Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

For a moment forget which party you are aligned with

1235

Comments

  • Sledog
    Sledog Member Posts: 38,622 Standard Supporter
    Orange Daddy bad!!!!!!

    Those are the words.
  • BearsWiin
    BearsWiin Member Posts: 5,076

    HHusky said:

    HHusky said:

    HHusky said:

    HHusky said:

    I’ll concede Joe looks terrible, subjectively.

    You won’t concede the President’s extortion scheme, which is obvious objectively on the evidence presented. I don’t have to guess your reaction if this mountain of evidence involved a Democratic Part President.

    Where is the proof counselor? All ketchup no fries. I know you rats want to hide behind the fact that this is not a court of law but we all know this hearsay wouldn't make it in a court of law neither would the one sided rules your side has set this farce up under. The entire proceeding is a complete joke and you have absolutely zero proof. The leader of your "committee" has already been caught lying (again) and he has a mystery guest who supposedly heard 3rd hand that something happened.

    Again, this whole charade is a joke and I can't believe you are all in on this joke especially with your background.
    Shitloads of the testimony this week were not hearsay. blob’s already offered the only defense that is actually a defense: that Daddy’s deep seeded concerns about corruption were his only motive. Everyone should practice keeping a straight face when they offer it.
    The testimony this week was so compelling that support for impeachment collapsed
    We’re not discussing Realpolitik. I agree that no one ever went broke underestimating the American public. We were discussing the fact that a Daddy is guilty as fuck.
    And yet you can't say of what

    On anything

    For three years


    Its beyond tired at this point
    The Ukraine bribery scheme isn’t nearly as involved as Daddy’s other acts of corruption. Even you should be able to follow it. And that’s not to discount Daddy’s multiple, illegal efforts to obstruct the investigation either.
    And yet you can't put it into words

    Any of it


    The jury is laughing at you
    I think I'd respect you more if instead of slavishly defending a diaper-wearing adderall-addicted early-stage dementia corrupt grifting buffoon you just came out and said yeah, he's all of that, and as long as the Senate Reps hold firm he's not going anywhere, suck it Dems, and I don't give a shit about the rule of law or national security because taxes and lib tears.


  • Sledog
    Sledog Member Posts: 38,622 Standard Supporter
    BearsWiin said:

    HHusky said:

    HHusky said:

    HHusky said:

    HHusky said:

    I’ll concede Joe looks terrible, subjectively.

    You won’t concede the President’s extortion scheme, which is obvious objectively on the evidence presented. I don’t have to guess your reaction if this mountain of evidence involved a Democratic Part President.

    Where is the proof counselor? All ketchup no fries. I know you rats want to hide behind the fact that this is not a court of law but we all know this hearsay wouldn't make it in a court of law neither would the one sided rules your side has set this farce up under. The entire proceeding is a complete joke and you have absolutely zero proof. The leader of your "committee" has already been caught lying (again) and he has a mystery guest who supposedly heard 3rd hand that something happened.

    Again, this whole charade is a joke and I can't believe you are all in on this joke especially with your background.
    Shitloads of the testimony this week were not hearsay. blob’s already offered the only defense that is actually a defense: that Daddy’s deep seeded concerns about corruption were his only motive. Everyone should practice keeping a straight face when they offer it.
    The testimony this week was so compelling that support for impeachment collapsed
    We’re not discussing Realpolitik. I agree that no one ever went broke underestimating the American public. We were discussing the fact that a Daddy is guilty as fuck.
    And yet you can't say of what

    On anything

    For three years


    Its beyond tired at this point
    The Ukraine bribery scheme isn’t nearly as involved as Daddy’s other acts of corruption. Even you should be able to follow it. And that’s not to discount Daddy’s multiple, illegal efforts to obstruct the investigation either.
    And yet you can't put it into words

    Any of it


    The jury is laughing at you
    I think I'd respect you more if instead of slavishly defending a diaper-wearing adderall-addicted early-stage dementia corrupt grifting buffoon you just came out and said yeah, he's all of that, and as long as the Senate Reps hold firm he's not going anywhere, suck it Dems, and I don't give a shit about the rule of law or national security because taxes and lib tears.


    Translation:

    I'm angry and Trumps mean!
  • BearsWiin
    BearsWiin Member Posts: 5,076
    Sledog said:

    BearsWiin said:

    HHusky said:

    HHusky said:

    HHusky said:

    HHusky said:

    I’ll concede Joe looks terrible, subjectively.

    You won’t concede the President’s extortion scheme, which is obvious objectively on the evidence presented. I don’t have to guess your reaction if this mountain of evidence involved a Democratic Part President.

    Where is the proof counselor? All ketchup no fries. I know you rats want to hide behind the fact that this is not a court of law but we all know this hearsay wouldn't make it in a court of law neither would the one sided rules your side has set this farce up under. The entire proceeding is a complete joke and you have absolutely zero proof. The leader of your "committee" has already been caught lying (again) and he has a mystery guest who supposedly heard 3rd hand that something happened.

    Again, this whole charade is a joke and I can't believe you are all in on this joke especially with your background.
    Shitloads of the testimony this week were not hearsay. blob’s already offered the only defense that is actually a defense: that Daddy’s deep seeded concerns about corruption were his only motive. Everyone should practice keeping a straight face when they offer it.
    The testimony this week was so compelling that support for impeachment collapsed
    We’re not discussing Realpolitik. I agree that no one ever went broke underestimating the American public. We were discussing the fact that a Daddy is guilty as fuck.
    And yet you can't say of what

    On anything

    For three years


    Its beyond tired at this point
    The Ukraine bribery scheme isn’t nearly as involved as Daddy’s other acts of corruption. Even you should be able to follow it. And that’s not to discount Daddy’s multiple, illegal efforts to obstruct the investigation either.
    And yet you can't put it into words

    Any of it


    The jury is laughing at you
    I think I'd respect you more if instead of slavishly defending a diaper-wearing adderall-addicted early-stage dementia corrupt grifting buffoon you just came out and said yeah, he's all of that, and as long as the Senate Reps hold firm he's not going anywhere, suck it Dems, and I don't give a shit about the rule of law or national security because taxes and lib tears.


    Translation:

    I'm angry and Trumps mean!
    You'd sell out this country if you could make a buck doing it
  • SFGbob
    SFGbob Member Posts: 33,188
    BearsWiin said:

    Sledog said:

    BearsWiin said:

    HHusky said:

    HHusky said:

    HHusky said:

    HHusky said:

    I’ll concede Joe looks terrible, subjectively.

    You won’t concede the President’s extortion scheme, which is obvious objectively on the evidence presented. I don’t have to guess your reaction if this mountain of evidence involved a Democratic Part President.

    Where is the proof counselor? All ketchup no fries. I know you rats want to hide behind the fact that this is not a court of law but we all know this hearsay wouldn't make it in a court of law neither would the one sided rules your side has set this farce up under. The entire proceeding is a complete joke and you have absolutely zero proof. The leader of your "committee" has already been caught lying (again) and he has a mystery guest who supposedly heard 3rd hand that something happened.

    Again, this whole charade is a joke and I can't believe you are all in on this joke especially with your background.
    Shitloads of the testimony this week were not hearsay. blob’s already offered the only defense that is actually a defense: that Daddy’s deep seeded concerns about corruption were his only motive. Everyone should practice keeping a straight face when they offer it.
    The testimony this week was so compelling that support for impeachment collapsed
    We’re not discussing Realpolitik. I agree that no one ever went broke underestimating the American public. We were discussing the fact that a Daddy is guilty as fuck.
    And yet you can't say of what

    On anything

    For three years


    Its beyond tired at this point
    The Ukraine bribery scheme isn’t nearly as involved as Daddy’s other acts of corruption. Even you should be able to follow it. And that’s not to discount Daddy’s multiple, illegal efforts to obstruct the investigation either.
    And yet you can't put it into words

    Any of it


    The jury is laughing at you
    I think I'd respect you more if instead of slavishly defending a diaper-wearing adderall-addicted early-stage dementia corrupt grifting buffoon you just came out and said yeah, he's all of that, and as long as the Senate Reps hold firm he's not going anywhere, suck it Dems, and I don't give a shit about the rule of law or national security because taxes and lib tears.


    Translation:

    I'm angry and Trumps mean!
    You'd sell out this country if you could make a buck doing it
    A liberal accusing someone else of selling out the country. How cute.
  • BearsWiin
    BearsWiin Member Posts: 5,076
    SFGbob said:

    BearsWiin said:

    Sledog said:

    BearsWiin said:

    HHusky said:

    HHusky said:

    HHusky said:

    HHusky said:

    I’ll concede Joe looks terrible, subjectively.

    You won’t concede the President’s extortion scheme, which is obvious objectively on the evidence presented. I don’t have to guess your reaction if this mountain of evidence involved a Democratic Part President.

    Where is the proof counselor? All ketchup no fries. I know you rats want to hide behind the fact that this is not a court of law but we all know this hearsay wouldn't make it in a court of law neither would the one sided rules your side has set this farce up under. The entire proceeding is a complete joke and you have absolutely zero proof. The leader of your "committee" has already been caught lying (again) and he has a mystery guest who supposedly heard 3rd hand that something happened.

    Again, this whole charade is a joke and I can't believe you are all in on this joke especially with your background.
    Shitloads of the testimony this week were not hearsay. blob’s already offered the only defense that is actually a defense: that Daddy’s deep seeded concerns about corruption were his only motive. Everyone should practice keeping a straight face when they offer it.
    The testimony this week was so compelling that support for impeachment collapsed
    We’re not discussing Realpolitik. I agree that no one ever went broke underestimating the American public. We were discussing the fact that a Daddy is guilty as fuck.
    And yet you can't say of what

    On anything

    For three years


    Its beyond tired at this point
    The Ukraine bribery scheme isn’t nearly as involved as Daddy’s other acts of corruption. Even you should be able to follow it. And that’s not to discount Daddy’s multiple, illegal efforts to obstruct the investigation either.
    And yet you can't put it into words

    Any of it


    The jury is laughing at you
    I think I'd respect you more if instead of slavishly defending a diaper-wearing adderall-addicted early-stage dementia corrupt grifting buffoon you just came out and said yeah, he's all of that, and as long as the Senate Reps hold firm he's not going anywhere, suck it Dems, and I don't give a shit about the rule of law or national security because taxes and lib tears.


    Translation:

    I'm angry and Trumps mean!
    You'd sell out this country if you could make a buck doing it
    A liberal accusing someone else of selling out the country. How cute.
    And another grifterlover who doesn't give a shit about the Constitution is heard from

    I'm sure there are more here, anybody else want to stand and be counted?
  • Sledog
    Sledog Member Posts: 38,622 Standard Supporter
    BearsWiin said:

    Sledog said:

    BearsWiin said:

    HHusky said:

    HHusky said:

    HHusky said:

    HHusky said:

    I’ll concede Joe looks terrible, subjectively.

    You won’t concede the President’s extortion scheme, which is obvious objectively on the evidence presented. I don’t have to guess your reaction if this mountain of evidence involved a Democratic Part President.

    Where is the proof counselor? All ketchup no fries. I know you rats want to hide behind the fact that this is not a court of law but we all know this hearsay wouldn't make it in a court of law neither would the one sided rules your side has set this farce up under. The entire proceeding is a complete joke and you have absolutely zero proof. The leader of your "committee" has already been caught lying (again) and he has a mystery guest who supposedly heard 3rd hand that something happened.

    Again, this whole charade is a joke and I can't believe you are all in on this joke especially with your background.
    Shitloads of the testimony this week were not hearsay. blob’s already offered the only defense that is actually a defense: that Daddy’s deep seeded concerns about corruption were his only motive. Everyone should practice keeping a straight face when they offer it.
    The testimony this week was so compelling that support for impeachment collapsed
    We’re not discussing Realpolitik. I agree that no one ever went broke underestimating the American public. We were discussing the fact that a Daddy is guilty as fuck.
    And yet you can't say of what

    On anything

    For three years


    Its beyond tired at this point
    The Ukraine bribery scheme isn’t nearly as involved as Daddy’s other acts of corruption. Even you should be able to follow it. And that’s not to discount Daddy’s multiple, illegal efforts to obstruct the investigation either.
    And yet you can't put it into words

    Any of it


    The jury is laughing at you
    I think I'd respect you more if instead of slavishly defending a diaper-wearing adderall-addicted early-stage dementia corrupt grifting buffoon you just came out and said yeah, he's all of that, and as long as the Senate Reps hold firm he's not going anywhere, suck it Dems, and I don't give a shit about the rule of law or national security because taxes and lib tears.


    Translation:

    I'm angry and Trumps mean!
    You'd sell out this country if you could make a buck doing it
    Translation:

    I'm too lazy to make a buck!
  • BearsWiin
    BearsWiin Member Posts: 5,076
    Sledog said:

    BearsWiin said:

    Sledog said:

    BearsWiin said:

    HHusky said:

    HHusky said:

    HHusky said:

    HHusky said:

    I’ll concede Joe looks terrible, subjectively.

    You won’t concede the President’s extortion scheme, which is obvious objectively on the evidence presented. I don’t have to guess your reaction if this mountain of evidence involved a Democratic Part President.

    Where is the proof counselor? All ketchup no fries. I know you rats want to hide behind the fact that this is not a court of law but we all know this hearsay wouldn't make it in a court of law neither would the one sided rules your side has set this farce up under. The entire proceeding is a complete joke and you have absolutely zero proof. The leader of your "committee" has already been caught lying (again) and he has a mystery guest who supposedly heard 3rd hand that something happened.

    Again, this whole charade is a joke and I can't believe you are all in on this joke especially with your background.
    Shitloads of the testimony this week were not hearsay. blob’s already offered the only defense that is actually a defense: that Daddy’s deep seeded concerns about corruption were his only motive. Everyone should practice keeping a straight face when they offer it.
    The testimony this week was so compelling that support for impeachment collapsed
    We’re not discussing Realpolitik. I agree that no one ever went broke underestimating the American public. We were discussing the fact that a Daddy is guilty as fuck.
    And yet you can't say of what

    On anything

    For three years


    Its beyond tired at this point
    The Ukraine bribery scheme isn’t nearly as involved as Daddy’s other acts of corruption. Even you should be able to follow it. And that’s not to discount Daddy’s multiple, illegal efforts to obstruct the investigation either.
    And yet you can't put it into words

    Any of it


    The jury is laughing at you
    I think I'd respect you more if instead of slavishly defending a diaper-wearing adderall-addicted early-stage dementia corrupt grifting buffoon you just came out and said yeah, he's all of that, and as long as the Senate Reps hold firm he's not going anywhere, suck it Dems, and I don't give a shit about the rule of law or national security because taxes and lib tears.


    Translation:

    I'm angry and Trumps mean!
    You'd sell out this country if you could make a buck doing it
    Translation:

    I'm too lazy to make a buck!
    Telling that you didn't disagree. What's your price? $100? I take you for a cheap whore.
  • Sledog
    Sledog Member Posts: 38,622 Standard Supporter
    BearsWiin said:

    Sledog said:

    BearsWiin said:

    Sledog said:

    BearsWiin said:

    HHusky said:

    HHusky said:

    HHusky said:

    HHusky said:

    I’ll concede Joe looks terrible, subjectively.

    You won’t concede the President’s extortion scheme, which is obvious objectively on the evidence presented. I don’t have to guess your reaction if this mountain of evidence involved a Democratic Part President.

    Where is the proof counselor? All ketchup no fries. I know you rats want to hide behind the fact that this is not a court of law but we all know this hearsay wouldn't make it in a court of law neither would the one sided rules your side has set this farce up under. The entire proceeding is a complete joke and you have absolutely zero proof. The leader of your "committee" has already been caught lying (again) and he has a mystery guest who supposedly heard 3rd hand that something happened.

    Again, this whole charade is a joke and I can't believe you are all in on this joke especially with your background.
    Shitloads of the testimony this week were not hearsay. blob’s already offered the only defense that is actually a defense: that Daddy’s deep seeded concerns about corruption were his only motive. Everyone should practice keeping a straight face when they offer it.
    The testimony this week was so compelling that support for impeachment collapsed
    We’re not discussing Realpolitik. I agree that no one ever went broke underestimating the American public. We were discussing the fact that a Daddy is guilty as fuck.
    And yet you can't say of what

    On anything

    For three years


    Its beyond tired at this point
    The Ukraine bribery scheme isn’t nearly as involved as Daddy’s other acts of corruption. Even you should be able to follow it. And that’s not to discount Daddy’s multiple, illegal efforts to obstruct the investigation either.
    And yet you can't put it into words

    Any of it


    The jury is laughing at you
    I think I'd respect you more if instead of slavishly defending a diaper-wearing adderall-addicted early-stage dementia corrupt grifting buffoon you just came out and said yeah, he's all of that, and as long as the Senate Reps hold firm he's not going anywhere, suck it Dems, and I don't give a shit about the rule of law or national security because taxes and lib tears.


    Translation:

    I'm angry and Trumps mean!
    You'd sell out this country if you could make a buck doing it
    Translation:

    I'm too lazy to make a buck!
    Telling that you didn't disagree. What's your price? $100? I take you for a cheap whore.
    You'd be a cheeseburger price on Santa Monica blvd.
  • RaceBannon
    RaceBannon Member, Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 115,603 Founders Club
    BearsWiin said:

    HHusky said:

    HHusky said:

    HHusky said:

    HHusky said:

    I’ll concede Joe looks terrible, subjectively.

    You won’t concede the President’s extortion scheme, which is obvious objectively on the evidence presented. I don’t have to guess your reaction if this mountain of evidence involved a Democratic Part President.

    Where is the proof counselor? All ketchup no fries. I know you rats want to hide behind the fact that this is not a court of law but we all know this hearsay wouldn't make it in a court of law neither would the one sided rules your side has set this farce up under. The entire proceeding is a complete joke and you have absolutely zero proof. The leader of your "committee" has already been caught lying (again) and he has a mystery guest who supposedly heard 3rd hand that something happened.

    Again, this whole charade is a joke and I can't believe you are all in on this joke especially with your background.
    Shitloads of the testimony this week were not hearsay. blob’s already offered the only defense that is actually a defense: that Daddy’s deep seeded concerns about corruption were his only motive. Everyone should practice keeping a straight face when they offer it.
    The testimony this week was so compelling that support for impeachment collapsed
    We’re not discussing Realpolitik. I agree that no one ever went broke underestimating the American public. We were discussing the fact that a Daddy is guilty as fuck.
    And yet you can't say of what

    On anything

    For three years


    Its beyond tired at this point
    The Ukraine bribery scheme isn’t nearly as involved as Daddy’s other acts of corruption. Even you should be able to follow it. And that’s not to discount Daddy’s multiple, illegal efforts to obstruct the investigation either.
    And yet you can't put it into words

    Any of it


    The jury is laughing at you
    I think I'd respect you more if instead of slavishly defending a diaper-wearing adderall-addicted early-stage dementia corrupt grifting buffoon you just came out and said yeah, he's all of that, and as long as the Senate Reps hold firm he's not going anywhere, suck it Dems, and I don't give a shit about the rule of law or national security because taxes and lib tears.


    And I don't give a fuck what you think Tailgunner Joe