning the national guard out to take guns away.Swaye said:
We just might find out soon in Virginia.GrundleStiltzkin said:
I get it. Just keep an eye on how the current and proposed "common sense controls" on a constitutionally-protected right are carried out.YellowSnow said:
Don't disagree. I just don't stress about it as much as my HH 2A bros. I am convinced there would be a major armed insurrection if the federales seriously tried to come for guns.GrundleStiltzkin said:
No BoR issue should be the primary to vote on. They should all be sacrosanct. However, 2A is the one most openly and directly attacked, followed by 1A and 4A.YellowSnow said:
2A shouldn't be the primary issue to vote on. No one's coming for your guns and you can't find me 38 state legislatures ready to amend the Constitution. American's love their guns and they are here to stay.GrundleStiltzkin said:Sorry Yang.
https://www.yang2020.com/policies/gun-safety/
Talks a strong game in privacy, data collection, etc in other areas. Not so much with lawful exercise of 2A.
As I've said, you want to make substantive changes to legal gun ownership, do it honestly and propose an amendment to alter. Eroding it piecemeal is not good, not just for 2A but for the Constitution and civil rights broadly.
Gosh I wonder what kind of laws they're thinking about. -
Or great day for a little revolution to retake their state.Swaye said:
Governor Blackface already walked back the whole "confiscate the AR's" thing when they realized there would be armed revolt in the hills. But ban on future sales of ARs, red flag law, and a ban on high capacity magazines are foregone conclusions. Virginia will become California overnight. Sad day for freedom. Great day for tyranny.Sledog said:
They haven't even written and passed a law yet and they threaten turning the national guard out to take guns away.Swaye said:
We just might find out soon in Virginia.GrundleStiltzkin said:
I get it. Just keep an eye on how the current and proposed "common sense controls" on a constitutionally-protected right are carried out.YellowSnow said:
Don't disagree. I just don't stress about it as much as my HH 2A bros. I am convinced there would be a major armed insurrection if the federales seriously tried to come for guns.GrundleStiltzkin said:
No BoR issue should be the primary to vote on. They should all be sacrosanct. However, 2A is the one most openly and directly attacked, followed by 1A and 4A.YellowSnow said:
2A shouldn't be the primary issue to vote on. No one's coming for your guns and you can't find me 38 state legislatures ready to amend the Constitution. American's love their guns and they are here to stay.GrundleStiltzkin said:Sorry Yang.
https://www.yang2020.com/policies/gun-safety/
Talks a strong game in privacy, data collection, etc in other areas. Not so much with lawful exercise of 2A.
As I've said, you want to make substantive changes to legal gun ownership, do it honestly and propose an amendment to alter. Eroding it piecemeal is not good, not just for 2A but for the Constitution and civil rights broadly.
Gosh I wonder what kind of laws they're thinking about.
Imagine if say 100,000 armed men and women just showed up at the state capital hung out for a couple hours and then went home.
How would that gun control vote go if that happened?
-
Are you suggesting our democracy should be held hostage by threat of violence?Sledog said:
Or great day for a little revolution to retake their state.Swaye said:
Governor Blackface already walked back the whole "confiscate the AR's" thing when they realized there would be armed revolt in the hills. But ban on future sales of ARs, red flag law, and a ban on high capacity magazines are foregone conclusions. Virginia will become California overnight. Sad day for freedom. Great day for tyranny.Sledog said:
They haven't even written and passed a law yet and they threaten turning the national guard out to take guns away.Swaye said:
We just might find out soon in Virginia.GrundleStiltzkin said:
I get it. Just keep an eye on how the current and proposed "common sense controls" on a constitutionally-protected right are carried out.YellowSnow said:
Don't disagree. I just don't stress about it as much as my HH 2A bros. I am convinced there would be a major armed insurrection if the federales seriously tried to come for guns.GrundleStiltzkin said:
No BoR issue should be the primary to vote on. They should all be sacrosanct. However, 2A is the one most openly and directly attacked, followed by 1A and 4A.YellowSnow said:
2A shouldn't be the primary issue to vote on. No one's coming for your guns and you can't find me 38 state legislatures ready to amend the Constitution. American's love their guns and they are here to stay.GrundleStiltzkin said:Sorry Yang.
https://www.yang2020.com/policies/gun-safety/
Talks a strong game in privacy, data collection, etc in other areas. Not so much with lawful exercise of 2A.
As I've said, you want to make substantive changes to legal gun ownership, do it honestly and propose an amendment to alter. Eroding it piecemeal is not good, not just for 2A but for the Constitution and civil rights broadly.
Gosh I wonder what kind of laws they're thinking about.
Imagine if say 100,000 armed men and women just showed up at the state capital hung out for a couple hours and then went home.
How would that gun control vote go if that happened? -
That was sort of the whole point of the 2nd Amendment.ThomasFremont said:
Are you suggesting our democracy should be held hostage by threat of violence?Sledog said:
Or great day for a little revolution to retake their state.Swaye said:
Governor Blackface already walked back the whole "confiscate the AR's" thing when they realized there would be armed revolt in the hills. But ban on future sales of ARs, red flag law, and a ban on high capacity magazines are foregone conclusions. Virginia will become California overnight. Sad day for freedom. Great day for tyranny.Sledog said:
They haven't even written and passed a law yet and they threaten turning the national guard out to take guns away.Swaye said:
We just might find out soon in Virginia.GrundleStiltzkin said:
I get it. Just keep an eye on how the current and proposed "common sense controls" on a constitutionally-protected right are carried out.YellowSnow said:
Don't disagree. I just don't stress about it as much as my HH 2A bros. I am convinced there would be a major armed insurrection if the federales seriously tried to come for guns.GrundleStiltzkin said:
No BoR issue should be the primary to vote on. They should all be sacrosanct. However, 2A is the one most openly and directly attacked, followed by 1A and 4A.YellowSnow said:
2A shouldn't be the primary issue to vote on. No one's coming for your guns and you can't find me 38 state legislatures ready to amend the Constitution. American's love their guns and they are here to stay.GrundleStiltzkin said:Sorry Yang.
https://www.yang2020.com/policies/gun-safety/
Talks a strong game in privacy, data collection, etc in other areas. Not so much with lawful exercise of 2A.
As I've said, you want to make substantive changes to legal gun ownership, do it honestly and propose an amendment to alter. Eroding it piecemeal is not good, not just for 2A but for the Constitution and civil rights broadly.
Gosh I wonder what kind of laws they're thinking about.
Imagine if say 100,000 armed men and women just showed up at the state capital hung out for a couple hours and then went home.
How would that gun control vote go if that happened?
If the government was tyrannical to its people, the people could usurp it. By force, if necessary.
The ultimate get your shit together/electoral college, so to speak.
-
Absolutely. Since you're dumb I'll remind you this is a republic and that is exactly what the second amendment was intended for.ThomasFremont said:
Are you suggesting our democracy should be held hostage by threat of violence?Sledog said:
Or great day for a little revolution to retake their state.Swaye said:
Governor Blackface already walked back the whole "confiscate the AR's" thing when they realized there would be armed revolt in the hills. But ban on future sales of ARs, red flag law, and a ban on high capacity magazines are foregone conclusions. Virginia will become California overnight. Sad day for freedom. Great day for tyranny.Sledog said:
They haven't even written and passed a law yet and they threaten turning the national guard out to take guns away.Swaye said:
We just might find out soon in Virginia.GrundleStiltzkin said:
I get it. Just keep an eye on how the current and proposed "common sense controls" on a constitutionally-protected right are carried out.YellowSnow said:
Don't disagree. I just don't stress about it as much as my HH 2A bros. I am convinced there would be a major armed insurrection if the federales seriously tried to come for guns.GrundleStiltzkin said:
No BoR issue should be the primary to vote on. They should all be sacrosanct. However, 2A is the one most openly and directly attacked, followed by 1A and 4A.YellowSnow said:
2A shouldn't be the primary issue to vote on. No one's coming for your guns and you can't find me 38 state legislatures ready to amend the Constitution. American's love their guns and they are here to stay.GrundleStiltzkin said:Sorry Yang.
https://www.yang2020.com/policies/gun-safety/
Talks a strong game in privacy, data collection, etc in other areas. Not so much with lawful exercise of 2A.
As I've said, you want to make substantive changes to legal gun ownership, do it honestly and propose an amendment to alter. Eroding it piecemeal is not good, not just for 2A but for the Constitution and civil rights broadly.
Gosh I wonder what kind of laws they're thinking about.
Imagine if say 100,000 armed men and women just showed up at the state capital hung out for a couple hours and then went home.
How would that gun control vote go if that happened?
I'm sure 10,000 would do. -
Hmmmm, so where has this armed resistance been while our privacy rights are stripped away? Or do you only care about your favorite amendment?
Just admit your little hobby is what it is and your Constitutional arguments are empty air. Or you’d have done something already. -
Why are all authoritarians like TF such control freaks? Because they have no actual power? Or balls?ThomasFremont said:Hmmmm, so where has this armed resistance been while our privacy rights are stripped away? Or do you only care about your favorite amendment?
Just admit your little hobby is what it is and your Constitutional arguments are empty air. Or you’d have done something already. -
I've been voting against it. The 2A is the amendment that protects all the others. It is the most important amendment. You're a pretend totalitarian what the first thing your side does? Take people's guns. History much? That education you claimed sucked and produced a turd.ThomasFremont said:Hmmmm, so where has this armed resistance been while our privacy rights are stripped away? Or do you only care about your favorite amendment?
Just admit your little hobby is what it is and your Constitutional arguments are empty air. Or you’d have done something already. -
You have NOT been voting against the erosion of our privacy rights.Sledog said:
I've been voting against it. The 2A is the amendment that protects all the others. It is the most important amendment. You're a pretend totalitarian what the first thing your side does? Take people's guns. History much? That education you claimed sucked and produced a turd.ThomasFremont said:Hmmmm, so where has this armed resistance been while our privacy rights are stripped away? Or do you only care about your favorite amendment?
Just admit your little hobby is what it is and your Constitutional arguments are empty air. Or you’d have done something already.
And gun rights remain intact.
When are you going to do something about it?
That’s your entire claim, that your guns defend the Constitution. Get to it or shut the fuck up. -
I’m an authoritarian because I believe in preserving our privacy rights as guaranteed in the Constitution?TurdBomber said:
Why are all authoritarians like TF such control freaks? Because they have no actual power? Or balls?ThomasFremont said:Hmmmm, so where has this armed resistance been while our privacy rights are stripped away? Or do you only care about your favorite amendment?
Just admit your little hobby is what it is and your Constitutional arguments are empty air. Or you’d have done something already.
Good one.
Got any more gems? -
It sounds like you have your own favorite hobby Amendment, then.ThomasFremont said:
I’m an authoritarian because I believe in preserving our privacy rights as guaranteed in the Constitution?TurdBomber said:
Why are all authoritarians like TF such control freaks? Because they have no actual power? Or balls?ThomasFremont said:Hmmmm, so where has this armed resistance been while our privacy rights are stripped away? Or do you only care about your favorite amendment?
Just admit your little hobby is what it is and your Constitutional arguments are empty air. Or you’d have done something already.
Good one.
Got any more gems?
-
They're for the worst case. We're not there yet but idiot's like you keep pushing.ThomasFremont said:
You have NOT been voting against the erosion of our privacy rights.Sledog said:
I've been voting against it. The 2A is the amendment that protects all the others. It is the most important amendment. You're a pretend totalitarian what the first thing your side does? Take people's guns. History much? That education you claimed sucked and produced a turd.ThomasFremont said:Hmmmm, so where has this armed resistance been while our privacy rights are stripped away? Or do you only care about your favorite amendment?
Just admit your little hobby is what it is and your Constitutional arguments are empty air. Or you’d have done something already.
And gun rights remain intact.
When are you going to do something about it?
That’s your entire claim, that your guns defend the Constitution. Get to it or shut the fuck up.
Are you really this stupid or do you just play stupid on the internet? -
I don’t pretend that the 2A is some elevated king of the amendments like some.PurpleThrobber said:
It sounds like you have your own favorite hobby Amendment, then.ThomasFremont said:
I’m an authoritarian because I believe in preserving our privacy rights as guaranteed in the Constitution?TurdBomber said:
Why are all authoritarians like TF such control freaks? Because they have no actual power? Or balls?ThomasFremont said:Hmmmm, so where has this armed resistance been while our privacy rights are stripped away? Or do you only care about your favorite amendment?
Just admit your little hobby is what it is and your Constitutional arguments are empty air. Or you’d have done something already.
Good one.
Got any more gems?
And I’m mostly just curious when Sledog is planning to step up and defend the Constitution like he says he will. It’s eroding around us as we speak. It’s almost like guns don’t defend our freedoms, people defend our freedoms, eh? -
No. You're authoritarian because you want government to be your mommy and get those mean kids with their guns in trouble.ThomasFremont said:
I’m an authoritarian because I believe in preserving our privacy rights as guaranteed in the Constitution?TurdBomber said:
Why are all authoritarians like TF such control freaks? Because they have no actual power? Or balls?ThomasFremont said:Hmmmm, so where has this armed resistance been while our privacy rights are stripped away? Or do you only care about your favorite amendment?
Just admit your little hobby is what it is and your Constitutional arguments are empty air. Or you’d have done something already.
Good one.
Got any more gems? -
Ok you're not pretending.ThomasFremont said:
I don’t pretend that the 2A is some elevated king of the amendments like some.PurpleThrobber said:
It sounds like you have your own favorite hobby Amendment, then.ThomasFremont said:
I’m an authoritarian because I believe in preserving our privacy rights as guaranteed in the Constitution?TurdBomber said:
Why are all authoritarians like TF such control freaks? Because they have no actual power? Or balls?ThomasFremont said:Hmmmm, so where has this armed resistance been while our privacy rights are stripped away? Or do you only care about your favorite amendment?
Just admit your little hobby is what it is and your Constitutional arguments are empty air. Or you’d have done something already.
Good one.
Got any more gems?
And I’m mostly just curious when Sledog is planning to step up and defend the Constitution like he says he will. It’s eroding around us as we speak. It’s almost like guns don’t defend our freedoms, people defend our freedoms, eh? -
Where did I say that? Let me save you some time, I didn’t.TurdBomber said:
No. You're authoritarian because you want government to be your mommy and get those mean kids with their guns in trouble.ThomasFremont said:
I’m an authoritarian because I believe in preserving our privacy rights as guaranteed in the Constitution?TurdBomber said:
Why are all authoritarians like TF such control freaks? Because they have no actual power? Or balls?ThomasFremont said:Hmmmm, so where has this armed resistance been while our privacy rights are stripped away? Or do you only care about your favorite amendment?
Just admit your little hobby is what it is and your Constitutional arguments are empty air. Or you’d have done something already.
Good one.
Got any more gems?
All I said is that Yang’s position is irrelevant because he will never have the political capital to fight that fight. And that it is not a high priority for his campaign anyways.
You caught up now? -
Cmon Sled, you swore an oath. And you claim you’re a bad man on the trigger.Sledog said:
Ok you're not pretending.ThomasFremont said:
I don’t pretend that the 2A is some elevated king of the amendments like some.PurpleThrobber said:
It sounds like you have your own favorite hobby Amendment, then.ThomasFremont said:
I’m an authoritarian because I believe in preserving our privacy rights as guaranteed in the Constitution?TurdBomber said:
Why are all authoritarians like TF such control freaks? Because they have no actual power? Or balls?ThomasFremont said:Hmmmm, so where has this armed resistance been while our privacy rights are stripped away? Or do you only care about your favorite amendment?
Just admit your little hobby is what it is and your Constitutional arguments are empty air. Or you’d have done something already.
Good one.
Got any more gems?
And I’m mostly just curious when Sledog is planning to step up and defend the Constitution like he says he will. It’s eroding around us as we speak. It’s almost like guns don’t defend our freedoms, people defend our freedoms, eh?
Are you an oath breaker or a pussy or abundance?
