The Daily Ilhan
Comments
-
I wonder if the FGM rate being 98% in Somalia plays into her being so salty.
-
Thanks for making my point. You hate this country so much that you believe that Western Civilization and American culture is reduced to nothing more than sterile strip mall and fast food. Why do you live here if you really believe that?HardlyClothed said:
The Western Civilization line is so funny because what is American culture but a sterile suburban strip mall lined by decadent fast food joints. That’s the civilization you want to defend? What’s your favorite Opera Bob?SFGbob said:
Don't dismiss the Muslim and the left both share a hatred of Western Civilization. There's also the reflexive need of leftists to side with the swarthy foreigners or the white westerners. The fact that Muslims hate gays, treat women like property, and are religious fanatics, when the left supposedly hates people who espouse any of these beliefs if they are Christians is something that is an objection that easily overcome if the Muslims shares the typical leftists hatred of America and the Jews.GrundleStiltzkin said:
Progressives seem to have a chinstinctive revulsion to the familiar, a certain homophobia of their own. Transexuals are celebrated simply because they are different, for example. This is most evident with progressive relationship to the Middle East and Islam. Their values couldn't be more different. However, Middle Eastern countries are opposed to the United States and thus are adopted as allies of the progressives, closer held by progressives the more virulent opposed to the US those countries are. By extension, Muslims are upheld by progressives because they believe Islamic values most challenge mainstream American values. Other than perhaps Islam's economic teachings, it's hard to see ideological comity between the two value sets.Swaye said:
What Derek just said. A good chunk of the left hates America right there with her. Obviously the electorate in Minnesota does. They knew what she was, and elected her anyway. Nothing good comes from Minnesota. Except Prince.Doogles said:The way she can barely contain her laughter...it's amazing the left can't see she hates America. She's not even trying to hide it.
-
This is the school of thought that believes we never should have attacked the Japanese because we just made them madder.HardlyClothed said:
The Iraq War sent the number of global jihadists skyrocketing by creating a sectarian holy war in the heart of the Middle East.Pitchfork51 said:One of the dumbest ideas the left has is that America created terrorism and it's just the response.
Like wtf
Muslims have been fighting the infidels since the beginning of islam -
America was asking for it!allpurpleallgold said:I think I agree with her. I’m not interested enough to watch the full interview but I agree with the quotes provided.
We know for a fact that American actions cause terrorism. We’ve seen it the last 16 years with the wars we started. Accepting that doesn’t mean you have contempt for America, denying it means you have contempt for truth.
-
Self-hatred and hatred of your country and our values and hatred of Western Civilization. This is the biggest difference between liberal elites today and liberal elites a hundred years ago. A hundred years ago both liberals and Conservatives believed that Americanizing newly arriving immigrants was a good thing, teaching them American values and culture was something that both liberals and Conservatives thought was a good thing.RaceBannon said:
Self hatred is a big part of being a liberal these daysBennyBeaver said:I fucking hate America. Mostly because all fucktards in the Tug.
Have you apologized for being white yet?
Not any more. -
Civil war is going to be awesome.
-
So do I. But I hate sand people too. I basically hate everyone except Orthodox Jews.Pitchfork51 said:
They mostly just hate white peopleGrundleStiltzkin said:
Progressives seem to have a chinstinctive revulsion to the familiar, a certain homophobia of their own. Transexuals are celebrated simply because they are different, for example. This is most evident with progressive relationship to the Middle East and Islam. Their values couldn't be more different. However, Middle Eastern countries are opposed to the United States and thus are adopted as allies of the progressives, closer held by progressives the more virulent opposed to the US those countries are. By extension, Muslims are upheld by progressives because they believe Islamic values most challenge mainstream American values. Other than perhaps Islam's economic teachings, it's hard to see ideological comity between the two value sets.Swaye said:
What Derek just said. A good chunk of the left hates America right there with her. Obviously the electorate in Minnesota does. They knew what she was, and elected her anyway. Nothing good comes from Minnesota. Except Prince.Doogles said:The way she can barely contain her laughter...it's amazing the left can't see she hates America. She's not even trying to hide it.
-
Photo of America ‘starting’ a war.allpurpleallgold said:I think I agree with her. I’m not interested enough to watch the full interview but I agree with the quotes provided.
We know for a fact that American actions cause terrorism. We’ve seen it the last 16 years with the wars we started. Accepting that doesn’t mean you have contempt for America, denying it means you have contempt for truth.
-
I feel bad that we have lost APAG forever.allpurpleallgold said:I think I agree with her. I’m not interested enough to watch the full interview but I agree with the quotes provided.
We know for a fact that American actions cause terrorism. We’ve seen it the last 16 years with the wars we started. Accepting that doesn’t mean you have contempt for America, denying it means you have contempt for truth. -
Nothing's changed with zeSwaye said:
I feel bad that we have lost APAG forever.allpurpleallgold said:I think I agree with her. I’m not interested enough to watch the full interview but I agree with the quotes provided.
We know for a fact that American actions cause terrorism. We’ve seen it the last 16 years with the wars we started. Accepting that doesn’t mean you have contempt for America, denying it means you have contempt for truth. -
That was an inside job and Bush knew!!!!USMChawk said:
Photo of America ‘starting’ a war.allpurpleallgold said:I think I agree with her. I’m not interested enough to watch the full interview but I agree with the quotes provided.
We know for a fact that American actions cause terrorism. We’ve seen it the last 16 years with the wars we started. Accepting that doesn’t mean you have contempt for America, denying it means you have contempt for truth. -
Pawz?SFGbob said:
That was an inside job and Bush knew!!!!USMChawk said:
Photo of America ‘starting’ a war.allpurpleallgold said:I think I agree with her. I’m not interested enough to watch the full interview but I agree with the quotes provided.
We know for a fact that American actions cause terrorism. We’ve seen it the last 16 years with the wars we started. Accepting that doesn’t mean you have contempt for America, denying it means you have contempt for truth. -
WrongSFGbob said:
That was an inside job and Bush knew!!!!USMChawk said:
Photo of America ‘starting’ a war.allpurpleallgold said:I think I agree with her. I’m not interested enough to watch the full interview but I agree with the quotes provided.
We know for a fact that American actions cause terrorism. We’ve seen it the last 16 years with the wars we started. Accepting that doesn’t mean you have contempt for America, denying it means you have contempt for truth.
https://hardcorehusky.com/discussions/tagged/pete-carroll-did-9-11
-
We were after we cut off the Dino juice.HillsboroDuck said:
America was asking for it!allpurpleallgold said:I think I agree with her. I’m not interested enough to watch the full interview but I agree with the quotes provided.
We know for a fact that American actions cause terrorism. We’ve seen it the last 16 years with the wars we started. Accepting that doesn’t mean you have contempt for America, denying it means you have contempt for truth. -
Should we have invaded Iraq Bob? Yes or no?SFGbob said:
This is the school of thought that believes we never should have attacked the Japanese because we just made them madder.HardlyClothed said:
The Iraq War sent the number of global jihadists skyrocketing by creating a sectarian holy war in the heart of the Middle East.Pitchfork51 said:One of the dumbest ideas the left has is that America created terrorism and it's just the response.
Like wtf
Muslims have been fighting the infidels since the beginning of islam -
USMChawk said:
Photo of America ‘starting’ a war.allpurpleallgold said:I think I agree with her. I’m not interested enough to watch the full interview but I agree with the quotes provided.
We know for a fact that American actions cause terrorism. We’ve seen it the last 16 years with the wars we started. Accepting that doesn’t mean you have contempt for America, denying it means you have contempt for truth.
Show me the evidence that Iraq was behind 9/11 or had any links to Al-Qaeda.
Besides getting Bin Laden what have been the redeeming aspects of the “Global War on Terror” exactly? -
We killed them as they flocked in. Fight over there not here. Kept attacks down world wide.HardlyClothed said:
The Iraq War sent the number of global jihadists skyrocketing by creating a sectarian holy war in the heart of the Middle East.Pitchfork51 said:One of the dumbest ideas the left has is that America created terrorism and it's just the response.
Like wtf
Muslims have been fighting the infidels since the beginning of islam -
Besides getting rich what are the redeeming aspects of "Winning The Lottery" exactly?HardlyClothed said:USMChawk said:
Photo of America ‘starting’ a war.allpurpleallgold said:I think I agree with her. I’m not interested enough to watch the full interview but I agree with the quotes provided.
We know for a fact that American actions cause terrorism. We’ve seen it the last 16 years with the wars we started. Accepting that doesn’t mean you have contempt for America, denying it means you have contempt for truth.
Show me the evidence that Iraq was behind 9/11 or had any links to Al-Qaeda.
Besides getting Bin Laden what have been the redeeming aspects of the “Global War on Terror” exactly? -
Speaking of non-sequitersHardlyClothed said:
Should we have invaded Iraq Bob? Yes or no?SFGbob said:
This is the school of thought that believes we never should have attacked the Japanese because we just made them madder.HardlyClothed said:
The Iraq War sent the number of global jihadists skyrocketing by creating a sectarian holy war in the heart of the Middle East.Pitchfork51 said:One of the dumbest ideas the left has is that America created terrorism and it's just the response.
Like wtf
Muslims have been fighting the infidels since the beginning of islam
We should have overthrown Sadaam after the 1st Gulf War. Btw, aren't you the very same dipshit who claims that calling people evil who really are evil leads to bad things so we should never identify anything as evil.
Was attacking Japan bad HC? It did make them madder, so we probably shouldn't have done it, right? -
Wow it only cost us $6 Trillion and counting. I’m feeling much richer.HillsboroDuck said:
Besides getting rich what are the redeeming aspects of "Winning The Lottery" exactly?HardlyClothed said:USMChawk said:
Photo of America ‘starting’ a war.allpurpleallgold said:I think I agree with her. I’m not interested enough to watch the full interview but I agree with the quotes provided.
We know for a fact that American actions cause terrorism. We’ve seen it the last 16 years with the wars we started. Accepting that doesn’t mean you have contempt for America, denying it means you have contempt for truth.
Show me the evidence that Iraq was behind 9/11 or had any links to Al-Qaeda.
Besides getting Bin Laden what have been the redeeming aspects of the “Global War on Terror” exactly? -
Ok so should we have overthrown him the 2nd time in 2003 yes or no? Or keep dodging.SFGbob said:
Speaking of non-sequitersHardlyClothed said:
Should we have invaded Iraq Bob? Yes or no?SFGbob said:
This is the school of thought that believes we never should have attacked the Japanese because we just made them madder.HardlyClothed said:
The Iraq War sent the number of global jihadists skyrocketing by creating a sectarian holy war in the heart of the Middle East.Pitchfork51 said:One of the dumbest ideas the left has is that America created terrorism and it's just the response.
Like wtf
Muslims have been fighting the infidels since the beginning of islam
We should have overthrown Sadaam after the 1st Gulf War. Btw, aren't you the very same dipshit who claims that calling people evil who really are evil leads to bad things so we should never identify anything as evil.
Was attacking Japan bad HC? It did make them madder, so we probably shouldn't have done it, right?
The simplistic Manichean narrative of the good and noble US fighting evil in the world is what I take issue with. Of course defeating Nazi Germany and Imperial Japan were good, dipshit. -
You missed the point, not surprisingly.HardlyClothed said:
Wow it only cost us $6 Trillion and counting. I’m feeling much richer.HillsboroDuck said:
Besides getting rich what are the redeeming aspects of "Winning The Lottery" exactly?HardlyClothed said:USMChawk said:
Photo of America ‘starting’ a war.allpurpleallgold said:I think I agree with her. I’m not interested enough to watch the full interview but I agree with the quotes provided.
We know for a fact that American actions cause terrorism. We’ve seen it the last 16 years with the wars we started. Accepting that doesn’t mean you have contempt for America, denying it means you have contempt for truth.
Show me the evidence that Iraq was behind 9/11 or had any links to Al-Qaeda.
Besides getting Bin Laden what have been the redeeming aspects of the “Global War on Terror” exactly?
The most important objective of the war on terror was Bin Laden. There's a worthwhile discussion to be had of whether the war on terror has been worth it. You can't have that discussion without chincluding the primary objective. -
If we went in it to win it Iraq then sure. We didn't pussy foot around Germany and Japan
Since we wont or can't do that anymore then leave the troops home -
Is that a lot?HardlyClothed said:
Wow it only cost us $6 Trillion and counting. I’m feeling much richer.HillsboroDuck said:
Besides getting rich what are the redeeming aspects of "Winning The Lottery" exactly?HardlyClothed said:USMChawk said:
Photo of America ‘starting’ a war.allpurpleallgold said:I think I agree with her. I’m not interested enough to watch the full interview but I agree with the quotes provided.
We know for a fact that American actions cause terrorism. We’ve seen it the last 16 years with the wars we started. Accepting that doesn’t mean you have contempt for America, denying it means you have contempt for truth.
Show me the evidence that Iraq was behind 9/11 or had any links to Al-Qaeda.
Besides getting Bin Laden what have been the redeeming aspects of the “Global War on Terror” exactly? -
This hate speech against a native religion of the peaceful Iranian people will not stand!HardlyClothed said:
Ok so should we have overthrown him the 2nd time in 2003 yes or no? Or keep dodging.SFGbob said:
Speaking of non-sequitersHardlyClothed said:
Should we have invaded Iraq Bob? Yes or no?SFGbob said:
This is the school of thought that believes we never should have attacked the Japanese because we just made them madder.HardlyClothed said:
The Iraq War sent the number of global jihadists skyrocketing by creating a sectarian holy war in the heart of the Middle East.Pitchfork51 said:One of the dumbest ideas the left has is that America created terrorism and it's just the response.
Like wtf
Muslims have been fighting the infidels since the beginning of islam
We should have overthrown Sadaam after the 1st Gulf War. Btw, aren't you the very same dipshit who claims that calling people evil who really are evil leads to bad things so we should never identify anything as evil.
Was attacking Japan bad HC? It did make them madder, so we probably shouldn't have done it, right?
The simplistic Manichean narrative of the good and noble US fighting evil in the world is what I take issue with. Of course defeating Nazi Germany and Imperial Japan were good, dipshit.
-
"Nation Building" is a waste of time, unless your foe is so thoroughly defeated they have no choice but to fall into line as was the case with Germany and Japan. The US kicks ass at total war. Pacification not so much.RaceBannon said:If we went in it to win it Iraq then sure. We didn't pussy foot around Germany and Japan
Since we wont or can't do that anymore then leave the troops home -
LEAVE! ThenBennyBeaver said:I fucking hate America. Mostly because all fucktards in the Tug.
-
How did I dodge? I answered your fucking question. And I can only hope to make myself one day as sophisticated a thinker as someone who reduces Western Civilization and American culture to nothing greater than fast food and strip malls.HardlyClothed said:
Ok so should we have overthrown him the 2nd time in 2003 yes or no? Or keep dodging.SFGbob said:
Speaking of non-sequitersHardlyClothed said:
Should we have invaded Iraq Bob? Yes or no?SFGbob said:
This is the school of thought that believes we never should have attacked the Japanese because we just made them madder.HardlyClothed said:
The Iraq War sent the number of global jihadists skyrocketing by creating a sectarian holy war in the heart of the Middle East.Pitchfork51 said:One of the dumbest ideas the left has is that America created terrorism and it's just the response.
Like wtf
Muslims have been fighting the infidels since the beginning of islam
We should have overthrown Sadaam after the 1st Gulf War. Btw, aren't you the very same dipshit who claims that calling people evil who really are evil leads to bad things so we should never identify anything as evil.
Was attacking Japan bad HC? It did make them madder, so we probably shouldn't have done it, right?
The simplistic Manichean narrative of the good and noble US fighting evil in the world is what I take issue with. Of course defeating Nazi Germany and Imperial Japan were good, dipshit. -
You said we should have overthrown him in ‘91. Got it. But we didn’t.SFGbob said:
How did I dodge? I answered your fucking question. And I can only hope to make myself one day as sophisticated a thinker as someone who reduces Western Civilization and American culture to nothing greater than fast food and strip malls.HardlyClothed said:
Ok so should we have overthrown him the 2nd time in 2003 yes or no? Or keep dodging.SFGbob said:
Speaking of non-sequitersHardlyClothed said:
Should we have invaded Iraq Bob? Yes or no?SFGbob said:
This is the school of thought that believes we never should have attacked the Japanese because we just made them madder.HardlyClothed said:
The Iraq War sent the number of global jihadists skyrocketing by creating a sectarian holy war in the heart of the Middle East.Pitchfork51 said:One of the dumbest ideas the left has is that America created terrorism and it's just the response.
Like wtf
Muslims have been fighting the infidels since the beginning of islam
We should have overthrown Sadaam after the 1st Gulf War. Btw, aren't you the very same dipshit who claims that calling people evil who really are evil leads to bad things so we should never identify anything as evil.
Was attacking Japan bad HC? It did make them madder, so we probably shouldn't have done it, right?
The simplistic Manichean narrative of the good and noble US fighting evil in the world is what I take issue with. Of course defeating Nazi Germany and Imperial Japan were good, dipshit.
Should we have overthrown him in 2003 knowing what you do now? Yes or no. Stop dodging the question “kunt”. -
Should have gotten rid of him and skipped the Nation building.HardlyClothed said:
You said we should have overthrown him in ‘91. Got it. But we didn’t.SFGbob said:
How did I dodge? I answered your fucking question. And I can only hope to make myself one day as sophisticated a thinker as someone who reduces Western Civilization and American culture to nothing greater than fast food and strip malls.HardlyClothed said:
Ok so should we have overthrown him the 2nd time in 2003 yes or no? Or keep dodging.SFGbob said:
Speaking of non-sequitersHardlyClothed said:
Should we have invaded Iraq Bob? Yes or no?SFGbob said:
This is the school of thought that believes we never should have attacked the Japanese because we just made them madder.HardlyClothed said:
The Iraq War sent the number of global jihadists skyrocketing by creating a sectarian holy war in the heart of the Middle East.Pitchfork51 said:One of the dumbest ideas the left has is that America created terrorism and it's just the response.
Like wtf
Muslims have been fighting the infidels since the beginning of islam
We should have overthrown Sadaam after the 1st Gulf War. Btw, aren't you the very same dipshit who claims that calling people evil who really are evil leads to bad things so we should never identify anything as evil.
Was attacking Japan bad HC? It did make them madder, so we probably shouldn't have done it, right?
The simplistic Manichean narrative of the good and noble US fighting evil in the world is what I take issue with. Of course defeating Nazi Germany and Imperial Japan were good, dipshit.
Should we have overthrown him in 2003 knowing what you do now? Yes or no. Stop dodging the question “kunt”.
