Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. Sign in or register to get started.

Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

For a moment forget which party you are aligned with

2

Comments

  • BendintheriverBendintheriver Member Posts: 6,188 Standard Supporter
    HHusky said:

    I’ll concede Joe looks terrible, subjectively.

    You won’t concede the President’s extortion scheme, which is obvious objectively on the evidence presented. I don’t have to guess your reaction if this mountain of evidence involved a Democratic Part President.

    Where is the proof counselor? All ketchup no fries. I know you rats want to hide behind the fact that this is not a court of law but we all know this hearsay wouldn't make it in a court of law neither would the one sided rules your side has set this farce up under. The entire proceeding is a complete joke and you have absolutely zero proof. The leader of your "committee" has already been caught lying (again) and he has a mystery guest who supposedly heard 3rd hand that something happened.

    Again, this whole charade is a joke and I can't believe you are all in on this joke especially with your background.
  • SledogSledog Member Posts: 34,460 Standard Supporter
    HHusky said:

    HHusky said:

    I’ll concede Joe looks terrible, subjectively.

    You won’t concede the President’s extortion scheme, which is obvious objectively on the evidence presented.

    i have absolutely no problem with the 'extortion'. Been very clear about that.

    You get the money when you assist in the investigation of a corrupt US Vice-President and his corrupt son. Simple.

    Why won't you concede that the Bidens are dirty as shit and should be facing criminal charges?




    The case against Daddy is obvious. Speculating that there’s a case to be made against Joe Biden is pretty desperate, just like all the other defenses offered thus far. You wouldn’t give it the time of day if we switched the parties.
    They'll use federal evidence laws in the Senate. They won't hear any of the witnesses that just testified as most were either multilevel hearsay or they had nothing to say as far as a crime. Which witness can directly testify to the crime Trump is accused of?
  • ThomasFremontThomasFremont Member Posts: 13,325
    Ok now do Trump.
  • BendintheriverBendintheriver Member Posts: 6,188 Standard Supporter

    Ok now do Trump.

    You do him. I like women.
  • HHuskyHHusky Member Posts: 21,626
    edited November 2019

    HHusky said:

    I’ll concede Joe looks terrible, subjectively.

    You won’t concede the President’s extortion scheme, which is obvious objectively on the evidence presented. I don’t have to guess your reaction if this mountain of evidence involved a Democratic Part President.

    Where is the proof counselor? All ketchup no fries. I know you rats want to hide behind the fact that this is not a court of law but we all know this hearsay wouldn't make it in a court of law neither would the one sided rules your side has set this farce up under. The entire proceeding is a complete joke and you have absolutely zero proof. The leader of your "committee" has already been caught lying (again) and he has a mystery guest who supposedly heard 3rd hand that something happened.

    Again, this whole charade is a joke and I can't believe you are all in on this joke especially with your background.
    Shitloads of the testimony this week were not hearsay, or would come in under hearsay exceptions. blob’s already offered the only defense that is actually a defense: that Daddy’s deep seeded concerns about corruption were his only motive. Everyone should practice keeping a straight face when they offer it.
  • ThomasFremontThomasFremont Member Posts: 13,325

    Ok now do Trump.

    You do him. I like women.
    Sure you do.
  • RaceBannonRaceBannon Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 107,693 Founders Club
    HHusky said:

    HHusky said:

    I’ll concede Joe looks terrible, subjectively.

    You won’t concede the President’s extortion scheme, which is obvious objectively on the evidence presented. I don’t have to guess your reaction if this mountain of evidence involved a Democratic Part President.

    Where is the proof counselor? All ketchup no fries. I know you rats want to hide behind the fact that this is not a court of law but we all know this hearsay wouldn't make it in a court of law neither would the one sided rules your side has set this farce up under. The entire proceeding is a complete joke and you have absolutely zero proof. The leader of your "committee" has already been caught lying (again) and he has a mystery guest who supposedly heard 3rd hand that something happened.

    Again, this whole charade is a joke and I can't believe you are all in on this joke especially with your background.
    Shitloads of the testimony this week were not hearsay. blob’s already offered the only defense that is actually a defense: that Daddy’s deep seeded concerns about corruption were his only motive. Everyone should practice keeping a straight face when they offer it.
    The testimony this week was so compelling that support for impeachment collapsed
  • HHuskyHHusky Member Posts: 21,626

    HHusky said:

    HHusky said:

    I’ll concede Joe looks terrible, subjectively.

    You won’t concede the President’s extortion scheme, which is obvious objectively on the evidence presented. I don’t have to guess your reaction if this mountain of evidence involved a Democratic Part President.

    Where is the proof counselor? All ketchup no fries. I know you rats want to hide behind the fact that this is not a court of law but we all know this hearsay wouldn't make it in a court of law neither would the one sided rules your side has set this farce up under. The entire proceeding is a complete joke and you have absolutely zero proof. The leader of your "committee" has already been caught lying (again) and he has a mystery guest who supposedly heard 3rd hand that something happened.

    Again, this whole charade is a joke and I can't believe you are all in on this joke especially with your background.
    Shitloads of the testimony this week were not hearsay. blob’s already offered the only defense that is actually a defense: that Daddy’s deep seeded concerns about corruption were his only motive. Everyone should practice keeping a straight face when they offer it.
    The testimony this week was so compelling that support for impeachment collapsed
    We’re not discussing Realpolitik. I agree that no one ever went broke underestimating the American public. We were discussing the fact that a Daddy is guilty as fuck.
  • SFGbobSFGbob Member Posts: 33,070
    HHusky said:

    HHusky said:

    HHusky said:

    I’ll concede Joe looks terrible, subjectively.

    You won’t concede the President’s extortion scheme, which is obvious objectively on the evidence presented. I don’t have to guess your reaction if this mountain of evidence involved a Democratic Part President.

    Where is the proof counselor? All ketchup no fries. I know you rats want to hide behind the fact that this is not a court of law but we all know this hearsay wouldn't make it in a court of law neither would the one sided rules your side has set this farce up under. The entire proceeding is a complete joke and you have absolutely zero proof. The leader of your "committee" has already been caught lying (again) and he has a mystery guest who supposedly heard 3rd hand that something happened.

    Again, this whole charade is a joke and I can't believe you are all in on this joke especially with your background.
    Shitloads of the testimony this week were not hearsay. blob’s already offered the only defense that is actually a defense: that Daddy’s deep seeded concerns about corruption were his only motive. Everyone should practice keeping a straight face when they offer it.
    The testimony this week was so compelling that support for impeachment collapsed
    We’re not discussing Realpolitik. I agree that no one ever went broke underestimating the American public. We were discussing the fact that a Daddy is guilty as fuck.
    Funny, this dumbfuck swallowed whole the lie about the Gentle Giant being shot in the back while running away and claimed Obama was fiscally responsible and then has the gall to call other people dumb?

    Care to talk about how you earned your nickname smart guy?
  • HHuskyHHusky Member Posts: 21,626
    SFGbob said:

    HHusky said:

    HHusky said:

    HHusky said:

    I’ll concede Joe looks terrible, subjectively.

    You won’t concede the President’s extortion scheme, which is obvious objectively on the evidence presented. I don’t have to guess your reaction if this mountain of evidence involved a Democratic Part President.

    Where is the proof counselor? All ketchup no fries. I know you rats want to hide behind the fact that this is not a court of law but we all know this hearsay wouldn't make it in a court of law neither would the one sided rules your side has set this farce up under. The entire proceeding is a complete joke and you have absolutely zero proof. The leader of your "committee" has already been caught lying (again) and he has a mystery guest who supposedly heard 3rd hand that something happened.

    Again, this whole charade is a joke and I can't believe you are all in on this joke especially with your background.
    Shitloads of the testimony this week were not hearsay. blob’s already offered the only defense that is actually a defense: that Daddy’s deep seeded concerns about corruption were his only motive. Everyone should practice keeping a straight face when they offer it.
    The testimony this week was so compelling that support for impeachment collapsed
    We’re not discussing Realpolitik. I agree that no one ever went broke underestimating the American public. We were discussing the fact that a Daddy is guilty as fuck.
    Funny, this dumbfuck swallowed whole the lie about the Gentle Giant being shot in the back while running away and claimed Obama was fiscally responsible and then has the gall to call other people dumb?

    Care to talk about how you earned your nickname smart guy?
    See Race? blob knows Daddy’s guilty.
  • RaceBannonRaceBannon Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 107,693 Founders Club
    HHusky said:

    HHusky said:

    HHusky said:

    I’ll concede Joe looks terrible, subjectively.

    You won’t concede the President’s extortion scheme, which is obvious objectively on the evidence presented. I don’t have to guess your reaction if this mountain of evidence involved a Democratic Part President.

    Where is the proof counselor? All ketchup no fries. I know you rats want to hide behind the fact that this is not a court of law but we all know this hearsay wouldn't make it in a court of law neither would the one sided rules your side has set this farce up under. The entire proceeding is a complete joke and you have absolutely zero proof. The leader of your "committee" has already been caught lying (again) and he has a mystery guest who supposedly heard 3rd hand that something happened.

    Again, this whole charade is a joke and I can't believe you are all in on this joke especially with your background.
    Shitloads of the testimony this week were not hearsay. blob’s already offered the only defense that is actually a defense: that Daddy’s deep seeded concerns about corruption were his only motive. Everyone should practice keeping a straight face when they offer it.
    The testimony this week was so compelling that support for impeachment collapsed
    We’re not discussing Realpolitik. I agree that no one ever went broke underestimating the American public. We were discussing the fact that a Daddy is guilty as fuck.
    And yet you can't say of what

    On anything

    For three years


    Its beyond tired at this point
  • SFGbobSFGbob Member Posts: 33,070
    HHusky said:

    SFGbob said:

    HHusky said:

    HHusky said:

    HHusky said:

    I’ll concede Joe looks terrible, subjectively.

    You won’t concede the President’s extortion scheme, which is obvious objectively on the evidence presented. I don’t have to guess your reaction if this mountain of evidence involved a Democratic Part President.

    Where is the proof counselor? All ketchup no fries. I know you rats want to hide behind the fact that this is not a court of law but we all know this hearsay wouldn't make it in a court of law neither would the one sided rules your side has set this farce up under. The entire proceeding is a complete joke and you have absolutely zero proof. The leader of your "committee" has already been caught lying (again) and he has a mystery guest who supposedly heard 3rd hand that something happened.

    Again, this whole charade is a joke and I can't believe you are all in on this joke especially with your background.
    Shitloads of the testimony this week were not hearsay. blob’s already offered the only defense that is actually a defense: that Daddy’s deep seeded concerns about corruption were his only motive. Everyone should practice keeping a straight face when they offer it.
    The testimony this week was so compelling that support for impeachment collapsed
    We’re not discussing Realpolitik. I agree that no one ever went broke underestimating the American public. We were discussing the fact that a Daddy is guilty as fuck.
    Funny, this dumbfuck swallowed whole the lie about the Gentle Giant being shot in the back while running away and claimed Obama was fiscally responsible and then has the gall to call other people dumb?

    Care to talk about how you earned your nickname smart guy?
    See Race? blob knows Daddy’s guilty.
    No, I know you commenting on the lack of intelligence of anyone other than yourself is a fucking joke.
  • SledogSledog Member Posts: 34,460 Standard Supporter
    HHusky said:

    HHusky said:

    I’ll concede Joe looks terrible, subjectively.

    You won’t concede the President’s extortion scheme, which is obvious objectively on the evidence presented. I don’t have to guess your reaction if this mountain of evidence involved a Democratic Part President.

    Where is the proof counselor? All ketchup no fries. I know you rats want to hide behind the fact that this is not a court of law but we all know this hearsay wouldn't make it in a court of law neither would the one sided rules your side has set this farce up under. The entire proceeding is a complete joke and you have absolutely zero proof. The leader of your "committee" has already been caught lying (again) and he has a mystery guest who supposedly heard 3rd hand that something happened.

    Again, this whole charade is a joke and I can't believe you are all in on this joke especially with your background.
    Shitloads of the testimony this week were not hearsay, or would come in under hearsay exceptions. blob’s already offered the only defense that is actually a defense: that Daddy’s deep seeded concerns about corruption were his only motive. Everyone should practice keeping a straight face when they offer it.
    Every single witness said they could not testify to Trump committing a crime. HTH
  • HHuskyHHusky Member Posts: 21,626

    HHusky said:

    HHusky said:

    HHusky said:

    I’ll concede Joe looks terrible, subjectively.

    You won’t concede the President’s extortion scheme, which is obvious objectively on the evidence presented. I don’t have to guess your reaction if this mountain of evidence involved a Democratic Part President.

    Where is the proof counselor? All ketchup no fries. I know you rats want to hide behind the fact that this is not a court of law but we all know this hearsay wouldn't make it in a court of law neither would the one sided rules your side has set this farce up under. The entire proceeding is a complete joke and you have absolutely zero proof. The leader of your "committee" has already been caught lying (again) and he has a mystery guest who supposedly heard 3rd hand that something happened.

    Again, this whole charade is a joke and I can't believe you are all in on this joke especially with your background.
    Shitloads of the testimony this week were not hearsay. blob’s already offered the only defense that is actually a defense: that Daddy’s deep seeded concerns about corruption were his only motive. Everyone should practice keeping a straight face when they offer it.
    The testimony this week was so compelling that support for impeachment collapsed
    We’re not discussing Realpolitik. I agree that no one ever went broke underestimating the American public. We were discussing the fact that a Daddy is guilty as fuck.
    And yet you can't say of what

    On anything

    For three years


    Its beyond tired at this point
    The Ukraine bribery scheme isn’t nearly as involved as Daddy’s other acts of corruption. Even you should be able to follow it. And that’s not to discount Daddy’s multiple, illegal efforts to obstruct the investigation either.
  • HHuskyHHusky Member Posts: 21,626
    Sledog said:

    HHusky said:

    HHusky said:

    I’ll concede Joe looks terrible, subjectively.

    You won’t concede the President’s extortion scheme, which is obvious objectively on the evidence presented. I don’t have to guess your reaction if this mountain of evidence involved a Democratic Part President.

    Where is the proof counselor? All ketchup no fries. I know you rats want to hide behind the fact that this is not a court of law but we all know this hearsay wouldn't make it in a court of law neither would the one sided rules your side has set this farce up under. The entire proceeding is a complete joke and you have absolutely zero proof. The leader of your "committee" has already been caught lying (again) and he has a mystery guest who supposedly heard 3rd hand that something happened.

    Again, this whole charade is a joke and I can't believe you are all in on this joke especially with your background.
    Shitloads of the testimony this week were not hearsay, or would come in under hearsay exceptions. blob’s already offered the only defense that is actually a defense: that Daddy’s deep seeded concerns about corruption were his only motive. Everyone should practice keeping a straight face when they offer it.
    Every single witness said they could not testify to Trump committing a crime. HTH
    They all declined to testify to a legal conclusion. I know you aren’t that nuanced at the Mall, but the smart people are that nuanced.
  • SledogSledog Member Posts: 34,460 Standard Supporter
    HHusky said:

    HHusky said:

    HHusky said:

    HHusky said:

    I’ll concede Joe looks terrible, subjectively.

    You won’t concede the President’s extortion scheme, which is obvious objectively on the evidence presented. I don’t have to guess your reaction if this mountain of evidence involved a Democratic Part President.

    Where is the proof counselor? All ketchup no fries. I know you rats want to hide behind the fact that this is not a court of law but we all know this hearsay wouldn't make it in a court of law neither would the one sided rules your side has set this farce up under. The entire proceeding is a complete joke and you have absolutely zero proof. The leader of your "committee" has already been caught lying (again) and he has a mystery guest who supposedly heard 3rd hand that something happened.

    Again, this whole charade is a joke and I can't believe you are all in on this joke especially with your background.
    Shitloads of the testimony this week were not hearsay. blob’s already offered the only defense that is actually a defense: that Daddy’s deep seeded concerns about corruption were his only motive. Everyone should practice keeping a straight face when they offer it.
    The testimony this week was so compelling that support for impeachment collapsed
    We’re not discussing Realpolitik. I agree that no one ever went broke underestimating the American public. We were discussing the fact that a Daddy is guilty as fuck.
    And yet you can't say of what

    On anything

    For three years


    Its beyond tired at this point
    The Ukraine bribery scheme isn’t nearly as involved as Daddy’s other acts of corruption. Even you should be able to follow it. And that’s not to discount Daddy’s multiple, illegal efforts to obstruct the investigation either.
    Do bribery to ask N Korea to denuke in trade for economic and other assistance? Investigating a crime a guy brags about in video is totally within the president's scope and duties.
  • HoustonHuskyHoustonHusky Member Posts: 5,995
    HondoBro #4 back to his daddy issues (how bad did your dad beat you...did he look like Trump or something) along with showing a complete misunderstanding of hearsay...especially since we have the actual transcript of the call in question.

    News at 11...
  • HHuskyHHusky Member Posts: 21,626

    HondoBro #4 back to his daddy issues (how bad did your dad beat you...did he look like Trump or something) along with showing a complete misunderstanding of hearsay...especially since we have the actual transcript of the call in question.

    News at 11...

    So back to the “You can’t prove it!” defense. Not as interesting as your actual opinion. But that’s where you gals get shy.
  • 2001400ex2001400ex Member Posts: 29,457

    HHusky said:

    HHusky said:

    I’ll concede Joe looks terrible, subjectively.

    You won’t concede the President’s extortion scheme, which is obvious objectively on the evidence presented. I don’t have to guess your reaction if this mountain of evidence involved a Democratic Part President.

    Where is the proof counselor? All ketchup no fries. I know you rats want to hide behind the fact that this is not a court of law but we all know this hearsay wouldn't make it in a court of law neither would the one sided rules your side has set this farce up under. The entire proceeding is a complete joke and you have absolutely zero proof. The leader of your "committee" has already been caught lying (again) and he has a mystery guest who supposedly heard 3rd hand that something happened.

    Again, this whole charade is a joke and I can't believe you are all in on this joke especially with your background.
    Shitloads of the testimony this week were not hearsay. blob’s already offered the only defense that is actually a defense: that Daddy’s deep seeded concerns about corruption were his only motive. Everyone should practice keeping a straight face when they offer it.
    The testimony this week was so compelling that support for impeachment collapsed
    Rasmussen disagrees.

    http://m.rasmussenreports.com/public_content/politics/trump_administration/trump_approval_index_history
  • RaceBannonRaceBannon Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 107,693 Founders Club
    HHusky said:

    HHusky said:

    HHusky said:

    HHusky said:

    I’ll concede Joe looks terrible, subjectively.

    You won’t concede the President’s extortion scheme, which is obvious objectively on the evidence presented. I don’t have to guess your reaction if this mountain of evidence involved a Democratic Part President.

    Where is the proof counselor? All ketchup no fries. I know you rats want to hide behind the fact that this is not a court of law but we all know this hearsay wouldn't make it in a court of law neither would the one sided rules your side has set this farce up under. The entire proceeding is a complete joke and you have absolutely zero proof. The leader of your "committee" has already been caught lying (again) and he has a mystery guest who supposedly heard 3rd hand that something happened.

    Again, this whole charade is a joke and I can't believe you are all in on this joke especially with your background.
    Shitloads of the testimony this week were not hearsay. blob’s already offered the only defense that is actually a defense: that Daddy’s deep seeded concerns about corruption were his only motive. Everyone should practice keeping a straight face when they offer it.
    The testimony this week was so compelling that support for impeachment collapsed
    We’re not discussing Realpolitik. I agree that no one ever went broke underestimating the American public. We were discussing the fact that a Daddy is guilty as fuck.
    And yet you can't say of what

    On anything

    For three years


    Its beyond tired at this point
    The Ukraine bribery scheme isn’t nearly as involved as Daddy’s other acts of corruption. Even you should be able to follow it. And that’s not to discount Daddy’s multiple, illegal efforts to obstruct the investigation either.
    And yet you can't put it into words

    Any of it


    The jury is laughing at you
Sign In or Register to comment.