For a moment forget which party you are aligned with

Bendintheriver

Is there anyone who does not cringe when Biden begins to speak? I lobbied him a couple of times way back when. Once with just me and my partner in the room with him and another time with a slightly larger group. The first time I was the newbie and my partner told me to expect a shallow conversation, in other words Biden was a man who was not a real sharp or prepared individual. Not stupid, just flighty and a person who was not real well read or educated on what he was speaking about. That is exactly what we got. A lazy elected representative basically. The second time he was acting like he was stoned. He wasted everyone's time and people were pissed.

He is 77 and now the gaffes are virtually every time he speaks. He has deteriorated mentally and he needs to step aside and enjoy the rest of his life and straighten out his family.

2001400ex

Bendintheriver said:

Is there anyone who does not cringe when Biden begins to speak? I lobbied him a couple of times way back when. Once with just me and my partner in the room with him and another time with a slightly larger group. The first time I was the newbie and my partner told me to expect a shallow conversation, in other words Biden was a man who was not a real sharp or prepared individual. Not stupid, just flighty and a person who was not real well read or educated on what he was speaking about. That is exactly what we got. A lazy elected representative basically. The second time he was acting like he was stoned. He wasted everyone's time and people were pissed.

He is 77 and now the gaffes are virtually every time he speaks. He has deteriorated mentally and he needs to step aside and enjoy the rest of his life and straighten out his family.

I always knew you were gay. Just didn't think you'd come out so soon.

HoustonHusky

If he was your dad, would you still let him drive or would you take away his keys?

2001400ex

HoustonHusky said:

If he was your dad, would you still let him drive or would you take away his keys?

Which one?

Blu82

The time has come for someone to take away Slow Joe's guns.

PurpleThrobber

People forget the Dems gave Ronnie R. shit about his age....people forget that.

He was 8 years younger than Biden is now.

YellowSnow

PurpleThrobber said:

People forget the Dems gave Ronnie R. shit about his age....people forget that.

He was 8 years younger than Biden is now.

As @Southerndawg pointed out yesterday, the Gipper was a master of comedy...Donnie can't hold his jock strap.

HHusky

I’ll concede Joe looks terrible, subjectively.

You won’t concede the President’s extortion scheme, which is obvious objectively on the evidence presented. I don’t have to guess your reaction if this mountain of evidence involved a Democratic Part President.

WestlinnDuck

Counselor, what evidence do you have? Please cite the witnesses who have used the words extortion or bribery in their testimony. I'm told the evidence is overwhelming. Just like you said about the fake Russian collusion. Have at it.

PurpleThrobber

HHusky said:

I’ll concede Joe looks terrible, subjectively.

You won’t concede the President’s extortion scheme, which is obvious objectively on the evidence presented.

i have absolutely no problem with the 'extortion'. Been very clear about that.

You get the money when you assist in the investigation of a corrupt US Vice-President and his corrupt son. Simple.

Why won't you concede that the Bidens are dirty as shit and should be facing criminal charges?

MikeDamone

Need to keep punching at domestic violence

HHusky

WestlinnDuck said:

Counselor, what evidence do you have? Please cite the witnesses who have used the words extortion or bribery in their testimony. I'm told the evidence is overwhelming. Just like you said about the fake Russian collusion. Have at it.

Witnesses relay facts, Gasbag. They don’t testify to legal conclusions. The facts here speak for themselves. Unlike Russian collusion, this was a pretty simple shakedown. You don’t care that Daddy did it. Just admit it.

HHusky

PurpleThrobber said:

HHusky said:

I’ll concede Joe looks terrible, subjectively.

You won’t concede the President’s extortion scheme, which is obvious objectively on the evidence presented.

i have absolutely no problem with the 'extortion'. Been very clear about that.

You get the money when you assist in the investigation of a corrupt US Vice-President and his corrupt son. Simple.

Why won't you concede that the Bidens are dirty as shit and should be facing criminal charges?

The case against Daddy is obvious. Speculating that there’s a case to be made against Joe Biden is pretty desperate, just like all the other defenses offered thus far. You wouldn’t give it the time of day if we switched the parties.

SFGbob

HHusky said:

WestlinnDuck said:

Counselor, what evidence do you have? Please cite the witnesses who have used the words extortion or bribery in their testimony. I'm told the evidence is overwhelming. Just like you said about the fake Russian collusion. Have at it.

Witnesses relay facts, Gasbag. They don’t testify to legal conclusions. The facts here speak for themselves. Unlike Russian collusion, this was a pretty simple shakedown. You don’t care that Daddy did it. Just admit it.

Yes, yes a "shakedown" in order to get something Obama flat-out refused to provided them but Trump did.

HHusky

SFGbob said:

HHusky said:

WestlinnDuck said:

Counselor, what evidence do you have? Please cite the witnesses who have used the words extortion or bribery in their testimony. I'm told the evidence is overwhelming. Just like you said about the fake Russian collusion. Have at it.

Witnesses relay facts, Gasbag. They don’t testify to legal conclusions. The facts here speak for themselves. Unlike Russian collusion, this was a pretty simple shakedown. You don’t care that Daddy did it. Just admit it.

Yes, yes a "shakedown" in order to get something Obama flat-out refused to provided them but Trump did.

Speaking of irrelevant arguments, here’s blob to tell us that when Daddy engages in extortion, he dangles “the good stuff”.

SFGbob

HHusky said:

SFGbob said:

HHusky said:

WestlinnDuck said:

Counselor, what evidence do you have? Please cite the witnesses who have used the words extortion or bribery in their testimony. I'm told the evidence is overwhelming. Just like you said about the fake Russian collusion. Have at it.

Witnesses relay facts, Gasbag. They don’t testify to legal conclusions. The facts here speak for themselves. Unlike Russian collusion, this was a pretty simple shakedown. You don’t care that Daddy did it. Just admit it.

Yes, yes a "shakedown" in order to get something Obama flat-out refused to provided them but Trump did.

Speaking of irrelevant arguments, here’s blob to tell us that when Daddy engages in extortion, he dangles “the good stuff”.

You mean arguments that make your snatch hurt.

WestlinnDuck

When you have lost the Morning Schmo ....

Well, Mika is still blowing Biden but it appears that the Morning Schmo has had enough and is looking to chow some pow or go with door number 2, the gay Peter’s peter.
https://hotair.com/archives/ed-morrissey/2019/11/21/morning-joe-time-dems-talk-biden/
Morning Joe: It’s time for Dems to have a talk about Biden
“I think Biden has the best chance of beating Trump. I do,” Scarborough declared earlier on MSNBC’s Morning Joe, “like if he’s on his game. But I just wonder, is the media grading Joe Biden on a scale?”
SCARBOROUGH: Of course, Willie, he’s struggling there. He’s closing his eyes. He knows he’s having trouble finding words. The sentences are jumbled, the words are jumbled. I just worried when I read — you see this and, listen, I’m just saying, I think Biden has the best chance of beating Trump. I do. Like if he’s on his game. But I just wonder, is the media grading Joe Biden on a scale? Are we afraid to say that a lot of his sentences don’t make sense? That he’s having trouble completing thoughts? That when he’s asked in a previous debate about Afghanistan an issue he knows more about than anybody, not only on that stage, but in Washington, D.C., he ends up stumbling through an answer on Iraq. Are we grading him on a scale the same way people have always graded Donald Trump on a scale in these debates?
GEIST: Yes. The answer is yes.
When co-host Mika Brzezinski argued that the presidency requires more than just extemporaneously putting together a coherent string of words, Scarborough shot back that it’s a minimum prerequisite for being an effective candidate:
Still, co-host Mika Brzezinski came to Biden’s defense, arguing voters care about more than just these debate soundbites.
“You’ve got to be able to complete a sentence if you’re running for president,” Scarborough shot back.
Where does one start with Biden’s performance last night? One could start at the start, as Biden seemed to lose his way on the very first question he attempted to answer, but that can just be attributed to momentary jitters. The rest is tough to explain away easily. For instance, Biden claimed to have the support of the Senate’s only African-American member (Caroline Mosley Braun), while forgetting that Kamala Harris was on the same stage as him:

HHusky

SFGbob said:

HHusky said:

SFGbob said:

HHusky said:

WestlinnDuck said:

Counselor, what evidence do you have? Please cite the witnesses who have used the words extortion or bribery in their testimony. I'm told the evidence is overwhelming. Just like you said about the fake Russian collusion. Have at it.

Witnesses relay facts, Gasbag. They don’t testify to legal conclusions. The facts here speak for themselves. Unlike Russian collusion, this was a pretty simple shakedown. You don’t care that Daddy did it. Just admit it.

Yes, yes a "shakedown" in order to get something Obama flat-out refused to provided them but Trump did.

Speaking of irrelevant arguments, here’s blob to tell us that when Daddy engages in extortion, he dangles “the good stuff”.

You mean arguments that make your snatch hurt.

“Daddy did it, but Obama!” isn’t as powerful an argument as you imagine.

SFGbob

HHusky said:

SFGbob said:

HHusky said:

SFGbob said:

HHusky said:

WestlinnDuck said:

Counselor, what evidence do you have? Please cite the witnesses who have used the words extortion or bribery in their testimony. I'm told the evidence is overwhelming. Just like you said about the fake Russian collusion. Have at it.

Witnesses relay facts, Gasbag. They don’t testify to legal conclusions. The facts here speak for themselves. Unlike Russian collusion, this was a pretty simple shakedown. You don’t care that Daddy did it. Just admit it.

Yes, yes a "shakedown" in order to get something Obama flat-out refused to provided them but Trump did.

Speaking of irrelevant arguments, here’s blob to tell us that when Daddy engages in extortion, he dangles “the good stuff”.

You mean arguments that make your snatch hurt.

“Daddy did it, but Obama!” isn’t as powerful an argument as you imagine.

No, my "argument" is that Obama refused to provide them with any lethal aid, and you didn't give a fuck. Trump did provide them with lethal aid, and he tried to get them to investigate the meddling by Ukraine into the 2016 election as part of the deal. I don't have a problem with that. Your crocodile tears about Trump hurting our standing in the world and making our allies distrust us is just bullshit you're spewing, you don't mean any of it.

You see, unlike you O'Keefed, I'm not a fraud. When I said in early 2017 that I wanted any and all foreign interference in our election investigated I meant it, and now we see that when you were calling for an investigation you were lying about wanting everything investigated, weren't you comrade.

Now go type "Daddy" three more times for your next killer rebuttal.

PurpleThrobber

HHusky said:

PurpleThrobber said:

HHusky said:

I’ll concede Joe looks terrible, subjectively.

You won’t concede the President’s extortion scheme, which is obvious objectively on the evidence presented.

i have absolutely no problem with the 'extortion'. Been very clear about that.

You get the money when you assist in the investigation of a corrupt US Vice-President and his corrupt son. Simple.

Why won't you concede that the Bidens are dirty as shit and should be facing criminal charges?

The case against Daddy is obvious. Speculating that there’s a case to be made against Joe Biden is pretty desperate, just like all the other defenses offered thus far. You wouldn’t give it the time of day if we switched the parties.

Thanks, party shill.

Same as it ever was.

HHusky

SFGbob said:

HHusky said:

SFGbob said:

HHusky said:

SFGbob said:

HHusky said:

WestlinnDuck said:

Counselor, what evidence do you have? Please cite the witnesses who have used the words extortion or bribery in their testimony. I'm told the evidence is overwhelming. Just like you said about the fake Russian collusion. Have at it.

Witnesses relay facts, Gasbag. They don’t testify to legal conclusions. The facts here speak for themselves. Unlike Russian collusion, this was a pretty simple shakedown. You don’t care that Daddy did it. Just admit it.

Yes, yes a "shakedown" in order to get something Obama flat-out refused to provided them but Trump did.

Speaking of irrelevant arguments, here’s blob to tell us that when Daddy engages in extortion, he dangles “the good stuff”.

You mean arguments that make your snatch hurt.

“Daddy did it, but Obama!” isn’t as powerful an argument as you imagine.

No, my "argument" is that Obama refused to provide them with any lethal aid, and you didn't give a fuck. Trump did provide them with lethal aid, and he tried to get them to investigate the meddling by Ukraine into the 2016 election as part of the deal. I don't have a problem with that. Your crocodile tears about Trump hurting our standing in the world and making our allies distrust us is just bullshit you're spewing, you don't mean any of it.

Now go type "Daddy" three more times for your next killer rebuttal.

I think we can all welcome Daddy exposing himself to cross examination on this fig leaf of a defense. What could possibly go wrong?

Bendintheriver

HHusky said:

I’ll concede Joe looks terrible, subjectively.

You won’t concede the President’s extortion scheme, which is obvious objectively on the evidence presented. I don’t have to guess your reaction if this mountain of evidence involved a Democratic Part President.

Where is the proof counselor? All ketchup no fries. I know you rats want to hide behind the fact that this is not a court of law but we all know this hearsay wouldn't make it in a court of law neither would the one sided rules your side has set this farce up under. The entire proceeding is a complete joke and you have absolutely zero proof. The leader of your "committee" has already been caught lying (again) and he has a mystery guest who supposedly heard 3rd hand that something happened.

Again, this whole charade is a joke and I can't believe you are all in on this joke especially with your background.

Sledog

HHusky said:

PurpleThrobber said:

HHusky said:

I’ll concede Joe looks terrible, subjectively.

You won’t concede the President’s extortion scheme, which is obvious objectively on the evidence presented.

i have absolutely no problem with the 'extortion'. Been very clear about that.

You get the money when you assist in the investigation of a corrupt US Vice-President and his corrupt son. Simple.

Why won't you concede that the Bidens are dirty as shit and should be facing criminal charges?

The case against Daddy is obvious. Speculating that there’s a case to be made against Joe Biden is pretty desperate, just like all the other defenses offered thus far. You wouldn’t give it the time of day if we switched the parties.

They'll use federal evidence laws in the Senate. They won't hear any of the witnesses that just testified as most were either multilevel hearsay or they had nothing to say as far as a crime. Which witness can directly testify to the crime Trump is accused of?

ThomasFremont

Ok now do Trump.

Bendintheriver

ThomasFremont said:

Ok now do Trump.

You do him. I like women.

HHusky

Bendintheriver said:

HHusky said:

I’ll concede Joe looks terrible, subjectively.

You won’t concede the President’s extortion scheme, which is obvious objectively on the evidence presented. I don’t have to guess your reaction if this mountain of evidence involved a Democratic Part President.

Where is the proof counselor? All ketchup no fries. I know you rats want to hide behind the fact that this is not a court of law but we all know this hearsay wouldn't make it in a court of law neither would the one sided rules your side has set this farce up under. The entire proceeding is a complete joke and you have absolutely zero proof. The leader of your "committee" has already been caught lying (again) and he has a mystery guest who supposedly heard 3rd hand that something happened.

Again, this whole charade is a joke and I can't believe you are all in on this joke especially with your background.

Shitloads of the testimony this week were not hearsay, or would come in under hearsay exceptions. blob’s already offered the only defense that is actually a defense: that Daddy’s deep seeded concerns about corruption were his only motive. Everyone should practice keeping a straight face when they offer it.

ThomasFremont

Bendintheriver said:

ThomasFremont said:

Ok now do Trump.

You do him. I like women.

Sure you do.

RaceBannon

HHusky said:

Bendintheriver said:

HHusky said:

I’ll concede Joe looks terrible, subjectively.

You won’t concede the President’s extortion scheme, which is obvious objectively on the evidence presented. I don’t have to guess your reaction if this mountain of evidence involved a Democratic Part President.

Where is the proof counselor? All ketchup no fries. I know you rats want to hide behind the fact that this is not a court of law but we all know this hearsay wouldn't make it in a court of law neither would the one sided rules your side has set this farce up under. The entire proceeding is a complete joke and you have absolutely zero proof. The leader of your "committee" has already been caught lying (again) and he has a mystery guest who supposedly heard 3rd hand that something happened.

Again, this whole charade is a joke and I can't believe you are all in on this joke especially with your background.

Shitloads of the testimony this week were not hearsay. blob’s already offered the only defense that is actually a defense: that Daddy’s deep seeded concerns about corruption were his only motive. Everyone should practice keeping a straight face when they offer it.

The testimony this week was so compelling that support for impeachment collapsed

HHusky

RaceBannon said:

HHusky said:

Bendintheriver said:

HHusky said:

I’ll concede Joe looks terrible, subjectively.

You won’t concede the President’s extortion scheme, which is obvious objectively on the evidence presented. I don’t have to guess your reaction if this mountain of evidence involved a Democratic Part President.

Where is the proof counselor? All ketchup no fries. I know you rats want to hide behind the fact that this is not a court of law but we all know this hearsay wouldn't make it in a court of law neither would the one sided rules your side has set this farce up under. The entire proceeding is a complete joke and you have absolutely zero proof. The leader of your "committee" has already been caught lying (again) and he has a mystery guest who supposedly heard 3rd hand that something happened.

Again, this whole charade is a joke and I can't believe you are all in on this joke especially with your background.

Shitloads of the testimony this week were not hearsay. blob’s already offered the only defense that is actually a defense: that Daddy’s deep seeded concerns about corruption were his only motive. Everyone should practice keeping a straight face when they offer it.

The testimony this week was so compelling that support for impeachment collapsed

We’re not discussing Realpolitik. I agree that no one ever went broke underestimating the American public. We were discussing the fact that a Daddy is guilty as fuck.

SFGbob

HHusky said:

RaceBannon said:

HHusky said:

Bendintheriver said:

HHusky said:

I’ll concede Joe looks terrible, subjectively.

You won’t concede the President’s extortion scheme, which is obvious objectively on the evidence presented. I don’t have to guess your reaction if this mountain of evidence involved a Democratic Part President.

Where is the proof counselor? All ketchup no fries. I know you rats want to hide behind the fact that this is not a court of law but we all know this hearsay wouldn't make it in a court of law neither would the one sided rules your side has set this farce up under. The entire proceeding is a complete joke and you have absolutely zero proof. The leader of your "committee" has already been caught lying (again) and he has a mystery guest who supposedly heard 3rd hand that something happened.

Again, this whole charade is a joke and I can't believe you are all in on this joke especially with your background.

Shitloads of the testimony this week were not hearsay. blob’s already offered the only defense that is actually a defense: that Daddy’s deep seeded concerns about corruption were his only motive. Everyone should practice keeping a straight face when they offer it.

The testimony this week was so compelling that support for impeachment collapsed

We’re not discussing Realpolitik. I agree that no one ever went broke underestimating the American public. We were discussing the fact that a Daddy is guilty as fuck.

Funny, this dumbfuck swallowed whole the lie about the Gentle Giant being shot in the back while running away and claimed Obama was fiscally responsible and then has the gall to call other people dumb?

Care to talk about how you earned your nickname smart guy?

HHusky

SFGbob said:

HHusky said:

RaceBannon said:

HHusky said:

Bendintheriver said:

HHusky said:

I’ll concede Joe looks terrible, subjectively.

You won’t concede the President’s extortion scheme, which is obvious objectively on the evidence presented. I don’t have to guess your reaction if this mountain of evidence involved a Democratic Part President.

Where is the proof counselor? All ketchup no fries. I know you rats want to hide behind the fact that this is not a court of law but we all know this hearsay wouldn't make it in a court of law neither would the one sided rules your side has set this farce up under. The entire proceeding is a complete joke and you have absolutely zero proof. The leader of your "committee" has already been caught lying (again) and he has a mystery guest who supposedly heard 3rd hand that something happened.

Again, this whole charade is a joke and I can't believe you are all in on this joke especially with your background.

Shitloads of the testimony this week were not hearsay. blob’s already offered the only defense that is actually a defense: that Daddy’s deep seeded concerns about corruption were his only motive. Everyone should practice keeping a straight face when they offer it.

The testimony this week was so compelling that support for impeachment collapsed

We’re not discussing Realpolitik. I agree that no one ever went broke underestimating the American public. We were discussing the fact that a Daddy is guilty as fuck.

Funny, this dumbfuck swallowed whole the lie about the Gentle Giant being shot in the back while running away and claimed Obama was fiscally responsible and then has the gall to call other people dumb?

Care to talk about how you earned your nickname smart guy?

See Race? blob knows Daddy’s guilty.