Home› Hardcore Husky Board

Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. Sign in or register to get started.

Sign In Register
Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

USC and Oregon part of Andy Staples' 15-team "Super League" concept

DerekJohnsonDerekJohnson Administrator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 65,251 Founders Club
in Hardcore Husky Board
https://trojanswire.usatoday.com/2021/04/20/usc-and-oregon-part-of-andy-staples-15-team-super-league-concept-as-pac-12-gets-representation-in-college-football/
· Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
«13

Comments

  • dirtysouwfdawgdirtysouwfdawg Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 13,707 Swaye's Wigwam
    They’ll back out after fan backlash.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • coach_pete_JPGcoach_pete_JPG Member Posts: 1,218
    Oregon and Nebraska must enjoy getting gangbanged mercilessly
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • FireCohenFireCohen Member Posts: 21,823
    edited April 2021
    RaceBannon said:

    20 years ago Michigan and UW would be in

    Clemson wouldn't

    Was UW decent in the late 90?
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • ntxduckntxduck Member Posts: 5,952
    edited April 2021
    RaceBannon said:

    FireCohen said:

    RaceBannon said:

    20 years ago Michigan and UW would be in

    Clemson wouldn't

    Was UW decent in the late 90?
    Your eyes are as good as mine but yes they were

    Preseason #1 as late as 1997. Natty in 91. Uncrowned champs in 2000 after beating the vaunted Canes

    Point is Michigan was coming off of a 97 natty and Oregon had yet to win a Rose Bowl and pop off. It would have been USC and UW not Oregon

    And it would be Florida State and Miami not Clemson

    In 2000 Bama was struggling

    Things change all the time and a super league of 15 teams is retarded. Do the Power 64
    USC had been pretty bad (aside from the Keyshawn team) for a decade in 2000.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • dncdnc Member Posts: 56,812
    ntxduck said:

    RaceBannon said:

    FireCohen said:

    RaceBannon said:

    20 years ago Michigan and UW would be in

    Clemson wouldn't

    Was UW decent in the late 90?
    Your eyes are as good as mine but yes they were

    Preseason #1 as late as 1997. Natty in 91. Uncrowned champs in 2000 after beating the vaunted Canes

    Point is Michigan was coming off of a 97 natty and Oregon had yet to win a Rose Bowl and pop off. It would have been USC and UW not Oregon

    And it would be Florida State and Miami not Clemson

    In 2000 Bama was struggling

    Things change all the time and a super league of 15 teams is retarded. Do the Power 64
    USC had been pretty bad (aside from the Keyshawn team) for a decade in 2000.
    Won 2 RBs in the 80s (and lost 2 more) and the 1 in the 90s. They weren't a juggernaut but they still pretty significant.

    They're always going to be a factor in this kind of stuff because of the TV market and history.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • RaceBannonRaceBannon Member, Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 109,035 Founders Club
    ntxduck said:

    RaceBannon said:

    FireCohen said:

    RaceBannon said:

    20 years ago Michigan and UW would be in

    Clemson wouldn't

    Was UW decent in the late 90?
    Your eyes are as good as mine but yes they were

    Preseason #1 as late as 1997. Natty in 91. Uncrowned champs in 2000 after beating the vaunted Canes

    Point is Michigan was coming off of a 97 natty and Oregon had yet to win a Rose Bowl and pop off. It would have been USC and UW not Oregon

    And it would be Florida State and Miami not Clemson

    In 2000 Bama was struggling

    Things change all the time and a super league of 15 teams is retarded. Do the Power 64
    USC had been pretty bad (aside from the Keyshawn team) for a decade in 2000.
    True

    They had dominated the Pac most of the 80's but UW and UCLA won multiple league titles in the 90s. Bitchfork almost won the natty in 96

    That's why I say let the 64 in
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • ntxduckntxduck Member Posts: 5,952
    RaceBannon said:

    ntxduck said:

    RaceBannon said:

    FireCohen said:

    RaceBannon said:

    20 years ago Michigan and UW would be in

    Clemson wouldn't

    Was UW decent in the late 90?
    Your eyes are as good as mine but yes they were

    Preseason #1 as late as 1997. Natty in 91. Uncrowned champs in 2000 after beating the vaunted Canes

    Point is Michigan was coming off of a 97 natty and Oregon had yet to win a Rose Bowl and pop off. It would have been USC and UW not Oregon

    And it would be Florida State and Miami not Clemson

    In 2000 Bama was struggling

    Things change all the time and a super league of 15 teams is retarded. Do the Power 64
    USC had been pretty bad (aside from the Keyshawn team) for a decade in 2000.
    True

    They had dominated the Pac most of the 80's but UW and UCLA won multiple league titles in the 90s. Bitchfork almost won the natty in 96

    That's why I say let the 64 in
    I’d forgotten how good ucla was in the late 90s.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • RaceBannonRaceBannon Member, Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 109,035 Founders Club
    ntxduck said:

    RaceBannon said:

    ntxduck said:

    RaceBannon said:

    FireCohen said:

    RaceBannon said:

    20 years ago Michigan and UW would be in

    Clemson wouldn't

    Was UW decent in the late 90?
    Your eyes are as good as mine but yes they were

    Preseason #1 as late as 1997. Natty in 91. Uncrowned champs in 2000 after beating the vaunted Canes

    Point is Michigan was coming off of a 97 natty and Oregon had yet to win a Rose Bowl and pop off. It would have been USC and UW not Oregon

    And it would be Florida State and Miami not Clemson

    In 2000 Bama was struggling

    Things change all the time and a super league of 15 teams is retarded. Do the Power 64
    USC had been pretty bad (aside from the Keyshawn team) for a decade in 2000.
    True

    They had dominated the Pac most of the 80's but UW and UCLA won multiple league titles in the 90s. Bitchfork almost won the natty in 96

    That's why I say let the 64 in
    I’d forgotten how good ucla was in the late 90s.
    UCLA won in 93 too. They lost to Wisconsin twice in the Rose Bowl I think

    UW
    UW
    UW
    UCLA
    Oregon
    USC
    ASU
    WSU
    UCLA
    Stanford


    From memory -the 90s. 6 out of the 10 won the league. And football was invented
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • dncdnc Member Posts: 56,812
    RaceBannon said:

    ntxduck said:

    RaceBannon said:

    ntxduck said:

    RaceBannon said:

    FireCohen said:

    RaceBannon said:

    20 years ago Michigan and UW would be in

    Clemson wouldn't

    Was UW decent in the late 90?
    Your eyes are as good as mine but yes they were

    Preseason #1 as late as 1997. Natty in 91. Uncrowned champs in 2000 after beating the vaunted Canes

    Point is Michigan was coming off of a 97 natty and Oregon had yet to win a Rose Bowl and pop off. It would have been USC and UW not Oregon

    And it would be Florida State and Miami not Clemson

    In 2000 Bama was struggling

    Things change all the time and a super league of 15 teams is retarded. Do the Power 64
    USC had been pretty bad (aside from the Keyshawn team) for a decade in 2000.
    True

    They had dominated the Pac most of the 80's but UW and UCLA won multiple league titles in the 90s. Bitchfork almost won the natty in 96

    That's why I say let the 64 in
    I’d forgotten how good ucla was in the late 90s.
    UCLA won in 93 too. They lost to Wisconsin twice in the Rose Bowl I think

    UW
    UW
    UW
    UCLA
    Oregon
    USC
    ASU
    WSU
    UCLA
    Stanford


    From memory -the 90s. 6 out of the 10 won the league. And football was invented
    UCLA tied with WSU in 97 and finished #5 in the country. They were real good with McNown.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • dncdnc Member Posts: 56,812
    How TF did I not remember/realize that the Pac lost 8 out of the 9 Rose Bowels between the UW wins in 91 and 2000?

    Thanks Northwestern!
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • WoolleyDoogWoolleyDoog Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 4,135 Swaye's Wigwam
    Stupid clickbait. I think keeping Florida State out was just to intentionally stir controversy. Other than pointless geography, not having Florida State and Miami but having Nebraska makes no sense. Oregon has nothing in common with these programs. Once you get past the 10 obvious choices, there are about 20 programs that can move up and down that are about the same.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • RaceBannonRaceBannon Member, Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 109,035 Founders Club
    People forget that Ty won multiple Rose Bowls at Stanford
    dnc said:

    How TF did I not remember/realize that the Pac lost 8 out of the 9 Rose Bowels between the UW wins in 91 and 2000?

    Thanks Northwestern!

    Did our boy Barry Alverez win three Rose Bowls? On Wisconsin @PurpleBaze @Mad_Son

    UW beat Wisconsin at home in 92 and Alveraz backed out of the 93 return game in Madison so he could build his program. Ended up winning the Rose Bowl that year
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • GrundleStiltzkinGrundleStiltzkin Member Posts: 61,516 Standard Supporter
    RaceBannon said:

    FireCohen said:

    RaceBannon said:

    20 years ago Michigan and UW would be in

    Clemson wouldn't

    Was UW decent in the late 90?
    Your eyes are as good as mine but yes they were

    Preseason #1 as late as 1997. Natty in 91. Uncrowned champs in 2000 after beating the vaunted Canes

    Point is Michigan was coming off of a 97 natty and Oregon had yet to win a Rose Bowl and pop off. It would have been USC and UW not Oregon

    And it would be Florida State and Miami not Clemson

    In 2000 Bama was struggling

    Things change all the time and a super league of 15 teams is retarded. Do the Power 64
    csb: Friend of mine was a CA JuCo player in mid 90s and got some interest from LSU. And it was kinda "LSU? Huh, ok, cool."
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • dncdnc Member Posts: 56,812
    RaceBannon said:

    People forget that Ty won multiple Rose Bowls at Stanford

    dnc said:

    How TF did I not remember/realize that the Pac lost 8 out of the 9 Rose Bowels between the UW wins in 91 and 2000?

    Thanks Northwestern!

    Did our boy Barry Alverez win three Rose Bowls? On Wisconsin @PurpleBaze @Mad_Son

    UW beat Wisconsin at home in 92 and Alveraz backed out of the 93 return game in Madison so he could build his program. Ended up winning the Rose Bowl that year
    Yep he won in 93, 98 and 99, twice over UCLA and once over Ty. All one score games.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • RaceBannonRaceBannon Member, Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 109,035 Founders Club
    And the legendary Fight for Your Seat Night at Autzen when Wiscy dropped by
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
Sign In or Register to comment.