For a moment forget which party you are aligned with

RaceBannon

HHusky said:

RaceBannon said:

HHusky said:

Bendintheriver said:

HHusky said:

I’ll concede Joe looks terrible, subjectively.

You won’t concede the President’s extortion scheme, which is obvious objectively on the evidence presented. I don’t have to guess your reaction if this mountain of evidence involved a Democratic Part President.

Where is the proof counselor? All ketchup no fries. I know you rats want to hide behind the fact that this is not a court of law but we all know this hearsay wouldn't make it in a court of law neither would the one sided rules your side has set this farce up under. The entire proceeding is a complete joke and you have absolutely zero proof. The leader of your "committee" has already been caught lying (again) and he has a mystery guest who supposedly heard 3rd hand that something happened.

Again, this whole charade is a joke and I can't believe you are all in on this joke especially with your background.

Shitloads of the testimony this week were not hearsay. blob’s already offered the only defense that is actually a defense: that Daddy’s deep seeded concerns about corruption were his only motive. Everyone should practice keeping a straight face when they offer it.

The testimony this week was so compelling that support for impeachment collapsed

We’re not discussing Realpolitik. I agree that no one ever went broke underestimating the American public. We were discussing the fact that a Daddy is guilty as fuck.

And yet you can't say of what

On anything

For three years


Its beyond tired at this point

SFGbob

HHusky said:

SFGbob said:

HHusky said:

RaceBannon said:

HHusky said:

Bendintheriver said:

HHusky said:

I’ll concede Joe looks terrible, subjectively.

You won’t concede the President’s extortion scheme, which is obvious objectively on the evidence presented. I don’t have to guess your reaction if this mountain of evidence involved a Democratic Part President.

Where is the proof counselor? All ketchup no fries. I know you rats want to hide behind the fact that this is not a court of law but we all know this hearsay wouldn't make it in a court of law neither would the one sided rules your side has set this farce up under. The entire proceeding is a complete joke and you have absolutely zero proof. The leader of your "committee" has already been caught lying (again) and he has a mystery guest who supposedly heard 3rd hand that something happened.

Again, this whole charade is a joke and I can't believe you are all in on this joke especially with your background.

Shitloads of the testimony this week were not hearsay. blob’s already offered the only defense that is actually a defense: that Daddy’s deep seeded concerns about corruption were his only motive. Everyone should practice keeping a straight face when they offer it.

The testimony this week was so compelling that support for impeachment collapsed

We’re not discussing Realpolitik. I agree that no one ever went broke underestimating the American public. We were discussing the fact that a Daddy is guilty as fuck.

Funny, this dumbfuck swallowed whole the lie about the Gentle Giant being shot in the back while running away and claimed Obama was fiscally responsible and then has the gall to call other people dumb?

Care to talk about how you earned your nickname smart guy?

See Race? blob knows Daddy’s guilty.

No, I know you commenting on the lack of intelligence of anyone other than yourself is a fucking joke.

Sledog

HHusky said:

Bendintheriver said:

HHusky said:

I’ll concede Joe looks terrible, subjectively.

You won’t concede the President’s extortion scheme, which is obvious objectively on the evidence presented. I don’t have to guess your reaction if this mountain of evidence involved a Democratic Part President.

Where is the proof counselor? All ketchup no fries. I know you rats want to hide behind the fact that this is not a court of law but we all know this hearsay wouldn't make it in a court of law neither would the one sided rules your side has set this farce up under. The entire proceeding is a complete joke and you have absolutely zero proof. The leader of your "committee" has already been caught lying (again) and he has a mystery guest who supposedly heard 3rd hand that something happened.

Again, this whole charade is a joke and I can't believe you are all in on this joke especially with your background.

Shitloads of the testimony this week were not hearsay, or would come in under hearsay exceptions. blob’s already offered the only defense that is actually a defense: that Daddy’s deep seeded concerns about corruption were his only motive. Everyone should practice keeping a straight face when they offer it.

Every single witness said they could not testify to Trump committing a crime. HTH

HHusky

RaceBannon said:

HHusky said:

RaceBannon said:

HHusky said:

Bendintheriver said:

HHusky said:

I’ll concede Joe looks terrible, subjectively.

You won’t concede the President’s extortion scheme, which is obvious objectively on the evidence presented. I don’t have to guess your reaction if this mountain of evidence involved a Democratic Part President.

Where is the proof counselor? All ketchup no fries. I know you rats want to hide behind the fact that this is not a court of law but we all know this hearsay wouldn't make it in a court of law neither would the one sided rules your side has set this farce up under. The entire proceeding is a complete joke and you have absolutely zero proof. The leader of your "committee" has already been caught lying (again) and he has a mystery guest who supposedly heard 3rd hand that something happened.

Again, this whole charade is a joke and I can't believe you are all in on this joke especially with your background.

Shitloads of the testimony this week were not hearsay. blob’s already offered the only defense that is actually a defense: that Daddy’s deep seeded concerns about corruption were his only motive. Everyone should practice keeping a straight face when they offer it.

The testimony this week was so compelling that support for impeachment collapsed

We’re not discussing Realpolitik. I agree that no one ever went broke underestimating the American public. We were discussing the fact that a Daddy is guilty as fuck.

And yet you can't say of what

On anything

For three years


Its beyond tired at this point

The Ukraine bribery scheme isn’t nearly as involved as Daddy’s other acts of corruption. Even you should be able to follow it. And that’s not to discount Daddy’s multiple, illegal efforts to obstruct the investigation either.

HHusky

Sledog said:

HHusky said:

Bendintheriver said:

HHusky said:

I’ll concede Joe looks terrible, subjectively.

You won’t concede the President’s extortion scheme, which is obvious objectively on the evidence presented. I don’t have to guess your reaction if this mountain of evidence involved a Democratic Part President.

Where is the proof counselor? All ketchup no fries. I know you rats want to hide behind the fact that this is not a court of law but we all know this hearsay wouldn't make it in a court of law neither would the one sided rules your side has set this farce up under. The entire proceeding is a complete joke and you have absolutely zero proof. The leader of your "committee" has already been caught lying (again) and he has a mystery guest who supposedly heard 3rd hand that something happened.

Again, this whole charade is a joke and I can't believe you are all in on this joke especially with your background.

Shitloads of the testimony this week were not hearsay, or would come in under hearsay exceptions. blob’s already offered the only defense that is actually a defense: that Daddy’s deep seeded concerns about corruption were his only motive. Everyone should practice keeping a straight face when they offer it.

Every single witness said they could not testify to Trump committing a crime. HTH

They all declined to testify to a legal conclusion. I know you aren’t that nuanced at the Mall, but the smart people are that nuanced.

Sledog

HHusky said:

RaceBannon said:

HHusky said:

RaceBannon said:

HHusky said:

Bendintheriver said:

HHusky said:

I’ll concede Joe looks terrible, subjectively.

You won’t concede the President’s extortion scheme, which is obvious objectively on the evidence presented. I don’t have to guess your reaction if this mountain of evidence involved a Democratic Part President.

Where is the proof counselor? All ketchup no fries. I know you rats want to hide behind the fact that this is not a court of law but we all know this hearsay wouldn't make it in a court of law neither would the one sided rules your side has set this farce up under. The entire proceeding is a complete joke and you have absolutely zero proof. The leader of your "committee" has already been caught lying (again) and he has a mystery guest who supposedly heard 3rd hand that something happened.

Again, this whole charade is a joke and I can't believe you are all in on this joke especially with your background.

Shitloads of the testimony this week were not hearsay. blob’s already offered the only defense that is actually a defense: that Daddy’s deep seeded concerns about corruption were his only motive. Everyone should practice keeping a straight face when they offer it.

The testimony this week was so compelling that support for impeachment collapsed

We’re not discussing Realpolitik. I agree that no one ever went broke underestimating the American public. We were discussing the fact that a Daddy is guilty as fuck.

And yet you can't say of what

On anything

For three years


Its beyond tired at this point

The Ukraine bribery scheme isn’t nearly as involved as Daddy’s other acts of corruption. Even you should be able to follow it. And that’s not to discount Daddy’s multiple, illegal efforts to obstruct the investigation either.

Do bribery to ask N Korea to denuke in trade for economic and other assistance? Investigating a crime a guy brags about in video is totally within the president's scope and duties.

HoustonHusky

HondoBro #4 back to his daddy issues (how bad did your dad beat you...did he look like Trump or something) along with showing a complete misunderstanding of hearsay...especially since we have the actual transcript of the call in question.

News at 11...

HHusky

HoustonHusky said:

HondoBro #4 back to his daddy issues (how bad did your dad beat you...did he look like Trump or something) along with showing a complete misunderstanding of hearsay...especially since we have the actual transcript of the call in question.

News at 11...

So back to the “You can’t prove it!” defense. Not as interesting as your actual opinion. But that’s where you gals get shy.

2001400ex

RaceBannon said:

HHusky said:

Bendintheriver said:

HHusky said:

I’ll concede Joe looks terrible, subjectively.

You won’t concede the President’s extortion scheme, which is obvious objectively on the evidence presented. I don’t have to guess your reaction if this mountain of evidence involved a Democratic Part President.

Where is the proof counselor? All ketchup no fries. I know you rats want to hide behind the fact that this is not a court of law but we all know this hearsay wouldn't make it in a court of law neither would the one sided rules your side has set this farce up under. The entire proceeding is a complete joke and you have absolutely zero proof. The leader of your "committee" has already been caught lying (again) and he has a mystery guest who supposedly heard 3rd hand that something happened.

Again, this whole charade is a joke and I can't believe you are all in on this joke especially with your background.

Shitloads of the testimony this week were not hearsay. blob’s already offered the only defense that is actually a defense: that Daddy’s deep seeded concerns about corruption were his only motive. Everyone should practice keeping a straight face when they offer it.

The testimony this week was so compelling that support for impeachment collapsed

Rasmussen disagrees.

http://m.rasmussenreports.com/public_content/politics/trump_administration/trump_approval_index_history

RaceBannon

HHusky said:

RaceBannon said:

HHusky said:

RaceBannon said:

HHusky said:

Bendintheriver said:

HHusky said:

I’ll concede Joe looks terrible, subjectively.

You won’t concede the President’s extortion scheme, which is obvious objectively on the evidence presented. I don’t have to guess your reaction if this mountain of evidence involved a Democratic Part President.

Where is the proof counselor? All ketchup no fries. I know you rats want to hide behind the fact that this is not a court of law but we all know this hearsay wouldn't make it in a court of law neither would the one sided rules your side has set this farce up under. The entire proceeding is a complete joke and you have absolutely zero proof. The leader of your "committee" has already been caught lying (again) and he has a mystery guest who supposedly heard 3rd hand that something happened.

Again, this whole charade is a joke and I can't believe you are all in on this joke especially with your background.

Shitloads of the testimony this week were not hearsay. blob’s already offered the only defense that is actually a defense: that Daddy’s deep seeded concerns about corruption were his only motive. Everyone should practice keeping a straight face when they offer it.

The testimony this week was so compelling that support for impeachment collapsed

We’re not discussing Realpolitik. I agree that no one ever went broke underestimating the American public. We were discussing the fact that a Daddy is guilty as fuck.

And yet you can't say of what

On anything

For three years


Its beyond tired at this point

The Ukraine bribery scheme isn’t nearly as involved as Daddy’s other acts of corruption. Even you should be able to follow it. And that’s not to discount Daddy’s multiple, illegal efforts to obstruct the investigation either.

And yet you can't put it into words

Any of it


The jury is laughing at you