Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.
Andrew Yang pulls out a shotgun
Comments
-
GrundleStiltzkin said:
Imagine being scare of a little Asian man.WilburHooksHands said:*Corso voice* Not so fast my friend!
Yes. And? -
We just might find out soon in Virginia.GrundleStiltzkin said:
I get it. Just keep an eye on how the current and proposed "common sense controls" on a constitutionally-protected right are carried out.YellowSnow said:
Don't disagree. I just don't stress about it as much as my HH 2A bros. I am convinced there would be a major armed insurrection if the federales seriously tried to come for guns.GrundleStiltzkin said:
No BoR issue should be the primary to vote on. They should all be sacrosanct. However, 2A is the one most openly and directly attacked, followed by 1A and 4A.YellowSnow said:
2A shouldn't be the primary issue to vote on. No one's coming for your guns and you can't find me 38 state legislatures ready to amend the Constitution. American's love their guns and they are here to stay.GrundleStiltzkin said:Sorry Yang.
https://www.yang2020.com/policies/gun-safety/
Talks a strong game in privacy, data collection, etc in other areas. Not so much with lawful exercise of 2A.
As I've said, you want to make substantive changes to legal gun ownership, do it honestly and propose an amendment to alter. Eroding it piecemeal is not good, not just for 2A but for the Constitution and civil rights broadly. -
They haven't even written and passed a law yet and they threaten turning the national guard out to take guns away.Swaye said:
We just might find out soon in Virginia.GrundleStiltzkin said:
I get it. Just keep an eye on how the current and proposed "common sense controls" on a constitutionally-protected right are carried out.YellowSnow said:
Don't disagree. I just don't stress about it as much as my HH 2A bros. I am convinced there would be a major armed insurrection if the federales seriously tried to come for guns.GrundleStiltzkin said:
No BoR issue should be the primary to vote on. They should all be sacrosanct. However, 2A is the one most openly and directly attacked, followed by 1A and 4A.YellowSnow said:
2A shouldn't be the primary issue to vote on. No one's coming for your guns and you can't find me 38 state legislatures ready to amend the Constitution. American's love their guns and they are here to stay.GrundleStiltzkin said:Sorry Yang.
https://www.yang2020.com/policies/gun-safety/
Talks a strong game in privacy, data collection, etc in other areas. Not so much with lawful exercise of 2A.
As I've said, you want to make substantive changes to legal gun ownership, do it honestly and propose an amendment to alter. Eroding it piecemeal is not good, not just for 2A but for the Constitution and civil rights broadly.
Gosh I wonder what kind of laws they're thinking about. -
Governor Blackface already walked back the whole "confiscate the AR's" thing when they realized there would be armed revolt in the hills. But ban on future sales of ARs, red flag law, and a ban on high capacity magazines are foregone conclusions. Virginia will become California overnight. Sad day for freedom. Great day for tyranny.Sledog said:
They haven't even written and passed a law yet and they threaten turning the national guard out to take guns away.Swaye said:
We just might find out soon in Virginia.GrundleStiltzkin said:
I get it. Just keep an eye on how the current and proposed "common sense controls" on a constitutionally-protected right are carried out.YellowSnow said:
Don't disagree. I just don't stress about it as much as my HH 2A bros. I am convinced there would be a major armed insurrection if the federales seriously tried to come for guns.GrundleStiltzkin said:
No BoR issue should be the primary to vote on. They should all be sacrosanct. However, 2A is the one most openly and directly attacked, followed by 1A and 4A.YellowSnow said:
2A shouldn't be the primary issue to vote on. No one's coming for your guns and you can't find me 38 state legislatures ready to amend the Constitution. American's love their guns and they are here to stay.GrundleStiltzkin said:Sorry Yang.
https://www.yang2020.com/policies/gun-safety/
Talks a strong game in privacy, data collection, etc in other areas. Not so much with lawful exercise of 2A.
As I've said, you want to make substantive changes to legal gun ownership, do it honestly and propose an amendment to alter. Eroding it piecemeal is not good, not just for 2A but for the Constitution and civil rights broadly.
Gosh I wonder what kind of laws they're thinking about. -
Or great day for a little revolution to retake their state.Swaye said:
Governor Blackface already walked back the whole "confiscate the AR's" thing when they realized there would be armed revolt in the hills. But ban on future sales of ARs, red flag law, and a ban on high capacity magazines are foregone conclusions. Virginia will become California overnight. Sad day for freedom. Great day for tyranny.Sledog said:
They haven't even written and passed a law yet and they threaten turning the national guard out to take guns away.Swaye said:
We just might find out soon in Virginia.GrundleStiltzkin said:
I get it. Just keep an eye on how the current and proposed "common sense controls" on a constitutionally-protected right are carried out.YellowSnow said:
Don't disagree. I just don't stress about it as much as my HH 2A bros. I am convinced there would be a major armed insurrection if the federales seriously tried to come for guns.GrundleStiltzkin said:
No BoR issue should be the primary to vote on. They should all be sacrosanct. However, 2A is the one most openly and directly attacked, followed by 1A and 4A.YellowSnow said:
2A shouldn't be the primary issue to vote on. No one's coming for your guns and you can't find me 38 state legislatures ready to amend the Constitution. American's love their guns and they are here to stay.GrundleStiltzkin said:Sorry Yang.
https://www.yang2020.com/policies/gun-safety/
Talks a strong game in privacy, data collection, etc in other areas. Not so much with lawful exercise of 2A.
As I've said, you want to make substantive changes to legal gun ownership, do it honestly and propose an amendment to alter. Eroding it piecemeal is not good, not just for 2A but for the Constitution and civil rights broadly.
Gosh I wonder what kind of laws they're thinking about.
Imagine if say 100,000 armed men and women just showed up at the state capital hung out for a couple hours and then went home.
How would that gun control vote go if that happened?
-
Are you suggesting our democracy should be held hostage by threat of violence?Sledog said:
Or great day for a little revolution to retake their state.Swaye said:
Governor Blackface already walked back the whole "confiscate the AR's" thing when they realized there would be armed revolt in the hills. But ban on future sales of ARs, red flag law, and a ban on high capacity magazines are foregone conclusions. Virginia will become California overnight. Sad day for freedom. Great day for tyranny.Sledog said:
They haven't even written and passed a law yet and they threaten turning the national guard out to take guns away.Swaye said:
We just might find out soon in Virginia.GrundleStiltzkin said:
I get it. Just keep an eye on how the current and proposed "common sense controls" on a constitutionally-protected right are carried out.YellowSnow said:
Don't disagree. I just don't stress about it as much as my HH 2A bros. I am convinced there would be a major armed insurrection if the federales seriously tried to come for guns.GrundleStiltzkin said:
No BoR issue should be the primary to vote on. They should all be sacrosanct. However, 2A is the one most openly and directly attacked, followed by 1A and 4A.YellowSnow said:
2A shouldn't be the primary issue to vote on. No one's coming for your guns and you can't find me 38 state legislatures ready to amend the Constitution. American's love their guns and they are here to stay.GrundleStiltzkin said:Sorry Yang.
https://www.yang2020.com/policies/gun-safety/
Talks a strong game in privacy, data collection, etc in other areas. Not so much with lawful exercise of 2A.
As I've said, you want to make substantive changes to legal gun ownership, do it honestly and propose an amendment to alter. Eroding it piecemeal is not good, not just for 2A but for the Constitution and civil rights broadly.
Gosh I wonder what kind of laws they're thinking about.
Imagine if say 100,000 armed men and women just showed up at the state capital hung out for a couple hours and then went home.
How would that gun control vote go if that happened? -
That was sort of the whole point of the 2nd Amendment.ThomasFremont said:
Are you suggesting our democracy should be held hostage by threat of violence?Sledog said:
Or great day for a little revolution to retake their state.Swaye said:
Governor Blackface already walked back the whole "confiscate the AR's" thing when they realized there would be armed revolt in the hills. But ban on future sales of ARs, red flag law, and a ban on high capacity magazines are foregone conclusions. Virginia will become California overnight. Sad day for freedom. Great day for tyranny.Sledog said:
They haven't even written and passed a law yet and they threaten turning the national guard out to take guns away.Swaye said:
We just might find out soon in Virginia.GrundleStiltzkin said:
I get it. Just keep an eye on how the current and proposed "common sense controls" on a constitutionally-protected right are carried out.YellowSnow said:
Don't disagree. I just don't stress about it as much as my HH 2A bros. I am convinced there would be a major armed insurrection if the federales seriously tried to come for guns.GrundleStiltzkin said:
No BoR issue should be the primary to vote on. They should all be sacrosanct. However, 2A is the one most openly and directly attacked, followed by 1A and 4A.YellowSnow said:
2A shouldn't be the primary issue to vote on. No one's coming for your guns and you can't find me 38 state legislatures ready to amend the Constitution. American's love their guns and they are here to stay.GrundleStiltzkin said:Sorry Yang.
https://www.yang2020.com/policies/gun-safety/
Talks a strong game in privacy, data collection, etc in other areas. Not so much with lawful exercise of 2A.
As I've said, you want to make substantive changes to legal gun ownership, do it honestly and propose an amendment to alter. Eroding it piecemeal is not good, not just for 2A but for the Constitution and civil rights broadly.
Gosh I wonder what kind of laws they're thinking about.
Imagine if say 100,000 armed men and women just showed up at the state capital hung out for a couple hours and then went home.
How would that gun control vote go if that happened?
If the government was tyrannical to its people, the people could usurp it. By force, if necessary.
The ultimate get your shit together/electoral college, so to speak.
-
Absolutely. Since you're dumb I'll remind you this is a republic and that is exactly what the second amendment was intended for.ThomasFremont said:
Are you suggesting our democracy should be held hostage by threat of violence?Sledog said:
Or great day for a little revolution to retake their state.Swaye said:
Governor Blackface already walked back the whole "confiscate the AR's" thing when they realized there would be armed revolt in the hills. But ban on future sales of ARs, red flag law, and a ban on high capacity magazines are foregone conclusions. Virginia will become California overnight. Sad day for freedom. Great day for tyranny.Sledog said:
They haven't even written and passed a law yet and they threaten turning the national guard out to take guns away.Swaye said:
We just might find out soon in Virginia.GrundleStiltzkin said:
I get it. Just keep an eye on how the current and proposed "common sense controls" on a constitutionally-protected right are carried out.YellowSnow said:
Don't disagree. I just don't stress about it as much as my HH 2A bros. I am convinced there would be a major armed insurrection if the federales seriously tried to come for guns.GrundleStiltzkin said:
No BoR issue should be the primary to vote on. They should all be sacrosanct. However, 2A is the one most openly and directly attacked, followed by 1A and 4A.YellowSnow said:
2A shouldn't be the primary issue to vote on. No one's coming for your guns and you can't find me 38 state legislatures ready to amend the Constitution. American's love their guns and they are here to stay.GrundleStiltzkin said:Sorry Yang.
https://www.yang2020.com/policies/gun-safety/
Talks a strong game in privacy, data collection, etc in other areas. Not so much with lawful exercise of 2A.
As I've said, you want to make substantive changes to legal gun ownership, do it honestly and propose an amendment to alter. Eroding it piecemeal is not good, not just for 2A but for the Constitution and civil rights broadly.
Gosh I wonder what kind of laws they're thinking about.
Imagine if say 100,000 armed men and women just showed up at the state capital hung out for a couple hours and then went home.
How would that gun control vote go if that happened?
I'm sure 10,000 would do. -
Hmmmm, so where has this armed resistance been while our privacy rights are stripped away? Or do you only care about your favorite amendment?
Just admit your little hobby is what it is and your Constitutional arguments are empty air. Or you’d have done something already. -
Why are all authoritarians like TF such control freaks? Because they have no actual power? Or balls?ThomasFremont said:Hmmmm, so where has this armed resistance been while our privacy rights are stripped away? Or do you only care about your favorite amendment?
Just admit your little hobby is what it is and your Constitutional arguments are empty air. Or you’d have done something already.
