Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. Sign in or register to get started.

Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

My thoughts on horse dewormer

1235»

Comments

  • WestlinnDuckWestlinnDuck Member Posts: 15,702 Standard Supporter

    pawz said:

    Kaepsknee said:

    A ton of data there that seems reliable. Some places over their skis in methodology but most seem to be legit studies. And if mostly true. IV is the most effective for early stage treatment. I’m not sure I would take it as a Prophylaxis, but it seems to be harmless when taken in appropo doses short term.

    There is a study out of Argentina on the prophylaxis benefits of IVM.

    Paraphrasing:
    Over 700 front line critical care medical professionals. 1 weekly dose.

    400 got IVM, the other 300+ did not

    The 400 that took IVM, not a single person contracted cv19.

    Of the 300+ that did not, 43% contracted cv19.


    It was more like 700 in the treatment group and 500 in the control group.

    Of the control group 58% got covid, zero in the treatment group

    Might seem too good to be true, but why don’t we try to replicate it rather than putting out horse memes with “y’all” in it
    No money with HCQ or ivermectin. No power in stopping the chicom crud and saving hundreds of thousands (according to our national medical bureaucracy) of American lives. You think the dazzler actually gives a sh*t about an effective cheap treatment?
  • doogiedoogie Member Posts: 15,072
    Dazzler cares about totalitarian control of the populace.
  • WestlinnDuckWestlinnDuck Member Posts: 15,702 Standard Supporter
    doogie said:

    Dazzler cares about totalitarian control of the populace.

    Scratch a leftist find a fascist.
  • TurdBomberTurdBomber Member Posts: 19,988 Standard Supporter
    Kaepsknee said:

    A ton of data there that seems reliable. Some places over their skis in methodology but most seem to be legit studies. And if mostly true. IV is the most effective for early stage treatment. I’m not sure I would take it as a Prophylaxis, but it seems to be harmless when taken in appropo doses short term.

    The key is the timing. Once it's embedded in the lung tissue, the chances of recovery without or death serious damage are slim.

    Similarly, Hydroxy worked best early on, when combined in a cocktail with other drugs such as (erythromycin?) and Zinc.

    Similarly again, like IVM, Hydroxy is virtually harmless, though known to cause arrhythmia in certain heart patients, but so little that the bullshit Lancet Study the WH was citing to shit on it got pulled for fraudulent sampling.
  • WestlinnDuckWestlinnDuck Member Posts: 15,702 Standard Supporter

    Kaepsknee said:

    A ton of data there that seems reliable. Some places over their skis in methodology but most seem to be legit studies. And if mostly true. IV is the most effective for early stage treatment. I’m not sure I would take it as a Prophylaxis, but it seems to be harmless when taken in appropo doses short term.

    The key is the timing. Once it's embedded in the lung tissue, the chances of recovery without or death serious damage are slim.

    Similarly, Hydroxy worked best early on, when combined in a cocktail with other drugs such as (erythromycin?) and Zinc.

    Similarly again, like IVM, Hydroxy is virtually harmless, though known to cause arrhythmia in certain heart patients, but so little that the bullshit Lancet Study the WH was citing to shit on it got pulled for fraudulent sampling.
    Well, dying of lack of oxygen and heat damage from the chicom crud is certainly better than the very rare chance of arrhythmia.
Sign In or Register to comment.