Trying to decide how to feel.
Comments
-
The Furd win comfortably last night with Tremayne and Humphries. There is a big gap between those two and the rest of the WRs. Higgins is better with those two on the field.Canadawg said:
Furd beat OregonBleachedAnusDawg said:Didn't watch a snap. 24 point loss to Oregon incoming that will reestablish the facts of how bad this team is. Look at the PAC standings if you want a good laugh; what a steaming pile the conference is. The only win that would indicate being an above average team is to beat Oregon. Going 5-4 in the PAC is equivalent to 1-7 in the SEC (Vandy).
-
points streak ends hereEwaDawg said:
Agreed. Jimmy does not ever allow more than 34 points and UW likely wont score more than 17. You can let the dwags score more than that but they need to reduce what they let oregon score proportionately.chuck said:
Easy money. If it stays single digits bet the farm.lawsandl said:The line looks like it’s -7 Oregon with a 51.5 point total.
I think I'd actually take the under. My call is 41-5 Oregon.
WTF. Yeah, I start typing before I finish thinking.
I can see winning the under, keeping jimmy's defensive streak alive, and getting blown out by meat as almost guaranteed.
Rather easily, in fact.
Script, anyone? -
Every team has injuries every game. The excuses didn't matter when we? were down all the starting WRs and they don't count nowlawsandl said:
The Furd win comfortably last night with Tremayne and Humphries. There is a big gap between those two and the rest of the WRs. Higgins is better with those two on the field.Canadawg said:
Furd beat OregonBleachedAnusDawg said:Didn't watch a snap. 24 point loss to Oregon incoming that will reestablish the facts of how bad this team is. Look at the PAC standings if you want a good laugh; what a steaming pile the conference is. The only win that would indicate being an above average team is to beat Oregon. Going 5-4 in the PAC is equivalent to 1-7 in the SEC (Vandy).
-
God, I hope so. What a worthless fucking stat.WilburHooksHands said:
points streak ends hereEwaDawg said:
Agreed. Jimmy does not ever allow more than 34 points and UW likely wont score more than 17. You can let the dwags score more than that but they need to reduce what they let oregon score proportionately.chuck said:
Easy money. If it stays single digits bet the farm.lawsandl said:The line looks like it’s -7 Oregon with a 51.5 point total.
I think I'd actually take the under. My call is 41-5 Oregon.
WTF. Yeah, I start typing before I finish thinking.
I can see winning the under, keeping jimmy's defensive streak alive, and getting blown out by meat as almost guaranteed.
Rather easily, in fact.
Script, anyone? -
I see a 35-10 loss but the crowd gives a standing o as they keep Oregon out of the end zone to preserve the streak of no 40 point games. So mission accomplished there.
-
Context matters though. That was a bad loss for Oregon. I wouldn’t have felt much better about the team (just the W) had Oregon came from behind to beat the Furd without Tremayne and Humphries.Canadawg said:
Every team has injuries every game. The excuses didn't matter when we? were down all the starting WRs and they don't count nowlawsandl said:
The Furd win comfortably last night with Tremayne and Humphries. There is a big gap between those two and the rest of the WRs. Higgins is better with those two on the field.Canadawg said:
Furd beat OregonBleachedAnusDawg said:Didn't watch a snap. 24 point loss to Oregon incoming that will reestablish the facts of how bad this team is. Look at the PAC standings if you want a good laugh; what a steaming pile the conference is. The only win that would indicate being an above average team is to beat Oregon. Going 5-4 in the PAC is equivalent to 1-7 in the SEC (Vandy).
-
Ok so when ducks win next week we will claim the win with the context that we? would have won with a better coach. You play the games so you don't have to debate which team is betterlawsandl said:
Context matters though. That was a bad loss for Oregon. I wouldn’t have felt much better about the team (just the W) had Oregon came from behind to beat the Furd without Tremayne and Humphries.Canadawg said:
Every team has injuries every game. The excuses didn't matter when we? were down all the starting WRs and they don't count nowlawsandl said:
The Furd win comfortably last night with Tremayne and Humphries. There is a big gap between those two and the rest of the WRs. Higgins is better with those two on the field.Canadawg said:
Furd beat OregonBleachedAnusDawg said:Didn't watch a snap. 24 point loss to Oregon incoming that will reestablish the facts of how bad this team is. Look at the PAC standings if you want a good laugh; what a steaming pile the conference is. The only win that would indicate being an above average team is to beat Oregon. Going 5-4 in the PAC is equivalent to 1-7 in the SEC (Vandy).
-
UW and Oregon will play it out on the field. I am talking about looking at common opponents for prognostication.Canadawg said:
Ok so when ducks win next week we will claim the win with the context that we? would have won with a better coach. You play the games so you don't have to debate which team is betterlawsandl said:
Context matters though. That was a bad loss for Oregon. I wouldn’t have felt much better about the team (just the W) had Oregon came from behind to beat the Furd without Tremayne and Humphries.Canadawg said:
Every team has injuries every game. The excuses didn't matter when we? were down all the starting WRs and they don't count nowlawsandl said:
The Furd win comfortably last night with Tremayne and Humphries. There is a big gap between those two and the rest of the WRs. Higgins is better with those two on the field.Canadawg said:
Furd beat OregonBleachedAnusDawg said:Didn't watch a snap. 24 point loss to Oregon incoming that will reestablish the facts of how bad this team is. Look at the PAC standings if you want a good laugh; what a steaming pile the conference is. The only win that would indicate being an above average team is to beat Oregon. Going 5-4 in the PAC is equivalent to 1-7 in the SEC (Vandy).
-
Yeah fair enough it's just funny to get that into the weeds when you could counter that with lots of other stuff that doesn't really matter like UW>Furd>Ducklawsandl said:
UW and Oregon will play it out on the field. I am talking about looking at common opponents for prognostication.Canadawg said:
Ok so when ducks win next week we will claim the win with the context that we? would have won with a better coach. You play the games so you don't have to debate which team is betterlawsandl said:
Context matters though. That was a bad loss for Oregon. I wouldn’t have felt much better about the team (just the W) had Oregon came from behind to beat the Furd without Tremayne and Humphries.Canadawg said:
Every team has injuries every game. The excuses didn't matter when we? were down all the starting WRs and they don't count nowlawsandl said:
The Furd win comfortably last night with Tremayne and Humphries. There is a big gap between those two and the rest of the WRs. Higgins is better with those two on the field.Canadawg said:
Furd beat OregonBleachedAnusDawg said:Didn't watch a snap. 24 point loss to Oregon incoming that will reestablish the facts of how bad this team is. Look at the PAC standings if you want a good laugh; what a steaming pile the conference is. The only win that would indicate being an above average team is to beat Oregon. Going 5-4 in the PAC is equivalent to 1-7 in the SEC (Vandy).
