NC Lt. Gov. answers the racist like Dazzler and Kobe who think blacks are too stupid to get free ID

Comments
-
Madam, I’ve never contended the voter suppression movement is racially motivated.
They just don’t want Democratic populations voting.
You knew that too. Not our first exchange on the subject.
-
But you do think that a certain segment of the population made up disproportionately of black people, are too stupid to be able to secure a free ID.HHusky said:Madam, I’ve never contended the voter suppression movement is racially motivated.
They just don’t want Democratic populations voting.
You knew that too. Not our first exchange on the subject.
You don't have to hang a flashing neon sign above your head that declares you as a racist for people to figure out you're a racist Dazzler. -
I appreciate you telling me what I think.
I am really the expert on the subject though. -
So now its "Democratic Populations" that are too stupid to get free ID
-
“Free”RaceBannon said:So now its "Democratic Populations" that are too stupid to get free ID
-
I'm not telling you what you think, you've already informed me of what you think. I'm just posting the comments of the NC Lt. Gov. who thinks what you think is racist garbage. I agree with him.HHusky said:I appreciate you telling me what I think.
I am really the expert on the subject though. -
Good for youSFGbob said:
I'm not telling you what you think, you've already informed me of what you think. I'm just posting the comments of the NC Lt. Gov. who thinks what you think is racist garbage. I agree with him.HHusky said:I appreciate you telling me what I think.
I am really the expert on the subject though. -
White flagHHusky said:
Good for youSFGbob said:
I'm not telling you what you think, you've already informed me of what you think. I'm just posting the comments of the NC Lt. Gov. who thinks what you think is racist garbage. I agree with him.HHusky said:I appreciate you telling me what I think.
I am really the expert on the subject though. -
What a disingenuous stupid fucking thing to sayHHusky said:Madam, I’ve never contended the voter suppression movement is racially motivated.
They just don’t want Democratic populations voting.
You knew that too. Not our first exchange on the subject. -
congratulationsSFGbob said:
White flagHHusky said:
Good for youSFGbob said:
I'm not telling you what you think, you've already informed me of what you think. I'm just posting the comments of the NC Lt. Gov. who thinks what you think is racist garbage. I agree with him.HHusky said:I appreciate you telling me what I think.
I am really the expert on the subject though. -
Are you unaware that ID is free?HHusky said:
“Free”RaceBannon said:So now its "Democratic Populations" that are too stupid to get free ID
Are your 'democratic populations" too stupid to stay in a hotel or get on a plane? Or get benefits from the state? -
Yeah, this is why you've heard the Dazzler so vigorously object to Biden and the other Rats he votes for calling voter ID laws the new Jim Crow because it has nothing to do with race.HHusky said:Madam, I’ve never contended the voter suppression movement is racially motivated.
They just don’t want Democratic populations voting.
You knew that too. Not our first exchange on the subject. -
congratulationsSFGbob said:
White flagHHusky said:
Good for youSFGbob said:
I'm not telling you what you think, you've already informed me of what you think. I'm just posting the comments of the NC Lt. Gov. who thinks what you think is racist garbage. I agree with him.HHusky said:I appreciate you telling me what I think.
I am really the expert on the subject though.
I’m aware of how much it can cost some people to get “free id”, all in order to “solve” the problem of Democratic populations voting.RaceBannon said:
Are you unaware that ID is free?HHusky said:
“Free”RaceBannon said:So now its "Democratic Populations" that are too stupid to get free ID
Are your 'democratic populations" too stupid to stay in a hotel or get on a plane? Or get benefits from the state? -
Oh no! Some political figure used political rhetoric!SFGbob said:
Yeah, this is why you've heard the Dazzler so vigorously object to Biden and the other Rats he votes for calling voter ID laws the new Jim Crow because it has nothing to do with race.HHusky said:Madam, I’ve never contended the voter suppression movement is racially motivated.
They just don’t want Democratic populations voting.
You knew that too. Not our first exchange on the subject.
I must protest that. -
Got it. So smearing your political opponents as racists is just "political rhetoric." Work the balls Dazzler, work the balls.HHusky said:
Oh no! Some political figure used political rhetoric!SFGbob said:
Yeah, this is why you've heard the Dazzler so vigorously object to Biden and the other Rats he votes for calling voter ID laws the new Jim Crow because it has nothing to do with race.HHusky said:Madam, I’ve never contended the voter suppression movement is racially motivated.
They just don’t want Democratic populations voting.
You knew that too. Not our first exchange on the subject.
I must protest that. -
palpable ironySFGbob said:
So smearing your political opponents as racists is just "political rhetoric."HHusky said:
Oh no! Some political figure used political rhetoric!SFGbob said:
Yeah, this is why you've heard the Dazzler so vigorously object to Biden and the other Rats he votes for calling voter ID laws the new Jim Crow because it has nothing to do with race.HHusky said:Madam, I’ve never contended the voter suppression movement is racially motivated.
They just don’t want Democratic populations voting.
You knew that too. Not our first exchange on the subject.
I must protest that.
-
Doublethink Dazzler weighs in with his normal level of faggotry.HHusky said:Madam, I’ve never contended the voter suppression movement is racially motivated.
They just don’t want Democratic populations voting.
You knew that too. Not our first exchange on the subject.
Work the balls, indeed. Christ.
-
HHusky said:
Good for youSFGbob said:
I'm not telling you what you think, you've already informed me of what you think. I'm just posting the comments of the NC Lt. Gov. who thinks what you think is racist garbage. I agree with him.HHusky said:I appreciate you telling me what I think.
I am really the expert on the subject though.
-
It makes absolutely zero sense to me why voter IDs are controversial if you truly believe in the concept of a fair and open election decided by the people
The reason people don’t view IDs as being free is because there obviously is a nominal cost tied to getting a drivers license. If there truly is a prohibitive cost to that (which I don’t necessarily agree with), I’m sure the problem can be readily solved by getting an ID that isn’t cost prohibitive
There’s always an excuse that someone uses when they really don’t want something to happen -
Imagine putting anyone to any additional effort in order to solve a nonexistent problem.Tequilla said:It makes absolutely zero sense to me why voter IDs are controversial if you truly believe in the concept of a fair and open election decided by the people
The reason people don’t view IDs as being free is because there obviously is a nominal cost tied to getting a drivers license. If there truly is a prohibitive cost to that (which I don’t necessarily agree with), I’m sure the problem can be readily solved by getting an ID that isn’t cost prohibitive
There’s always an excuse that someone uses when they really don’t want something to happen
What could the motive POSSIBLY be? Just a mystery, ain’t it? -
An "effort" that you believe black people are disproportionately both too stupid and too lazy to achieve. Thank you Dazzler, no further questions.HHusky said:
Imagine putting anyone to any additional effort in order to solve a nonexistent problem.Tequilla said:It makes absolutely zero sense to me why voter IDs are controversial if you truly believe in the concept of a fair and open election decided by the people
The reason people don’t view IDs as being free is because there obviously is a nominal cost tied to getting a drivers license. If there truly is a prohibitive cost to that (which I don’t necessarily agree with), I’m sure the problem can be readily solved by getting an ID that isn’t cost prohibitive
There’s always an excuse that someone uses when they really don’t want something to happen
What could the motive POSSIBLY be? Just a mystery, ain’t it? -
There is a difference between a driver's license and free ID in CaliforniaTequilla said:It makes absolutely zero sense to me why voter IDs are controversial if you truly believe in the concept of a fair and open election decided by the people
The reason people don’t view IDs as being free is because there obviously is a nominal cost tied to getting a drivers license. If there truly is a prohibitive cost to that (which I don’t necessarily agree with), I’m sure the problem can be readily solved by getting an ID that isn’t cost prohibitive
There’s always an excuse that someone uses when they really don’t want something to happen
Driver's license is not free -
I guess the motive is a mystery, but 36 states require it. Racism?HHusky said:
Imagine putting anyone to any additional effort in order to solve a nonexistent problem.Tequilla said:It makes absolutely zero sense to me why voter IDs are controversial if you truly believe in the concept of a fair and open election decided by the people
The reason people don’t view IDs as being free is because there obviously is a nominal cost tied to getting a drivers license. If there truly is a prohibitive cost to that (which I don’t necessarily agree with), I’m sure the problem can be readily solved by getting an ID that isn’t cost prohibitive
There’s always an excuse that someone uses when they really don’t want something to happen
What could the motive POSSIBLY be? Just a mystery, ain’t it? -
Absolutely not.hardhat said:
I guess the motive is a mystery, but 36 states require it. Racism?HHusky said:
Imagine putting anyone to any additional effort in order to solve a nonexistent problem.Tequilla said:It makes absolutely zero sense to me why voter IDs are controversial if you truly believe in the concept of a fair and open election decided by the people
The reason people don’t view IDs as being free is because there obviously is a nominal cost tied to getting a drivers license. If there truly is a prohibitive cost to that (which I don’t necessarily agree with), I’m sure the problem can be readily solved by getting an ID that isn’t cost prohibitive
There’s always an excuse that someone uses when they really don’t want something to happen
What could the motive POSSIBLY be? Just a mystery, ain’t it?
I already addressed that. -
So what is the nefarious motive that 36 states want some form of ID to vote?HHusky said:
Absolutely not.hardhat said:
I guess the motive is a mystery, but 36 states require it. Racism?HHusky said:
Imagine putting anyone to any additional effort in order to solve a nonexistent problem.Tequilla said:It makes absolutely zero sense to me why voter IDs are controversial if you truly believe in the concept of a fair and open election decided by the people
The reason people don’t view IDs as being free is because there obviously is a nominal cost tied to getting a drivers license. If there truly is a prohibitive cost to that (which I don’t necessarily agree with), I’m sure the problem can be readily solved by getting an ID that isn’t cost prohibitive
There’s always an excuse that someone uses when they really don’t want something to happen
What could the motive POSSIBLY be? Just a mystery, ain’t it?
I already addressed that. -
1) What is additional effort? Asking all adults to have an ID? That’s pretty much common sense given the need to have IDs for any number of things.HHusky said:
Imagine putting anyone to any additional effort in order to solve a nonexistent problem.Tequilla said:It makes absolutely zero sense to me why voter IDs are controversial if you truly believe in the concept of a fair and open election decided by the people
The reason people don’t view IDs as being free is because there obviously is a nominal cost tied to getting a drivers license. If there truly is a prohibitive cost to that (which I don’t necessarily agree with), I’m sure the problem can be readily solved by getting an ID that isn’t cost prohibitive
There’s always an excuse that someone uses when they really don’t want something to happen
What could the motive POSSIBLY be? Just a mystery, ain’t it?
2) What isn’t a problem? It’s pretty standard in polling that around 80% of the population supports IDs to vote. Moreover, if you have a large segment of the population (regardless of the side) that doesn’t have full faith and confidence in the election process, that’s a problem.
A Democrat if they are so confident in their messaging, positioning, and support by the people should have no issue in ensuring fully transparent elections that are full of “controls” to ensure one vote per person, that the person voting is that person, etc
But the reality is that the Democrats aren’t as confident as they want you to believe because they know that all the votes that vanish when you execute an election properly disproportionately impacts their vote totals -
numbers.
The preference that Democrats vote in smaller numbers.hardhat said:
So what is the nefarious motive that 36 states want some form of ID to vote?HHusky said:
Absolutely not.hardhat said:
I guess the motive is a mystery, but 36 states require it. Racism?HHusky said:
Imagine putting anyone to any additional effort in order to solve a nonexistent problem.Tequilla said:It makes absolutely zero sense to me why voter IDs are controversial if you truly believe in the concept of a fair and open election decided by the people
The reason people don’t view IDs as being free is because there obviously is a nominal cost tied to getting a drivers license. If there truly is a prohibitive cost to that (which I don’t necessarily agree with), I’m sure the problem can be readily solved by getting an ID that isn’t cost prohibitive
There’s always an excuse that someone uses when they really don’t want something to happen
What could the motive POSSIBLY be? Just a mystery, ain’t it?
I already addressed that. -
Exactly ...RaceBannon said:
There is a difference between a driver's license and free ID in CaliforniaTequilla said:It makes absolutely zero sense to me why voter IDs are controversial if you truly believe in the concept of a fair and open election decided by the people
The reason people don’t view IDs as being free is because there obviously is a nominal cost tied to getting a drivers license. If there truly is a prohibitive cost to that (which I don’t necessarily agree with), I’m sure the problem can be readily solved by getting an ID that isn’t cost prohibitive
There’s always an excuse that someone uses when they really don’t want something to happen
Driver's license is not free
That’s why I said I don’t believe a prohibitive cost
A driver’s license is largely nominal in cost
If a driver’s license is too expensive there’s always the ability to get an ID card ... which if it isn’t free should be -
This is based on what? When were those laws written? This is a bizarre narrative.HHusky said:numbers.
The preference that Democrats vote in smaller numbers.hardhat said:
So what is the nefarious motive that 36 states want some form of ID to vote?HHusky said:
Absolutely not.hardhat said:
I guess the motive is a mystery, but 36 states require it. Racism?HHusky said:
Imagine putting anyone to any additional effort in order to solve a nonexistent problem.Tequilla said:It makes absolutely zero sense to me why voter IDs are controversial if you truly believe in the concept of a fair and open election decided by the people
The reason people don’t view IDs as being free is because there obviously is a nominal cost tied to getting a drivers license. If there truly is a prohibitive cost to that (which I don’t necessarily agree with), I’m sure the problem can be readily solved by getting an ID that isn’t cost prohibitive
There’s always an excuse that someone uses when they really don’t want something to happen
What could the motive POSSIBLY be? Just a mystery, ain’t it?
I already addressed that.