Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.
Quuuaaaccckkk
Comments
-
Class rankings don’t matter in June Hth!
-
Then why are other Huskies talking about the issue?
I think some of your pals are knocking three star athletes too. I am just trying to edify the ignorant. -
I have no illusions here. This year we will be lucky to finish in the top fifteen. The important issue for the Ducks is following last years class with filling positions of need.
-
Raw numbers are meaningless at this point, the only thing that matters (for a school that has any decent ability to recruit anyway) are percentages.DJDuck said:As of now these are the class rankings of schools we are talking about:
#11 Oregon
#54 Washington
#60 USC
Facts about 3 star recruits in this years class
Clemson has FIVE 3 star commits
Alabama has THREE 3 star commits
LSU has FIVE 3 star commits
Clemson: 4 3 stars out of 18 commits = 87.8% blue chips, overall average score of 94.56 (1st)
Bama: 3 3 stars out of 15 commits = 80% blue chips, overall average score of 93.35 (4th)
LSU: 5 3 stars out of 20 commits = 75% blue chips, overall average score of 92.47 (5th)
Oregon: 7 3 stars out of 13 commits = 46.15% blue chips, overall average score of 89.58 (19th)
Washington: 3 3 stars out of 6 commits = 50% blue chips, overall average score of 89.06 (21st)
Washington and Oregon's classes are roughly equal right now. You can argue Oregon's is better because fuller is better than emptier, but OTOH Oregon's top commit in these calculations isn't really committed to them and Washington's class is definitely trending better of late.
I'm honestly kind of surprised by how much Oregon's recruiting momentum has slowed down, I didn't expect that. Ever since the shit they pulled with Smalls it's like they can only take 3 stars. It's almost like karma's a bitch... -
Actually Oregon is in pretty good shape. They already have some important recruits in key positions. I never expected us to do as well as last year or have a top ten class.
I do expect Oregon to have the #1 class in the PAC 12. Right or wrong they will be up there. Whether you admit it or not MC & Co are a machine.
With the talent in Washington next year It should be UW’s year.
-
I've admitted many times I think Cristoball and his staff are a recruiting machine. That's why I'm shocked how mediocre their results have been this class. I did not see that coming.DJDuck said:Actually Oregon is in pretty good shape. They already have some important recruits in key positions. I never expected us to do as well as last year or have a top ten class.
I do expect Oregon to have the #1 class in the PAC 12. Right or wrong they will be up there. Whether you admit it or not MC & Co are a machine.
With the talent in Washington next year It should be UW’s year.
Oregon will not have the #1 class in the Pac this year. -
Who do you think will be #1?
BTW I should have been more clear. I met “you” in the larger sense. I should have said merely “ whether oeople admit it or not”. Sorry. -
I think UW will have the #1 class in the Pac unless USC hires Urban.DJDuck said:Who do you think will be #1?
BTW I should have been more clear. I met “you” in the larger sense. I should have said merely “ whether oeople admit it or not”. Sorry.
I would have said Oregon before the last couple of weeks. -
Given the milieu in the PAC 12 it will be one of us for awhile IMO.
Utah, Colorado, WSU, OSU, ASU, UA are just lacking
Cal has a new young coach and is doing better but they have a ways to go.
UCLA-Chip is a good coach but hates to recruit and it shows
USC is always a threat and will get good players but won’t be what they could be with Helton still at the helm. Oregon has made huge inroads into USC traditional territories of Mater Dei, St John Bosco, Narbonne, Norco and others.
Both UO & UO have recruiters that the other schools can’t match. -
Fuck recruiting rankings. Just get physically people and kick ass on the FUCKING FIELD!
FUCK RECRUITING NATTIES!
