Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

NC Lt. Gov. answers the racist like Dazzler and Kobe who think blacks are too stupid to get free ID

12357

Comments

  • RaceBannon
    RaceBannon Member, Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 115,528 Founders Club
    HHusky said:

    hardhat said:

    Does this mean that if a black person shows up to vote, they're asked 'who are you voting for?' and if they say 'republicans, of course!' they're allowed to vote without ID?

    hardhat said:

    HHusky said:

    Tequilla said:

    HHusky said:

    Tequilla said:

    It makes absolutely zero sense to me why voter IDs are controversial if you truly believe in the concept of a fair and open election decided by the people

    The reason people don’t view IDs as being free is because there obviously is a nominal cost tied to getting a drivers license. If there truly is a prohibitive cost to that (which I don’t necessarily agree with), I’m sure the problem can be readily solved by getting an ID that isn’t cost prohibitive

    There’s always an excuse that someone uses when they really don’t want something to happen

    Imagine putting anyone to any additional effort in order to solve a nonexistent problem.

    What could the motive POSSIBLY be? Just a mystery, ain’t it?
    1) What is additional effort? Asking all adults to have an ID? That’s pretty much common sense given the need to have IDs for any number of things.

    2) What isn’t a problem? It’s pretty standard in polling that around 80% of the population supports IDs to vote. Moreover, if you have a large segment of the population (regardless of the side) that doesn’t have full faith and confidence in the election process, that’s a problem.

    A Democrat if they are so confident in their messaging, positioning, and support by the people should have no issue in ensuring fully transparent elections that are full of “controls” to ensure one vote per person, that the person voting is that person, etc

    But the reality is that the Democrats aren’t as confident as they want you to believe because they know that all the votes that vanish when you execute an election properly disproportionately impacts their vote totals
    The populations disproportionately affected tend to vote Democrat. That is the sole motivation behind the Voter ID requirements enacted in the past 20 years.
    Bullshit.
    Here are a few other countries that require ID to vote
    Norway
    Germany
    Israel
    Mexico
    Iceland

    Do you think people living in those countries are 100% white? I don't know how anyone can get away with this nonsense any longer. Whatever news sources you are consuming that are filling you with this garbage, you need to stop listening to them and think a little bit.
    I've now said repeatedly that it wasn't racially motivated.

    A guy who can't take Yes for an answer is gonna have trouble getting laid.
    Because you are lying and just a couple posts up slipped up again
    HHusky said:

    Tequilla said:

    HHusky said:

    Tequilla said:

    It makes absolutely zero sense to me why voter IDs are controversial if you truly believe in the concept of a fair and open election decided by the people

    The reason people don’t view IDs as being free is because there obviously is a nominal cost tied to getting a drivers license. If there truly is a prohibitive cost to that (which I don’t necessarily agree with), I’m sure the problem can be readily solved by getting an ID that isn’t cost prohibitive

    There’s always an excuse that someone uses when they really don’t want something to happen

    Imagine putting anyone to any additional effort in order to solve a nonexistent problem.

    What could the motive POSSIBLY be? Just a mystery, ain’t it?
    1) What is additional effort? Asking all adults to have an ID? That’s pretty much common sense given the need to have IDs for any number of things.

    2) What isn’t a problem? It’s pretty standard in polling that around 80% of the population supports IDs to vote. Moreover, if you have a large segment of the population (regardless of the side) that doesn’t have full faith and confidence in the election process, that’s a problem.

    A Democrat if they are so confident in their messaging, positioning, and support by the people should have no issue in ensuring fully transparent elections that are full of “controls” to ensure one vote per person, that the person voting is that person, etc

    But the reality is that the Democrats aren’t as confident as they want you to believe because they know that all the votes that vanish when you execute an election properly disproportionately impacts their vote totals
    The populations disproportionately affected tend to vote Democrat. That is the sole motivation behind the Voter ID requirements enacted in the past 20 years.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • HHusky
    HHusky Member Posts: 24,335
    SFGbob said:

    HHusky said:

    Tequilla said:

    HHusky said:

    Tequilla said:

    It makes absolutely zero sense to me why voter IDs are controversial if you truly believe in the concept of a fair and open election decided by the people

    The reason people don’t view IDs as being free is because there obviously is a nominal cost tied to getting a drivers license. If there truly is a prohibitive cost to that (which I don’t necessarily agree with), I’m sure the problem can be readily solved by getting an ID that isn’t cost prohibitive

    There’s always an excuse that someone uses when they really don’t want something to happen

    Imagine putting anyone to any additional effort in order to solve a nonexistent problem.

    What could the motive POSSIBLY be? Just a mystery, ain’t it?
    1) What is additional effort? Asking all adults to have an ID? That’s pretty much common sense given the need to have IDs for any number of things.

    2) What isn’t a problem? It’s pretty standard in polling that around 80% of the population supports IDs to vote. Moreover, if you have a large segment of the population (regardless of the side) that doesn’t have full faith and confidence in the election process, that’s a problem.

    A Democrat if they are so confident in their messaging, positioning, and support by the people should have no issue in ensuring fully transparent elections that are full of “controls” to ensure one vote per person, that the person voting is that person, etc

    But the reality is that the Democrats aren’t as confident as they want you to believe because they know that all the votes that vanish when you execute an election properly disproportionately impacts their vote totals
    The populations disproportionately affected tend to vote Democrat. That is the sole motivation behind the Voter ID requirements enacted in the past 20 years.
    That's why in the first election after Georgia passed their voter ID law the percentage of black voters increased. But the Dazzler always bases his position on the "facts"
    You overpaid for college.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • HHusky
    HHusky Member Posts: 24,335
    RaceBannon said:

    HHusky said:

    Tequilla said:

    HHusky said:

    Tequilla said:

    It makes absolutely zero sense to me why voter IDs are controversial if you truly believe in the concept of a fair and open election decided by the people

    The reason people don’t view IDs as being free is because there obviously is a nominal cost tied to getting a drivers license. If there truly is a prohibitive cost to that (which I don’t necessarily agree with), I’m sure the problem can be readily solved by getting an ID that isn’t cost prohibitive

    There’s always an excuse that someone uses when they really don’t want something to happen

    Imagine putting anyone to any additional effort in order to solve a nonexistent problem.

    What could the motive POSSIBLY be? Just a mystery, ain’t it?
    1) What is additional effort? Asking all adults to have an ID? That’s pretty much common sense given the need to have IDs for any number of things.

    2) What isn’t a problem? It’s pretty standard in polling that around 80% of the population supports IDs to vote. Moreover, if you have a large segment of the population (regardless of the side) that doesn’t have full faith and confidence in the election process, that’s a problem.

    A Democrat if they are so confident in their messaging, positioning, and support by the people should have no issue in ensuring fully transparent elections that are full of “controls” to ensure one vote per person, that the person voting is that person, etc

    But the reality is that the Democrats aren’t as confident as they want you to believe because they know that all the votes that vanish when you execute an election properly disproportionately impacts their vote totals
    The populations disproportionately affected tend to vote Democrat. That is the sole motivation behind the Voter ID requirements enacted in the past 20 years.
    And the mask comes off again
    delphic
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • hardhat
    hardhat Member Posts: 8,344
    HHusky said:

    hardhat said:

    Does this mean that if a black person shows up to vote, they're asked 'who are you voting for?' and if they say 'republicans, of course!' they're allowed to vote without ID?

    hardhat said:

    HHusky said:

    Tequilla said:

    HHusky said:

    Tequilla said:

    It makes absolutely zero sense to me why voter IDs are controversial if you truly believe in the concept of a fair and open election decided by the people

    The reason people don’t view IDs as being free is because there obviously is a nominal cost tied to getting a drivers license. If there truly is a prohibitive cost to that (which I don’t necessarily agree with), I’m sure the problem can be readily solved by getting an ID that isn’t cost prohibitive

    There’s always an excuse that someone uses when they really don’t want something to happen

    Imagine putting anyone to any additional effort in order to solve a nonexistent problem.

    What could the motive POSSIBLY be? Just a mystery, ain’t it?
    1) What is additional effort? Asking all adults to have an ID? That’s pretty much common sense given the need to have IDs for any number of things.

    2) What isn’t a problem? It’s pretty standard in polling that around 80% of the population supports IDs to vote. Moreover, if you have a large segment of the population (regardless of the side) that doesn’t have full faith and confidence in the election process, that’s a problem.

    A Democrat if they are so confident in their messaging, positioning, and support by the people should have no issue in ensuring fully transparent elections that are full of “controls” to ensure one vote per person, that the person voting is that person, etc

    But the reality is that the Democrats aren’t as confident as they want you to believe because they know that all the votes that vanish when you execute an election properly disproportionately impacts their vote totals
    The populations disproportionately affected tend to vote Democrat. That is the sole motivation behind the Voter ID requirements enacted in the past 20 years.
    Bullshit.
    Here are a few other countries that require ID to vote
    Norway
    Germany
    Israel
    Mexico
    Iceland

    Do you think people living in those countries are 100% white? I don't know how anyone can get away with this nonsense any longer. Whatever news sources you are consuming that are filling you with this garbage, you need to stop listening to them and think a little bit.
    I've now said repeatedly that it wasn't racially motivated.

    A guy who can't take Yes for an answer is gonna have trouble getting laid.
    We’re trying to point out that there is no evil intent in the requirement for voter id.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • SFGbob
    SFGbob Member Posts: 33,188
    HHusky said:

    SFGbob said:

    HHusky said:

    Tequilla said:

    HHusky said:

    Tequilla said:

    It makes absolutely zero sense to me why voter IDs are controversial if you truly believe in the concept of a fair and open election decided by the people

    The reason people don’t view IDs as being free is because there obviously is a nominal cost tied to getting a drivers license. If there truly is a prohibitive cost to that (which I don’t necessarily agree with), I’m sure the problem can be readily solved by getting an ID that isn’t cost prohibitive

    There’s always an excuse that someone uses when they really don’t want something to happen

    Imagine putting anyone to any additional effort in order to solve a nonexistent problem.

    What could the motive POSSIBLY be? Just a mystery, ain’t it?
    1) What is additional effort? Asking all adults to have an ID? That’s pretty much common sense given the need to have IDs for any number of things.

    2) What isn’t a problem? It’s pretty standard in polling that around 80% of the population supports IDs to vote. Moreover, if you have a large segment of the population (regardless of the side) that doesn’t have full faith and confidence in the election process, that’s a problem.

    A Democrat if they are so confident in their messaging, positioning, and support by the people should have no issue in ensuring fully transparent elections that are full of “controls” to ensure one vote per person, that the person voting is that person, etc

    But the reality is that the Democrats aren’t as confident as they want you to believe because they know that all the votes that vanish when you execute an election properly disproportionately impacts their vote totals
    The populations disproportionately affected tend to vote Democrat. That is the sole motivation behind the Voter ID requirements enacted in the past 20 years.
    That's why in the first election after Georgia passed their voter ID law the percentage of black voters increased. But the Dazzler always bases his position on the "facts"
    You overpaid for college.
    If voter ID laws depress Rat party voters then explain why Rat party voting increased after Georgia passed their voter ID law. Now dodge the question and come up with some lame ass unfunny cute response.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • HHusky
    HHusky Member Posts: 24,335
    SFGbob said:

    HHusky said:

    SFGbob said:

    HHusky said:

    Tequilla said:

    HHusky said:

    Tequilla said:

    It makes absolutely zero sense to me why voter IDs are controversial if you truly believe in the concept of a fair and open election decided by the people

    The reason people don’t view IDs as being free is because there obviously is a nominal cost tied to getting a drivers license. If there truly is a prohibitive cost to that (which I don’t necessarily agree with), I’m sure the problem can be readily solved by getting an ID that isn’t cost prohibitive

    There’s always an excuse that someone uses when they really don’t want something to happen

    Imagine putting anyone to any additional effort in order to solve a nonexistent problem.

    What could the motive POSSIBLY be? Just a mystery, ain’t it?
    1) What is additional effort? Asking all adults to have an ID? That’s pretty much common sense given the need to have IDs for any number of things.

    2) What isn’t a problem? It’s pretty standard in polling that around 80% of the population supports IDs to vote. Moreover, if you have a large segment of the population (regardless of the side) that doesn’t have full faith and confidence in the election process, that’s a problem.

    A Democrat if they are so confident in their messaging, positioning, and support by the people should have no issue in ensuring fully transparent elections that are full of “controls” to ensure one vote per person, that the person voting is that person, etc

    But the reality is that the Democrats aren’t as confident as they want you to believe because they know that all the votes that vanish when you execute an election properly disproportionately impacts their vote totals
    The populations disproportionately affected tend to vote Democrat. That is the sole motivation behind the Voter ID requirements enacted in the past 20 years.
    That's why in the first election after Georgia passed their voter ID law the percentage of black voters increased. But the Dazzler always bases his position on the "facts"
    You overpaid for college.
    If voter ID laws depress Rat party voters then explain why Rat party voting increased after Georgia passed their voter ID law. Now dodge the question and come up with some lame ass unfunny cute response.
    The question, as anyone who attended class knows, is what the numbers would have looked like but for the changes to the law.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • PurpleThrobber
    PurpleThrobber Member Posts: 48,530 Standard Supporter
    hardhat said:

    HHusky said:

    Tequilla said:

    HHusky said:

    Tequilla said:

    It makes absolutely zero sense to me why voter IDs are controversial if you truly believe in the concept of a fair and open election decided by the people

    The reason people don’t view IDs as being free is because there obviously is a nominal cost tied to getting a drivers license. If there truly is a prohibitive cost to that (which I don’t necessarily agree with), I’m sure the problem can be readily solved by getting an ID that isn’t cost prohibitive

    There’s always an excuse that someone uses when they really don’t want something to happen

    Imagine putting anyone to any additional effort in order to solve a nonexistent problem.

    What could the motive POSSIBLY be? Just a mystery, ain’t it?
    1) What is additional effort? Asking all adults to have an ID? That’s pretty much common sense given the need to have IDs for any number of things.

    2) What isn’t a problem? It’s pretty standard in polling that around 80% of the population supports IDs to vote. Moreover, if you have a large segment of the population (regardless of the side) that doesn’t have full faith and confidence in the election process, that’s a problem.

    A Democrat if they are so confident in their messaging, positioning, and support by the people should have no issue in ensuring fully transparent elections that are full of “controls” to ensure one vote per person, that the person voting is that person, etc

    But the reality is that the Democrats aren’t as confident as they want you to believe because they know that all the votes that vanish when you execute an election properly disproportionately impacts their vote totals
    The populations disproportionately affected tend to vote Democrat. That is the sole motivation behind the Voter ID requirements enacted in the past 20 years.
    Bullshit.
    Here are a few other countries that require ID to vote
    Norway
    Germany
    Israel
    Mexico
    Iceland

    Do you think people living in those countries are 100% white? I don't know how anyone can get away with this nonsense any longer. Whatever news sources you are consuming that are filling you with this garbage, you need to stop listening to them and think a little bit.


    Iraq has controls in place too.

    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • HHusky
    HHusky Member Posts: 24,335
    hardhat said:

    HHusky said:

    hardhat said:

    Does this mean that if a black person shows up to vote, they're asked 'who are you voting for?' and if they say 'republicans, of course!' they're allowed to vote without ID?

    hardhat said:

    HHusky said:

    Tequilla said:

    HHusky said:

    Tequilla said:

    It makes absolutely zero sense to me why voter IDs are controversial if you truly believe in the concept of a fair and open election decided by the people

    The reason people don’t view IDs as being free is because there obviously is a nominal cost tied to getting a drivers license. If there truly is a prohibitive cost to that (which I don’t necessarily agree with), I’m sure the problem can be readily solved by getting an ID that isn’t cost prohibitive

    There’s always an excuse that someone uses when they really don’t want something to happen

    Imagine putting anyone to any additional effort in order to solve a nonexistent problem.

    What could the motive POSSIBLY be? Just a mystery, ain’t it?
    1) What is additional effort? Asking all adults to have an ID? That’s pretty much common sense given the need to have IDs for any number of things.

    2) What isn’t a problem? It’s pretty standard in polling that around 80% of the population supports IDs to vote. Moreover, if you have a large segment of the population (regardless of the side) that doesn’t have full faith and confidence in the election process, that’s a problem.

    A Democrat if they are so confident in their messaging, positioning, and support by the people should have no issue in ensuring fully transparent elections that are full of “controls” to ensure one vote per person, that the person voting is that person, etc

    But the reality is that the Democrats aren’t as confident as they want you to believe because they know that all the votes that vanish when you execute an election properly disproportionately impacts their vote totals
    The populations disproportionately affected tend to vote Democrat. That is the sole motivation behind the Voter ID requirements enacted in the past 20 years.
    Bullshit.
    Here are a few other countries that require ID to vote
    Norway
    Germany
    Israel
    Mexico
    Iceland

    Do you think people living in those countries are 100% white? I don't know how anyone can get away with this nonsense any longer. Whatever news sources you are consuming that are filling you with this garbage, you need to stop listening to them and think a little bit.
    I've now said repeatedly that it wasn't racially motivated.

    A guy who can't take Yes for an answer is gonna have trouble getting laid.
    We’re trying to point out that there is no evil intent in the requirement for voter id.
    The subject was also the US of A. But Norway! Awesome
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • hardhat
    hardhat Member Posts: 8,344
    HHusky said:

    hardhat said:

    HHusky said:

    hardhat said:

    Does this mean that if a black person shows up to vote, they're asked 'who are you voting for?' and if they say 'republicans, of course!' they're allowed to vote without ID?

    hardhat said:

    HHusky said:

    Tequilla said:

    HHusky said:

    Tequilla said:

    It makes absolutely zero sense to me why voter IDs are controversial if you truly believe in the concept of a fair and open election decided by the people

    The reason people don’t view IDs as being free is because there obviously is a nominal cost tied to getting a drivers license. If there truly is a prohibitive cost to that (which I don’t necessarily agree with), I’m sure the problem can be readily solved by getting an ID that isn’t cost prohibitive

    There’s always an excuse that someone uses when they really don’t want something to happen

    Imagine putting anyone to any additional effort in order to solve a nonexistent problem.

    What could the motive POSSIBLY be? Just a mystery, ain’t it?
    1) What is additional effort? Asking all adults to have an ID? That’s pretty much common sense given the need to have IDs for any number of things.

    2) What isn’t a problem? It’s pretty standard in polling that around 80% of the population supports IDs to vote. Moreover, if you have a large segment of the population (regardless of the side) that doesn’t have full faith and confidence in the election process, that’s a problem.

    A Democrat if they are so confident in their messaging, positioning, and support by the people should have no issue in ensuring fully transparent elections that are full of “controls” to ensure one vote per person, that the person voting is that person, etc

    But the reality is that the Democrats aren’t as confident as they want you to believe because they know that all the votes that vanish when you execute an election properly disproportionately impacts their vote totals
    The populations disproportionately affected tend to vote Democrat. That is the sole motivation behind the Voter ID requirements enacted in the past 20 years.
    Bullshit.
    Here are a few other countries that require ID to vote
    Norway
    Germany
    Israel
    Mexico
    Iceland

    Do you think people living in those countries are 100% white? I don't know how anyone can get away with this nonsense any longer. Whatever news sources you are consuming that are filling you with this garbage, you need to stop listening to them and think a little bit.
    I've now said repeatedly that it wasn't racially motivated.

    A guy who can't take Yes for an answer is gonna have trouble getting laid.
    We’re trying to point out that there is no evil intent in the requirement for voter id.
    The subject was also the US of A. But Norway! Awesome
    No, the subject is requiring id to vote. And Norway is awesome.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • SFGbob
    SFGbob Member Posts: 33,188
    HHusky said:

    SFGbob said:

    HHusky said:

    SFGbob said:

    HHusky said:

    Tequilla said:

    HHusky said:

    Tequilla said:

    It makes absolutely zero sense to me why voter IDs are controversial if you truly believe in the concept of a fair and open election decided by the people

    The reason people don’t view IDs as being free is because there obviously is a nominal cost tied to getting a drivers license. If there truly is a prohibitive cost to that (which I don’t necessarily agree with), I’m sure the problem can be readily solved by getting an ID that isn’t cost prohibitive

    There’s always an excuse that someone uses when they really don’t want something to happen

    Imagine putting anyone to any additional effort in order to solve a nonexistent problem.

    What could the motive POSSIBLY be? Just a mystery, ain’t it?
    1) What is additional effort? Asking all adults to have an ID? That’s pretty much common sense given the need to have IDs for any number of things.

    2) What isn’t a problem? It’s pretty standard in polling that around 80% of the population supports IDs to vote. Moreover, if you have a large segment of the population (regardless of the side) that doesn’t have full faith and confidence in the election process, that’s a problem.

    A Democrat if they are so confident in their messaging, positioning, and support by the people should have no issue in ensuring fully transparent elections that are full of “controls” to ensure one vote per person, that the person voting is that person, etc

    But the reality is that the Democrats aren’t as confident as they want you to believe because they know that all the votes that vanish when you execute an election properly disproportionately impacts their vote totals
    The populations disproportionately affected tend to vote Democrat. That is the sole motivation behind the Voter ID requirements enacted in the past 20 years.
    That's why in the first election after Georgia passed their voter ID law the percentage of black voters increased. But the Dazzler always bases his position on the "facts"
    You overpaid for college.
    If voter ID laws depress Rat party voters then explain why Rat party voting increased after Georgia passed their voter ID law. Now dodge the question and come up with some lame ass unfunny cute response.
    The question, as anyone who attended class knows, is what the numbers would have looked like but for the changes to the law.
    So the number of Rat voters increased after voter ID laws were passed but they would have went up even more because your snatch told you so.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter