The Daily Ilhan
Comments
-
Ok so should we have overthrown him the 2nd time in 2003 yes or no? Or keep dodging.SFGbob said:
Speaking of non-sequitersHardlyClothed said:
Should we have invaded Iraq Bob? Yes or no?SFGbob said:
This is the school of thought that believes we never should have attacked the Japanese because we just made them madder.HardlyClothed said:
The Iraq War sent the number of global jihadists skyrocketing by creating a sectarian holy war in the heart of the Middle East.Pitchfork51 said:One of the dumbest ideas the left has is that America created terrorism and it's just the response.
Like wtf
Muslims have been fighting the infidels since the beginning of islam
We should have overthrown Sadaam after the 1st Gulf War. Btw, aren't you the very same dipshit who claims that calling people evil who really are evil leads to bad things so we should never identify anything as evil.
Was attacking Japan bad HC? It did make them madder, so we probably shouldn't have done it, right?
The simplistic Manichean narrative of the good and noble US fighting evil in the world is what I take issue with. Of course defeating Nazi Germany and Imperial Japan were good, dipshit. -
You missed the point, not surprisingly.HardlyClothed said:
Wow it only cost us $6 Trillion and counting. I’m feeling much richer.HillsboroDuck said:
Besides getting rich what are the redeeming aspects of "Winning The Lottery" exactly?HardlyClothed said:USMChawk said:
Photo of America ‘starting’ a war.allpurpleallgold said:I think I agree with her. I’m not interested enough to watch the full interview but I agree with the quotes provided.
We know for a fact that American actions cause terrorism. We’ve seen it the last 16 years with the wars we started. Accepting that doesn’t mean you have contempt for America, denying it means you have contempt for truth.
Show me the evidence that Iraq was behind 9/11 or had any links to Al-Qaeda.
Besides getting Bin Laden what have been the redeeming aspects of the “Global War on Terror” exactly?
The most important objective of the war on terror was Bin Laden. There's a worthwhile discussion to be had of whether the war on terror has been worth it. You can't have that discussion without chincluding the primary objective. -
If we went in it to win it Iraq then sure. We didn't pussy foot around Germany and Japan
Since we wont or can't do that anymore then leave the troops home -
Is that a lot?HardlyClothed said:
Wow it only cost us $6 Trillion and counting. I’m feeling much richer.HillsboroDuck said:
Besides getting rich what are the redeeming aspects of "Winning The Lottery" exactly?HardlyClothed said:USMChawk said:
Photo of America ‘starting’ a war.allpurpleallgold said:I think I agree with her. I’m not interested enough to watch the full interview but I agree with the quotes provided.
We know for a fact that American actions cause terrorism. We’ve seen it the last 16 years with the wars we started. Accepting that doesn’t mean you have contempt for America, denying it means you have contempt for truth.
Show me the evidence that Iraq was behind 9/11 or had any links to Al-Qaeda.
Besides getting Bin Laden what have been the redeeming aspects of the “Global War on Terror” exactly? -
This hate speech against a native religion of the peaceful Iranian people will not stand!HardlyClothed said:
Ok so should we have overthrown him the 2nd time in 2003 yes or no? Or keep dodging.SFGbob said:
Speaking of non-sequitersHardlyClothed said:
Should we have invaded Iraq Bob? Yes or no?SFGbob said:
This is the school of thought that believes we never should have attacked the Japanese because we just made them madder.HardlyClothed said:
The Iraq War sent the number of global jihadists skyrocketing by creating a sectarian holy war in the heart of the Middle East.Pitchfork51 said:One of the dumbest ideas the left has is that America created terrorism and it's just the response.
Like wtf
Muslims have been fighting the infidels since the beginning of islam
We should have overthrown Sadaam after the 1st Gulf War. Btw, aren't you the very same dipshit who claims that calling people evil who really are evil leads to bad things so we should never identify anything as evil.
Was attacking Japan bad HC? It did make them madder, so we probably shouldn't have done it, right?
The simplistic Manichean narrative of the good and noble US fighting evil in the world is what I take issue with. Of course defeating Nazi Germany and Imperial Japan were good, dipshit.
-
"Nation Building" is a waste of time, unless your foe is so thoroughly defeated they have no choice but to fall into line as was the case with Germany and Japan. The US kicks ass at total war. Pacification not so much.RaceBannon said:If we went in it to win it Iraq then sure. We didn't pussy foot around Germany and Japan
Since we wont or can't do that anymore then leave the troops home -
LEAVE! ThenBennyBeaver said:I fucking hate America. Mostly because all fucktards in the Tug.
-
How did I dodge? I answered your fucking question. And I can only hope to make myself one day as sophisticated a thinker as someone who reduces Western Civilization and American culture to nothing greater than fast food and strip malls.HardlyClothed said:
Ok so should we have overthrown him the 2nd time in 2003 yes or no? Or keep dodging.SFGbob said:
Speaking of non-sequitersHardlyClothed said:
Should we have invaded Iraq Bob? Yes or no?SFGbob said:
This is the school of thought that believes we never should have attacked the Japanese because we just made them madder.HardlyClothed said:
The Iraq War sent the number of global jihadists skyrocketing by creating a sectarian holy war in the heart of the Middle East.Pitchfork51 said:One of the dumbest ideas the left has is that America created terrorism and it's just the response.
Like wtf
Muslims have been fighting the infidels since the beginning of islam
We should have overthrown Sadaam after the 1st Gulf War. Btw, aren't you the very same dipshit who claims that calling people evil who really are evil leads to bad things so we should never identify anything as evil.
Was attacking Japan bad HC? It did make them madder, so we probably shouldn't have done it, right?
The simplistic Manichean narrative of the good and noble US fighting evil in the world is what I take issue with. Of course defeating Nazi Germany and Imperial Japan were good, dipshit. -
You said we should have overthrown him in ‘91. Got it. But we didn’t.SFGbob said:
How did I dodge? I answered your fucking question. And I can only hope to make myself one day as sophisticated a thinker as someone who reduces Western Civilization and American culture to nothing greater than fast food and strip malls.HardlyClothed said:
Ok so should we have overthrown him the 2nd time in 2003 yes or no? Or keep dodging.SFGbob said:
Speaking of non-sequitersHardlyClothed said:
Should we have invaded Iraq Bob? Yes or no?SFGbob said:
This is the school of thought that believes we never should have attacked the Japanese because we just made them madder.HardlyClothed said:
The Iraq War sent the number of global jihadists skyrocketing by creating a sectarian holy war in the heart of the Middle East.Pitchfork51 said:One of the dumbest ideas the left has is that America created terrorism and it's just the response.
Like wtf
Muslims have been fighting the infidels since the beginning of islam
We should have overthrown Sadaam after the 1st Gulf War. Btw, aren't you the very same dipshit who claims that calling people evil who really are evil leads to bad things so we should never identify anything as evil.
Was attacking Japan bad HC? It did make them madder, so we probably shouldn't have done it, right?
The simplistic Manichean narrative of the good and noble US fighting evil in the world is what I take issue with. Of course defeating Nazi Germany and Imperial Japan were good, dipshit.
Should we have overthrown him in 2003 knowing what you do now? Yes or no. Stop dodging the question “kunt”. -
Should have gotten rid of him and skipped the Nation building.HardlyClothed said:
You said we should have overthrown him in ‘91. Got it. But we didn’t.SFGbob said:
How did I dodge? I answered your fucking question. And I can only hope to make myself one day as sophisticated a thinker as someone who reduces Western Civilization and American culture to nothing greater than fast food and strip malls.HardlyClothed said:
Ok so should we have overthrown him the 2nd time in 2003 yes or no? Or keep dodging.SFGbob said:
Speaking of non-sequitersHardlyClothed said:
Should we have invaded Iraq Bob? Yes or no?SFGbob said:
This is the school of thought that believes we never should have attacked the Japanese because we just made them madder.HardlyClothed said:
The Iraq War sent the number of global jihadists skyrocketing by creating a sectarian holy war in the heart of the Middle East.Pitchfork51 said:One of the dumbest ideas the left has is that America created terrorism and it's just the response.
Like wtf
Muslims have been fighting the infidels since the beginning of islam
We should have overthrown Sadaam after the 1st Gulf War. Btw, aren't you the very same dipshit who claims that calling people evil who really are evil leads to bad things so we should never identify anything as evil.
Was attacking Japan bad HC? It did make them madder, so we probably shouldn't have done it, right?
The simplistic Manichean narrative of the good and noble US fighting evil in the world is what I take issue with. Of course defeating Nazi Germany and Imperial Japan were good, dipshit.
Should we have overthrown him in 2003 knowing what you do now? Yes or no. Stop dodging the question “kunt”.
