Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

For a moment forget which party you are aligned with

2»

Comments

  • RaceBannon
    RaceBannon Member, Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 113,882 Founders Club
    HHusky said:

    HHusky said:

    HHusky said:

    I’ll concede Joe looks terrible, subjectively.

    You won’t concede the President’s extortion scheme, which is obvious objectively on the evidence presented. I don’t have to guess your reaction if this mountain of evidence involved a Democratic Part President.

    Where is the proof counselor? All ketchup no fries. I know you rats want to hide behind the fact that this is not a court of law but we all know this hearsay wouldn't make it in a court of law neither would the one sided rules your side has set this farce up under. The entire proceeding is a complete joke and you have absolutely zero proof. The leader of your "committee" has already been caught lying (again) and he has a mystery guest who supposedly heard 3rd hand that something happened.

    Again, this whole charade is a joke and I can't believe you are all in on this joke especially with your background.
    Shitloads of the testimony this week were not hearsay. blob’s already offered the only defense that is actually a defense: that Daddy’s deep seeded concerns about corruption were his only motive. Everyone should practice keeping a straight face when they offer it.
    The testimony this week was so compelling that support for impeachment collapsed
    We’re not discussing Realpolitik. I agree that no one ever went broke underestimating the American public. We were discussing the fact that a Daddy is guilty as fuck.
    And yet you can't say of what

    On anything

    For three years


    Its beyond tired at this point
  • SFGbob
    SFGbob Member Posts: 33,183
    HHusky said:

    SFGbob said:

    HHusky said:

    HHusky said:

    HHusky said:

    I’ll concede Joe looks terrible, subjectively.

    You won’t concede the President’s extortion scheme, which is obvious objectively on the evidence presented. I don’t have to guess your reaction if this mountain of evidence involved a Democratic Part President.

    Where is the proof counselor? All ketchup no fries. I know you rats want to hide behind the fact that this is not a court of law but we all know this hearsay wouldn't make it in a court of law neither would the one sided rules your side has set this farce up under. The entire proceeding is a complete joke and you have absolutely zero proof. The leader of your "committee" has already been caught lying (again) and he has a mystery guest who supposedly heard 3rd hand that something happened.

    Again, this whole charade is a joke and I can't believe you are all in on this joke especially with your background.
    Shitloads of the testimony this week were not hearsay. blob’s already offered the only defense that is actually a defense: that Daddy’s deep seeded concerns about corruption were his only motive. Everyone should practice keeping a straight face when they offer it.
    The testimony this week was so compelling that support for impeachment collapsed
    We’re not discussing Realpolitik. I agree that no one ever went broke underestimating the American public. We were discussing the fact that a Daddy is guilty as fuck.
    Funny, this dumbfuck swallowed whole the lie about the Gentle Giant being shot in the back while running away and claimed Obama was fiscally responsible and then has the gall to call other people dumb?

    Care to talk about how you earned your nickname smart guy?
    See Race? blob knows Daddy’s guilty.
    No, I know you commenting on the lack of intelligence of anyone other than yourself is a fucking joke.
  • Sledog
    Sledog Member Posts: 37,753 Standard Supporter
    HHusky said:

    HHusky said:

    I’ll concede Joe looks terrible, subjectively.

    You won’t concede the President’s extortion scheme, which is obvious objectively on the evidence presented. I don’t have to guess your reaction if this mountain of evidence involved a Democratic Part President.

    Where is the proof counselor? All ketchup no fries. I know you rats want to hide behind the fact that this is not a court of law but we all know this hearsay wouldn't make it in a court of law neither would the one sided rules your side has set this farce up under. The entire proceeding is a complete joke and you have absolutely zero proof. The leader of your "committee" has already been caught lying (again) and he has a mystery guest who supposedly heard 3rd hand that something happened.

    Again, this whole charade is a joke and I can't believe you are all in on this joke especially with your background.
    Shitloads of the testimony this week were not hearsay, or would come in under hearsay exceptions. blob’s already offered the only defense that is actually a defense: that Daddy’s deep seeded concerns about corruption were his only motive. Everyone should practice keeping a straight face when they offer it.
    Every single witness said they could not testify to Trump committing a crime. HTH
  • HHusky
    HHusky Member Posts: 23,898

    HHusky said:

    HHusky said:

    HHusky said:

    I’ll concede Joe looks terrible, subjectively.

    You won’t concede the President’s extortion scheme, which is obvious objectively on the evidence presented. I don’t have to guess your reaction if this mountain of evidence involved a Democratic Part President.

    Where is the proof counselor? All ketchup no fries. I know you rats want to hide behind the fact that this is not a court of law but we all know this hearsay wouldn't make it in a court of law neither would the one sided rules your side has set this farce up under. The entire proceeding is a complete joke and you have absolutely zero proof. The leader of your "committee" has already been caught lying (again) and he has a mystery guest who supposedly heard 3rd hand that something happened.

    Again, this whole charade is a joke and I can't believe you are all in on this joke especially with your background.
    Shitloads of the testimony this week were not hearsay. blob’s already offered the only defense that is actually a defense: that Daddy’s deep seeded concerns about corruption were his only motive. Everyone should practice keeping a straight face when they offer it.
    The testimony this week was so compelling that support for impeachment collapsed
    We’re not discussing Realpolitik. I agree that no one ever went broke underestimating the American public. We were discussing the fact that a Daddy is guilty as fuck.
    And yet you can't say of what

    On anything

    For three years


    Its beyond tired at this point
    The Ukraine bribery scheme isn’t nearly as involved as Daddy’s other acts of corruption. Even you should be able to follow it. And that’s not to discount Daddy’s multiple, illegal efforts to obstruct the investigation either.
  • HHusky
    HHusky Member Posts: 23,898
    Sledog said:

    HHusky said:

    HHusky said:

    I’ll concede Joe looks terrible, subjectively.

    You won’t concede the President’s extortion scheme, which is obvious objectively on the evidence presented. I don’t have to guess your reaction if this mountain of evidence involved a Democratic Part President.

    Where is the proof counselor? All ketchup no fries. I know you rats want to hide behind the fact that this is not a court of law but we all know this hearsay wouldn't make it in a court of law neither would the one sided rules your side has set this farce up under. The entire proceeding is a complete joke and you have absolutely zero proof. The leader of your "committee" has already been caught lying (again) and he has a mystery guest who supposedly heard 3rd hand that something happened.

    Again, this whole charade is a joke and I can't believe you are all in on this joke especially with your background.
    Shitloads of the testimony this week were not hearsay, or would come in under hearsay exceptions. blob’s already offered the only defense that is actually a defense: that Daddy’s deep seeded concerns about corruption were his only motive. Everyone should practice keeping a straight face when they offer it.
    Every single witness said they could not testify to Trump committing a crime. HTH
    They all declined to testify to a legal conclusion. I know you aren’t that nuanced at the Mall, but the smart people are that nuanced.
  • Sledog
    Sledog Member Posts: 37,753 Standard Supporter
    HHusky said:

    HHusky said:

    HHusky said:

    HHusky said:

    I’ll concede Joe looks terrible, subjectively.

    You won’t concede the President’s extortion scheme, which is obvious objectively on the evidence presented. I don’t have to guess your reaction if this mountain of evidence involved a Democratic Part President.

    Where is the proof counselor? All ketchup no fries. I know you rats want to hide behind the fact that this is not a court of law but we all know this hearsay wouldn't make it in a court of law neither would the one sided rules your side has set this farce up under. The entire proceeding is a complete joke and you have absolutely zero proof. The leader of your "committee" has already been caught lying (again) and he has a mystery guest who supposedly heard 3rd hand that something happened.

    Again, this whole charade is a joke and I can't believe you are all in on this joke especially with your background.
    Shitloads of the testimony this week were not hearsay. blob’s already offered the only defense that is actually a defense: that Daddy’s deep seeded concerns about corruption were his only motive. Everyone should practice keeping a straight face when they offer it.
    The testimony this week was so compelling that support for impeachment collapsed
    We’re not discussing Realpolitik. I agree that no one ever went broke underestimating the American public. We were discussing the fact that a Daddy is guilty as fuck.
    And yet you can't say of what

    On anything

    For three years


    Its beyond tired at this point
    The Ukraine bribery scheme isn’t nearly as involved as Daddy’s other acts of corruption. Even you should be able to follow it. And that’s not to discount Daddy’s multiple, illegal efforts to obstruct the investigation either.
    Do bribery to ask N Korea to denuke in trade for economic and other assistance? Investigating a crime a guy brags about in video is totally within the president's scope and duties.
  • HoustonHusky
    HoustonHusky Member Posts: 5,999
    HondoBro #4 back to his daddy issues (how bad did your dad beat you...did he look like Trump or something) along with showing a complete misunderstanding of hearsay...especially since we have the actual transcript of the call in question.

    News at 11...
  • HHusky
    HHusky Member Posts: 23,898

    HondoBro #4 back to his daddy issues (how bad did your dad beat you...did he look like Trump or something) along with showing a complete misunderstanding of hearsay...especially since we have the actual transcript of the call in question.

    News at 11...

    So back to the “You can’t prove it!” defense. Not as interesting as your actual opinion. But that’s where you gals get shy.
  • 2001400ex
    2001400ex Member Posts: 29,457

    HHusky said:

    HHusky said:

    I’ll concede Joe looks terrible, subjectively.

    You won’t concede the President’s extortion scheme, which is obvious objectively on the evidence presented. I don’t have to guess your reaction if this mountain of evidence involved a Democratic Part President.

    Where is the proof counselor? All ketchup no fries. I know you rats want to hide behind the fact that this is not a court of law but we all know this hearsay wouldn't make it in a court of law neither would the one sided rules your side has set this farce up under. The entire proceeding is a complete joke and you have absolutely zero proof. The leader of your "committee" has already been caught lying (again) and he has a mystery guest who supposedly heard 3rd hand that something happened.

    Again, this whole charade is a joke and I can't believe you are all in on this joke especially with your background.
    Shitloads of the testimony this week were not hearsay. blob’s already offered the only defense that is actually a defense: that Daddy’s deep seeded concerns about corruption were his only motive. Everyone should practice keeping a straight face when they offer it.
    The testimony this week was so compelling that support for impeachment collapsed
    Rasmussen disagrees.

    http://m.rasmussenreports.com/public_content/politics/trump_administration/trump_approval_index_history
  • RaceBannon
    RaceBannon Member, Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 113,882 Founders Club
    HHusky said:

    HHusky said:

    HHusky said:

    HHusky said:

    I’ll concede Joe looks terrible, subjectively.

    You won’t concede the President’s extortion scheme, which is obvious objectively on the evidence presented. I don’t have to guess your reaction if this mountain of evidence involved a Democratic Part President.

    Where is the proof counselor? All ketchup no fries. I know you rats want to hide behind the fact that this is not a court of law but we all know this hearsay wouldn't make it in a court of law neither would the one sided rules your side has set this farce up under. The entire proceeding is a complete joke and you have absolutely zero proof. The leader of your "committee" has already been caught lying (again) and he has a mystery guest who supposedly heard 3rd hand that something happened.

    Again, this whole charade is a joke and I can't believe you are all in on this joke especially with your background.
    Shitloads of the testimony this week were not hearsay. blob’s already offered the only defense that is actually a defense: that Daddy’s deep seeded concerns about corruption were his only motive. Everyone should practice keeping a straight face when they offer it.
    The testimony this week was so compelling that support for impeachment collapsed
    We’re not discussing Realpolitik. I agree that no one ever went broke underestimating the American public. We were discussing the fact that a Daddy is guilty as fuck.
    And yet you can't say of what

    On anything

    For three years


    Its beyond tired at this point
    The Ukraine bribery scheme isn’t nearly as involved as Daddy’s other acts of corruption. Even you should be able to follow it. And that’s not to discount Daddy’s multiple, illegal efforts to obstruct the investigation either.
    And yet you can't put it into words

    Any of it


    The jury is laughing at you
  • Sledog
    Sledog Member Posts: 37,753 Standard Supporter
    Orange Daddy bad!!!!!!

    Those are the words.
  • BearsWiin
    BearsWiin Member Posts: 5,072

    HHusky said:

    HHusky said:

    HHusky said:

    HHusky said:

    I’ll concede Joe looks terrible, subjectively.

    You won’t concede the President’s extortion scheme, which is obvious objectively on the evidence presented. I don’t have to guess your reaction if this mountain of evidence involved a Democratic Part President.

    Where is the proof counselor? All ketchup no fries. I know you rats want to hide behind the fact that this is not a court of law but we all know this hearsay wouldn't make it in a court of law neither would the one sided rules your side has set this farce up under. The entire proceeding is a complete joke and you have absolutely zero proof. The leader of your "committee" has already been caught lying (again) and he has a mystery guest who supposedly heard 3rd hand that something happened.

    Again, this whole charade is a joke and I can't believe you are all in on this joke especially with your background.
    Shitloads of the testimony this week were not hearsay. blob’s already offered the only defense that is actually a defense: that Daddy’s deep seeded concerns about corruption were his only motive. Everyone should practice keeping a straight face when they offer it.
    The testimony this week was so compelling that support for impeachment collapsed
    We’re not discussing Realpolitik. I agree that no one ever went broke underestimating the American public. We were discussing the fact that a Daddy is guilty as fuck.
    And yet you can't say of what

    On anything

    For three years


    Its beyond tired at this point
    The Ukraine bribery scheme isn’t nearly as involved as Daddy’s other acts of corruption. Even you should be able to follow it. And that’s not to discount Daddy’s multiple, illegal efforts to obstruct the investigation either.
    And yet you can't put it into words

    Any of it


    The jury is laughing at you
    I think I'd respect you more if instead of slavishly defending a diaper-wearing adderall-addicted early-stage dementia corrupt grifting buffoon you just came out and said yeah, he's all of that, and as long as the Senate Reps hold firm he's not going anywhere, suck it Dems, and I don't give a shit about the rule of law or national security because taxes and lib tears.


  • Sledog
    Sledog Member Posts: 37,753 Standard Supporter
    BearsWiin said:

    HHusky said:

    HHusky said:

    HHusky said:

    HHusky said:

    I’ll concede Joe looks terrible, subjectively.

    You won’t concede the President’s extortion scheme, which is obvious objectively on the evidence presented. I don’t have to guess your reaction if this mountain of evidence involved a Democratic Part President.

    Where is the proof counselor? All ketchup no fries. I know you rats want to hide behind the fact that this is not a court of law but we all know this hearsay wouldn't make it in a court of law neither would the one sided rules your side has set this farce up under. The entire proceeding is a complete joke and you have absolutely zero proof. The leader of your "committee" has already been caught lying (again) and he has a mystery guest who supposedly heard 3rd hand that something happened.

    Again, this whole charade is a joke and I can't believe you are all in on this joke especially with your background.
    Shitloads of the testimony this week were not hearsay. blob’s already offered the only defense that is actually a defense: that Daddy’s deep seeded concerns about corruption were his only motive. Everyone should practice keeping a straight face when they offer it.
    The testimony this week was so compelling that support for impeachment collapsed
    We’re not discussing Realpolitik. I agree that no one ever went broke underestimating the American public. We were discussing the fact that a Daddy is guilty as fuck.
    And yet you can't say of what

    On anything

    For three years


    Its beyond tired at this point
    The Ukraine bribery scheme isn’t nearly as involved as Daddy’s other acts of corruption. Even you should be able to follow it. And that’s not to discount Daddy’s multiple, illegal efforts to obstruct the investigation either.
    And yet you can't put it into words

    Any of it


    The jury is laughing at you
    I think I'd respect you more if instead of slavishly defending a diaper-wearing adderall-addicted early-stage dementia corrupt grifting buffoon you just came out and said yeah, he's all of that, and as long as the Senate Reps hold firm he's not going anywhere, suck it Dems, and I don't give a shit about the rule of law or national security because taxes and lib tears.


    Translation:

    I'm angry and Trumps mean!
  • BearsWiin
    BearsWiin Member Posts: 5,072
    Sledog said:

    BearsWiin said:

    HHusky said:

    HHusky said:

    HHusky said:

    HHusky said:

    I’ll concede Joe looks terrible, subjectively.

    You won’t concede the President’s extortion scheme, which is obvious objectively on the evidence presented. I don’t have to guess your reaction if this mountain of evidence involved a Democratic Part President.

    Where is the proof counselor? All ketchup no fries. I know you rats want to hide behind the fact that this is not a court of law but we all know this hearsay wouldn't make it in a court of law neither would the one sided rules your side has set this farce up under. The entire proceeding is a complete joke and you have absolutely zero proof. The leader of your "committee" has already been caught lying (again) and he has a mystery guest who supposedly heard 3rd hand that something happened.

    Again, this whole charade is a joke and I can't believe you are all in on this joke especially with your background.
    Shitloads of the testimony this week were not hearsay. blob’s already offered the only defense that is actually a defense: that Daddy’s deep seeded concerns about corruption were his only motive. Everyone should practice keeping a straight face when they offer it.
    The testimony this week was so compelling that support for impeachment collapsed
    We’re not discussing Realpolitik. I agree that no one ever went broke underestimating the American public. We were discussing the fact that a Daddy is guilty as fuck.
    And yet you can't say of what

    On anything

    For three years


    Its beyond tired at this point
    The Ukraine bribery scheme isn’t nearly as involved as Daddy’s other acts of corruption. Even you should be able to follow it. And that’s not to discount Daddy’s multiple, illegal efforts to obstruct the investigation either.
    And yet you can't put it into words

    Any of it


    The jury is laughing at you
    I think I'd respect you more if instead of slavishly defending a diaper-wearing adderall-addicted early-stage dementia corrupt grifting buffoon you just came out and said yeah, he's all of that, and as long as the Senate Reps hold firm he's not going anywhere, suck it Dems, and I don't give a shit about the rule of law or national security because taxes and lib tears.


    Translation:

    I'm angry and Trumps mean!
    You'd sell out this country if you could make a buck doing it
  • SFGbob
    SFGbob Member Posts: 33,183
    BearsWiin said:

    Sledog said:

    BearsWiin said:

    HHusky said:

    HHusky said:

    HHusky said:

    HHusky said:

    I’ll concede Joe looks terrible, subjectively.

    You won’t concede the President’s extortion scheme, which is obvious objectively on the evidence presented. I don’t have to guess your reaction if this mountain of evidence involved a Democratic Part President.

    Where is the proof counselor? All ketchup no fries. I know you rats want to hide behind the fact that this is not a court of law but we all know this hearsay wouldn't make it in a court of law neither would the one sided rules your side has set this farce up under. The entire proceeding is a complete joke and you have absolutely zero proof. The leader of your "committee" has already been caught lying (again) and he has a mystery guest who supposedly heard 3rd hand that something happened.

    Again, this whole charade is a joke and I can't believe you are all in on this joke especially with your background.
    Shitloads of the testimony this week were not hearsay. blob’s already offered the only defense that is actually a defense: that Daddy’s deep seeded concerns about corruption were his only motive. Everyone should practice keeping a straight face when they offer it.
    The testimony this week was so compelling that support for impeachment collapsed
    We’re not discussing Realpolitik. I agree that no one ever went broke underestimating the American public. We were discussing the fact that a Daddy is guilty as fuck.
    And yet you can't say of what

    On anything

    For three years


    Its beyond tired at this point
    The Ukraine bribery scheme isn’t nearly as involved as Daddy’s other acts of corruption. Even you should be able to follow it. And that’s not to discount Daddy’s multiple, illegal efforts to obstruct the investigation either.
    And yet you can't put it into words

    Any of it


    The jury is laughing at you
    I think I'd respect you more if instead of slavishly defending a diaper-wearing adderall-addicted early-stage dementia corrupt grifting buffoon you just came out and said yeah, he's all of that, and as long as the Senate Reps hold firm he's not going anywhere, suck it Dems, and I don't give a shit about the rule of law or national security because taxes and lib tears.


    Translation:

    I'm angry and Trumps mean!
    You'd sell out this country if you could make a buck doing it
    A liberal accusing someone else of selling out the country. How cute.
  • BearsWiin
    BearsWiin Member Posts: 5,072
    SFGbob said:

    BearsWiin said:

    Sledog said:

    BearsWiin said:

    HHusky said:

    HHusky said:

    HHusky said:

    HHusky said:

    I’ll concede Joe looks terrible, subjectively.

    You won’t concede the President’s extortion scheme, which is obvious objectively on the evidence presented. I don’t have to guess your reaction if this mountain of evidence involved a Democratic Part President.

    Where is the proof counselor? All ketchup no fries. I know you rats want to hide behind the fact that this is not a court of law but we all know this hearsay wouldn't make it in a court of law neither would the one sided rules your side has set this farce up under. The entire proceeding is a complete joke and you have absolutely zero proof. The leader of your "committee" has already been caught lying (again) and he has a mystery guest who supposedly heard 3rd hand that something happened.

    Again, this whole charade is a joke and I can't believe you are all in on this joke especially with your background.
    Shitloads of the testimony this week were not hearsay. blob’s already offered the only defense that is actually a defense: that Daddy’s deep seeded concerns about corruption were his only motive. Everyone should practice keeping a straight face when they offer it.
    The testimony this week was so compelling that support for impeachment collapsed
    We’re not discussing Realpolitik. I agree that no one ever went broke underestimating the American public. We were discussing the fact that a Daddy is guilty as fuck.
    And yet you can't say of what

    On anything

    For three years


    Its beyond tired at this point
    The Ukraine bribery scheme isn’t nearly as involved as Daddy’s other acts of corruption. Even you should be able to follow it. And that’s not to discount Daddy’s multiple, illegal efforts to obstruct the investigation either.
    And yet you can't put it into words

    Any of it


    The jury is laughing at you
    I think I'd respect you more if instead of slavishly defending a diaper-wearing adderall-addicted early-stage dementia corrupt grifting buffoon you just came out and said yeah, he's all of that, and as long as the Senate Reps hold firm he's not going anywhere, suck it Dems, and I don't give a shit about the rule of law or national security because taxes and lib tears.


    Translation:

    I'm angry and Trumps mean!
    You'd sell out this country if you could make a buck doing it
    A liberal accusing someone else of selling out the country. How cute.
    And another grifterlover who doesn't give a shit about the Constitution is heard from

    I'm sure there are more here, anybody else want to stand and be counted?
  • Sledog
    Sledog Member Posts: 37,753 Standard Supporter
    BearsWiin said:

    Sledog said:

    BearsWiin said:

    HHusky said:

    HHusky said:

    HHusky said:

    HHusky said:

    I’ll concede Joe looks terrible, subjectively.

    You won’t concede the President’s extortion scheme, which is obvious objectively on the evidence presented. I don’t have to guess your reaction if this mountain of evidence involved a Democratic Part President.

    Where is the proof counselor? All ketchup no fries. I know you rats want to hide behind the fact that this is not a court of law but we all know this hearsay wouldn't make it in a court of law neither would the one sided rules your side has set this farce up under. The entire proceeding is a complete joke and you have absolutely zero proof. The leader of your "committee" has already been caught lying (again) and he has a mystery guest who supposedly heard 3rd hand that something happened.

    Again, this whole charade is a joke and I can't believe you are all in on this joke especially with your background.
    Shitloads of the testimony this week were not hearsay. blob’s already offered the only defense that is actually a defense: that Daddy’s deep seeded concerns about corruption were his only motive. Everyone should practice keeping a straight face when they offer it.
    The testimony this week was so compelling that support for impeachment collapsed
    We’re not discussing Realpolitik. I agree that no one ever went broke underestimating the American public. We were discussing the fact that a Daddy is guilty as fuck.
    And yet you can't say of what

    On anything

    For three years


    Its beyond tired at this point
    The Ukraine bribery scheme isn’t nearly as involved as Daddy’s other acts of corruption. Even you should be able to follow it. And that’s not to discount Daddy’s multiple, illegal efforts to obstruct the investigation either.
    And yet you can't put it into words

    Any of it


    The jury is laughing at you
    I think I'd respect you more if instead of slavishly defending a diaper-wearing adderall-addicted early-stage dementia corrupt grifting buffoon you just came out and said yeah, he's all of that, and as long as the Senate Reps hold firm he's not going anywhere, suck it Dems, and I don't give a shit about the rule of law or national security because taxes and lib tears.


    Translation:

    I'm angry and Trumps mean!
    You'd sell out this country if you could make a buck doing it
    Translation:

    I'm too lazy to make a buck!
  • BearsWiin
    BearsWiin Member Posts: 5,072
    Sledog said:

    BearsWiin said:

    Sledog said:

    BearsWiin said:

    HHusky said:

    HHusky said:

    HHusky said:

    HHusky said:

    I’ll concede Joe looks terrible, subjectively.

    You won’t concede the President’s extortion scheme, which is obvious objectively on the evidence presented. I don’t have to guess your reaction if this mountain of evidence involved a Democratic Part President.

    Where is the proof counselor? All ketchup no fries. I know you rats want to hide behind the fact that this is not a court of law but we all know this hearsay wouldn't make it in a court of law neither would the one sided rules your side has set this farce up under. The entire proceeding is a complete joke and you have absolutely zero proof. The leader of your "committee" has already been caught lying (again) and he has a mystery guest who supposedly heard 3rd hand that something happened.

    Again, this whole charade is a joke and I can't believe you are all in on this joke especially with your background.
    Shitloads of the testimony this week were not hearsay. blob’s already offered the only defense that is actually a defense: that Daddy’s deep seeded concerns about corruption were his only motive. Everyone should practice keeping a straight face when they offer it.
    The testimony this week was so compelling that support for impeachment collapsed
    We’re not discussing Realpolitik. I agree that no one ever went broke underestimating the American public. We were discussing the fact that a Daddy is guilty as fuck.
    And yet you can't say of what

    On anything

    For three years


    Its beyond tired at this point
    The Ukraine bribery scheme isn’t nearly as involved as Daddy’s other acts of corruption. Even you should be able to follow it. And that’s not to discount Daddy’s multiple, illegal efforts to obstruct the investigation either.
    And yet you can't put it into words

    Any of it


    The jury is laughing at you
    I think I'd respect you more if instead of slavishly defending a diaper-wearing adderall-addicted early-stage dementia corrupt grifting buffoon you just came out and said yeah, he's all of that, and as long as the Senate Reps hold firm he's not going anywhere, suck it Dems, and I don't give a shit about the rule of law or national security because taxes and lib tears.


    Translation:

    I'm angry and Trumps mean!
    You'd sell out this country if you could make a buck doing it
    Translation:

    I'm too lazy to make a buck!
    Telling that you didn't disagree. What's your price? $100? I take you for a cheap whore.
  • Sledog
    Sledog Member Posts: 37,753 Standard Supporter
    BearsWiin said:

    Sledog said:

    BearsWiin said:

    Sledog said:

    BearsWiin said:

    HHusky said:

    HHusky said:

    HHusky said:

    HHusky said:

    I’ll concede Joe looks terrible, subjectively.

    You won’t concede the President’s extortion scheme, which is obvious objectively on the evidence presented. I don’t have to guess your reaction if this mountain of evidence involved a Democratic Part President.

    Where is the proof counselor? All ketchup no fries. I know you rats want to hide behind the fact that this is not a court of law but we all know this hearsay wouldn't make it in a court of law neither would the one sided rules your side has set this farce up under. The entire proceeding is a complete joke and you have absolutely zero proof. The leader of your "committee" has already been caught lying (again) and he has a mystery guest who supposedly heard 3rd hand that something happened.

    Again, this whole charade is a joke and I can't believe you are all in on this joke especially with your background.
    Shitloads of the testimony this week were not hearsay. blob’s already offered the only defense that is actually a defense: that Daddy’s deep seeded concerns about corruption were his only motive. Everyone should practice keeping a straight face when they offer it.
    The testimony this week was so compelling that support for impeachment collapsed
    We’re not discussing Realpolitik. I agree that no one ever went broke underestimating the American public. We were discussing the fact that a Daddy is guilty as fuck.
    And yet you can't say of what

    On anything

    For three years


    Its beyond tired at this point
    The Ukraine bribery scheme isn’t nearly as involved as Daddy’s other acts of corruption. Even you should be able to follow it. And that’s not to discount Daddy’s multiple, illegal efforts to obstruct the investigation either.
    And yet you can't put it into words

    Any of it


    The jury is laughing at you
    I think I'd respect you more if instead of slavishly defending a diaper-wearing adderall-addicted early-stage dementia corrupt grifting buffoon you just came out and said yeah, he's all of that, and as long as the Senate Reps hold firm he's not going anywhere, suck it Dems, and I don't give a shit about the rule of law or national security because taxes and lib tears.


    Translation:

    I'm angry and Trumps mean!
    You'd sell out this country if you could make a buck doing it
    Translation:

    I'm too lazy to make a buck!
    Telling that you didn't disagree. What's your price? $100? I take you for a cheap whore.
    You'd be a cheeseburger price on Santa Monica blvd.
  • RaceBannon
    RaceBannon Member, Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 113,882 Founders Club
    BearsWiin said:

    HHusky said:

    HHusky said:

    HHusky said:

    HHusky said:

    I’ll concede Joe looks terrible, subjectively.

    You won’t concede the President’s extortion scheme, which is obvious objectively on the evidence presented. I don’t have to guess your reaction if this mountain of evidence involved a Democratic Part President.

    Where is the proof counselor? All ketchup no fries. I know you rats want to hide behind the fact that this is not a court of law but we all know this hearsay wouldn't make it in a court of law neither would the one sided rules your side has set this farce up under. The entire proceeding is a complete joke and you have absolutely zero proof. The leader of your "committee" has already been caught lying (again) and he has a mystery guest who supposedly heard 3rd hand that something happened.

    Again, this whole charade is a joke and I can't believe you are all in on this joke especially with your background.
    Shitloads of the testimony this week were not hearsay. blob’s already offered the only defense that is actually a defense: that Daddy’s deep seeded concerns about corruption were his only motive. Everyone should practice keeping a straight face when they offer it.
    The testimony this week was so compelling that support for impeachment collapsed
    We’re not discussing Realpolitik. I agree that no one ever went broke underestimating the American public. We were discussing the fact that a Daddy is guilty as fuck.
    And yet you can't say of what

    On anything

    For three years


    Its beyond tired at this point
    The Ukraine bribery scheme isn’t nearly as involved as Daddy’s other acts of corruption. Even you should be able to follow it. And that’s not to discount Daddy’s multiple, illegal efforts to obstruct the investigation either.
    And yet you can't put it into words

    Any of it


    The jury is laughing at you
    I think I'd respect you more if instead of slavishly defending a diaper-wearing adderall-addicted early-stage dementia corrupt grifting buffoon you just came out and said yeah, he's all of that, and as long as the Senate Reps hold firm he's not going anywhere, suck it Dems, and I don't give a shit about the rule of law or national security because taxes and lib tears.


    And I don't give a fuck what you think Tailgunner Joe


  • RaceBannon
    RaceBannon Member, Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 113,882 Founders Club
    In this thread team hondo melts down in a red baiting name calling fit because they are asked to you know, prove any of the bullshit they spout.

    Imagine being wrong for three years and going ballistic at the people who are right


    If you needed proof that Schiff joined the long list of failed leaders of the resistance this thread confirms it

    It's all over but the name calling and further meltdowns
  • BearsWiin
    BearsWiin Member Posts: 5,072

    BearsWiin said:

    HHusky said:

    HHusky said:

    HHusky said:

    HHusky said:

    I’ll concede Joe looks terrible, subjectively.

    You won’t concede the President’s extortion scheme, which is obvious objectively on the evidence presented. I don’t have to guess your reaction if this mountain of evidence involved a Democratic Part President.

    Where is the proof counselor? All ketchup no fries. I know you rats want to hide behind the fact that this is not a court of law but we all know this hearsay wouldn't make it in a court of law neither would the one sided rules your side has set this farce up under. The entire proceeding is a complete joke and you have absolutely zero proof. The leader of your "committee" has already been caught lying (again) and he has a mystery guest who supposedly heard 3rd hand that something happened.

    Again, this whole charade is a joke and I can't believe you are all in on this joke especially with your background.
    Shitloads of the testimony this week were not hearsay. blob’s already offered the only defense that is actually a defense: that Daddy’s deep seeded concerns about corruption were his only motive. Everyone should practice keeping a straight face when they offer it.
    The testimony this week was so compelling that support for impeachment collapsed
    We’re not discussing Realpolitik. I agree that no one ever went broke underestimating the American public. We were discussing the fact that a Daddy is guilty as fuck.
    And yet you can't say of what

    On anything

    For three years


    Its beyond tired at this point
    The Ukraine bribery scheme isn’t nearly as involved as Daddy’s other acts of corruption. Even you should be able to follow it. And that’s not to discount Daddy’s multiple, illegal efforts to obstruct the investigation either.
    And yet you can't put it into words

    Any of it


    The jury is laughing at you
    I think I'd respect you more if instead of slavishly defending a diaper-wearing adderall-addicted early-stage dementia corrupt grifting buffoon you just came out and said yeah, he's all of that, and as long as the Senate Reps hold firm he's not going anywhere, suck it Dems, and I don't give a shit about the rule of law or national security because taxes and lib tears.


    And I don't give a fuck what you think Tailgunner Joe


    Of course you don't, Race, of course you don't
  • RaceBannon
    RaceBannon Member, Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 113,882 Founders Club
    BearsWiin said:

    BearsWiin said:

    HHusky said:

    HHusky said:

    HHusky said:

    HHusky said:

    I’ll concede Joe looks terrible, subjectively.

    You won’t concede the President’s extortion scheme, which is obvious objectively on the evidence presented. I don’t have to guess your reaction if this mountain of evidence involved a Democratic Part President.

    Where is the proof counselor? All ketchup no fries. I know you rats want to hide behind the fact that this is not a court of law but we all know this hearsay wouldn't make it in a court of law neither would the one sided rules your side has set this farce up under. The entire proceeding is a complete joke and you have absolutely zero proof. The leader of your "committee" has already been caught lying (again) and he has a mystery guest who supposedly heard 3rd hand that something happened.

    Again, this whole charade is a joke and I can't believe you are all in on this joke especially with your background.
    Shitloads of the testimony this week were not hearsay. blob’s already offered the only defense that is actually a defense: that Daddy’s deep seeded concerns about corruption were his only motive. Everyone should practice keeping a straight face when they offer it.
    The testimony this week was so compelling that support for impeachment collapsed
    We’re not discussing Realpolitik. I agree that no one ever went broke underestimating the American public. We were discussing the fact that a Daddy is guilty as fuck.
    And yet you can't say of what

    On anything

    For three years


    Its beyond tired at this point
    The Ukraine bribery scheme isn’t nearly as involved as Daddy’s other acts of corruption. Even you should be able to follow it. And that’s not to discount Daddy’s multiple, illegal efforts to obstruct the investigation either.
    And yet you can't put it into words

    Any of it


    The jury is laughing at you
    I think I'd respect you more if instead of slavishly defending a diaper-wearing adderall-addicted early-stage dementia corrupt grifting buffoon you just came out and said yeah, he's all of that, and as long as the Senate Reps hold firm he's not going anywhere, suck it Dems, and I don't give a shit about the rule of law or national security because taxes and lib tears.


    And I don't give a fuck what you think Tailgunner Joe


    Of course you don't, Race, of course you don't
    Who are you again?
  • BearsWiin
    BearsWiin Member Posts: 5,072

    BearsWiin said:

    BearsWiin said:

    HHusky said:

    HHusky said:

    HHusky said:

    HHusky said:

    I’ll concede Joe looks terrible, subjectively.

    You won’t concede the President’s extortion scheme, which is obvious objectively on the evidence presented. I don’t have to guess your reaction if this mountain of evidence involved a Democratic Part President.

    Where is the proof counselor? All ketchup no fries. I know you rats want to hide behind the fact that this is not a court of law but we all know this hearsay wouldn't make it in a court of law neither would the one sided rules your side has set this farce up under. The entire proceeding is a complete joke and you have absolutely zero proof. The leader of your "committee" has already been caught lying (again) and he has a mystery guest who supposedly heard 3rd hand that something happened.

    Again, this whole charade is a joke and I can't believe you are all in on this joke especially with your background.
    Shitloads of the testimony this week were not hearsay. blob’s already offered the only defense that is actually a defense: that Daddy’s deep seeded concerns about corruption were his only motive. Everyone should practice keeping a straight face when they offer it.
    The testimony this week was so compelling that support for impeachment collapsed
    We’re not discussing Realpolitik. I agree that no one ever went broke underestimating the American public. We were discussing the fact that a Daddy is guilty as fuck.
    And yet you can't say of what

    On anything

    For three years


    Its beyond tired at this point
    The Ukraine bribery scheme isn’t nearly as involved as Daddy’s other acts of corruption. Even you should be able to follow it. And that’s not to discount Daddy’s multiple, illegal efforts to obstruct the investigation either.
    And yet you can't put it into words

    Any of it


    The jury is laughing at you
    I think I'd respect you more if instead of slavishly defending a diaper-wearing adderall-addicted early-stage dementia corrupt grifting buffoon you just came out and said yeah, he's all of that, and as long as the Senate Reps hold firm he's not going anywhere, suck it Dems, and I don't give a shit about the rule of law or national security because taxes and lib tears.


    And I don't give a fuck what you think Tailgunner Joe


    Of course you don't, Race, of course you don't
    Who are you again?
    I'm the guy you recognized in the bar from my picture

    Over drinks you even seemed a bit contrite about the shit you spew here
  • RaceBannon
    RaceBannon Member, Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 113,882 Founders Club
    BearsWiin said:

    BearsWiin said:

    BearsWiin said:

    HHusky said:

    HHusky said:

    HHusky said:

    HHusky said:

    I’ll concede Joe looks terrible, subjectively.

    You won’t concede the President’s extortion scheme, which is obvious objectively on the evidence presented. I don’t have to guess your reaction if this mountain of evidence involved a Democratic Part President.

    Where is the proof counselor? All ketchup no fries. I know you rats want to hide behind the fact that this is not a court of law but we all know this hearsay wouldn't make it in a court of law neither would the one sided rules your side has set this farce up under. The entire proceeding is a complete joke and you have absolutely zero proof. The leader of your "committee" has already been caught lying (again) and he has a mystery guest who supposedly heard 3rd hand that something happened.

    Again, this whole charade is a joke and I can't believe you are all in on this joke especially with your background.
    Shitloads of the testimony this week were not hearsay. blob’s already offered the only defense that is actually a defense: that Daddy’s deep seeded concerns about corruption were his only motive. Everyone should practice keeping a straight face when they offer it.
    The testimony this week was so compelling that support for impeachment collapsed
    We’re not discussing Realpolitik. I agree that no one ever went broke underestimating the American public. We were discussing the fact that a Daddy is guilty as fuck.
    And yet you can't say of what

    On anything

    For three years


    Its beyond tired at this point
    The Ukraine bribery scheme isn’t nearly as involved as Daddy’s other acts of corruption. Even you should be able to follow it. And that’s not to discount Daddy’s multiple, illegal efforts to obstruct the investigation either.
    And yet you can't put it into words

    Any of it


    The jury is laughing at you
    I think I'd respect you more if instead of slavishly defending a diaper-wearing adderall-addicted early-stage dementia corrupt grifting buffoon you just came out and said yeah, he's all of that, and as long as the Senate Reps hold firm he's not going anywhere, suck it Dems, and I don't give a shit about the rule of law or national security because taxes and lib tears.


    And I don't give a fuck what you think Tailgunner Joe


    Of course you don't, Race, of course you don't
    Who are you again?
    I'm the guy you recognized in the bar from my picture

    Over drinks you even seemed a bit contrite about the shit you spew here
    You seem upset

    You must really care about my opinion


    Everyone does
  • oregonblitzkrieg
    oregonblitzkrieg Member Posts: 15,288
    edited November 2019

    Is there anyone who does not cringe when Biden begins to speak? I lobbied him a couple of times way back when. Once with just me and my partner in the room with him and another time with a slightly larger group. The first time I was the newbie and my partner told me to expect a shallow conversation, in other words Biden was a man who was not a real sharp or prepared individual. Not stupid, just flighty and a person who was not real well read or educated on what he was speaking about. That is exactly what we got. A lazy elected representative basically. The second time he was acting like he was stoned. He wasted everyone's time and people were pissed.

    He is 77 and now the gaffes are virtually every time he speaks. He has deteriorated mentally and he needs to step aside and enjoy the rest of his life and straighten out his family.

    Disagree. He needs to be investigated, arrested and prosecuted on domestic and international corruption charges, and held responsible for whatever role he played as Vice President in the attempted coup of Donald Trump. He can enjoy the rest of his life behind bars. Hunter can get straightened out behind bars too.