Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.
2016 - USC v Alabama @ Jerry World
Comments
-
No we are calling you out for saying Oregon is more of a premiere program than USC.oregonblitzkrieg said:You guys are being doogs by turning this into an Oregon argument. I put Oregon aside and make this argument.
Even in UW's best days and USC was down the Trojans were always the premiere program.
They have advantages that nobody else has. Tradition, HUGE Market, great local talent, great weather, no NFL team so they are the big fish in a big town, etc. -
No one's saying they SHOULDN'T be won on the field. We're saying that you don't get to invalidate 100 years of championships because the selection process wasn't the best. The BCS selection process sucked too, btw.oregonblitzkrieg said:You really honestly believe championships shouldn't be won on the field. Maybe the SuperBowl should have been voted on and the Seahawks and Broncos could share the trophy and everyone could claim they have a kajillion national championships. Real abundance, yeah
-
And if the Huskies couldn't lay claim to a national title you would not so passionately defend the hard fought, battle won 15 national championships of Alabama and 11 of USC.dnc said:
I like to argue that poles are incapable of selecting champions while supporting a system where poles select the two teams to play for a championship.oregonblitzkrieg said:
Idnc said:
Never before have I been so honored to make a poast disappear.oregonblitzkrieg said:
Pre BCS 'championships' don't count. Don't tell Alabama that though. They think they have 15. Legitimate championships are when #1 plays #2 and one of them wins.haie said:USC >>>>>>>>>>> Oregon (11 national championships)
but yes they are a pretty douchey school.
Not your best week.
Case closed. Just try to defend this shit.
Either poles have value or they don't. I say they don't, so BCS championships are just as worthless as pole titles. But I'm not fucktarded enough to think just because I don't like the system means college football's championships don't count.
And yes, this is absolutely quook shit. If Oregon won the 1894 Helms championship by one vote we wouldn't be having this discussion. -
You're being a twister. I never said Oregon was more premiere. This isn't about Oregon. Fuck dude, I guess I should just agree that USC is the blessed child of Odin and they have the eternal right to be the premier program on the west coast.He_Needs_More_Time said:
No we are calling you out for saying Oregon is more of a premiere program than USC.oregonblitzkrieg said:You guys are being doogs by turning this into an Oregon argument. I put Oregon aside and make this argument.
Even in UW's best days and USC was down the Trojans were always the premiere program.
They have advantages that nobody else has. Tradition, HUGE Market, great local talent, great weather, no NFL team so they are the big fish in a big town, etc. -
Disagree. This has to do with your fucktarded belief that the BCS was somehow enough of an upgrade on the poles that BCS titles should count and pole titles don't.oregonblitzkrieg said:
And if the Huskies couldn't lay claim to a national title you would not so passionately defend the hard fought, battle won 15 national championships of Alabama and 11 of USC.dnc said:
I like to argue that poles are incapable of selecting champions while supporting a system where poles select the two teams to play for a championship.oregonblitzkrieg said:
Idnc said:
Never before have I been so honored to make a poast disappear.oregonblitzkrieg said:
Pre BCS 'championships' don't count. Don't tell Alabama that though. They think they have 15. Legitimate championships are when #1 plays #2 and one of them wins.haie said:USC >>>>>>>>>>> Oregon (11 national championships)
but yes they are a pretty douchey school.
Not your best week.
Case closed. Just try to defend this shit.
Either poles have value or they don't. I say they don't, so BCS championships are just as worthless as pole titles. But I'm not fucktarded enough to think just because I don't like the system means college football's championships don't count.
And yes, this is absolutely quook shit. If Oregon won the 1894 Helms championship by one vote we wouldn't be having this discussion.
Again, you are arguing that the poles are not good enough to select a champion but are good enough to select the two teams to play for a championship.
Either you think they all count or none of them.
Hope that helps. -
This argument can't really be won or lost. Polls are imperfect. But polls alone can't produce a legitimate national championship. Combined with a game between one and two, we get a little closer to reality.dnc said:
Disagree. This has to do with your fucktarded believe that the BCS was somehow enough of an upgrade on the poles that BCS titles should count and pole titles don't.oregonblitzkrieg said:
And if the Huskies couldn't lay claim to a national title you would not so passionately defend the hard fought, battle won 15 national championships of Alabama and 11 of USC.dnc said:
I like to argue that poles are incapable of selecting champions while supporting a system where poles select the two teams to play for a championship.oregonblitzkrieg said:
Idnc said:
Never before have I been so honored to make a poast disappear.oregonblitzkrieg said:
Pre BCS 'championships' don't count. Don't tell Alabama that though. They think they have 15. Legitimate championships are when #1 plays #2 and one of them wins.haie said:USC >>>>>>>>>>> Oregon (11 national championships)
but yes they are a pretty douchey school.
Not your best week.
Case closed. Just try to defend this shit.
Either poles have value or they don't. I say they don't, so BCS championships are just as worthless as pole titles. But I'm not fucktarded enough to think just because I don't like the system means college football's championships don't count.
And yes, this is absolutely quook shit. If Oregon won the 1894 Helms championship by one vote we wouldn't be having this discussion.
Again, you are arguing that the poles are not good enough to select a champion but are good enough to select the two teams to play for a championship.
Either you think they all count or none of them.
Hope them helps. -
OBK, the BCS has had plenty of controversies and have put the wrong team into championship games before. Why do those championships count more than the ones pre BCS? Like DNC said, you can't punish every team because of a bad system.
-
Good point.RoadDawg55 said:OBK, the BCS has had plenty of controversies and have put the wrong team into championship games before. Why do those championships count more than the ones pre BCS? Like DNC said, you can't punish every team because of a bad system.
-
It's already been won.oregonblitzkrieg said:
This argument can't really be won or lost. Polls are imperfect. But polls alone can't produce a legitimate national championship. Combined with a game between one and two, we get a little closer to reality.dnc said:
Disagree. This has to do with your fucktarded believe that the BCS was somehow enough of an upgrade on the poles that BCS titles should count and pole titles don't.oregonblitzkrieg said:
And if the Huskies couldn't lay claim to a national title you would not so passionately defend the hard fought, battle won 15 national championships of Alabama and 11 of USC.dnc said:
I like to argue that poles are incapable of selecting champions while supporting a system where poles select the two teams to play for a championship.oregonblitzkrieg said:
Idnc said:
Never before have I been so honored to make a poast disappear.oregonblitzkrieg said:
Pre BCS 'championships' don't count. Don't tell Alabama that though. They think they have 15. Legitimate championships are when #1 plays #2 and one of them wins.haie said:USC >>>>>>>>>>> Oregon (11 national championships)
but yes they are a pretty douchey school.
Not your best week.
Case closed. Just try to defend this shit.
Either poles have value or they don't. I say they don't, so BCS championships are just as worthless as pole titles. But I'm not fucktarded enough to think just because I don't like the system means college football's championships don't count.
And yes, this is absolutely quook shit. If Oregon won the 1894 Helms championship by one vote we wouldn't be having this discussion.
Again, you are arguing that the poles are not good enough to select a champion but are good enough to select the two teams to play for a championship.
Either you think they all count or none of them.
Hope them helps.
-
Before 1920 women couldn't vote, therefore Warren G Harding was the first American president. Only presidents voted on by the full populace count.
![[Deleted User]](https://wb.vanillicon.com/b14605887e2b6b59902271a0095c9265_100.png)
