Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. Sign in or register to get started.

Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

Trying to decide how to feel.

24

Comments

  • DerekJohnsonDerekJohnson Administrator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 62,643 Founders Club

    I went to sleep at halftime. That’s how I feel.

    Tanned, rested and ready.
  • CFetters_Nacho_LoverCFetters_Nacho_Lover Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 30,052 Founders Club

    I went to sleep at halftime. That’s how I feel.

    I was actually awake at kickoff watching the end of the Penn St-Ohio St game. I watched the UW game during commercials and then a Stanford series that resulted in Sirmon getting an interception. That was enough for me. Actually it was too much.
  • whlinderwhlinder Member Posts: 4,628 Standard Supporter
    Still at a cumulative 0 plays watched this season. Fuck the Athletic Director
  • chuckchuck Member, Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 10,951 Swaye's Wigwam
    edited October 2021

    The weirdest part about this is if they beat whoregon they could still win the division/conference.

    It won’t happen but this conference is a shit show.

    Oregon is going to beat UW by 30+. It's a horrible matchup for the defense and we all know what the offense will do.
  • lawsandllawsandl Member Posts: 1,555
    edited October 2021
    The line looks like it’s -7 Oregon with a 51.5 point total.
  • chuckchuck Member, Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 10,951 Swaye's Wigwam
    lawsandl said:

    The line looks like it’s -7 Oregon with a 51.5 point total.

    Easy money. If it stays single digits bet the farm.

    I think I'd actually take the under. My call is 41-5 Oregon.
  • JoeyJoey Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 6,592 Founders Club
    lawsandl said:

    The line looks like it’s -7 Oregon with a 51.5 point total.

    Say 34-17.5?
  • EwaDawgEwaDawg Member Posts: 4,188
    edited October 2021

    chuck said:

    lawsandl said:

    The line looks like it’s -7 Oregon with a 51.5 point total.

    Easy money. If it stays single digits bet the farm.

    I think I'd actually take the under. My call is 41-5 Oregon.
    Agreed. Jimmy does not ever allow more than 34 points and UW likely wont score more than 17. You can let the dwags score more than that but they need to reduce what they let oregon score proportionately.

    WTF. Yeah, I start typing before I finish thinking.

    I can see winning the under, keeping jimmy's defensive streak alive, and getting blown out by meat as almost guaranteed.

    Rather easily, in fact.

    Script, anyone?

  • CanadawgCanadawg Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 4,459 Swaye's Wigwam

    Didn't watch a snap. 24 point loss to Oregon incoming that will reestablish the facts of how bad this team is. Look at the PAC standings if you want a good laugh; what a steaming pile the conference is. The only win that would indicate being an above average team is to beat Oregon. Going 5-4 in the PAC is equivalent to 1-7 in the SEC (Vandy).

    Furd beat Oregon
  • lawsandllawsandl Member Posts: 1,555
    Canadawg said:

    Didn't watch a snap. 24 point loss to Oregon incoming that will reestablish the facts of how bad this team is. Look at the PAC standings if you want a good laugh; what a steaming pile the conference is. The only win that would indicate being an above average team is to beat Oregon. Going 5-4 in the PAC is equivalent to 1-7 in the SEC (Vandy).

    Furd beat Oregon
    The Furd win comfortably last night with Tremayne and Humphries. There is a big gap between those two and the rest of the WRs. Higgins is better with those two on the field.
  • lawsandllawsandl Member Posts: 1,555
    chuck said:

    lawsandl said:

    The line looks like it’s -7 Oregon with a 51.5 point total.

    Easy money. If it stays single digits bet the farm.

    I think I'd actually take the under. My call is 41-5 Oregon.
    Oregon is holding no one to less than 10.
  • WilburHooksHandsWilburHooksHands Member Posts: 6,799
    EwaDawg said:




    chuck said:

    lawsandl said:

    The line looks like it’s -7 Oregon with a 51.5 point total.

    Easy money. If it stays single digits bet the farm.

    I think I'd actually take the under. My call is 41-5 Oregon.
    Agreed. Jimmy does not ever allow more than 34 points and UW likely wont score more than 17. You can let the dwags score more than that but they need to reduce what they let oregon score proportionately.

    WTF. Yeah, I start typing before I finish thinking.

    I can see winning the under, keeping jimmy's defensive streak alive, and getting blown out by meat as almost guaranteed.

    Rather easily, in fact.

    Script, anyone?

    points streak ends here
  • CanadawgCanadawg Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 4,459 Swaye's Wigwam
    lawsandl said:

    Canadawg said:

    Didn't watch a snap. 24 point loss to Oregon incoming that will reestablish the facts of how bad this team is. Look at the PAC standings if you want a good laugh; what a steaming pile the conference is. The only win that would indicate being an above average team is to beat Oregon. Going 5-4 in the PAC is equivalent to 1-7 in the SEC (Vandy).

    Furd beat Oregon
    The Furd win comfortably last night with Tremayne and Humphries. There is a big gap between those two and the rest of the WRs. Higgins is better with those two on the field.
    Every team has injuries every game. The excuses didn't matter when we? were down all the starting WRs and they don't count now
  • EwaDawgEwaDawg Member Posts: 4,188

    EwaDawg said:




    chuck said:

    lawsandl said:

    The line looks like it’s -7 Oregon with a 51.5 point total.

    Easy money. If it stays single digits bet the farm.

    I think I'd actually take the under. My call is 41-5 Oregon.
    Agreed. Jimmy does not ever allow more than 34 points and UW likely wont score more than 17. You can let the dwags score more than that but they need to reduce what they let oregon score proportionately.

    WTF. Yeah, I start typing before I finish thinking.

    I can see winning the under, keeping jimmy's defensive streak alive, and getting blown out by meat as almost guaranteed.

    Rather easily, in fact.

    Script, anyone?

    points streak ends here
    God, I hope so. What a worthless fucking stat.
  • AtomicDawgAtomicDawg Member Posts: 7,052 Standard Supporter
    I see a 35-10 loss but the crowd gives a standing o as they keep Oregon out of the end zone to preserve the streak of no 40 point games. So mission accomplished there.
  • lawsandllawsandl Member Posts: 1,555
    Canadawg said:

    lawsandl said:

    Canadawg said:

    Didn't watch a snap. 24 point loss to Oregon incoming that will reestablish the facts of how bad this team is. Look at the PAC standings if you want a good laugh; what a steaming pile the conference is. The only win that would indicate being an above average team is to beat Oregon. Going 5-4 in the PAC is equivalent to 1-7 in the SEC (Vandy).

    Furd beat Oregon
    The Furd win comfortably last night with Tremayne and Humphries. There is a big gap between those two and the rest of the WRs. Higgins is better with those two on the field.
    Every team has injuries every game. The excuses didn't matter when we? were down all the starting WRs and they don't count now
    Context matters though. That was a bad loss for Oregon. I wouldn’t have felt much better about the team (just the W) had Oregon came from behind to beat the Furd without Tremayne and Humphries.
  • CanadawgCanadawg Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 4,459 Swaye's Wigwam
    lawsandl said:

    Canadawg said:

    lawsandl said:

    Canadawg said:

    Didn't watch a snap. 24 point loss to Oregon incoming that will reestablish the facts of how bad this team is. Look at the PAC standings if you want a good laugh; what a steaming pile the conference is. The only win that would indicate being an above average team is to beat Oregon. Going 5-4 in the PAC is equivalent to 1-7 in the SEC (Vandy).

    Furd beat Oregon
    The Furd win comfortably last night with Tremayne and Humphries. There is a big gap between those two and the rest of the WRs. Higgins is better with those two on the field.
    Every team has injuries every game. The excuses didn't matter when we? were down all the starting WRs and they don't count now
    Context matters though. That was a bad loss for Oregon. I wouldn’t have felt much better about the team (just the W) had Oregon came from behind to beat the Furd without Tremayne and Humphries.
    Ok so when ducks win next week we will claim the win with the context that we? would have won with a better coach. You play the games so you don't have to debate which team is better
  • lawsandllawsandl Member Posts: 1,555
    Canadawg said:

    lawsandl said:

    Canadawg said:

    lawsandl said:

    Canadawg said:

    Didn't watch a snap. 24 point loss to Oregon incoming that will reestablish the facts of how bad this team is. Look at the PAC standings if you want a good laugh; what a steaming pile the conference is. The only win that would indicate being an above average team is to beat Oregon. Going 5-4 in the PAC is equivalent to 1-7 in the SEC (Vandy).

    Furd beat Oregon
    The Furd win comfortably last night with Tremayne and Humphries. There is a big gap between those two and the rest of the WRs. Higgins is better with those two on the field.
    Every team has injuries every game. The excuses didn't matter when we? were down all the starting WRs and they don't count now
    Context matters though. That was a bad loss for Oregon. I wouldn’t have felt much better about the team (just the W) had Oregon came from behind to beat the Furd without Tremayne and Humphries.
    Ok so when ducks win next week we will claim the win with the context that we? would have won with a better coach. You play the games so you don't have to debate which team is better
    UW and Oregon will play it out on the field. I am talking about looking at common opponents for prognostication.
  • CanadawgCanadawg Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 4,459 Swaye's Wigwam
    lawsandl said:

    Canadawg said:

    lawsandl said:

    Canadawg said:

    lawsandl said:

    Canadawg said:

    Didn't watch a snap. 24 point loss to Oregon incoming that will reestablish the facts of how bad this team is. Look at the PAC standings if you want a good laugh; what a steaming pile the conference is. The only win that would indicate being an above average team is to beat Oregon. Going 5-4 in the PAC is equivalent to 1-7 in the SEC (Vandy).

    Furd beat Oregon
    The Furd win comfortably last night with Tremayne and Humphries. There is a big gap between those two and the rest of the WRs. Higgins is better with those two on the field.
    Every team has injuries every game. The excuses didn't matter when we? were down all the starting WRs and they don't count now
    Context matters though. That was a bad loss for Oregon. I wouldn’t have felt much better about the team (just the W) had Oregon came from behind to beat the Furd without Tremayne and Humphries.
    Ok so when ducks win next week we will claim the win with the context that we? would have won with a better coach. You play the games so you don't have to debate which team is better
    UW and Oregon will play it out on the field. I am talking about looking at common opponents for prognostication.
    Yeah fair enough it's just funny to get that into the weeds when you could counter that with lots of other stuff that doesn't really matter like UW>Furd>Duck
Sign In or Register to comment.