A study of 657,461 children shows vaccines do not cause autism
Comments
-
What about child 657,462?
-
A scientist can have an agenda and then they have to get their research peer reviewed. And then anyone can read it. And then other scientists can test it and try and reproduce the results.Southerndawg said:
Science doesn't have an agenda, but a lot of "scientists" do. When you grow up you might actually learn that lesson.allpurpleallgold said:Objectively, you’re getting hustled. First it caused autism, we need more studies, more studies come in showing no link, so they move on to the next bullshit argument.
Science doesn’t have an agenda. You prove science wrong with more science. When you can’t, it’s not because of a conspiracy, it’s because you’re wrong.
You wrote that this guy argues that vaccines are ineffective and you have the audacity to tell me to be objective. Motherfucker who do you know that has polio?
https://www.reddit.com/r/vaxxhappened/comments/axfqhz/saw_this_on_facebook_and_idk_if_its_true_but_the/
You spread this misinformation and the blood is on your hands too.
I have no dog in this vaccine food fight, but will say that it fits well within the realm of natural selection that antibiotics, anti-virals and vaccinations all come with unintended consequences, as well as immediate risks associated with their use. Where one draws the line on that risk should be a personal decision. The meme using polio as an example of the foolhardiness of avoiding vaccines has some merit. Polio is a devastating disease. IMHO, a vaccination against such a disease is well worth the risk. Vaccination for Measles, Mumps and Rubella? That's arguable.
Why can’t anyone do that with the horrible risks of vaccines? Oh right, it’s the biggest conspiracy in human history. But I’m the one that needs to grow up. -
South dog thinks the conspiracy is with scientists. And that political pundits and politicians don't have an agenda, are truthful about vaccines, and know more than scientists.allpurpleallgold said:
A scientist can have an agenda and then they have to get their research peer reviewed. And then anyone can read it. And then other scientists can test it and try and reproduce the results.Southerndawg said:
Science doesn't have an agenda, but a lot of "scientists" do. When you grow up you might actually learn that lesson.allpurpleallgold said:Objectively, you’re getting hustled. First it caused autism, we need more studies, more studies come in showing no link, so they move on to the next bullshit argument.
Science doesn’t have an agenda. You prove science wrong with more science. When you can’t, it’s not because of a conspiracy, it’s because you’re wrong.
You wrote that this guy argues that vaccines are ineffective and you have the audacity to tell me to be objective. Motherfucker who do you know that has polio?
https://www.reddit.com/r/vaxxhappened/comments/axfqhz/saw_this_on_facebook_and_idk_if_its_true_but_the/
You spread this misinformation and the blood is on your hands too.
I have no dog in this vaccine food fight, but will say that it fits well within the realm of natural selection that antibiotics, anti-virals and vaccinations all come with unintended consequences, as well as immediate risks associated with their use. Where one draws the line on that risk should be a personal decision. The meme using polio as an example of the foolhardiness of avoiding vaccines has some merit. Polio is a devastating disease. IMHO, a vaccination against such a disease is well worth the risk. Vaccination for Measles, Mumps and Rubella? That's arguable.
Why can’t anyone do that with the horrible risks of vaccines? Oh right, it’s the biggest conspiracy in human history. But I’m the one that needs to grow up. -
Wait - you guys think vaccines cause autism?? lolololololol
-
As I said, I have no dog in your vaccine food fight. @HillsboroDuck had the best response. He and his wife used a reasoned risk-benefit assessment to lead them to the decision to vaccinate their kids. Their decision, not someone else's. That's as it should be.allpurpleallgold said:
A scientist can have an agenda and then they have to get their research peer reviewed. And then anyone can read it. And then other scientists can test it and try and reproduce the results.Southerndawg said:
Science doesn't have an agenda, but a lot of "scientists" do. When you grow up you might actually learn that lesson.allpurpleallgold said:Objectively, you’re getting hustled. First it caused autism, we need more studies, more studies come in showing no link, so they move on to the next bullshit argument.
Science doesn’t have an agenda. You prove science wrong with more science. When you can’t, it’s not because of a conspiracy, it’s because you’re wrong.
You wrote that this guy argues that vaccines are ineffective and you have the audacity to tell me to be objective. Motherfucker who do you know that has polio?
https://www.reddit.com/r/vaxxhappened/comments/axfqhz/saw_this_on_facebook_and_idk_if_its_true_but_the/
You spread this misinformation and the blood is on your hands too.
I have no dog in this vaccine food fight, but will say that it fits well within the realm of natural selection that antibiotics, anti-virals and vaccinations all come with unintended consequences, as well as immediate risks associated with their use. Where one draws the line on that risk should be a personal decision. The meme using polio as an example of the foolhardiness of avoiding vaccines has some merit. Polio is a devastating disease. IMHO, a vaccination against such a disease is well worth the risk. Vaccination for Measles, Mumps and Rubella? That's arguable.
Why can’t anyone do that with the horrible risks of vaccines? Oh right, it’s the biggest conspiracy in human history. But I’m the one that needs to grow up.
But here you go again. More naivety. Science is pure because scientists are kept in check by other scientists. The problem with peer reviews is the peer part. They're not always objective. This is especially true when there is a lot of money betting on a particular outcome. Again, when you grow up, you might learn this lesson. Or not. -
lololololol
-
Someone forgot to vaccinate you.2001400ex said:
South dog thinks the conspiracy is with scientists. And that political pundits and politicians don't have an agenda, are truthful about vaccines, and know more than scientists.allpurpleallgold said:
A scientist can have an agenda and then they have to get their research peer reviewed. And then anyone can read it. And then other scientists can test it and try and reproduce the results.Southerndawg said:
Science doesn't have an agenda, but a lot of "scientists" do. When you grow up you might actually learn that lesson.allpurpleallgold said:Objectively, you’re getting hustled. First it caused autism, we need more studies, more studies come in showing no link, so they move on to the next bullshit argument.
Science doesn’t have an agenda. You prove science wrong with more science. When you can’t, it’s not because of a conspiracy, it’s because you’re wrong.
You wrote that this guy argues that vaccines are ineffective and you have the audacity to tell me to be objective. Motherfucker who do you know that has polio?
https://www.reddit.com/r/vaxxhappened/comments/axfqhz/saw_this_on_facebook_and_idk_if_its_true_but_the/
You spread this misinformation and the blood is on your hands too.
I have no dog in this vaccine food fight, but will say that it fits well within the realm of natural selection that antibiotics, anti-virals and vaccinations all come with unintended consequences, as well as immediate risks associated with their use. Where one draws the line on that risk should be a personal decision. The meme using polio as an example of the foolhardiness of avoiding vaccines has some merit. Polio is a devastating disease. IMHO, a vaccination against such a disease is well worth the risk. Vaccination for Measles, Mumps and Rubella? That's arguable.
Why can’t anyone do that with the horrible risks of vaccines? Oh right, it’s the biggest conspiracy in human history. But I’m the one that needs to grow up. -
They’re actually moving on from autism claiming it’s going to cause mysterious problems that we can’t even fathom yet.Dennis_DeYoung said:Hahaha you fuckers are stupid and crazy and filled with Russian propaganda. lololol
Christ. Oh well, I guess this is what 25 years of Limbaugh and Fox do to you.
God you guys are hysterical. Holy fuck - vaccine truthers???? lofl lololololololololololol -
Science has an agenda in some instances. Like global warming.allpurpleallgold said:Objectively, you’re getting hustled. First it caused autism, we need more studies, more studies come in showing no link, so they move on to the next bullshit argument.
Science doesn’t have an agenda. You prove science wrong with more science. When you can’t, it’s not because of a conspiracy, it’s because you’re wrong.
You wrote that this guy argues that vaccines are ineffective and you have the audacity to tell me to be objective. Motherfucker who do you know that has polio?
https://www.reddit.com/r/vaxxhappened/comments/axfqhz/saw_this_on_facebook_and_idk_if_its_true_but_the/
You spread this misinformation and the blood is on your hands too. -
So is the owner of this site an anti-vaxxer?
