Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

Washington Huskies football schedule

24

Comments

  • dhdawg
    dhdawg Member Posts: 13,326
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2013_Georgia_State_Panthers_football_team
    Georgia State went 0 and fucking 12 last year. This will be the kind of bullshit USC will start scheduling so they can pad win totals to make it seem like "progress" is being made
  • Tequilla
    Tequilla Member Posts: 20,098
    dhdawg said:

    also, while at the same time it's only TCU, they did beat an undefeated team in the fiesta bowl. You can say that bullshit about mark few, saying that about petersen is just stupid. And if it's so easy to go 92-12 why doesn't BSU coach do it?

    Fuck you

    DIAFF
  • Tequilla
    Tequilla Member Posts: 20,098
    September 20th is worse than September 6 ... at least Eastern is a relatively strong DII school.

    This is a schedule set up for success.

    Rose Bowl or bust.
  • RoadDawg55
    RoadDawg55 Member Posts: 30,129
    Tequilla said:

    September 20th is worse than September 6 ... at least Eastern is a relatively strong DII school.

    This is a schedule set up for success.

    Rose Bowl or bust.

    Disagree. As long as Helfrich doesn't fuck it up, Oregon is the best team in the Pac 12. The game is on the road too. UCLA is probably better too. I think it is 11 wins or bust. A Rose Bowl berth means a top 4 finish with the new playoffs. It's not impossible, but it's probably unlikely. While Sark recruited some talented players, this team has too many holes (at least on paper) for me to proclaim Rose Bowl or bust.
  • oregonblitzkrieg
    oregonblitzkrieg Member Posts: 15,288

    That's a rose bowl schedule right there - win or lose at Oregon. I don't expect Petersen to achieve that in his 1st year, but I certainly think he could. Great schedule except Sark forgot to give his backup qb's any meaningful reps. Miles was FORCED into action.

    I've been railing on Sark for 2 years over this, more than any other topic, AND FOR GOOD DAGUMMED REASON! He fucked up our opportunity for a rose bowl last year (the year we absolutely should have gone) Now we need an Auburn miracle to reach Pasadena. I don't expect Pete to win more than 8, but he very well could do the unthinkable and win the North and beat UCLA for roses. That's what I'm hoping coach can accomplish. But if Grinolds or anybody here bung - rapes Coach for going 8-5 or 9-4, I'll send Vito in to whack your family in their beds. He gets 3-5 years.

    Raging, flamboyant doog comments.
  • Fire_Marshall_Bill
    Fire_Marshall_Bill Member Posts: 25,613 Standard Supporter

    Anything less than 10 with a new head coach and our starting QB on the cusp of playing at Pasadena CC next year? Firecrotch, you are a prime example of what's wrong with fanbases', college or pro.

    They should be 4-0 with that pathetic OOC slate. So yes, I expect 6 and fucking 4 (or maybe 15 total games if they make the con. championship) in the remaing games. You need to stop dooging it up.
  • TierbsHsotBoobs
    TierbsHsotBoobs Member Posts: 39,680

    dhdawg said:

    Well I'll be ready cause I'm not going to fucking accept 8-5

    dhdawg said:

    Well I'll be ready cause I'm not going to fucking accept 8-5

    It took Sark 5 years to get to 8 wins. You automatically Expect 10 and are unwilling to 'accept' 8? With a new head coach, no qb, no TE, the loss of an 1800 yd rusher, two of our best receivers in limbo, new safeties and a new corner? Isn't that a lot to EXPECT?
    If Peterman goes 8-5 in 2014, I'll want his ass fired on the 50 yard line at the end of the Apple Cup. That's 4-0 + 4-5.
  • puppylove_sugarsteel
    puppylove_sugarsteel Member Posts: 9,133

    dhdawg said:

    Well I'll be ready cause I'm not going to fucking accept 8-5

    dhdawg said:

    Well I'll be ready cause I'm not going to fucking accept 8-5

    It took Sark 5 years to get to 8 wins. You automatically Expect 10 and are unwilling to 'accept' 8? With a new head coach, no qb, no TE, the loss of an 1800 yd rusher, two of our best receivers in limbo, new safeties and a new corner? Isn't that a lot to EXPECT?
    All the starting OL back, the whole front 7 on D. If we get good QB play, this should be a 10 win team. 8 wins would be disappointing.

    dhdawg said:

    Well I'll be ready cause I'm not going to fucking accept 8-5

    dhdawg said:

    Well I'll be ready cause I'm not going to fucking accept 8-5

    It took Sark 5 years to get to 8 wins. You automatically Expect 10 and are unwilling to 'accept' 8? With a new head coach, no qb, no TE, the loss of an 1800 yd rusher, two of our best receivers in limbo, new safeties and a new corner? Isn't that a lot to EXPECT?
    All the starting OL back, the whole front 7 on D. If we get good QB play, this should be a 10 win team. 8 wins would be disappointing.
    Pay attention for fuck sake. I'd be disappointed with anything less than 10 as well. But Peterson shouldn't be expected to win more than 8, period!
  • haie
    haie Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 23,712 Founders Club
    I'm expecting 10+ this year, given that our identity should be running the ball down people's throats, and only asking whatever qb is in there to make a play only when the defense gives it to him. This team should surprise the rest of the league and really the country.
  • RoadDawg55
    RoadDawg55 Member Posts: 30,129
    edited March 2014

    dhdawg said:

    Well I'll be ready cause I'm not going to fucking accept 8-5

    dhdawg said:

    Well I'll be ready cause I'm not going to fucking accept 8-5

    It took Sark 5 years to get to 8 wins. You automatically Expect 10 and are unwilling to 'accept' 8? With a new head coach, no qb, no TE, the loss of an 1800 yd rusher, two of our best receivers in limbo, new safeties and a new corner? Isn't that a lot to EXPECT?
    All the starting OL back, the whole front 7 on D. If we get good QB play, this should be a 10 win team. 8 wins would be disappointing.

    dhdawg said:

    Well I'll be ready cause I'm not going to fucking accept 8-5

    dhdawg said:

    Well I'll be ready cause I'm not going to fucking accept 8-5

    It took Sark 5 years to get to 8 wins. You automatically Expect 10 and are unwilling to 'accept' 8? With a new head coach, no qb, no TE, the loss of an 1800 yd rusher, two of our best receivers in limbo, new safeties and a new corner? Isn't that a lot to EXPECT?
    All the starting OL back, the whole front 7 on D. If we get good QB play, this should be a 10 win team. 8 wins would be disappointing.
    Pay attention for fuck sake. I'd be disappointed with anything less than 10 as well. But Peterson shouldn't be expected to win more than 8, period!
    He should be expected to win at least 10. Take your own advice, pay attention, and look at the schedule.
  • CheersWestDawg
    CheersWestDawg Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 2,478 Swaye's Wigwam
    Going 4-0 in the out of conference and one game better than seven win Steve in conference equals 10-3. That should be the minimum expectation.
  • NeGgaPlEaSe
    NeGgaPlEaSe Member Posts: 5,757
    At Hawaii, that's a preseason bowel game
  • [Deleted User]
    [Deleted User] Posts: 11,453

    Anything less than 10 with a new head coach and our starting QB on the cusp of playing at Pasadena CC next year? Firecrotch, you are a prime example of what's wrong with fanbases', college or pro.

    Fuck Doogman belongs.

    Thanks for proving you are still the biggest Doog in here in this thread.

    Raise the expectations already you dumb fuck doog!
  • PurpleJ
    PurpleJ Member Posts: 37,643 Founders Club
    Is it too late to change the OOC schedule? I know it is, but I just wanted to ask. Also, I can't tell if puppy has stopped taking his meds or if he is just freebasing them now.
  • RavennaDawg
    RavennaDawg Member Posts: 846
    Eastern is D I.

    In fact, they were the NCAA Division I National Champion in Football four years ago.
    Tequilla said:

    September 20th is worse than September 6 ... at least Eastern is a relatively strong DII school.

    This is a schedule set up for success.

    Rose Bowl or bust.

  • [Deleted User]
    [Deleted User] Posts: 11,453
    I'm not at all surprised that the biggest Sark Doog and Lambo Doog is once again Dooging it up?

    8-5 is such a failure of a season. Losing conference record or an embarrassing loss.

    10-3 really isn't that unrealistic. Go 6-1 at home and 4-2 on the road(three being Hawaii, Colorado and Cal). Not even setting the bar high.
  • Tailgater
    Tailgater Member Posts: 1,389

    Eastern is D I.

    Eastern is 20 less scholarships and two less coaches playing FCS football in the Big Sky. Definitely a D1 cupcake with a granite frosting.
  • Tequilla
    Tequilla Member Posts: 20,098
    If you can't see that this is a schedule set up for a team to be very, very successful, then you probably fit in better elsewhere.
  • fivehundredmileDAWG
    fivehundredmileDAWG Member Posts: 1,212
    He should win at least 10 in the regular season. That would mean if we go 4-0 non conference then 6-3 in conference which is a one win improvement.

    Also I see many of you think Geoergia State is FCS ... They are not .. They are FBS after recently transitioning. Eastern is the only FCS team ... And ironically they may be the best of the 4 non conference opponents.

    This season could be special if we catch a break or two during conference ... We could be in the hunt..

    ... Not Kim GrinoldsFS special...
  • Tequilla
    Tequilla Member Posts: 20,098
    KGFS would be 4-0 in the dreckfest of the non-conference, 5-4 in conference, and then winning a lower tier bowl game and saying that a 10 win season is really special that gives a lot of recruiting momentum.

    How you are doing in the grand scheme of things starts with how you perform in your conference. Bottom line.
  • [Deleted User]
    [Deleted User] Posts: 11,453
    KGFS special season with Sark is 9-4.

    With Petermen he needs to see a championship first. With no access you watch how Kim minimizes a 10 or even 11 win season.

    He'll be like PLSS with Lambo and give Sark the credit.
  • RoadDawg55
    RoadDawg55 Member Posts: 30,129
    Tequilla said:

    If you can't see that this is a schedule set up for a team to be very, very successful, then you probably fit in better elsewhere.

    If you are saying PuppySteel doesn't belong here, you can get the fuck out!
  • ApostleofGrief
    ApostleofGrief Member Posts: 3,904
    Tailgater said:

    Eastern is D I.

    Eastern is 20 less scholarships and two less coaches playing FCS football in the Big Sky. Definitely a D1 cupcake with a granite frosting.
    I don't get this Eastern is a cupcake bullshit AT ALL. I was in the stands in 2011 when Eastern kicked the huskys up and down the field, dominated on both sides of the ball. Give the home team credit for cashing in on some stupid mistakes of Eastern's, like fumbling a punt return.
  • Tailgater
    Tailgater Member Posts: 1,389
    Tequilla said:

    If you can't see that this is a schedule set up for a team to be very, very successful, then you probably fit in better elsewhere.

    Oldtimers such as I, whose time remaining on this planet is counting down, cannot believe that beatdowns of the likes of Eastern Washington and Georgia State can equate to anything described as "very very successful". By hosting two such football subpowers in Husky Stadium, the very best that any UW team can accomplish for the 2014 regular season is 10-0 (4-0 at home).

  • SteveInShelton
    SteveInShelton Member Posts: 1,611
    If Sark were still coaching, the entire first month of the season would be un-watchable. At least with Petersen coaching, we'll be able to see what a real gameplan looks like. It's still pretty un-watchable though. What a travesty of an OOC.
  • dhdawg
    dhdawg Member Posts: 13,326

    Tailgater said:

    Eastern is D I.

    Eastern is 20 less scholarships and two less coaches playing FCS football in the Big Sky. Definitely a D1 cupcake with a granite frosting.
    I don't get this Eastern is a cupcake bullshit AT ALL. I was in the stands in 2011 when Eastern kicked the huskys up and down the field, dominated on both sides of the ball. Give the home team credit for cashing in on some stupid mistakes of Eastern's, like fumbling a punt return.
    Any FCS team should be a cupcake when playing UW. The game in 2011 was awful and was quite possibly the poster game of Nick Holt playing his CB's 12 yards off the receiver and giving up a 7 yard pass. Eastern is not a cupcake to UNLV or Wyoming, but it absolutely is a cupcake to UW. It should be a plunger by halftime.

    Esteem just went up and down the field running stick routes crossing routes curl routes and bullahit like that. If trufant doesn't make that pick they probably lose, the team tanks and sark may have been gone after 2011, that was one of the sark squeaker specials where he gets incredibly lucky like osu in 2012 wsu in 2013 and 2010 Stanford in 2012, fuck we barely beat Hawaii that year
  • ApostleofGrief
    ApostleofGrief Member Posts: 3,904
    you are also more likely to see guys from this state playing for Eastern than for the huskkies. Keep in mind that washington will be playing with an unproven quarterback and has lost all its offensive weapons of note and will be breaking in a new coaching staff. Eastern was one game from the championship last season and has a well-established coaching staff. I'm not the one to pimp EWU winning this game, but it is not a cupcake effort just because they are I-AA.