Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.
For a moment forget which party you are aligned with
Comments
-
Witnesses relay facts, Gasbag. They don’t testify to legal conclusions. The facts here speak for themselves. Unlike Russian collusion, this was a pretty simple shakedown. You don’t care that Daddy did it. Just admit it.WestlinnDuck said:Counselor, what evidence do you have? Please cite the witnesses who have used the words extortion or bribery in their testimony. I'm told the evidence is overwhelming. Just like you said about the fake Russian collusion. Have at it.
-
The case against Daddy is obvious. Speculating that there’s a case to be made against Joe Biden is pretty desperate, just like all the other defenses offered thus far. You wouldn’t give it the time of day if we switched the parties.PurpleThrobber said:
i have absolutely no problem with the 'extortion'. Been very clear about that.HHusky said:I’ll concede Joe looks terrible, subjectively.
You won’t concede the President’s extortion scheme, which is obvious objectively on the evidence presented.
You get the money when you assist in the investigation of a corrupt US Vice-President and his corrupt son. Simple.
Why won't you concede that the Bidens are dirty as shit and should be facing criminal charges? -
Yes, yes a "shakedown" in order to get something Obama flat-out refused to provided them but Trump did.HHusky said:
Witnesses relay facts, Gasbag. They don’t testify to legal conclusions. The facts here speak for themselves. Unlike Russian collusion, this was a pretty simple shakedown. You don’t care that Daddy did it. Just admit it.WestlinnDuck said:Counselor, what evidence do you have? Please cite the witnesses who have used the words extortion or bribery in their testimony. I'm told the evidence is overwhelming. Just like you said about the fake Russian collusion. Have at it.
-
Speaking of irrelevant arguments, here’s blob to tell us that when Daddy engages in extortion, he dangles “the good stuff”.SFGbob said:
Yes, yes a "shakedown" in order to get something Obama flat-out refused to provided them but Trump did.HHusky said:
Witnesses relay facts, Gasbag. They don’t testify to legal conclusions. The facts here speak for themselves. Unlike Russian collusion, this was a pretty simple shakedown. You don’t care that Daddy did it. Just admit it.WestlinnDuck said:Counselor, what evidence do you have? Please cite the witnesses who have used the words extortion or bribery in their testimony. I'm told the evidence is overwhelming. Just like you said about the fake Russian collusion. Have at it.
-
You mean arguments that make your snatch hurt.HHusky said:
Speaking of irrelevant arguments, here’s blob to tell us that when Daddy engages in extortion, he dangles “the good stuff”.SFGbob said:
Yes, yes a "shakedown" in order to get something Obama flat-out refused to provided them but Trump did.HHusky said:
Witnesses relay facts, Gasbag. They don’t testify to legal conclusions. The facts here speak for themselves. Unlike Russian collusion, this was a pretty simple shakedown. You don’t care that Daddy did it. Just admit it.WestlinnDuck said:Counselor, what evidence do you have? Please cite the witnesses who have used the words extortion or bribery in their testimony. I'm told the evidence is overwhelming. Just like you said about the fake Russian collusion. Have at it.
-
When you have lost the Morning Schmo ....
Well, Mika is still blowing Biden but it appears that the Morning Schmo has had enough and is looking to chow some pow or go with door number 2, the gay Peter’s peter.
https://hotair.com/archives/ed-morrissey/2019/11/21/morning-joe-time-dems-talk-biden/
Morning Joe: It’s time for Dems to have a talk about Biden
“I think Biden has the best chance of beating Trump. I do,” Scarborough declared earlier on MSNBC’s Morning Joe, “like if he’s on his game. But I just wonder, is the media grading Joe Biden on a scale?”
SCARBOROUGH: Of course, Willie, he’s struggling there. He’s closing his eyes. He knows he’s having trouble finding words. The sentences are jumbled, the words are jumbled. I just worried when I read — you see this and, listen, I’m just saying, I think Biden has the best chance of beating Trump. I do. Like if he’s on his game. But I just wonder, is the media grading Joe Biden on a scale? Are we afraid to say that a lot of his sentences don’t make sense? That he’s having trouble completing thoughts? That when he’s asked in a previous debate about Afghanistan an issue he knows more about than anybody, not only on that stage, but in Washington, D.C., he ends up stumbling through an answer on Iraq. Are we grading him on a scale the same way people have always graded Donald Trump on a scale in these debates?
GEIST: Yes. The answer is yes.
When co-host Mika Brzezinski argued that the presidency requires more than just extemporaneously putting together a coherent string of words, Scarborough shot back that it’s a minimum prerequisite for being an effective candidate:
Still, co-host Mika Brzezinski came to Biden’s defense, arguing voters care about more than just these debate soundbites.
“You’ve got to be able to complete a sentence if you’re running for president,” Scarborough shot back.
Where does one start with Biden’s performance last night? One could start at the start, as Biden seemed to lose his way on the very first question he attempted to answer, but that can just be attributed to momentary jitters. The rest is tough to explain away easily. For instance, Biden claimed to have the support of the Senate’s only African-American member (Caroline Mosley Braun), while forgetting that Kamala Harris was on the same stage as him: -
“Daddy did it, but Obama!” isn’t as powerful an argument as you imagine.SFGbob said:
You mean arguments that make your snatch hurt.HHusky said:
Speaking of irrelevant arguments, here’s blob to tell us that when Daddy engages in extortion, he dangles “the good stuff”.SFGbob said:
Yes, yes a "shakedown" in order to get something Obama flat-out refused to provided them but Trump did.HHusky said:
Witnesses relay facts, Gasbag. They don’t testify to legal conclusions. The facts here speak for themselves. Unlike Russian collusion, this was a pretty simple shakedown. You don’t care that Daddy did it. Just admit it.WestlinnDuck said:Counselor, what evidence do you have? Please cite the witnesses who have used the words extortion or bribery in their testimony. I'm told the evidence is overwhelming. Just like you said about the fake Russian collusion. Have at it.
-
No, my "argument" is that Obama refused to provide them with any lethal aid, and you didn't give a fuck. Trump did provide them with lethal aid, and he tried to get them to investigate the meddling by Ukraine into the 2016 election as part of the deal. I don't have a problem with that. Your crocodile tears about Trump hurting our standing in the world and making our allies distrust us is just bullshit you're spewing, you don't mean any of it.HHusky said:
“Daddy did it, but Obama!” isn’t as powerful an argument as you imagine.SFGbob said:
You mean arguments that make your snatch hurt.HHusky said:
Speaking of irrelevant arguments, here’s blob to tell us that when Daddy engages in extortion, he dangles “the good stuff”.SFGbob said:
Yes, yes a "shakedown" in order to get something Obama flat-out refused to provided them but Trump did.HHusky said:
Witnesses relay facts, Gasbag. They don’t testify to legal conclusions. The facts here speak for themselves. Unlike Russian collusion, this was a pretty simple shakedown. You don’t care that Daddy did it. Just admit it.WestlinnDuck said:Counselor, what evidence do you have? Please cite the witnesses who have used the words extortion or bribery in their testimony. I'm told the evidence is overwhelming. Just like you said about the fake Russian collusion. Have at it.
You see, unlike you O'Keefed, I'm not a fraud. When I said in early 2017 that I wanted any and all foreign interference in our election investigated I meant it, and now we see that when you were calling for an investigation you were lying about wanting everything investigated, weren't you comrade.
Now go type "Daddy" three more times for your next killer rebuttal. -
Thanks, party shill.HHusky said:
The case against Daddy is obvious. Speculating that there’s a case to be made against Joe Biden is pretty desperate, just like all the other defenses offered thus far. You wouldn’t give it the time of day if we switched the parties.PurpleThrobber said:
i have absolutely no problem with the 'extortion'. Been very clear about that.HHusky said:I’ll concede Joe looks terrible, subjectively.
You won’t concede the President’s extortion scheme, which is obvious objectively on the evidence presented.
You get the money when you assist in the investigation of a corrupt US Vice-President and his corrupt son. Simple.
Why won't you concede that the Bidens are dirty as shit and should be facing criminal charges?
Same as it ever was.
-
I think we can all welcome Daddy exposing himself to cross examination on this fig leaf of a defense. What could possibly go wrong?SFGbob said:
No, my "argument" is that Obama refused to provide them with any lethal aid, and you didn't give a fuck. Trump did provide them with lethal aid, and he tried to get them to investigate the meddling by Ukraine into the 2016 election as part of the deal. I don't have a problem with that. Your crocodile tears about Trump hurting our standing in the world and making our allies distrust us is just bullshit you're spewing, you don't mean any of it.HHusky said:
“Daddy did it, but Obama!” isn’t as powerful an argument as you imagine.SFGbob said:
You mean arguments that make your snatch hurt.HHusky said:
Speaking of irrelevant arguments, here’s blob to tell us that when Daddy engages in extortion, he dangles “the good stuff”.SFGbob said:
Yes, yes a "shakedown" in order to get something Obama flat-out refused to provided them but Trump did.HHusky said:
Witnesses relay facts, Gasbag. They don’t testify to legal conclusions. The facts here speak for themselves. Unlike Russian collusion, this was a pretty simple shakedown. You don’t care that Daddy did it. Just admit it.WestlinnDuck said:Counselor, what evidence do you have? Please cite the witnesses who have used the words extortion or bribery in their testimony. I'm told the evidence is overwhelming. Just like you said about the fake Russian collusion. Have at it.
Now go type "Daddy" three more times for your next killer rebuttal.
