The Daily AOC
Comments
-
You don't think there could be illegal activity in a pipeline spill? How cute of Bob.SFGbob said:
But what she was describing wasn't illegal activity. Nice work dumbfuck. She was claiming that the Bank should be held liable if there was an oil spill by the pipeline they provided financing to build. That's not illegal activity.2001400ex said:
I don't know if the pipeline situation fits. But it's clear the bank could be held liable if they are aware, or should have been aware, of illegal activity.MikeDamone said:
I read it. Doesn’t seem like you did or you wouldn’t have posted it. It has nothing to with the topic. Dumbshit. Nice attempt at a quick google search and a faint hope it would turn up something to bail you out. It didn’t.2001400ex said:
So you don't want to read.RaceBannon said:
That's what I thought2001400ex said:
https://www.fdic.gov/regulations/laws/rules/8000-1250.htmlRaceBannon said:
Bump2001400ex said:Shocking that ignorant people don't understand how banks providing financing could be held liable for the actions of their customers.
But but but AOC!!!!! Farting cows!!!! Crayons!!!!!
Tell us more
Nothing
Same thing with CPAs. If they find that the CPA should have known about the fraud, they are held liable.
How did I know that Hondo would move the goal posts and respond with gibberish. -
Were 100 miles away from your original claim2001400ex said:
You don't think there could be illegal activity in a pipeline spill? How cute of Bob.SFGbob said:
But what she was describing wasn't illegal activity. Nice work dumbfuck. She was claiming that the Bank should be held liable if there was an oil spill by the pipeline they provided financing to build. That's not illegal activity.2001400ex said:
I don't know if the pipeline situation fits. But it's clear the bank could be held liable if they are aware, or should have been aware, of illegal activity.MikeDamone said:
I read it. Doesn’t seem like you did or you wouldn’t have posted it. It has nothing to with the topic. Dumbshit. Nice attempt at a quick google search and a faint hope it would turn up something to bail you out. It didn’t.2001400ex said:
So you don't want to read.RaceBannon said:
That's what I thought2001400ex said:
https://www.fdic.gov/regulations/laws/rules/8000-1250.htmlRaceBannon said:
Bump2001400ex said:Shocking that ignorant people don't understand how banks providing financing could be held liable for the actions of their customers.
But but but AOC!!!!! Farting cows!!!! Crayons!!!!!
Tell us more
Nothing
Same thing with CPAs. If they find that the CPA should have known about the fraud, they are held liable.
How did I know that Hondo would move the goal posts and respond with gibberish.
And the GND did talk about cow farts
I'd be embarrassed too
Fuck off -
You're so far out in hypotheticals that it's meaningless.2001400ex said:
You don't think there could be illegal activity in a pipeline spill? How cute of Bob.SFGbob said:
But what she was describing wasn't illegal activity. Nice work dumbfuck. She was claiming that the Bank should be held liable if there was an oil spill by the pipeline they provided financing to build. That's not illegal activity.2001400ex said:
I don't know if the pipeline situation fits. But it's clear the bank could be held liable if they are aware, or should have been aware, of illegal activity.MikeDamone said:
I read it. Doesn’t seem like you did or you wouldn’t have posted it. It has nothing to with the topic. Dumbshit. Nice attempt at a quick google search and a faint hope it would turn up something to bail you out. It didn’t.2001400ex said:
So you don't want to read.RaceBannon said:
That's what I thought2001400ex said:
https://www.fdic.gov/regulations/laws/rules/8000-1250.htmlRaceBannon said:
Bump2001400ex said:Shocking that ignorant people don't understand how banks providing financing could be held liable for the actions of their customers.
But but but AOC!!!!! Farting cows!!!! Crayons!!!!!
Tell us more
Nothing
Same thing with CPAs. If they find that the CPA should have known about the fraud, they are held liable.
How did I know that Hondo would move the goal posts and respond with gibberish.
-
Sure. Required maintained could have been missed, sabatouge, etc.2001400ex said:
You don't think there could be illegal activity in a pipeline spill? How cute of Bob.SFGbob said:
But what she was describing wasn't illegal activity. Nice work dumbfuck. She was claiming that the Bank should be held liable if there was an oil spill by the pipeline they provided financing to build. That's not illegal activity.2001400ex said:
I don't know if the pipeline situation fits. But it's clear the bank could be held liable if they are aware, or should have been aware, of illegal activity.MikeDamone said:
I read it. Doesn’t seem like you did or you wouldn’t have posted it. It has nothing to with the topic. Dumbshit. Nice attempt at a quick google search and a faint hope it would turn up something to bail you out. It didn’t.2001400ex said:
So you don't want to read.RaceBannon said:
That's what I thought2001400ex said:
https://www.fdic.gov/regulations/laws/rules/8000-1250.htmlRaceBannon said:
Bump2001400ex said:Shocking that ignorant people don't understand how banks providing financing could be held liable for the actions of their customers.
But but but AOC!!!!! Farting cows!!!! Crayons!!!!!
Tell us more
Nothing
Same thing with CPAs. If they find that the CPA should have known about the fraud, they are held liable.
How did I know that Hondo would move the goal posts and respond with gibberish.
And how would the bank be responsible? We are still waiting for real life examples of anything remotely close to this assertion by AOC. Which is, the oil companies know fossil fuels are causing a global catastrophe and the finance companies also no this, yet provide capital anyway, so are responsible for damages created by climate change. That’s the assertion. Stay on topic. I know that’s damn near impossible for you. -
There "could" be all kinds of things Hondo. You "could" have been blowing the crane operator and thus caused an accident that led to a spill. I want to know specifically what illegal activity Wells Fargo knew about that would have made them liable. You came running to defend her Hondo, why can't you back up your mouth?2001400ex said:
You don't think there could be illegal activity in a pipeline spill? How cute of Bob.SFGbob said:
But what she was describing wasn't illegal activity. Nice work dumbfuck. She was claiming that the Bank should be held liable if there was an oil spill by the pipeline they provided financing to build. That's not illegal activity.2001400ex said:
I don't know if the pipeline situation fits. But it's clear the bank could be held liable if they are aware, or should have been aware, of illegal activity.MikeDamone said:
I read it. Doesn’t seem like you did or you wouldn’t have posted it. It has nothing to with the topic. Dumbshit. Nice attempt at a quick google search and a faint hope it would turn up something to bail you out. It didn’t.2001400ex said:
So you don't want to read.RaceBannon said:
That's what I thought2001400ex said:
https://www.fdic.gov/regulations/laws/rules/8000-1250.htmlRaceBannon said:
Bump2001400ex said:Shocking that ignorant people don't understand how banks providing financing could be held liable for the actions of their customers.
But but but AOC!!!!! Farting cows!!!! Crayons!!!!!
Tell us more
Nothing
Same thing with CPAs. If they find that the CPA should have known about the fraud, they are held liable.
How did I know that Hondo would move the goal posts and respond with gibberish. -
Hondo is too stupid to be capable of embarrassment.RaceBannon said:
Were 100 miles away from your original claim2001400ex said:
You don't think there could be illegal activity in a pipeline spill? How cute of Bob.SFGbob said:
But what she was describing wasn't illegal activity. Nice work dumbfuck. She was claiming that the Bank should be held liable if there was an oil spill by the pipeline they provided financing to build. That's not illegal activity.2001400ex said:
I don't know if the pipeline situation fits. But it's clear the bank could be held liable if they are aware, or should have been aware, of illegal activity.MikeDamone said:
I read it. Doesn’t seem like you did or you wouldn’t have posted it. It has nothing to with the topic. Dumbshit. Nice attempt at a quick google search and a faint hope it would turn up something to bail you out. It didn’t.2001400ex said:
So you don't want to read.RaceBannon said:
That's what I thought2001400ex said:
https://www.fdic.gov/regulations/laws/rules/8000-1250.htmlRaceBannon said:
Bump2001400ex said:Shocking that ignorant people don't understand how banks providing financing could be held liable for the actions of their customers.
But but but AOC!!!!! Farting cows!!!! Crayons!!!!!
Tell us more
Nothing
Same thing with CPAs. If they find that the CPA should have known about the fraud, they are held liable.
How did I know that Hondo would move the goal posts and respond with gibberish.
And the GND did talk about cow farts
I'd be embarrassed too
Fuck off -
AOC: "If there was a leak from the pipeline, why shouldn't Wells Fargo pay for the cleanup of it, since it paid for the construction?"
The claim by AOC at issue.
The statement by Hondo he made in her defense:
Shocking that ignorant people don't understand how banks providing financing could be held liable for the actions of their customers.
The head up the ass gibberish Hondo responded with when asked to back up this claim:
You don't think there could be illegal activity in a pipeline spill? How cute of Bob.
-
Put a fork in this thread. Hondo's never going to back up his mouth as predicted.
-
Hondo can’t answer the question. No surprise there.
-
Point of fact, when you build a pipeline, you do everything in your power to prevent leaks. Oil spills are magnitudes more expensive than anything you would spend on construction; cost of cleanup, lost product, bad optics, bad for relationships with your easement/row partners, god help you everyone is coming after you legally from the EPA down to the guy who smelled it from his backyard 5 miles away etc. so beyond any moral argument about the environment it's just in the pipeline owners' interest to keep product in the line.
Pipelines are still massive complicated feats of engineering where even one crew member fucking up their job can cause a failure so shit does happen. If you look at the historical record incidents are way down and continuing to fall though. The #1 cause of incidents are third party idiots doing un-permitted excavation hitting lines. Companies are spending millions on education campaigns to try to get people to actually do their own responsibility and follow the law. -
So when the 3rd party idiot puts a hole in the pipeline when he is doing unauthorized digging, you immediately call your lawyer and file a lawsuit against the Bank that lent you the money to build the pipeline correct?UW_Doog_Bot said:Point of fact, when you build a pipeline, you do everything in your power to prevent leaks. Oil spills are magnitudes more expensive than anything you would spend on construction; cost of cleanup, lost product, bad optics, bad for relationships with your easement/row partners, god help you everyone is coming after you legally from the EPA down to the guy who smelled it from his backyard 5 miles away etc. so beyond any moral argument about the environment it's just in the pipeline owners' interest to keep product in the line.
Pipelines are still massive complicated feats of engineering where even one crew member fucking up their job can cause a failure so shit does happen. If you look at the historical record incidents are way down and continuing to fall though. The #1 cause of incidents are third party idiots doing un-permitted excavation hitting lines. Companies are spending millions on education campaigns to try to get people to actually do their own responsibility and follow the law.
That's the way I hear it is done from Social Justice Warriors. -
You should also go after the bank holding the mortgage of the third party idiot for loaning him the money to get a house and therefore have the chance to be a third party idiotSFGbob said:
So when the 3rd party idiot puts a hole in the pipeline when he is doing unauthorized digging, you immediately call your lawyer and file a lawsuit against the Bank that lent you the money to build the pipeline correct?UW_Doog_Bot said:Point of fact, when you build a pipeline, you do everything in your power to prevent leaks. Oil spills are magnitudes more expensive than anything you would spend on construction; cost of cleanup, lost product, bad optics, bad for relationships with your easement/row partners, god help you everyone is coming after you legally from the EPA down to the guy who smelled it from his backyard 5 miles away etc. so beyond any moral argument about the environment it's just in the pipeline owners' interest to keep product in the line.
Pipelines are still massive complicated feats of engineering where even one crew member fucking up their job can cause a failure so shit does happen. If you look at the historical record incidents are way down and continuing to fall though. The #1 cause of incidents are third party idiots doing un-permitted excavation hitting lines. Companies are spending millions on education campaigns to try to get people to actually do their own responsibility and follow the law.
That's the way I hear it is done from Social Justice Warriors. -
You better stop before you give our resident ambulance chaser any new ideas. You could sue the lending institutions that allowed the 3rd party idiot to purchase and or lease his construction equipment that he used to perform his unauthorized digging, as well as the food truck that sold his crew lunch when they were working on the project.RaceBannon said:
You should also go after the bank holding the mortgage of the third party idiot for loaning him the money to get a house and therefore have the chance to be a third party idiotSFGbob said:
So when the 3rd party idiot puts a hole in the pipeline when he is doing unauthorized digging, you immediately call your lawyer and file a lawsuit against the Bank that lent you the money to build the pipeline correct?UW_Doog_Bot said:Point of fact, when you build a pipeline, you do everything in your power to prevent leaks. Oil spills are magnitudes more expensive than anything you would spend on construction; cost of cleanup, lost product, bad optics, bad for relationships with your easement/row partners, god help you everyone is coming after you legally from the EPA down to the guy who smelled it from his backyard 5 miles away etc. so beyond any moral argument about the environment it's just in the pipeline owners' interest to keep product in the line.
Pipelines are still massive complicated feats of engineering where even one crew member fucking up their job can cause a failure so shit does happen. If you look at the historical record incidents are way down and continuing to fall though. The #1 cause of incidents are third party idiots doing un-permitted excavation hitting lines. Companies are spending millions on education campaigns to try to get people to actually do their own responsibility and follow the law.
That's the way I hear it is done from Social Justice Warriors. -
If we are going to sue hondo I am inSFGbob said:
You better stop before you give our resident ambulance chaser any new ideas. You could sue the lending institutions that allowed the 3rd party idiot to purchase and or lease his construction equipment that he used to perform his unauthorized digging, as well as the food truck that sold his crew lunch when they were working on the project.RaceBannon said:
You should also go after the bank holding the mortgage of the third party idiot for loaning him the money to get a house and therefore have the chance to be a third party idiotSFGbob said:
So when the 3rd party idiot puts a hole in the pipeline when he is doing unauthorized digging, you immediately call your lawyer and file a lawsuit against the Bank that lent you the money to build the pipeline correct?UW_Doog_Bot said:Point of fact, when you build a pipeline, you do everything in your power to prevent leaks. Oil spills are magnitudes more expensive than anything you would spend on construction; cost of cleanup, lost product, bad optics, bad for relationships with your easement/row partners, god help you everyone is coming after you legally from the EPA down to the guy who smelled it from his backyard 5 miles away etc. so beyond any moral argument about the environment it's just in the pipeline owners' interest to keep product in the line.
Pipelines are still massive complicated feats of engineering where even one crew member fucking up their job can cause a failure so shit does happen. If you look at the historical record incidents are way down and continuing to fall though. The #1 cause of incidents are third party idiots doing un-permitted excavation hitting lines. Companies are spending millions on education campaigns to try to get people to actually do their own responsibility and follow the law.
That's the way I hear it is done from Social Justice Warriors. -
Maybe we should send an invite to AOC to provide a business 101 class. She made drinks one time and talked to drunk people.
Now she is screaming and yelling at CEO's.
I would put her resume against any of yours!
Did you know she was a community organizer once? What have you done?!!! That's what I thought!!
-
You guys are making a lot of assumptions. You know nothing about the pipeline spill and therefore have zero knowledge of whether the bank could be held liable. Yes, under the right circumstances they could be held liable. I'm not sure if they could in this instance.
But keep up with your ignorance cause AOC is in your head. -
But we're making assupmptions2001400ex said:You guys are making a lot of assumptions. You know nothing about the pipeline spill and therefore have zero knowledge of whether the bank could be held liable. Yes, under the right circumstances they could be held liable. I'm not sure if they could in this instance.
But keep up with your ignorance cause AOC is in your head.
JFC you made a statement of fact that was 100% bullshit -
Yes, but he was technically correct and just as Hillary's comments regarding blacks being turned away from the polls on account of their skin color was based upon fact while being completely factually inaccurate.RaceBannon said:
But we're making assupmptions2001400ex said:You guys are making a lot of assumptions. You know nothing about the pipeline spill and therefore have zero knowledge of whether the bank could be held liable. Yes, under the right circumstances they could be held liable. I'm not sure if they could in this instance.
But keep up with your ignorance cause AOC is in your head.
JFC you made a statement of fact that was 100% bullshit
This is what you do to yourself when you lack the ability to admit when you've put your head up your ass and you're incapable of shame.
-
Still waiting for that list of instances where finance companies were held liable for pipeline spills....2001400ex said:You guys are making a lot of assumptions. You know nothing about the pipeline spill and therefore have zero knowledge of whether the bank could be held liable. Yes, under the right circumstances they could be held liable. I'm not sure if they could in this instance.
But keep up with your ignorance cause AOC is in your head.
You really need to learn when to surrender vs doubling down.
Dimwit -
So a business person gets a loan to open a restaurant and he/she/they kitchen has a fire, burns down a business next store. The bank providing the loan should be required to pay for clean up and remodel?
Am I tracking correctly?
-
Hey fuckstick.. There we studies that show people were turned away at the polls on Wisconsin and they were in disproportionately black areas.SFGbob said:
Yes, but he was technically correct and just as Hillary's comments regarding blacks being turned away from the polls on account of their skin color was based upon fact while being completely factually inaccurate.RaceBannon said:
But we're making assupmptions2001400ex said:You guys are making a lot of assumptions. You know nothing about the pipeline spill and therefore have zero knowledge of whether the bank could be held liable. Yes, under the right circumstances they could be held liable. I'm not sure if they could in this instance.
But keep up with your ignorance cause AOC is in your head.
JFC you made a statement of fact that was 100% bullshit
This is what you do to yourself when you lack the ability to admit when you've put your head up your ass and you're incapable of shame.
Are you ignorant on purpose or just stupid? -
How many cow farts are caused to get hondo his burgers to flip? Shouldn't his bank be liable?
-
I love when he shoves his head up his ass all while calling everyone else ignorant. It takes a special level of Kuntiness to do that.MikeDamone said:
Still waiting for that list of instances where finance companies were held liable for pipeline spills....2001400ex said:You guys are making a lot of assumptions. You know nothing about the pipeline spill and therefore have zero knowledge of whether the bank could be held liable. Yes, under the right circumstances they could be held liable. I'm not sure if they could in this instance.
But keep up with your ignorance cause AOC is in your head.
You really need to learn when to surrender vs doubling down.
Dimwit -
Just close all banks and the problem is solved. In the AOC jungle gym.SFGbob said:
Only if you're a fucking moron is that an example of a strawman. It's a direct parallel to what AOC is calling for. Wells Fargo should be held liable for an oil spill because they lent money to pipeline builder.2001400ex said:
And that is what we call textbook strawman.SFGbob said:Sound reasoning. If I crash my car into school bus full of kids they should sue the bank that lent me the money to by the car, not me.
-
So far out of your element here. Stick to what you know: Burgers.2001400ex said:
Why am I not surprised that you think banking regulations are gibberish.SFGbob said:
Called it, gibberish.2001400ex said:
https://www.fdic.gov/regulations/laws/rules/8000-1250.htmlRaceBannon said:
Bump2001400ex said:Shocking that ignorant people don't understand how banks providing financing could be held liable for the actions of their customers.
But but but AOC!!!!! Farting cows!!!! Crayons!!!!!
Tell us more -
Ultimately, I don't think AOC is looking for legal or legislative action here. Progressives have been trying to attack businesses and industries by naming & shaming their chickenshit financial services providers. For example:
https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2018-04-13/jpmorgan-cfo-lake-says-bank-has-cut-exposure-to-gun-industry
https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2018-04-10/bofa-will-no-longer-lend-to-some-gunmakers-vice-chairman-says -
Why stop there? Keep suing all the way to the Trump White House, because everything is actually Trump's fault, eventually.RaceBannon said:
You should also go after the bank holding the mortgage of the third party idiot for loaning him the money to get a house and therefore have the chance to be a third party idiotSFGbob said:
So when the 3rd party idiot puts a hole in the pipeline when he is doing unauthorized digging, you immediately call your lawyer and file a lawsuit against the Bank that lent you the money to build the pipeline correct?UW_Doog_Bot said:Point of fact, when you build a pipeline, you do everything in your power to prevent leaks. Oil spills are magnitudes more expensive than anything you would spend on construction; cost of cleanup, lost product, bad optics, bad for relationships with your easement/row partners, god help you everyone is coming after you legally from the EPA down to the guy who smelled it from his backyard 5 miles away etc. so beyond any moral argument about the environment it's just in the pipeline owners' interest to keep product in the line.
Pipelines are still massive complicated feats of engineering where even one crew member fucking up their job can cause a failure so shit does happen. If you look at the historical record incidents are way down and continuing to fall though. The #1 cause of incidents are third party idiots doing un-permitted excavation hitting lines. Companies are spending millions on education campaigns to try to get people to actually do their own responsibility and follow the law.
That's the way I hear it is done from Social Justice Warriors. -
The greatest irony is how privileged AOC actually is by being cute and having enormous tits. If she's smaller than a C-Cup, she's still serving drinks in Brooklyn.jecornel said:Maybe we should send an invite to AOC to provide a business 101 class. She made drinks one time and talked to drunk people.
Now she is screaming and yelling at CEO's.
I would put her resume against any of yours!
Did you know she was a community organizer once? What have you done?!!! That's what I thought!! -
More people voted but still2001400ex said:
Hey fuckstick.. There we studies that show people were turned away at the polls on Wisconsin and they were in disproportionately black areas.SFGbob said:
Yes, but he was technically correct and just as Hillary's comments regarding blacks being turned away from the polls on account of their skin color was based upon fact while being completely factually inaccurate.RaceBannon said:
But we're making assupmptions2001400ex said:You guys are making a lot of assumptions. You know nothing about the pipeline spill and therefore have zero knowledge of whether the bank could be held liable. Yes, under the right circumstances they could be held liable. I'm not sure if they could in this instance.
But keep up with your ignorance cause AOC is in your head.
JFC you made a statement of fact that was 100% bullshit
This is what you do to yourself when you lack the ability to admit when you've put your head up your ass and you're incapable of shame.
Are you ignorant on purpose or just stupid?
Let's see your studies -
Link?2001400ex said:
Hey fuckstick.. There we studies that show people were turned away at the polls on Wisconsin and they were in disproportionately black areas.SFGbob said:
Yes, but he was technically correct and just as Hillary's comments regarding blacks being turned away from the polls on account of their skin color was based upon fact while being completely factually inaccurate.RaceBannon said:
But we're making assupmptions2001400ex said:You guys are making a lot of assumptions. You know nothing about the pipeline spill and therefore have zero knowledge of whether the bank could be held liable. Yes, under the right circumstances they could be held liable. I'm not sure if they could in this instance.
But keep up with your ignorance cause AOC is in your head.
JFC you made a statement of fact that was 100% bullshit
This is what you do to yourself when you lack the ability to admit when you've put your head up your ass and you're incapable of shame.
Are you ignorant on purpose or just stupid?
