NC Lt. Gov. answers the racist like Dazzler and Kobe who think blacks are too stupid to get free ID
Comments
-
And Democrats (read: black people) vote in smaller number if you require voter ID because Dazzler and other Rat party members think they are too stupid and lazy to get a free government ID.HHusky said:The preference that Democrats vote in smaller numbers.
The preference that Democrats vote in smaller numbers.hardhat said:
So what is the nefarious motive that 36 states want some form of ID to vote?HHusky said:
Absolutely not.hardhat said:
I guess the motive is a mystery, but 36 states require it. Racism?HHusky said:
Imagine putting anyone to any additional effort in order to solve a nonexistent problem.Tequilla said:It makes absolutely zero sense to me why voter IDs are controversial if you truly believe in the concept of a fair and open election decided by the people
The reason people don’t view IDs as being free is because there obviously is a nominal cost tied to getting a drivers license. If there truly is a prohibitive cost to that (which I don’t necessarily agree with), I’m sure the problem can be readily solved by getting an ID that isn’t cost prohibitive
There’s always an excuse that someone uses when they really don’t want something to happen
What could the motive POSSIBLY be? Just a mystery, ain’t it?
I already addressed that.
Round and round we go. Thanks for the further confirmation Dazzler but I think we already have enough evidence on the record in support of this fact. -
The populations disproportionately affected tend to vote Democrat. That is the sole motivation behind the Voter ID requirements enacted in the past 20 years.Tequilla said:
1) What is additional effort? Asking all adults to have an ID? That’s pretty much common sense given the need to have IDs for any number of things.HHusky said:
Imagine putting anyone to any additional effort in order to solve a nonexistent problem.Tequilla said:It makes absolutely zero sense to me why voter IDs are controversial if you truly believe in the concept of a fair and open election decided by the people
The reason people don’t view IDs as being free is because there obviously is a nominal cost tied to getting a drivers license. If there truly is a prohibitive cost to that (which I don’t necessarily agree with), I’m sure the problem can be readily solved by getting an ID that isn’t cost prohibitive
There’s always an excuse that someone uses when they really don’t want something to happen
What could the motive POSSIBLY be? Just a mystery, ain’t it?
2) What isn’t a problem? It’s pretty standard in polling that around 80% of the population supports IDs to vote. Moreover, if you have a large segment of the population (regardless of the side) that doesn’t have full faith and confidence in the election process, that’s a problem.
A Democrat if they are so confident in their messaging, positioning, and support by the people should have no issue in ensuring fully transparent elections that are full of “controls” to ensure one vote per person, that the person voting is that person, etc
But the reality is that the Democrats aren’t as confident as they want you to believe because they know that all the votes that vanish when you execute an election properly disproportionately impacts their vote totals -
Does this mean that if a black person shows up to vote, they're asked 'who are you voting for?' and if they say 'republicans, of course!' they're allowed to vote without ID?
-
True, and Dimocrats harvest votes, have corrupt machines in plenty of cities, and are currently flooding the US with ill eagles for future votes and Texass. Their values align with the whiney, activist far left losers and not 80% of the USHHusky said:Madam, I’ve never contended the voter suppression movement is racially motivated.
They just don’t want Democratic populations voting.
You knew that too. Not our first exchange on the subject. -
Bullshit.HHusky said:
The populations disproportionately affected tend to vote Democrat. That is the sole motivation behind the Voter ID requirements enacted in the past 20 years.Tequilla said:
1) What is additional effort? Asking all adults to have an ID? That’s pretty much common sense given the need to have IDs for any number of things.HHusky said:
Imagine putting anyone to any additional effort in order to solve a nonexistent problem.Tequilla said:It makes absolutely zero sense to me why voter IDs are controversial if you truly believe in the concept of a fair and open election decided by the people
The reason people don’t view IDs as being free is because there obviously is a nominal cost tied to getting a drivers license. If there truly is a prohibitive cost to that (which I don’t necessarily agree with), I’m sure the problem can be readily solved by getting an ID that isn’t cost prohibitive
There’s always an excuse that someone uses when they really don’t want something to happen
What could the motive POSSIBLY be? Just a mystery, ain’t it?
2) What isn’t a problem? It’s pretty standard in polling that around 80% of the population supports IDs to vote. Moreover, if you have a large segment of the population (regardless of the side) that doesn’t have full faith and confidence in the election process, that’s a problem.
A Democrat if they are so confident in their messaging, positioning, and support by the people should have no issue in ensuring fully transparent elections that are full of “controls” to ensure one vote per person, that the person voting is that person, etc
But the reality is that the Democrats aren’t as confident as they want you to believe because they know that all the votes that vanish when you execute an election properly disproportionately impacts their vote totals
Here are a few other countries that require ID to vote
Norway
Germany
Israel
Mexico
Iceland
Do you think people living in those countries are 100% white? I don't know how anyone can get away with this nonsense any longer. Whatever news sources you are consuming that are filling you with this garbage, you need to stop listening to them and think a little bit. -
And what population groups are those?HHusky said:
The populations disproportionately affected tend to vote Democrat. That is the sole motivation behind the Voter ID requirements enacted in the past 20 years.Tequilla said:
1) What is additional effort? Asking all adults to have an ID? That’s pretty much common sense given the need to have IDs for any number of things.HHusky said:
Imagine putting anyone to any additional effort in order to solve a nonexistent problem.Tequilla said:It makes absolutely zero sense to me why voter IDs are controversial if you truly believe in the concept of a fair and open election decided by the people
The reason people don’t view IDs as being free is because there obviously is a nominal cost tied to getting a drivers license. If there truly is a prohibitive cost to that (which I don’t necessarily agree with), I’m sure the problem can be readily solved by getting an ID that isn’t cost prohibitive
There’s always an excuse that someone uses when they really don’t want something to happen
What could the motive POSSIBLY be? Just a mystery, ain’t it?
2) What isn’t a problem? It’s pretty standard in polling that around 80% of the population supports IDs to vote. Moreover, if you have a large segment of the population (regardless of the side) that doesn’t have full faith and confidence in the election process, that’s a problem.
A Democrat if they are so confident in their messaging, positioning, and support by the people should have no issue in ensuring fully transparent elections that are full of “controls” to ensure one vote per person, that the person voting is that person, etc
But the reality is that the Democrats aren’t as confident as they want you to believe because they know that all the votes that vanish when you execute an election properly disproportionately impacts their vote totals
Illegal immigrants that are not citizens of this country?
People that can’t verify their identity?
Anybody that in theory can’t get an ID ... the differentiator there isn’t based on race but instead based on income levels -
That's why in the first election after Georgia passed their voter ID law the percentage of black voters increased. But the Dazzler always bases his position on the "facts"HHusky said:
The populations disproportionately affected tend to vote Democrat. That is the sole motivation behind the Voter ID requirements enacted in the past 20 years.Tequilla said:
1) What is additional effort? Asking all adults to have an ID? That’s pretty much common sense given the need to have IDs for any number of things.HHusky said:
Imagine putting anyone to any additional effort in order to solve a nonexistent problem.Tequilla said:It makes absolutely zero sense to me why voter IDs are controversial if you truly believe in the concept of a fair and open election decided by the people
The reason people don’t view IDs as being free is because there obviously is a nominal cost tied to getting a drivers license. If there truly is a prohibitive cost to that (which I don’t necessarily agree with), I’m sure the problem can be readily solved by getting an ID that isn’t cost prohibitive
There’s always an excuse that someone uses when they really don’t want something to happen
What could the motive POSSIBLY be? Just a mystery, ain’t it?
2) What isn’t a problem? It’s pretty standard in polling that around 80% of the population supports IDs to vote. Moreover, if you have a large segment of the population (regardless of the side) that doesn’t have full faith and confidence in the election process, that’s a problem.
A Democrat if they are so confident in their messaging, positioning, and support by the people should have no issue in ensuring fully transparent elections that are full of “controls” to ensure one vote per person, that the person voting is that person, etc
But the reality is that the Democrats aren’t as confident as they want you to believe because they know that all the votes that vanish when you execute an election properly disproportionately impacts their vote totals -
And the mask comes off againHHusky said:
The populations disproportionately affected tend to vote Democrat. That is the sole motivation behind the Voter ID requirements enacted in the past 20 years.Tequilla said:
1) What is additional effort? Asking all adults to have an ID? That’s pretty much common sense given the need to have IDs for any number of things.HHusky said:
Imagine putting anyone to any additional effort in order to solve a nonexistent problem.Tequilla said:It makes absolutely zero sense to me why voter IDs are controversial if you truly believe in the concept of a fair and open election decided by the people
The reason people don’t view IDs as being free is because there obviously is a nominal cost tied to getting a drivers license. If there truly is a prohibitive cost to that (which I don’t necessarily agree with), I’m sure the problem can be readily solved by getting an ID that isn’t cost prohibitive
There’s always an excuse that someone uses when they really don’t want something to happen
What could the motive POSSIBLY be? Just a mystery, ain’t it?
2) What isn’t a problem? It’s pretty standard in polling that around 80% of the population supports IDs to vote. Moreover, if you have a large segment of the population (regardless of the side) that doesn’t have full faith and confidence in the election process, that’s a problem.
A Democrat if they are so confident in their messaging, positioning, and support by the people should have no issue in ensuring fully transparent elections that are full of “controls” to ensure one vote per person, that the person voting is that person, etc
But the reality is that the Democrats aren’t as confident as they want you to believe because they know that all the votes that vanish when you execute an election properly disproportionately impacts their vote totals -
Scratch an msnbc viewer, find a ...?
-
hardhat said:
Does this mean that if a black person shows up to vote, they're asked 'who are you voting for?' and if they say 'republicans, of course!' they're allowed to vote without ID?
I've now said repeatedly that it wasn't racially motivated.hardhat said:
Bullshit.HHusky said:
The populations disproportionately affected tend to vote Democrat. That is the sole motivation behind the Voter ID requirements enacted in the past 20 years.Tequilla said:
1) What is additional effort? Asking all adults to have an ID? That’s pretty much common sense given the need to have IDs for any number of things.HHusky said:
Imagine putting anyone to any additional effort in order to solve a nonexistent problem.Tequilla said:It makes absolutely zero sense to me why voter IDs are controversial if you truly believe in the concept of a fair and open election decided by the people
The reason people don’t view IDs as being free is because there obviously is a nominal cost tied to getting a drivers license. If there truly is a prohibitive cost to that (which I don’t necessarily agree with), I’m sure the problem can be readily solved by getting an ID that isn’t cost prohibitive
There’s always an excuse that someone uses when they really don’t want something to happen
What could the motive POSSIBLY be? Just a mystery, ain’t it?
2) What isn’t a problem? It’s pretty standard in polling that around 80% of the population supports IDs to vote. Moreover, if you have a large segment of the population (regardless of the side) that doesn’t have full faith and confidence in the election process, that’s a problem.
A Democrat if they are so confident in their messaging, positioning, and support by the people should have no issue in ensuring fully transparent elections that are full of “controls” to ensure one vote per person, that the person voting is that person, etc
But the reality is that the Democrats aren’t as confident as they want you to believe because they know that all the votes that vanish when you execute an election properly disproportionately impacts their vote totals
Here are a few other countries that require ID to vote
Norway
Germany
Israel
Mexico
Iceland
Do you think people living in those countries are 100% white? I don't know how anyone can get away with this nonsense any longer. Whatever news sources you are consuming that are filling you with this garbage, you need to stop listening to them and think a little bit.
A guy who can't take Yes for an answer is gonna have trouble getting laid. -
Because you are lying and just a couple posts up slipped up againHHusky said:hardhat said:Does this mean that if a black person shows up to vote, they're asked 'who are you voting for?' and if they say 'republicans, of course!' they're allowed to vote without ID?
I've now said repeatedly that it wasn't racially motivated.hardhat said:
Bullshit.HHusky said:
The populations disproportionately affected tend to vote Democrat. That is the sole motivation behind the Voter ID requirements enacted in the past 20 years.Tequilla said:
1) What is additional effort? Asking all adults to have an ID? That’s pretty much common sense given the need to have IDs for any number of things.HHusky said:
Imagine putting anyone to any additional effort in order to solve a nonexistent problem.Tequilla said:It makes absolutely zero sense to me why voter IDs are controversial if you truly believe in the concept of a fair and open election decided by the people
The reason people don’t view IDs as being free is because there obviously is a nominal cost tied to getting a drivers license. If there truly is a prohibitive cost to that (which I don’t necessarily agree with), I’m sure the problem can be readily solved by getting an ID that isn’t cost prohibitive
There’s always an excuse that someone uses when they really don’t want something to happen
What could the motive POSSIBLY be? Just a mystery, ain’t it?
2) What isn’t a problem? It’s pretty standard in polling that around 80% of the population supports IDs to vote. Moreover, if you have a large segment of the population (regardless of the side) that doesn’t have full faith and confidence in the election process, that’s a problem.
A Democrat if they are so confident in their messaging, positioning, and support by the people should have no issue in ensuring fully transparent elections that are full of “controls” to ensure one vote per person, that the person voting is that person, etc
But the reality is that the Democrats aren’t as confident as they want you to believe because they know that all the votes that vanish when you execute an election properly disproportionately impacts their vote totals
Here are a few other countries that require ID to vote
Norway
Germany
Israel
Mexico
Iceland
Do you think people living in those countries are 100% white? I don't know how anyone can get away with this nonsense any longer. Whatever news sources you are consuming that are filling you with this garbage, you need to stop listening to them and think a little bit.
A guy who can't take Yes for an answer is gonna have trouble getting laid.HHusky said:
The populations disproportionately affected tend to vote Democrat. That is the sole motivation behind the Voter ID requirements enacted in the past 20 years.Tequilla said:
1) What is additional effort? Asking all adults to have an ID? That’s pretty much common sense given the need to have IDs for any number of things.HHusky said:
Imagine putting anyone to any additional effort in order to solve a nonexistent problem.Tequilla said:It makes absolutely zero sense to me why voter IDs are controversial if you truly believe in the concept of a fair and open election decided by the people
The reason people don’t view IDs as being free is because there obviously is a nominal cost tied to getting a drivers license. If there truly is a prohibitive cost to that (which I don’t necessarily agree with), I’m sure the problem can be readily solved by getting an ID that isn’t cost prohibitive
There’s always an excuse that someone uses when they really don’t want something to happen
What could the motive POSSIBLY be? Just a mystery, ain’t it?
2) What isn’t a problem? It’s pretty standard in polling that around 80% of the population supports IDs to vote. Moreover, if you have a large segment of the population (regardless of the side) that doesn’t have full faith and confidence in the election process, that’s a problem.
A Democrat if they are so confident in their messaging, positioning, and support by the people should have no issue in ensuring fully transparent elections that are full of “controls” to ensure one vote per person, that the person voting is that person, etc
But the reality is that the Democrats aren’t as confident as they want you to believe because they know that all the votes that vanish when you execute an election properly disproportionately impacts their vote totals -
You overpaid for college.SFGbob said:
That's why in the first election after Georgia passed their voter ID law the percentage of black voters increased. But the Dazzler always bases his position on the "facts"HHusky said:
The populations disproportionately affected tend to vote Democrat. That is the sole motivation behind the Voter ID requirements enacted in the past 20 years.Tequilla said:
1) What is additional effort? Asking all adults to have an ID? That’s pretty much common sense given the need to have IDs for any number of things.HHusky said:
Imagine putting anyone to any additional effort in order to solve a nonexistent problem.Tequilla said:It makes absolutely zero sense to me why voter IDs are controversial if you truly believe in the concept of a fair and open election decided by the people
The reason people don’t view IDs as being free is because there obviously is a nominal cost tied to getting a drivers license. If there truly is a prohibitive cost to that (which I don’t necessarily agree with), I’m sure the problem can be readily solved by getting an ID that isn’t cost prohibitive
There’s always an excuse that someone uses when they really don’t want something to happen
What could the motive POSSIBLY be? Just a mystery, ain’t it?
2) What isn’t a problem? It’s pretty standard in polling that around 80% of the population supports IDs to vote. Moreover, if you have a large segment of the population (regardless of the side) that doesn’t have full faith and confidence in the election process, that’s a problem.
A Democrat if they are so confident in their messaging, positioning, and support by the people should have no issue in ensuring fully transparent elections that are full of “controls” to ensure one vote per person, that the person voting is that person, etc
But the reality is that the Democrats aren’t as confident as they want you to believe because they know that all the votes that vanish when you execute an election properly disproportionately impacts their vote totals -
delphicRaceBannon said:
And the mask comes off againHHusky said:
The populations disproportionately affected tend to vote Democrat. That is the sole motivation behind the Voter ID requirements enacted in the past 20 years.Tequilla said:
1) What is additional effort? Asking all adults to have an ID? That’s pretty much common sense given the need to have IDs for any number of things.HHusky said:
Imagine putting anyone to any additional effort in order to solve a nonexistent problem.Tequilla said:It makes absolutely zero sense to me why voter IDs are controversial if you truly believe in the concept of a fair and open election decided by the people
The reason people don’t view IDs as being free is because there obviously is a nominal cost tied to getting a drivers license. If there truly is a prohibitive cost to that (which I don’t necessarily agree with), I’m sure the problem can be readily solved by getting an ID that isn’t cost prohibitive
There’s always an excuse that someone uses when they really don’t want something to happen
What could the motive POSSIBLY be? Just a mystery, ain’t it?
2) What isn’t a problem? It’s pretty standard in polling that around 80% of the population supports IDs to vote. Moreover, if you have a large segment of the population (regardless of the side) that doesn’t have full faith and confidence in the election process, that’s a problem.
A Democrat if they are so confident in their messaging, positioning, and support by the people should have no issue in ensuring fully transparent elections that are full of “controls” to ensure one vote per person, that the person voting is that person, etc
But the reality is that the Democrats aren’t as confident as they want you to believe because they know that all the votes that vanish when you execute an election properly disproportionately impacts their vote totals -
We’re trying to point out that there is no evil intent in the requirement for voter id.HHusky said:hardhat said:Does this mean that if a black person shows up to vote, they're asked 'who are you voting for?' and if they say 'republicans, of course!' they're allowed to vote without ID?
I've now said repeatedly that it wasn't racially motivated.hardhat said:
Bullshit.HHusky said:
The populations disproportionately affected tend to vote Democrat. That is the sole motivation behind the Voter ID requirements enacted in the past 20 years.Tequilla said:
1) What is additional effort? Asking all adults to have an ID? That’s pretty much common sense given the need to have IDs for any number of things.HHusky said:
Imagine putting anyone to any additional effort in order to solve a nonexistent problem.Tequilla said:It makes absolutely zero sense to me why voter IDs are controversial if you truly believe in the concept of a fair and open election decided by the people
The reason people don’t view IDs as being free is because there obviously is a nominal cost tied to getting a drivers license. If there truly is a prohibitive cost to that (which I don’t necessarily agree with), I’m sure the problem can be readily solved by getting an ID that isn’t cost prohibitive
There’s always an excuse that someone uses when they really don’t want something to happen
What could the motive POSSIBLY be? Just a mystery, ain’t it?
2) What isn’t a problem? It’s pretty standard in polling that around 80% of the population supports IDs to vote. Moreover, if you have a large segment of the population (regardless of the side) that doesn’t have full faith and confidence in the election process, that’s a problem.
A Democrat if they are so confident in their messaging, positioning, and support by the people should have no issue in ensuring fully transparent elections that are full of “controls” to ensure one vote per person, that the person voting is that person, etc
But the reality is that the Democrats aren’t as confident as they want you to believe because they know that all the votes that vanish when you execute an election properly disproportionately impacts their vote totals
Here are a few other countries that require ID to vote
Norway
Germany
Israel
Mexico
Iceland
Do you think people living in those countries are 100% white? I don't know how anyone can get away with this nonsense any longer. Whatever news sources you are consuming that are filling you with this garbage, you need to stop listening to them and think a little bit.
A guy who can't take Yes for an answer is gonna have trouble getting laid. -
If voter ID laws depress Rat party voters then explain why Rat party voting increased after Georgia passed their voter ID law. Now dodge the question and come up with some lame ass unfunny cute response.HHusky said:
You overpaid for college.SFGbob said:
That's why in the first election after Georgia passed their voter ID law the percentage of black voters increased. But the Dazzler always bases his position on the "facts"HHusky said:
The populations disproportionately affected tend to vote Democrat. That is the sole motivation behind the Voter ID requirements enacted in the past 20 years.Tequilla said:
1) What is additional effort? Asking all adults to have an ID? That’s pretty much common sense given the need to have IDs for any number of things.HHusky said:
Imagine putting anyone to any additional effort in order to solve a nonexistent problem.Tequilla said:It makes absolutely zero sense to me why voter IDs are controversial if you truly believe in the concept of a fair and open election decided by the people
The reason people don’t view IDs as being free is because there obviously is a nominal cost tied to getting a drivers license. If there truly is a prohibitive cost to that (which I don’t necessarily agree with), I’m sure the problem can be readily solved by getting an ID that isn’t cost prohibitive
There’s always an excuse that someone uses when they really don’t want something to happen
What could the motive POSSIBLY be? Just a mystery, ain’t it?
2) What isn’t a problem? It’s pretty standard in polling that around 80% of the population supports IDs to vote. Moreover, if you have a large segment of the population (regardless of the side) that doesn’t have full faith and confidence in the election process, that’s a problem.
A Democrat if they are so confident in their messaging, positioning, and support by the people should have no issue in ensuring fully transparent elections that are full of “controls” to ensure one vote per person, that the person voting is that person, etc
But the reality is that the Democrats aren’t as confident as they want you to believe because they know that all the votes that vanish when you execute an election properly disproportionately impacts their vote totals -
The question, as anyone who attended class knows, is what the numbers would have looked like but for the changes to the law.SFGbob said:
If voter ID laws depress Rat party voters then explain why Rat party voting increased after Georgia passed their voter ID law. Now dodge the question and come up with some lame ass unfunny cute response.HHusky said:
You overpaid for college.SFGbob said:
That's why in the first election after Georgia passed their voter ID law the percentage of black voters increased. But the Dazzler always bases his position on the "facts"HHusky said:
The populations disproportionately affected tend to vote Democrat. That is the sole motivation behind the Voter ID requirements enacted in the past 20 years.Tequilla said:
1) What is additional effort? Asking all adults to have an ID? That’s pretty much common sense given the need to have IDs for any number of things.HHusky said:
Imagine putting anyone to any additional effort in order to solve a nonexistent problem.Tequilla said:It makes absolutely zero sense to me why voter IDs are controversial if you truly believe in the concept of a fair and open election decided by the people
The reason people don’t view IDs as being free is because there obviously is a nominal cost tied to getting a drivers license. If there truly is a prohibitive cost to that (which I don’t necessarily agree with), I’m sure the problem can be readily solved by getting an ID that isn’t cost prohibitive
There’s always an excuse that someone uses when they really don’t want something to happen
What could the motive POSSIBLY be? Just a mystery, ain’t it?
2) What isn’t a problem? It’s pretty standard in polling that around 80% of the population supports IDs to vote. Moreover, if you have a large segment of the population (regardless of the side) that doesn’t have full faith and confidence in the election process, that’s a problem.
A Democrat if they are so confident in their messaging, positioning, and support by the people should have no issue in ensuring fully transparent elections that are full of “controls” to ensure one vote per person, that the person voting is that person, etc
But the reality is that the Democrats aren’t as confident as they want you to believe because they know that all the votes that vanish when you execute an election properly disproportionately impacts their vote totals -
hardhat said:
Bullshit.HHusky said:
The populations disproportionately affected tend to vote Democrat. That is the sole motivation behind the Voter ID requirements enacted in the past 20 years.Tequilla said:
1) What is additional effort? Asking all adults to have an ID? That’s pretty much common sense given the need to have IDs for any number of things.HHusky said:
Imagine putting anyone to any additional effort in order to solve a nonexistent problem.Tequilla said:It makes absolutely zero sense to me why voter IDs are controversial if you truly believe in the concept of a fair and open election decided by the people
The reason people don’t view IDs as being free is because there obviously is a nominal cost tied to getting a drivers license. If there truly is a prohibitive cost to that (which I don’t necessarily agree with), I’m sure the problem can be readily solved by getting an ID that isn’t cost prohibitive
There’s always an excuse that someone uses when they really don’t want something to happen
What could the motive POSSIBLY be? Just a mystery, ain’t it?
2) What isn’t a problem? It’s pretty standard in polling that around 80% of the population supports IDs to vote. Moreover, if you have a large segment of the population (regardless of the side) that doesn’t have full faith and confidence in the election process, that’s a problem.
A Democrat if they are so confident in their messaging, positioning, and support by the people should have no issue in ensuring fully transparent elections that are full of “controls” to ensure one vote per person, that the person voting is that person, etc
But the reality is that the Democrats aren’t as confident as they want you to believe because they know that all the votes that vanish when you execute an election properly disproportionately impacts their vote totals
Here are a few other countries that require ID to vote
Norway
Germany
Israel
Mexico
Iceland
Do you think people living in those countries are 100% white? I don't know how anyone can get away with this nonsense any longer. Whatever news sources you are consuming that are filling you with this garbage, you need to stop listening to them and think a little bit.
Iraq has controls in place too.
-
The subject was also the US of A. But Norway! Awesomehardhat said:
We’re trying to point out that there is no evil intent in the requirement for voter id.HHusky said:hardhat said:Does this mean that if a black person shows up to vote, they're asked 'who are you voting for?' and if they say 'republicans, of course!' they're allowed to vote without ID?
I've now said repeatedly that it wasn't racially motivated.hardhat said:
Bullshit.HHusky said:
The populations disproportionately affected tend to vote Democrat. That is the sole motivation behind the Voter ID requirements enacted in the past 20 years.Tequilla said:
1) What is additional effort? Asking all adults to have an ID? That’s pretty much common sense given the need to have IDs for any number of things.HHusky said:
Imagine putting anyone to any additional effort in order to solve a nonexistent problem.Tequilla said:It makes absolutely zero sense to me why voter IDs are controversial if you truly believe in the concept of a fair and open election decided by the people
The reason people don’t view IDs as being free is because there obviously is a nominal cost tied to getting a drivers license. If there truly is a prohibitive cost to that (which I don’t necessarily agree with), I’m sure the problem can be readily solved by getting an ID that isn’t cost prohibitive
There’s always an excuse that someone uses when they really don’t want something to happen
What could the motive POSSIBLY be? Just a mystery, ain’t it?
2) What isn’t a problem? It’s pretty standard in polling that around 80% of the population supports IDs to vote. Moreover, if you have a large segment of the population (regardless of the side) that doesn’t have full faith and confidence in the election process, that’s a problem.
A Democrat if they are so confident in their messaging, positioning, and support by the people should have no issue in ensuring fully transparent elections that are full of “controls” to ensure one vote per person, that the person voting is that person, etc
But the reality is that the Democrats aren’t as confident as they want you to believe because they know that all the votes that vanish when you execute an election properly disproportionately impacts their vote totals
Here are a few other countries that require ID to vote
Norway
Germany
Israel
Mexico
Iceland
Do you think people living in those countries are 100% white? I don't know how anyone can get away with this nonsense any longer. Whatever news sources you are consuming that are filling you with this garbage, you need to stop listening to them and think a little bit.
A guy who can't take Yes for an answer is gonna have trouble getting laid. -
No, the subject is requiring id to vote. And Norway is awesome.HHusky said:
The subject was also the US of A. But Norway! Awesomehardhat said:
We’re trying to point out that there is no evil intent in the requirement for voter id.HHusky said:hardhat said:Does this mean that if a black person shows up to vote, they're asked 'who are you voting for?' and if they say 'republicans, of course!' they're allowed to vote without ID?
I've now said repeatedly that it wasn't racially motivated.hardhat said:
Bullshit.HHusky said:
The populations disproportionately affected tend to vote Democrat. That is the sole motivation behind the Voter ID requirements enacted in the past 20 years.Tequilla said:
1) What is additional effort? Asking all adults to have an ID? That’s pretty much common sense given the need to have IDs for any number of things.HHusky said:
Imagine putting anyone to any additional effort in order to solve a nonexistent problem.Tequilla said:It makes absolutely zero sense to me why voter IDs are controversial if you truly believe in the concept of a fair and open election decided by the people
The reason people don’t view IDs as being free is because there obviously is a nominal cost tied to getting a drivers license. If there truly is a prohibitive cost to that (which I don’t necessarily agree with), I’m sure the problem can be readily solved by getting an ID that isn’t cost prohibitive
There’s always an excuse that someone uses when they really don’t want something to happen
What could the motive POSSIBLY be? Just a mystery, ain’t it?
2) What isn’t a problem? It’s pretty standard in polling that around 80% of the population supports IDs to vote. Moreover, if you have a large segment of the population (regardless of the side) that doesn’t have full faith and confidence in the election process, that’s a problem.
A Democrat if they are so confident in their messaging, positioning, and support by the people should have no issue in ensuring fully transparent elections that are full of “controls” to ensure one vote per person, that the person voting is that person, etc
But the reality is that the Democrats aren’t as confident as they want you to believe because they know that all the votes that vanish when you execute an election properly disproportionately impacts their vote totals
Here are a few other countries that require ID to vote
Norway
Germany
Israel
Mexico
Iceland
Do you think people living in those countries are 100% white? I don't know how anyone can get away with this nonsense any longer. Whatever news sources you are consuming that are filling you with this garbage, you need to stop listening to them and think a little bit.
A guy who can't take Yes for an answer is gonna have trouble getting laid. -
So the number of Rat voters increased after voter ID laws were passed but they would have went up even more because your snatch told you so.HHusky said:
The question, as anyone who attended class knows, is what the numbers would have looked like but for the changes to the law.SFGbob said:
If voter ID laws depress Rat party voters then explain why Rat party voting increased after Georgia passed their voter ID law. Now dodge the question and come up with some lame ass unfunny cute response.HHusky said:
You overpaid for college.SFGbob said:
That's why in the first election after Georgia passed their voter ID law the percentage of black voters increased. But the Dazzler always bases his position on the "facts"HHusky said:
The populations disproportionately affected tend to vote Democrat. That is the sole motivation behind the Voter ID requirements enacted in the past 20 years.Tequilla said:
1) What is additional effort? Asking all adults to have an ID? That’s pretty much common sense given the need to have IDs for any number of things.HHusky said:
Imagine putting anyone to any additional effort in order to solve a nonexistent problem.Tequilla said:It makes absolutely zero sense to me why voter IDs are controversial if you truly believe in the concept of a fair and open election decided by the people
The reason people don’t view IDs as being free is because there obviously is a nominal cost tied to getting a drivers license. If there truly is a prohibitive cost to that (which I don’t necessarily agree with), I’m sure the problem can be readily solved by getting an ID that isn’t cost prohibitive
There’s always an excuse that someone uses when they really don’t want something to happen
What could the motive POSSIBLY be? Just a mystery, ain’t it?
2) What isn’t a problem? It’s pretty standard in polling that around 80% of the population supports IDs to vote. Moreover, if you have a large segment of the population (regardless of the side) that doesn’t have full faith and confidence in the election process, that’s a problem.
A Democrat if they are so confident in their messaging, positioning, and support by the people should have no issue in ensuring fully transparent elections that are full of “controls” to ensure one vote per person, that the person voting is that person, etc
But the reality is that the Democrats aren’t as confident as they want you to believe because they know that all the votes that vanish when you execute an election properly disproportionately impacts their vote totals -
You asked the wrong question. I understand your embarrassment.SFGbob said:
So the number of Rat voters increased after voter ID laws were passed but they would have went up even more because your snatch told you so.HHusky said:
The question, as anyone who attended class knows, is what the numbers would have looked like but for the changes to the law.SFGbob said:
If voter ID laws depress Rat party voters then explain why Rat party voting increased after Georgia passed their voter ID law. Now dodge the question and come up with some lame ass unfunny cute response.HHusky said:
You overpaid for college.SFGbob said:
That's why in the first election after Georgia passed their voter ID law the percentage of black voters increased. But the Dazzler always bases his position on the "facts"HHusky said:
The populations disproportionately affected tend to vote Democrat. That is the sole motivation behind the Voter ID requirements enacted in the past 20 years.Tequilla said:
1) What is additional effort? Asking all adults to have an ID? That’s pretty much common sense given the need to have IDs for any number of things.HHusky said:
Imagine putting anyone to any additional effort in order to solve a nonexistent problem.Tequilla said:It makes absolutely zero sense to me why voter IDs are controversial if you truly believe in the concept of a fair and open election decided by the people
The reason people don’t view IDs as being free is because there obviously is a nominal cost tied to getting a drivers license. If there truly is a prohibitive cost to that (which I don’t necessarily agree with), I’m sure the problem can be readily solved by getting an ID that isn’t cost prohibitive
There’s always an excuse that someone uses when they really don’t want something to happen
What could the motive POSSIBLY be? Just a mystery, ain’t it?
2) What isn’t a problem? It’s pretty standard in polling that around 80% of the population supports IDs to vote. Moreover, if you have a large segment of the population (regardless of the side) that doesn’t have full faith and confidence in the election process, that’s a problem.
A Democrat if they are so confident in their messaging, positioning, and support by the people should have no issue in ensuring fully transparent elections that are full of “controls” to ensure one vote per person, that the person voting is that person, etc
But the reality is that the Democrats aren’t as confident as they want you to believe because they know that all the votes that vanish when you execute an election properly disproportionately impacts their vote totals -
Norway is awesome. I think if your goal is for the US to be more like Norway, many of us would agree.hardhat said:
No, the subject is requiring id to vote. And Norway is awesome.HHusky said:
The subject was also the US of A. But Norway! Awesomehardhat said:
We’re trying to point out that there is no evil intent in the requirement for voter id.HHusky said:hardhat said:Does this mean that if a black person shows up to vote, they're asked 'who are you voting for?' and if they say 'republicans, of course!' they're allowed to vote without ID?
I've now said repeatedly that it wasn't racially motivated.hardhat said:
Bullshit.HHusky said:
The populations disproportionately affected tend to vote Democrat. That is the sole motivation behind the Voter ID requirements enacted in the past 20 years.Tequilla said:
1) What is additional effort? Asking all adults to have an ID? That’s pretty much common sense given the need to have IDs for any number of things.HHusky said:
Imagine putting anyone to any additional effort in order to solve a nonexistent problem.Tequilla said:It makes absolutely zero sense to me why voter IDs are controversial if you truly believe in the concept of a fair and open election decided by the people
The reason people don’t view IDs as being free is because there obviously is a nominal cost tied to getting a drivers license. If there truly is a prohibitive cost to that (which I don’t necessarily agree with), I’m sure the problem can be readily solved by getting an ID that isn’t cost prohibitive
There’s always an excuse that someone uses when they really don’t want something to happen
What could the motive POSSIBLY be? Just a mystery, ain’t it?
2) What isn’t a problem? It’s pretty standard in polling that around 80% of the population supports IDs to vote. Moreover, if you have a large segment of the population (regardless of the side) that doesn’t have full faith and confidence in the election process, that’s a problem.
A Democrat if they are so confident in their messaging, positioning, and support by the people should have no issue in ensuring fully transparent elections that are full of “controls” to ensure one vote per person, that the person voting is that person, etc
But the reality is that the Democrats aren’t as confident as they want you to believe because they know that all the votes that vanish when you execute an election properly disproportionately impacts their vote totals
Here are a few other countries that require ID to vote
Norway
Germany
Israel
Mexico
Iceland
Do you think people living in those countries are 100% white? I don't know how anyone can get away with this nonsense any longer. Whatever news sources you are consuming that are filling you with this garbage, you need to stop listening to them and think a little bit.
A guy who can't take Yes for an answer is gonna have trouble getting laid. -
Great, so voter id is ok then.HHusky said:
Norway is awesome. I think if your goal is for the US to be more like Norway, many of us would agree.hardhat said:
No, the subject is requiring id to vote. And Norway is awesome.HHusky said:
The subject was also the US of A. But Norway! Awesomehardhat said:
We’re trying to point out that there is no evil intent in the requirement for voter id.HHusky said:hardhat said:Does this mean that if a black person shows up to vote, they're asked 'who are you voting for?' and if they say 'republicans, of course!' they're allowed to vote without ID?
I've now said repeatedly that it wasn't racially motivated.hardhat said:
Bullshit.HHusky said:
The populations disproportionately affected tend to vote Democrat. That is the sole motivation behind the Voter ID requirements enacted in the past 20 years.Tequilla said:
1) What is additional effort? Asking all adults to have an ID? That’s pretty much common sense given the need to have IDs for any number of things.HHusky said:
Imagine putting anyone to any additional effort in order to solve a nonexistent problem.Tequilla said:It makes absolutely zero sense to me why voter IDs are controversial if you truly believe in the concept of a fair and open election decided by the people
The reason people don’t view IDs as being free is because there obviously is a nominal cost tied to getting a drivers license. If there truly is a prohibitive cost to that (which I don’t necessarily agree with), I’m sure the problem can be readily solved by getting an ID that isn’t cost prohibitive
There’s always an excuse that someone uses when they really don’t want something to happen
What could the motive POSSIBLY be? Just a mystery, ain’t it?
2) What isn’t a problem? It’s pretty standard in polling that around 80% of the population supports IDs to vote. Moreover, if you have a large segment of the population (regardless of the side) that doesn’t have full faith and confidence in the election process, that’s a problem.
A Democrat if they are so confident in their messaging, positioning, and support by the people should have no issue in ensuring fully transparent elections that are full of “controls” to ensure one vote per person, that the person voting is that person, etc
But the reality is that the Democrats aren’t as confident as they want you to believe because they know that all the votes that vanish when you execute an election properly disproportionately impacts their vote totals
Here are a few other countries that require ID to vote
Norway
Germany
Israel
Mexico
Iceland
Do you think people living in those countries are 100% white? I don't know how anyone can get away with this nonsense any longer. Whatever news sources you are consuming that are filling you with this garbage, you need to stop listening to them and think a little bit.
A guy who can't take Yes for an answer is gonna have trouble getting laid. -
H is getting pummeled worse than usual today
-
You dodged the question like a Kunt like you always do. Every question is the wrong question.HHusky said:
You asked the wrong question. I understand your embarrassment.SFGbob said:
So the number of Rat voters increased after voter ID laws were passed but they would have went up even more because your snatch told you so.HHusky said:
The question, as anyone who attended class knows, is what the numbers would have looked like but for the changes to the law.SFGbob said:
If voter ID laws depress Rat party voters then explain why Rat party voting increased after Georgia passed their voter ID law. Now dodge the question and come up with some lame ass unfunny cute response.HHusky said:
You overpaid for college.SFGbob said:
That's why in the first election after Georgia passed their voter ID law the percentage of black voters increased. But the Dazzler always bases his position on the "facts"HHusky said:
The populations disproportionately affected tend to vote Democrat. That is the sole motivation behind the Voter ID requirements enacted in the past 20 years.Tequilla said:
1) What is additional effort? Asking all adults to have an ID? That’s pretty much common sense given the need to have IDs for any number of things.HHusky said:
Imagine putting anyone to any additional effort in order to solve a nonexistent problem.Tequilla said:It makes absolutely zero sense to me why voter IDs are controversial if you truly believe in the concept of a fair and open election decided by the people
The reason people don’t view IDs as being free is because there obviously is a nominal cost tied to getting a drivers license. If there truly is a prohibitive cost to that (which I don’t necessarily agree with), I’m sure the problem can be readily solved by getting an ID that isn’t cost prohibitive
There’s always an excuse that someone uses when they really don’t want something to happen
What could the motive POSSIBLY be? Just a mystery, ain’t it?
2) What isn’t a problem? It’s pretty standard in polling that around 80% of the population supports IDs to vote. Moreover, if you have a large segment of the population (regardless of the side) that doesn’t have full faith and confidence in the election process, that’s a problem.
A Democrat if they are so confident in their messaging, positioning, and support by the people should have no issue in ensuring fully transparent elections that are full of “controls” to ensure one vote per person, that the person voting is that person, etc
But the reality is that the Democrats aren’t as confident as they want you to believe because they know that all the votes that vanish when you execute an election properly disproportionately impacts their vote totals
Black voter turnout increased after Georgia passed it's voter ID law. Same with Texas and same with Ohio. Obviously black people aren't as lazy and stupid as you and Biden feel they are. -
I gladly spend some of my hard earned $DOOGC for his voice as a Siri replacement.SFGbob said: -
You have an awfully limited view of what makes Norway awesome. I'm sure many of us would give in to you on the issue in exchange for some of the other things that make Norway awesome.hardhat said:
Great, so voter id is ok then.HHusky said:
Norway is awesome. I think if your goal is for the US to be more like Norway, many of us would agree.hardhat said:
No, the subject is requiring id to vote. And Norway is awesome.HHusky said:
The subject was also the US of A. But Norway! Awesomehardhat said:
We’re trying to point out that there is no evil intent in the requirement for voter id.HHusky said:hardhat said:Does this mean that if a black person shows up to vote, they're asked 'who are you voting for?' and if they say 'republicans, of course!' they're allowed to vote without ID?
I've now said repeatedly that it wasn't racially motivated.hardhat said:
Bullshit.HHusky said:
The populations disproportionately affected tend to vote Democrat. That is the sole motivation behind the Voter ID requirements enacted in the past 20 years.Tequilla said:
1) What is additional effort? Asking all adults to have an ID? That’s pretty much common sense given the need to have IDs for any number of things.HHusky said:
Imagine putting anyone to any additional effort in order to solve a nonexistent problem.Tequilla said:It makes absolutely zero sense to me why voter IDs are controversial if you truly believe in the concept of a fair and open election decided by the people
The reason people don’t view IDs as being free is because there obviously is a nominal cost tied to getting a drivers license. If there truly is a prohibitive cost to that (which I don’t necessarily agree with), I’m sure the problem can be readily solved by getting an ID that isn’t cost prohibitive
There’s always an excuse that someone uses when they really don’t want something to happen
What could the motive POSSIBLY be? Just a mystery, ain’t it?
2) What isn’t a problem? It’s pretty standard in polling that around 80% of the population supports IDs to vote. Moreover, if you have a large segment of the population (regardless of the side) that doesn’t have full faith and confidence in the election process, that’s a problem.
A Democrat if they are so confident in their messaging, positioning, and support by the people should have no issue in ensuring fully transparent elections that are full of “controls” to ensure one vote per person, that the person voting is that person, etc
But the reality is that the Democrats aren’t as confident as they want you to believe because they know that all the votes that vanish when you execute an election properly disproportionately impacts their vote totals
Here are a few other countries that require ID to vote
Norway
Germany
Israel
Mexico
Iceland
Do you think people living in those countries are 100% white? I don't know how anyone can get away with this nonsense any longer. Whatever news sources you are consuming that are filling you with this garbage, you need to stop listening to them and think a little bit.
A guy who can't take Yes for an answer is gonna have trouble getting laid.
You don't usually hold Norway up as what we should aspire to, but I'm happy to see you're making (slow) progress. -
Psoriasis sufferer?hardhat said:Scratch an msnbc viewer, find a ...?
-
I "dodged" a stupid question.SFGbob said:
You dodged the question like a Kunt like you always do. Every question is the wrong question.HHusky said:
You asked the wrong question. I understand your embarrassment.SFGbob said:
So the number of Rat voters increased after voter ID laws were passed but they would have went up even more because your snatch told you so.HHusky said:
The question, as anyone who attended class knows, is what the numbers would have looked like but for the changes to the law.SFGbob said:
If voter ID laws depress Rat party voters then explain why Rat party voting increased after Georgia passed their voter ID law. Now dodge the question and come up with some lame ass unfunny cute response.HHusky said:
You overpaid for college.SFGbob said:
That's why in the first election after Georgia passed their voter ID law the percentage of black voters increased. But the Dazzler always bases his position on the "facts"HHusky said:
The populations disproportionately affected tend to vote Democrat. That is the sole motivation behind the Voter ID requirements enacted in the past 20 years.Tequilla said:
1) What is additional effort? Asking all adults to have an ID? That’s pretty much common sense given the need to have IDs for any number of things.HHusky said:
Imagine putting anyone to any additional effort in order to solve a nonexistent problem.Tequilla said:It makes absolutely zero sense to me why voter IDs are controversial if you truly believe in the concept of a fair and open election decided by the people
The reason people don’t view IDs as being free is because there obviously is a nominal cost tied to getting a drivers license. If there truly is a prohibitive cost to that (which I don’t necessarily agree with), I’m sure the problem can be readily solved by getting an ID that isn’t cost prohibitive
There’s always an excuse that someone uses when they really don’t want something to happen
What could the motive POSSIBLY be? Just a mystery, ain’t it?
2) What isn’t a problem? It’s pretty standard in polling that around 80% of the population supports IDs to vote. Moreover, if you have a large segment of the population (regardless of the side) that doesn’t have full faith and confidence in the election process, that’s a problem.
A Democrat if they are so confident in their messaging, positioning, and support by the people should have no issue in ensuring fully transparent elections that are full of “controls” to ensure one vote per person, that the person voting is that person, etc
But the reality is that the Democrats aren’t as confident as they want you to believe because they know that all the votes that vanish when you execute an election properly disproportionately impacts their vote totals
Black voter turnout increased after Georgia passed it's voter ID law. Same with Texas and same with Ohio. Obviously black people aren't as lazy and stupid as you and Biden feel they are.
Guilty. -
Finally admitted: @HHusky wants to live among almost exclusively white people.HHusky said:
You have an awfully limited view of what makes Norway awesome. I'm sure many of us would give in to you on the issue in exchange for some of the other things that make Norway awesome.hardhat said:
Great, so voter id is ok then.HHusky said:
Norway is awesome. I think if your goal is for the US to be more like Norway, many of us would agree.hardhat said:
No, the subject is requiring id to vote. And Norway is awesome.HHusky said:
The subject was also the US of A. But Norway! Awesomehardhat said:
We’re trying to point out that there is no evil intent in the requirement for voter id.HHusky said:hardhat said:Does this mean that if a black person shows up to vote, they're asked 'who are you voting for?' and if they say 'republicans, of course!' they're allowed to vote without ID?
I've now said repeatedly that it wasn't racially motivated.hardhat said:
Bullshit.HHusky said:
The populations disproportionately affected tend to vote Democrat. That is the sole motivation behind the Voter ID requirements enacted in the past 20 years.Tequilla said:
1) What is additional effort? Asking all adults to have an ID? That’s pretty much common sense given the need to have IDs for any number of things.HHusky said:
Imagine putting anyone to any additional effort in order to solve a nonexistent problem.Tequilla said:It makes absolutely zero sense to me why voter IDs are controversial if you truly believe in the concept of a fair and open election decided by the people
The reason people don’t view IDs as being free is because there obviously is a nominal cost tied to getting a drivers license. If there truly is a prohibitive cost to that (which I don’t necessarily agree with), I’m sure the problem can be readily solved by getting an ID that isn’t cost prohibitive
There’s always an excuse that someone uses when they really don’t want something to happen
What could the motive POSSIBLY be? Just a mystery, ain’t it?
2) What isn’t a problem? It’s pretty standard in polling that around 80% of the population supports IDs to vote. Moreover, if you have a large segment of the population (regardless of the side) that doesn’t have full faith and confidence in the election process, that’s a problem.
A Democrat if they are so confident in their messaging, positioning, and support by the people should have no issue in ensuring fully transparent elections that are full of “controls” to ensure one vote per person, that the person voting is that person, etc
But the reality is that the Democrats aren’t as confident as they want you to believe because they know that all the votes that vanish when you execute an election properly disproportionately impacts their vote totals
Here are a few other countries that require ID to vote
Norway
Germany
Israel
Mexico
Iceland
Do you think people living in those countries are 100% white? I don't know how anyone can get away with this nonsense any longer. Whatever news sources you are consuming that are filling you with this garbage, you need to stop listening to them and think a little bit.
A guy who can't take Yes for an answer is gonna have trouble getting laid.
You don't usually hold Norway up as what we should aspire to, but I'm happy to see you're making (slow) progress.
