NC Lt. Gov. answers the racist like Dazzler and Kobe who think blacks are too stupid to get free ID

HHusky

Tequilla said:

It makes absolutely zero sense to me why voter IDs are controversial if you truly believe in the concept of a fair and open election decided by the people

The reason people don’t view IDs as being free is because there obviously is a nominal cost tied to getting a drivers license. If there truly is a prohibitive cost to that (which I don’t necessarily agree with), I’m sure the problem can be readily solved by getting an ID that isn’t cost prohibitive

There’s always an excuse that someone uses when they really don’t want something to happen

Imagine putting anyone to any additional effort in order to solve a nonexistent problem.

What could the motive POSSIBLY be? Just a mystery, ain’t it?

SFGbob

HHusky said:

Tequilla said:

It makes absolutely zero sense to me why voter IDs are controversial if you truly believe in the concept of a fair and open election decided by the people

The reason people don’t view IDs as being free is because there obviously is a nominal cost tied to getting a drivers license. If there truly is a prohibitive cost to that (which I don’t necessarily agree with), I’m sure the problem can be readily solved by getting an ID that isn’t cost prohibitive

There’s always an excuse that someone uses when they really don’t want something to happen

Imagine putting anyone to any additional effort in order to solve a nonexistent problem.

What could the motive POSSIBLY be? Just a mystery, ain’t it?

An "effort" that you believe black people are disproportionately both too stupid and too lazy to achieve. Thank you Dazzler, no further questions.

RaceBannon

Tequilla said:

It makes absolutely zero sense to me why voter IDs are controversial if you truly believe in the concept of a fair and open election decided by the people

The reason people don’t view IDs as being free is because there obviously is a nominal cost tied to getting a drivers license. If there truly is a prohibitive cost to that (which I don’t necessarily agree with), I’m sure the problem can be readily solved by getting an ID that isn’t cost prohibitive

There’s always an excuse that someone uses when they really don’t want something to happen

There is a difference between a driver's license and free ID in California

Driver's license is not free

hardhat

HHusky said:

Tequilla said:

It makes absolutely zero sense to me why voter IDs are controversial if you truly believe in the concept of a fair and open election decided by the people

The reason people don’t view IDs as being free is because there obviously is a nominal cost tied to getting a drivers license. If there truly is a prohibitive cost to that (which I don’t necessarily agree with), I’m sure the problem can be readily solved by getting an ID that isn’t cost prohibitive

There’s always an excuse that someone uses when they really don’t want something to happen

Imagine putting anyone to any additional effort in order to solve a nonexistent problem.

What could the motive POSSIBLY be? Just a mystery, ain’t it?

I guess the motive is a mystery, but 36 states require it. Racism?

HHusky

hardhat said:

HHusky said:

Tequilla said:

It makes absolutely zero sense to me why voter IDs are controversial if you truly believe in the concept of a fair and open election decided by the people

The reason people don’t view IDs as being free is because there obviously is a nominal cost tied to getting a drivers license. If there truly is a prohibitive cost to that (which I don’t necessarily agree with), I’m sure the problem can be readily solved by getting an ID that isn’t cost prohibitive

There’s always an excuse that someone uses when they really don’t want something to happen

Imagine putting anyone to any additional effort in order to solve a nonexistent problem.

What could the motive POSSIBLY be? Just a mystery, ain’t it?

I guess the motive is a mystery, but 36 states require it. Racism?

Absolutely not.

I already addressed that.

hardhat

HHusky said:

hardhat said:

HHusky said:

Tequilla said:

It makes absolutely zero sense to me why voter IDs are controversial if you truly believe in the concept of a fair and open election decided by the people

The reason people don’t view IDs as being free is because there obviously is a nominal cost tied to getting a drivers license. If there truly is a prohibitive cost to that (which I don’t necessarily agree with), I’m sure the problem can be readily solved by getting an ID that isn’t cost prohibitive

There’s always an excuse that someone uses when they really don’t want something to happen

Imagine putting anyone to any additional effort in order to solve a nonexistent problem.

What could the motive POSSIBLY be? Just a mystery, ain’t it?

I guess the motive is a mystery, but 36 states require it. Racism?

Absolutely not.

I already addressed that.

So what is the nefarious motive that 36 states want some form of ID to vote?

Tequilla

HHusky said:

Tequilla said:

It makes absolutely zero sense to me why voter IDs are controversial if you truly believe in the concept of a fair and open election decided by the people

The reason people don’t view IDs as being free is because there obviously is a nominal cost tied to getting a drivers license. If there truly is a prohibitive cost to that (which I don’t necessarily agree with), I’m sure the problem can be readily solved by getting an ID that isn’t cost prohibitive

There’s always an excuse that someone uses when they really don’t want something to happen

Imagine putting anyone to any additional effort in order to solve a nonexistent problem.

What could the motive POSSIBLY be? Just a mystery, ain’t it?

1) What is additional effort? Asking all adults to have an ID? That’s pretty much common sense given the need to have IDs for any number of things.

2) What isn’t a problem? It’s pretty standard in polling that around 80% of the population supports IDs to vote. Moreover, if you have a large segment of the population (regardless of the side) that doesn’t have full faith and confidence in the election process, that’s a problem.

A Democrat if they are so confident in their messaging, positioning, and support by the people should have no issue in ensuring fully transparent elections that are full of “controls” to ensure one vote per person, that the person voting is that person, etc

But the reality is that the Democrats aren’t as confident as they want you to believe because they know that all the votes that vanish when you execute an election properly disproportionately impacts their vote totals

HHusky

numbers.

hardhat said:

HHusky said:

hardhat said:

HHusky said:

Tequilla said:

It makes absolutely zero sense to me why voter IDs are controversial if you truly believe in the concept of a fair and open election decided by the people

The reason people don’t view IDs as being free is because there obviously is a nominal cost tied to getting a drivers license. If there truly is a prohibitive cost to that (which I don’t necessarily agree with), I’m sure the problem can be readily solved by getting an ID that isn’t cost prohibitive

There’s always an excuse that someone uses when they really don’t want something to happen

Imagine putting anyone to any additional effort in order to solve a nonexistent problem.

What could the motive POSSIBLY be? Just a mystery, ain’t it?

I guess the motive is a mystery, but 36 states require it. Racism?

Absolutely not.

I already addressed that.

So what is the nefarious motive that 36 states want some form of ID to vote?

The preference that Democrats vote in smaller numbers.

Tequilla

RaceBannon said:

Tequilla said:

It makes absolutely zero sense to me why voter IDs are controversial if you truly believe in the concept of a fair and open election decided by the people

The reason people don’t view IDs as being free is because there obviously is a nominal cost tied to getting a drivers license. If there truly is a prohibitive cost to that (which I don’t necessarily agree with), I’m sure the problem can be readily solved by getting an ID that isn’t cost prohibitive

There’s always an excuse that someone uses when they really don’t want something to happen

There is a difference between a driver's license and free ID in California

Driver's license is not free

Exactly ...

That’s why I said I don’t believe a prohibitive cost

A driver’s license is largely nominal in cost

If a driver’s license is too expensive there’s always the ability to get an ID card ... which if it isn’t free should be

hardhat

HHusky said:

numbers.

hardhat said:

HHusky said:

hardhat said:

HHusky said:

Tequilla said:

It makes absolutely zero sense to me why voter IDs are controversial if you truly believe in the concept of a fair and open election decided by the people

The reason people don’t view IDs as being free is because there obviously is a nominal cost tied to getting a drivers license. If there truly is a prohibitive cost to that (which I don’t necessarily agree with), I’m sure the problem can be readily solved by getting an ID that isn’t cost prohibitive

There’s always an excuse that someone uses when they really don’t want something to happen

Imagine putting anyone to any additional effort in order to solve a nonexistent problem.

What could the motive POSSIBLY be? Just a mystery, ain’t it?

I guess the motive is a mystery, but 36 states require it. Racism?

Absolutely not.

I already addressed that.

So what is the nefarious motive that 36 states want some form of ID to vote?

The preference that Democrats vote in smaller numbers.

This is based on what? When were those laws written? This is a bizarre narrative.