For a moment forget which party you are aligned with

Bendintheriver

HHusky said:

I’ll concede Joe looks terrible, subjectively.

You won’t concede the President’s extortion scheme, which is obvious objectively on the evidence presented. I don’t have to guess your reaction if this mountain of evidence involved a Democratic Part President.

Where is the proof counselor? All ketchup no fries. I know you rats want to hide behind the fact that this is not a court of law but we all know this hearsay wouldn't make it in a court of law neither would the one sided rules your side has set this farce up under. The entire proceeding is a complete joke and you have absolutely zero proof. The leader of your "committee" has already been caught lying (again) and he has a mystery guest who supposedly heard 3rd hand that something happened.

Again, this whole charade is a joke and I can't believe you are all in on this joke especially with your background.

Sledog

HHusky said:

PurpleThrobber said:

HHusky said:

I’ll concede Joe looks terrible, subjectively.

You won’t concede the President’s extortion scheme, which is obvious objectively on the evidence presented.

i have absolutely no problem with the 'extortion'. Been very clear about that.

You get the money when you assist in the investigation of a corrupt US Vice-President and his corrupt son. Simple.

Why won't you concede that the Bidens are dirty as shit and should be facing criminal charges?

The case against Daddy is obvious. Speculating that there’s a case to be made against Joe Biden is pretty desperate, just like all the other defenses offered thus far. You wouldn’t give it the time of day if we switched the parties.

They'll use federal evidence laws in the Senate. They won't hear any of the witnesses that just testified as most were either multilevel hearsay or they had nothing to say as far as a crime. Which witness can directly testify to the crime Trump is accused of?

ThomasFremont

Ok now do Trump.

Bendintheriver

ThomasFremont said:

Ok now do Trump.

You do him. I like women.

HHusky

Bendintheriver said:

HHusky said:

I’ll concede Joe looks terrible, subjectively.

You won’t concede the President’s extortion scheme, which is obvious objectively on the evidence presented. I don’t have to guess your reaction if this mountain of evidence involved a Democratic Part President.

Where is the proof counselor? All ketchup no fries. I know you rats want to hide behind the fact that this is not a court of law but we all know this hearsay wouldn't make it in a court of law neither would the one sided rules your side has set this farce up under. The entire proceeding is a complete joke and you have absolutely zero proof. The leader of your "committee" has already been caught lying (again) and he has a mystery guest who supposedly heard 3rd hand that something happened.

Again, this whole charade is a joke and I can't believe you are all in on this joke especially with your background.

Shitloads of the testimony this week were not hearsay, or would come in under hearsay exceptions. blob’s already offered the only defense that is actually a defense: that Daddy’s deep seeded concerns about corruption were his only motive. Everyone should practice keeping a straight face when they offer it.

ThomasFremont

Bendintheriver said:

ThomasFremont said:

Ok now do Trump.

You do him. I like women.

Sure you do.

RaceBannon

HHusky said:

Bendintheriver said:

HHusky said:

I’ll concede Joe looks terrible, subjectively.

You won’t concede the President’s extortion scheme, which is obvious objectively on the evidence presented. I don’t have to guess your reaction if this mountain of evidence involved a Democratic Part President.

Where is the proof counselor? All ketchup no fries. I know you rats want to hide behind the fact that this is not a court of law but we all know this hearsay wouldn't make it in a court of law neither would the one sided rules your side has set this farce up under. The entire proceeding is a complete joke and you have absolutely zero proof. The leader of your "committee" has already been caught lying (again) and he has a mystery guest who supposedly heard 3rd hand that something happened.

Again, this whole charade is a joke and I can't believe you are all in on this joke especially with your background.

Shitloads of the testimony this week were not hearsay. blob’s already offered the only defense that is actually a defense: that Daddy’s deep seeded concerns about corruption were his only motive. Everyone should practice keeping a straight face when they offer it.

The testimony this week was so compelling that support for impeachment collapsed

HHusky

RaceBannon said:

HHusky said:

Bendintheriver said:

HHusky said:

I’ll concede Joe looks terrible, subjectively.

You won’t concede the President’s extortion scheme, which is obvious objectively on the evidence presented. I don’t have to guess your reaction if this mountain of evidence involved a Democratic Part President.

Where is the proof counselor? All ketchup no fries. I know you rats want to hide behind the fact that this is not a court of law but we all know this hearsay wouldn't make it in a court of law neither would the one sided rules your side has set this farce up under. The entire proceeding is a complete joke and you have absolutely zero proof. The leader of your "committee" has already been caught lying (again) and he has a mystery guest who supposedly heard 3rd hand that something happened.

Again, this whole charade is a joke and I can't believe you are all in on this joke especially with your background.

Shitloads of the testimony this week were not hearsay. blob’s already offered the only defense that is actually a defense: that Daddy’s deep seeded concerns about corruption were his only motive. Everyone should practice keeping a straight face when they offer it.

The testimony this week was so compelling that support for impeachment collapsed

We’re not discussing Realpolitik. I agree that no one ever went broke underestimating the American public. We were discussing the fact that a Daddy is guilty as fuck.

SFGbob

HHusky said:

RaceBannon said:

HHusky said:

Bendintheriver said:

HHusky said:

I’ll concede Joe looks terrible, subjectively.

You won’t concede the President’s extortion scheme, which is obvious objectively on the evidence presented. I don’t have to guess your reaction if this mountain of evidence involved a Democratic Part President.

Where is the proof counselor? All ketchup no fries. I know you rats want to hide behind the fact that this is not a court of law but we all know this hearsay wouldn't make it in a court of law neither would the one sided rules your side has set this farce up under. The entire proceeding is a complete joke and you have absolutely zero proof. The leader of your "committee" has already been caught lying (again) and he has a mystery guest who supposedly heard 3rd hand that something happened.

Again, this whole charade is a joke and I can't believe you are all in on this joke especially with your background.

Shitloads of the testimony this week were not hearsay. blob’s already offered the only defense that is actually a defense: that Daddy’s deep seeded concerns about corruption were his only motive. Everyone should practice keeping a straight face when they offer it.

The testimony this week was so compelling that support for impeachment collapsed

We’re not discussing Realpolitik. I agree that no one ever went broke underestimating the American public. We were discussing the fact that a Daddy is guilty as fuck.

Funny, this dumbfuck swallowed whole the lie about the Gentle Giant being shot in the back while running away and claimed Obama was fiscally responsible and then has the gall to call other people dumb?

Care to talk about how you earned your nickname smart guy?

HHusky

SFGbob said:

HHusky said:

RaceBannon said:

HHusky said:

Bendintheriver said:

HHusky said:

I’ll concede Joe looks terrible, subjectively.

You won’t concede the President’s extortion scheme, which is obvious objectively on the evidence presented. I don’t have to guess your reaction if this mountain of evidence involved a Democratic Part President.

Where is the proof counselor? All ketchup no fries. I know you rats want to hide behind the fact that this is not a court of law but we all know this hearsay wouldn't make it in a court of law neither would the one sided rules your side has set this farce up under. The entire proceeding is a complete joke and you have absolutely zero proof. The leader of your "committee" has already been caught lying (again) and he has a mystery guest who supposedly heard 3rd hand that something happened.

Again, this whole charade is a joke and I can't believe you are all in on this joke especially with your background.

Shitloads of the testimony this week were not hearsay. blob’s already offered the only defense that is actually a defense: that Daddy’s deep seeded concerns about corruption were his only motive. Everyone should practice keeping a straight face when they offer it.

The testimony this week was so compelling that support for impeachment collapsed

We’re not discussing Realpolitik. I agree that no one ever went broke underestimating the American public. We were discussing the fact that a Daddy is guilty as fuck.

Funny, this dumbfuck swallowed whole the lie about the Gentle Giant being shot in the back while running away and claimed Obama was fiscally responsible and then has the gall to call other people dumb?

Care to talk about how you earned your nickname smart guy?

See Race? blob knows Daddy’s guilty.