Audit Live @ AZAudit.org
Comments
-
The important thing to remember here is that Maricopa County official(s) illegally deleted data but the Auditors have recovered the data, doubled the number of tables and are diligently continuing their jobs today while Maricopa County remains in contempt of court.
-
Yup. Some corrupt mother-fucker intentionally deleted data on one of the hard drives. And the press REFUSES to report on that fact.doogie said:The important thing to remember here is that Maricopa County official(s) illegally deleted data but the Auditors have recovered the data, doubled the number of tables and are diligently continuing their jobs today while Maricopa County remains in contempt of court.
-
But leftards are dumber than dirt and lie like a dog so they push the meme that if they have the file, then it wasn't deleted. Since the government is involved, good chance their was no separate backup of data. There obviously were not internal controls or none that were followed including any chain of custody or access issues.TurdBomber said:
For about the past 15 years, all hard disks containing any important data have created "images" of the hard disks, saved on backup or separate drives. Anyone not doing image backups is stuck in the 1990s, Norton Utilities days.WestlinnDuck said:
When you delete a file on a hard disk, the digital file remains until over ridden with new data or the disk is formatted. The "deleted" file just doesn't show up anymore on a file registry. So, yes it was deleted, but the data from a forensic digital file expert was recovered because it was over riden or formatted.Bob_C said:So it was deleted but recovered? So still deleted?
Destroying important data for good is virtually impossible today, without destroying several copies. -
See immediate above.WestlinnDuck said:
But leftards are dumber than dirt and lie like a dog so they push the meme that if they have the file, then it wasn't deleted. Since the government is involved, good chance their was no separate backup of data. There obviously were not internal controls or none that were followed including any chain of custody or access issues.TurdBomber said:
For about the past 15 years, all hard disks containing any important data have created "images" of the hard disks, saved on backup or separate drives. Anyone not doing image backups is stuck in the 1990s, Norton Utilities days.WestlinnDuck said:
When you delete a file on a hard disk, the digital file remains until over ridden with new data or the disk is formatted. The "deleted" file just doesn't show up anymore on a file registry. So, yes it was deleted, but the data from a forensic digital file expert was recovered because it was over riden or formatted.Bob_C said:So it was deleted but recovered? So still deleted?
Destroying important data for good is virtually impossible today, without destroying several copies. -
I'd be fucking SHOCKED if there wasn't co-location and some form of redundancy of their systems.TurdBomber said:
See immediate above.WestlinnDuck said:
But leftards are dumber than dirt and lie like a dog so they push the meme that if they have the file, then it wasn't deleted. Since the government is involved, good chance their was no separate backup of data. There obviously were not internal controls or none that were followed including any chain of custody or access issues.TurdBomber said:
For about the past 15 years, all hard disks containing any important data have created "images" of the hard disks, saved on backup or separate drives. Anyone not doing image backups is stuck in the 1990s, Norton Utilities days.WestlinnDuck said:
When you delete a file on a hard disk, the digital file remains until over ridden with new data or the disk is formatted. The "deleted" file just doesn't show up anymore on a file registry. So, yes it was deleted, but the data from a forensic digital file expert was recovered because it was over riden or formatted.Bob_C said:So it was deleted but recovered? So still deleted?
Destroying important data for good is virtually impossible today, without destroying several copies.
For fuck's sake, for $16.58/month I can get dropbox that has history and can reel back to prior versions of files. A county as large as Maricopa certainly has data backup systems in place with prior versions available.
No wonder the county officials are fighting so hard to get this set aside. They now know they are fucked beyond belief.
-
Somebody tried to delete the data, but was too dumb to realize there were multiple copies.PurpleThrobber said:
I'd be fucking SHOCKED if there wasn't co-location and some form of redundancy of their systems.TurdBomber said:
See immediate above.WestlinnDuck said:
But leftards are dumber than dirt and lie like a dog so they push the meme that if they have the file, then it wasn't deleted. Since the government is involved, good chance their was no separate backup of data. There obviously were not internal controls or none that were followed including any chain of custody or access issues.TurdBomber said:
For about the past 15 years, all hard disks containing any important data have created "images" of the hard disks, saved on backup or separate drives. Anyone not doing image backups is stuck in the 1990s, Norton Utilities days.WestlinnDuck said:
When you delete a file on a hard disk, the digital file remains until over ridden with new data or the disk is formatted. The "deleted" file just doesn't show up anymore on a file registry. So, yes it was deleted, but the data from a forensic digital file expert was recovered because it was over riden or formatted.Bob_C said:So it was deleted but recovered? So still deleted?
Destroying important data for good is virtually impossible today, without destroying several copies.
For fuck's sake, for $16.58/month I can get dropbox that has history and can reel back to prior versions of files. A county as large as Maricopa certainly has data backup systems in place with prior versions available.
No wonder the county officials are fighting so hard to get this set aside. They now know they are fucked beyond belief.
The only question is why?
And that question will never, ever be taken up in themainstream mediaMinistry of Information. -
I always preferred SCSI over IDE, btw. And the RAID array I built worked like a charm.PurpleThrobber said:
I'd be fucking SHOCKED if there wasn't co-location and some form of redundancy of their systems.TurdBomber said:
See immediate above.WestlinnDuck said:
But leftards are dumber than dirt and lie like a dog so they push the meme that if they have the file, then it wasn't deleted. Since the government is involved, good chance their was no separate backup of data. There obviously were not internal controls or none that were followed including any chain of custody or access issues.TurdBomber said:
For about the past 15 years, all hard disks containing any important data have created "images" of the hard disks, saved on backup or separate drives. Anyone not doing image backups is stuck in the 1990s, Norton Utilities days.WestlinnDuck said:
When you delete a file on a hard disk, the digital file remains until over ridden with new data or the disk is formatted. The "deleted" file just doesn't show up anymore on a file registry. So, yes it was deleted, but the data from a forensic digital file expert was recovered because it was over riden or formatted.Bob_C said:So it was deleted but recovered? So still deleted?
Destroying important data for good is virtually impossible today, without destroying several copies.
For fuck's sake, for $16.58/month I can get dropbox that has history and can reel back to prior versions of files. A county as large as Maricopa certainly has data backup systems in place with prior versions available.
No wonder the county officials are fighting so hard to get this set aside. They now know they are fucked beyond belief.
And Fuck MS Exchange Server and SharePoint, while I'm at it. Bloated, useless, overpriced crap.
Where was I? Got stuck in 1999 there for a minute.
Y2K! Y2K!!!! Game Over! The End of Times is Upon Us!!!!! -
Which one of you is this
-
MeLoneStarDawg said:Which one of you is this
-
Could I get the recipe for that bowl of shit that’s your avatar?MikeDamone said:
MeLoneStarDawg said:Which one of you is this
-
NoLoneStarDawg said:
Could I get the recipe for that bowl of shit that’s your avatar?MikeDamone said:
MeLoneStarDawg said:Which one of you is this
-
You drive a faggoty Nissan SUV?MikeDamone said:
MeLoneStarDawg said:Which one of you is this
It fits I guess. -
Enumclaw license plate frame. Enough said on that!dflea said:
You drive a faggoty Nissan SUV?MikeDamone said:
MeLoneStarDawg said:Which one of you is this
It fits I guess. -
Pepe the Frog is my soulmate.LoneStarDawg said:Which one of you is this
-
L-oh-Fucking- el
After publicly expressing “grave concerns” over Arizona’s audit of the 2020 election results, and after her continual bashing of the Senate “fraudit” of Maricopa County ballots, Secretary of State Katie Hobbs (D) was “stripped” of her ability to “defend election lawsuits” by the state’s Republican-led House Appropriations Committee on Tuesday.
The responsibility was transferred “exclusively” to Attorney General Mark Brnovich (R) through the end of the 2023 fiscal year.
https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2021/05/breaking-continual-trashing-senate-audit-republican-led-committee-strips-democrat-katie-hobbs-hearing-audit-related-lawsuits-2023/ -
She's part of the Arizona swampdoogie said:L-oh-Fucking- el
After publicly expressing “grave concerns” over Arizona’s audit of the 2020 election results, and after her continual bashing of the Senate “fraudit” of Maricopa County ballots, Secretary of State Katie Hobbs (D) was “stripped” of her ability to “defend election lawsuits” by the state’s Republican-led House Appropriations Committee on Tuesday.
The responsibility was transferred “exclusively” to Attorney General Mark Brnovich (R) through the end of the 2023 fiscal year.
https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2021/05/breaking-continual-trashing-senate-audit-republican-led-committee-strips-democrat-katie-hobbs-hearing-audit-related-lawsuits-2023/
still wood though, even though she's 51 -
New Hampshire says the machines count non existent votes....
-
Nobody admits voting for BidenSledog said:New Hampshire says the machines count non existent votes....
Checks out -
Fire_Marshall_Bill said:
She's part of the Arizona swampdoogie said:L-oh-Fucking- el
After publicly expressing “grave concerns” over Arizona’s audit of the 2020 election results, and after her continual bashing of the Senate “fraudit” of Maricopa County ballots, Secretary of State Katie Hobbs (D) was “stripped” of her ability to “defend election lawsuits” by the state’s Republican-led House Appropriations Committee on Tuesday.
The responsibility was transferred “exclusively” to Attorney General Mark Brnovich (R) through the end of the 2023 fiscal year.
https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2021/05/breaking-continual-trashing-senate-audit-republican-led-committee-strips-democrat-katie-hobbs-hearing-audit-related-lawsuits-2023/
still wood though, even though she's 51
uhhhh ... disagree
-
I wood the bisexual senator before her.
-
Two reasons were given Monday for Luzerne County Republican ballots mislabeled as Democratic ones on electronic screens at polling places in the May 18 primary.
Dominion Voting Systems Inc., which supplied and programs the devices, said “human error” caused the data entry typographical mistake in the heading at the top of the ballot, according to company executive vice president of operations Nicole Nollette.
And county Administrative Services Division Head David Parsnik acknowledged the county does not test the on-screen ballots after they are approved. The county leaves it up to Dominion to program them into the electronic ballot marking devices with no county examination before the machines are locked up for delivery, he said.
The explanation came during a more than two-hour special meeting called by the county’s volunteer citizen Election Board solely to address the ballot mislabeling error.
https://www.timesleader.com/news/1493598/cause-of-luzerne-county-ballot-mislabeling-identified
-
It's all human error but since it always only effects one side it ain't no accident!
-
I missed my weekly alert. Has Karen Fann woofed yet?
-
If Biden got more votes than Obama, most votes ever, it seems you should have nothing to worry about.GreenRiverGatorz said:I missed my weekly alert. Has Karen Fann woofed yet?
But here you are.
@MelloDawg @HHusky @PurpleBaze -
I'm very worried. That's why I'm asking. I'm on the record as not being able to handle the ups and downs.pawz said:
If Biden got more votes than Obama, most votes ever, it seems you should have nothing to worry about.GreenRiverGatorz said:I missed my weekly alert. Has Karen Fann woofed yet?
But here you are.
@MelloDawg @HHusky @PurpleBaze
@pawz -
Did we win yet?
-
@pawzpawz said:
If Biden got more votes than Obama, most votes ever, it seems you should have nothing to worry about.GreenRiverGatorz said:I missed my weekly alert. Has Karen Fann woofed yet?
But here you are.
@MelloDawg @HHusky @PurpleBaze -
@PurpleBazeMikeDamone said:Did we win yet?
-
-
Don't ruin this thread with your malarkey @PurpleBaze!!PurpleBaze said:
Chimportant shit goin down. @MelloDawg says so.