It makes absolutely zero sense to me why voter IDs are controversial if you truly believe in the concept of a fair and open election decided by the people
The reason people don’t view IDs as being free is because there obviously is a nominal cost tied to getting a drivers license. If there truly is a prohibitive cost to that (which I don’t necessarily agree with), I’m sure the problem can be readily solved by getting an ID that isn’t cost prohibitive
There’s always an excuse that someone uses when they really don’t want something to happen
Imagine putting anyone to any additional effort in order to solve a nonexistent problem.
What could the motive POSSIBLY be? Just a mystery, ain’t it?
It makes absolutely zero sense to me why voter IDs are controversial if you truly believe in the concept of a fair and open election decided by the people
The reason people don’t view IDs as being free is because there obviously is a nominal cost tied to getting a drivers license. If there truly is a prohibitive cost to that (which I don’t necessarily agree with), I’m sure the problem can be readily solved by getting an ID that isn’t cost prohibitive
There’s always an excuse that someone uses when they really don’t want something to happen
Imagine putting anyone to any additional effort in order to solve a nonexistent problem.
What could the motive POSSIBLY be? Just a mystery, ain’t it?
An "effort" that you believe black people are disproportionately both too stupid and too lazy to achieve. Thank you Dazzler, no further questions.
It makes absolutely zero sense to me why voter IDs are controversial if you truly believe in the concept of a fair and open election decided by the people
The reason people don’t view IDs as being free is because there obviously is a nominal cost tied to getting a drivers license. If there truly is a prohibitive cost to that (which I don’t necessarily agree with), I’m sure the problem can be readily solved by getting an ID that isn’t cost prohibitive
There’s always an excuse that someone uses when they really don’t want something to happen
There is a difference between a driver's license and free ID in California
It makes absolutely zero sense to me why voter IDs are controversial if you truly believe in the concept of a fair and open election decided by the people
The reason people don’t view IDs as being free is because there obviously is a nominal cost tied to getting a drivers license. If there truly is a prohibitive cost to that (which I don’t necessarily agree with), I’m sure the problem can be readily solved by getting an ID that isn’t cost prohibitive
There’s always an excuse that someone uses when they really don’t want something to happen
Imagine putting anyone to any additional effort in order to solve a nonexistent problem.
What could the motive POSSIBLY be? Just a mystery, ain’t it?
I guess the motive is a mystery, but 36 states require it. Racism?
It makes absolutely zero sense to me why voter IDs are controversial if you truly believe in the concept of a fair and open election decided by the people
The reason people don’t view IDs as being free is because there obviously is a nominal cost tied to getting a drivers license. If there truly is a prohibitive cost to that (which I don’t necessarily agree with), I’m sure the problem can be readily solved by getting an ID that isn’t cost prohibitive
There’s always an excuse that someone uses when they really don’t want something to happen
Imagine putting anyone to any additional effort in order to solve a nonexistent problem.
What could the motive POSSIBLY be? Just a mystery, ain’t it?
I guess the motive is a mystery, but 36 states require it. Racism?
It makes absolutely zero sense to me why voter IDs are controversial if you truly believe in the concept of a fair and open election decided by the people
The reason people don’t view IDs as being free is because there obviously is a nominal cost tied to getting a drivers license. If there truly is a prohibitive cost to that (which I don’t necessarily agree with), I’m sure the problem can be readily solved by getting an ID that isn’t cost prohibitive
There’s always an excuse that someone uses when they really don’t want something to happen
Imagine putting anyone to any additional effort in order to solve a nonexistent problem.
What could the motive POSSIBLY be? Just a mystery, ain’t it?
I guess the motive is a mystery, but 36 states require it. Racism?
Absolutely not.
I already addressed that.
So what is the nefarious motive that 36 states want some form of ID to vote?
It makes absolutely zero sense to me why voter IDs are controversial if you truly believe in the concept of a fair and open election decided by the people
The reason people don’t view IDs as being free is because there obviously is a nominal cost tied to getting a drivers license. If there truly is a prohibitive cost to that (which I don’t necessarily agree with), I’m sure the problem can be readily solved by getting an ID that isn’t cost prohibitive
There’s always an excuse that someone uses when they really don’t want something to happen
Imagine putting anyone to any additional effort in order to solve a nonexistent problem.
What could the motive POSSIBLY be? Just a mystery, ain’t it?
1) What is additional effort? Asking all adults to have an ID? That’s pretty much common sense given the need to have IDs for any number of things.
2) What isn’t a problem? It’s pretty standard in polling that around 80% of the population supports IDs to vote. Moreover, if you have a large segment of the population (regardless of the side) that doesn’t have full faith and confidence in the election process, that’s a problem.
A Democrat if they are so confident in their messaging, positioning, and support by the people should have no issue in ensuring fully transparent elections that are full of “controls” to ensure one vote per person, that the person voting is that person, etc
But the reality is that the Democrats aren’t as confident as they want you to believe because they know that all the votes that vanish when you execute an election properly disproportionately impacts their vote totals
It makes absolutely zero sense to me why voter IDs are controversial if you truly believe in the concept of a fair and open election decided by the people
The reason people don’t view IDs as being free is because there obviously is a nominal cost tied to getting a drivers license. If there truly is a prohibitive cost to that (which I don’t necessarily agree with), I’m sure the problem can be readily solved by getting an ID that isn’t cost prohibitive
There’s always an excuse that someone uses when they really don’t want something to happen
Imagine putting anyone to any additional effort in order to solve a nonexistent problem.
What could the motive POSSIBLY be? Just a mystery, ain’t it?
I guess the motive is a mystery, but 36 states require it. Racism?
Absolutely not.
I already addressed that.
So what is the nefarious motive that 36 states want some form of ID to vote?
The preference that Democrats vote in smaller numbers.
It makes absolutely zero sense to me why voter IDs are controversial if you truly believe in the concept of a fair and open election decided by the people
The reason people don’t view IDs as being free is because there obviously is a nominal cost tied to getting a drivers license. If there truly is a prohibitive cost to that (which I don’t necessarily agree with), I’m sure the problem can be readily solved by getting an ID that isn’t cost prohibitive
There’s always an excuse that someone uses when they really don’t want something to happen
There is a difference between a driver's license and free ID in California
Driver's license is not free
Exactly ...
That’s why I said I don’t believe a prohibitive cost
A driver’s license is largely nominal in cost
If a driver’s license is too expensive there’s always the ability to get an ID card ... which if it isn’t free should be
It makes absolutely zero sense to me why voter IDs are controversial if you truly believe in the concept of a fair and open election decided by the people
The reason people don’t view IDs as being free is because there obviously is a nominal cost tied to getting a drivers license. If there truly is a prohibitive cost to that (which I don’t necessarily agree with), I’m sure the problem can be readily solved by getting an ID that isn’t cost prohibitive
There’s always an excuse that someone uses when they really don’t want something to happen
Imagine putting anyone to any additional effort in order to solve a nonexistent problem.
What could the motive POSSIBLY be? Just a mystery, ain’t it?
I guess the motive is a mystery, but 36 states require it. Racism?
Absolutely not.
I already addressed that.
So what is the nefarious motive that 36 states want some form of ID to vote?
The preference that Democrats vote in smaller numbers.
This is based on what? When were those laws written? This is a bizarre narrative.
It makes absolutely zero sense to me why voter IDs are controversial if you truly believe in the concept of a fair and open election decided by the people
The reason people don’t view IDs as being free is because there obviously is a nominal cost tied to getting a drivers license. If there truly is a prohibitive cost to that (which I don’t necessarily agree with), I’m sure the problem can be readily solved by getting an ID that isn’t cost prohibitive
There’s always an excuse that someone uses when they really don’t want something to happen
Imagine putting anyone to any additional effort in order to solve a nonexistent problem.
What could the motive POSSIBLY be? Just a mystery, ain’t it?
I guess the motive is a mystery, but 36 states require it. Racism?
Absolutely not.
I already addressed that.
So what is the nefarious motive that 36 states want some form of ID to vote?
The preference that Democrats vote in smaller numbers.
And Democrats (read: black people) vote in smaller number if you require voter ID because Dazzler and other Rat party members think they are too stupid and lazy to get a free government ID.
Round and round we go. Thanks for the further confirmation Dazzler but I think we already have enough evidence on the record in support of this fact.
It makes absolutely zero sense to me why voter IDs are controversial if you truly believe in the concept of a fair and open election decided by the people
The reason people don’t view IDs as being free is because there obviously is a nominal cost tied to getting a drivers license. If there truly is a prohibitive cost to that (which I don’t necessarily agree with), I’m sure the problem can be readily solved by getting an ID that isn’t cost prohibitive
There’s always an excuse that someone uses when they really don’t want something to happen
Imagine putting anyone to any additional effort in order to solve a nonexistent problem.
What could the motive POSSIBLY be? Just a mystery, ain’t it?
1) What is additional effort? Asking all adults to have an ID? That’s pretty much common sense given the need to have IDs for any number of things.
2) What isn’t a problem? It’s pretty standard in polling that around 80% of the population supports IDs to vote. Moreover, if you have a large segment of the population (regardless of the side) that doesn’t have full faith and confidence in the election process, that’s a problem.
A Democrat if they are so confident in their messaging, positioning, and support by the people should have no issue in ensuring fully transparent elections that are full of “controls” to ensure one vote per person, that the person voting is that person, etc
But the reality is that the Democrats aren’t as confident as they want you to believe because they know that all the votes that vanish when you execute an election properly disproportionately impacts their vote totals
The populations disproportionately affected tend to vote Democrat. That is the sole motivation behind the Voter ID requirements enacted in the past 20 years.
Does this mean that if a black person shows up to vote, they're asked 'who are you voting for?' and if they say 'republicans, of course!' they're allowed to vote without ID?
Madam, I’ve never contended the voter suppression movement is racially motivated.
They just don’t want Democratic populations voting.
You knew that too. Not our first exchange on the subject.
True, and Dimocrats harvest votes, have corrupt machines in plenty of cities, and are currently flooding the US with ill eagles for future votes and Texass. Their values align with the whiney, activist far left losers and not 80% of the US
It makes absolutely zero sense to me why voter IDs are controversial if you truly believe in the concept of a fair and open election decided by the people
The reason people don’t view IDs as being free is because there obviously is a nominal cost tied to getting a drivers license. If there truly is a prohibitive cost to that (which I don’t necessarily agree with), I’m sure the problem can be readily solved by getting an ID that isn’t cost prohibitive
There’s always an excuse that someone uses when they really don’t want something to happen
Imagine putting anyone to any additional effort in order to solve a nonexistent problem.
What could the motive POSSIBLY be? Just a mystery, ain’t it?
1) What is additional effort? Asking all adults to have an ID? That’s pretty much common sense given the need to have IDs for any number of things.
2) What isn’t a problem? It’s pretty standard in polling that around 80% of the population supports IDs to vote. Moreover, if you have a large segment of the population (regardless of the side) that doesn’t have full faith and confidence in the election process, that’s a problem.
A Democrat if they are so confident in their messaging, positioning, and support by the people should have no issue in ensuring fully transparent elections that are full of “controls” to ensure one vote per person, that the person voting is that person, etc
But the reality is that the Democrats aren’t as confident as they want you to believe because they know that all the votes that vanish when you execute an election properly disproportionately impacts their vote totals
The populations disproportionately affected tend to vote Democrat. That is the sole motivation behind the Voter ID requirements enacted in the past 20 years.
Bullshit. Here are a few other countries that require ID to vote Norway Germany Israel Mexico Iceland
Do you think people living in those countries are 100% white? I don't know how anyone can get away with this nonsense any longer. Whatever news sources you are consuming that are filling you with this garbage, you need to stop listening to them and think a little bit.
It makes absolutely zero sense to me why voter IDs are controversial if you truly believe in the concept of a fair and open election decided by the people
The reason people don’t view IDs as being free is because there obviously is a nominal cost tied to getting a drivers license. If there truly is a prohibitive cost to that (which I don’t necessarily agree with), I’m sure the problem can be readily solved by getting an ID that isn’t cost prohibitive
There’s always an excuse that someone uses when they really don’t want something to happen
Imagine putting anyone to any additional effort in order to solve a nonexistent problem.
What could the motive POSSIBLY be? Just a mystery, ain’t it?
1) What is additional effort? Asking all adults to have an ID? That’s pretty much common sense given the need to have IDs for any number of things.
2) What isn’t a problem? It’s pretty standard in polling that around 80% of the population supports IDs to vote. Moreover, if you have a large segment of the population (regardless of the side) that doesn’t have full faith and confidence in the election process, that’s a problem.
A Democrat if they are so confident in their messaging, positioning, and support by the people should have no issue in ensuring fully transparent elections that are full of “controls” to ensure one vote per person, that the person voting is that person, etc
But the reality is that the Democrats aren’t as confident as they want you to believe because they know that all the votes that vanish when you execute an election properly disproportionately impacts their vote totals
The populations disproportionately affected tend to vote Democrat. That is the sole motivation behind the Voter ID requirements enacted in the past 20 years.
And what population groups are those?
Illegal immigrants that are not citizens of this country?
People that can’t verify their identity?
Anybody that in theory can’t get an ID ... the differentiator there isn’t based on race but instead based on income levels
It makes absolutely zero sense to me why voter IDs are controversial if you truly believe in the concept of a fair and open election decided by the people
The reason people don’t view IDs as being free is because there obviously is a nominal cost tied to getting a drivers license. If there truly is a prohibitive cost to that (which I don’t necessarily agree with), I’m sure the problem can be readily solved by getting an ID that isn’t cost prohibitive
There’s always an excuse that someone uses when they really don’t want something to happen
Imagine putting anyone to any additional effort in order to solve a nonexistent problem.
What could the motive POSSIBLY be? Just a mystery, ain’t it?
1) What is additional effort? Asking all adults to have an ID? That’s pretty much common sense given the need to have IDs for any number of things.
2) What isn’t a problem? It’s pretty standard in polling that around 80% of the population supports IDs to vote. Moreover, if you have a large segment of the population (regardless of the side) that doesn’t have full faith and confidence in the election process, that’s a problem.
A Democrat if they are so confident in their messaging, positioning, and support by the people should have no issue in ensuring fully transparent elections that are full of “controls” to ensure one vote per person, that the person voting is that person, etc
But the reality is that the Democrats aren’t as confident as they want you to believe because they know that all the votes that vanish when you execute an election properly disproportionately impacts their vote totals
The populations disproportionately affected tend to vote Democrat. That is the sole motivation behind the Voter ID requirements enacted in the past 20 years.
That's why in the first election after Georgia passed their voter ID law the percentage of black voters increased. But the Dazzler always bases his position on the "facts"
It makes absolutely zero sense to me why voter IDs are controversial if you truly believe in the concept of a fair and open election decided by the people
The reason people don’t view IDs as being free is because there obviously is a nominal cost tied to getting a drivers license. If there truly is a prohibitive cost to that (which I don’t necessarily agree with), I’m sure the problem can be readily solved by getting an ID that isn’t cost prohibitive
There’s always an excuse that someone uses when they really don’t want something to happen
Imagine putting anyone to any additional effort in order to solve a nonexistent problem.
What could the motive POSSIBLY be? Just a mystery, ain’t it?
1) What is additional effort? Asking all adults to have an ID? That’s pretty much common sense given the need to have IDs for any number of things.
2) What isn’t a problem? It’s pretty standard in polling that around 80% of the population supports IDs to vote. Moreover, if you have a large segment of the population (regardless of the side) that doesn’t have full faith and confidence in the election process, that’s a problem.
A Democrat if they are so confident in their messaging, positioning, and support by the people should have no issue in ensuring fully transparent elections that are full of “controls” to ensure one vote per person, that the person voting is that person, etc
But the reality is that the Democrats aren’t as confident as they want you to believe because they know that all the votes that vanish when you execute an election properly disproportionately impacts their vote totals
The populations disproportionately affected tend to vote Democrat. That is the sole motivation behind the Voter ID requirements enacted in the past 20 years.
Does this mean that if a black person shows up to vote, they're asked 'who are you voting for?' and if they say 'republicans, of course!' they're allowed to vote without ID?
It makes absolutely zero sense to me why voter IDs are controversial if you truly believe in the concept of a fair and open election decided by the people
The reason people don’t view IDs as being free is because there obviously is a nominal cost tied to getting a drivers license. If there truly is a prohibitive cost to that (which I don’t necessarily agree with), I’m sure the problem can be readily solved by getting an ID that isn’t cost prohibitive
There’s always an excuse that someone uses when they really don’t want something to happen
Imagine putting anyone to any additional effort in order to solve a nonexistent problem.
What could the motive POSSIBLY be? Just a mystery, ain’t it?
1) What is additional effort? Asking all adults to have an ID? That’s pretty much common sense given the need to have IDs for any number of things.
2) What isn’t a problem? It’s pretty standard in polling that around 80% of the population supports IDs to vote. Moreover, if you have a large segment of the population (regardless of the side) that doesn’t have full faith and confidence in the election process, that’s a problem.
A Democrat if they are so confident in their messaging, positioning, and support by the people should have no issue in ensuring fully transparent elections that are full of “controls” to ensure one vote per person, that the person voting is that person, etc
But the reality is that the Democrats aren’t as confident as they want you to believe because they know that all the votes that vanish when you execute an election properly disproportionately impacts their vote totals
The populations disproportionately affected tend to vote Democrat. That is the sole motivation behind the Voter ID requirements enacted in the past 20 years.
Bullshit. Here are a few other countries that require ID to vote Norway Germany Israel Mexico Iceland
Do you think people living in those countries are 100% white? I don't know how anyone can get away with this nonsense any longer. Whatever news sources you are consuming that are filling you with this garbage, you need to stop listening to them and think a little bit.
I've now said repeatedly that it wasn't racially motivated.
A guy who can't take Yes for an answer is gonna have trouble getting laid.
Comments
What could the motive POSSIBLY be? Just a mystery, ain’t it?
Driver's license is not free
I already addressed that.
2) What isn’t a problem? It’s pretty standard in polling that around 80% of the population supports IDs to vote. Moreover, if you have a large segment of the population (regardless of the side) that doesn’t have full faith and confidence in the election process, that’s a problem.
A Democrat if they are so confident in their messaging, positioning, and support by the people should have no issue in ensuring fully transparent elections that are full of “controls” to ensure one vote per person, that the person voting is that person, etc
But the reality is that the Democrats aren’t as confident as they want you to believe because they know that all the votes that vanish when you execute an election properly disproportionately impacts their vote totals
That’s why I said I don’t believe a prohibitive cost
A driver’s license is largely nominal in cost
If a driver’s license is too expensive there’s always the ability to get an ID card ... which if it isn’t free should be
Round and round we go. Thanks for the further confirmation Dazzler but I think we already have enough evidence on the record in support of this fact.
Here are a few other countries that require ID to vote
Norway
Germany
Israel
Mexico
Iceland
Do you think people living in those countries are 100% white? I don't know how anyone can get away with this nonsense any longer. Whatever news sources you are consuming that are filling you with this garbage, you need to stop listening to them and think a little bit.
Illegal immigrants that are not citizens of this country?
People that can’t verify their identity?
Anybody that in theory can’t get an ID ... the differentiator there isn’t based on race but instead based on income levels
A guy who can't take Yes for an answer is gonna have trouble getting laid.