Not surprised. This decision didn't really matter, other than the rioting, because it's going to be appealed so LIPO. The guy wasn't going to get a fair trial. There is no way anyone can convince me he intended to kill Floyd.
The evidence is overwhelming that black people don’t get fair trials in America. But fair trials aren’t a problem until a cop puts his knee on someone’s neck for 9 minutes.
Is it possible that some people are consistent advocates of fair trials, regardless of circumstance?
Yes. And I think the Democrats, including Joe, who couldn't hold their tongues before a verdict have helped to add to a narrative of unfairness that the RW was going to spout anyway, but there was no need to help them. Unforced error.
They walked into the deliberation room and everyone looked at each other and were like are we going to ruin our lives for some pig? Nope.... GUILTY. They didn’t even review the evidence. Lol.
Not surprised. This decision didn't really matter, other than the rioting, because it's going to be appealed so LIPO. The guy wasn't going to get a fair trial. There is no way anyone can convince me he intended to kill Floyd.
The evidence is overwhelming that black people don’t get fair trials in America. But fair trials aren’t a problem until a cop puts his knee on someone’s neck for 9 minutes.
Is it possible that some people are consistent advocates of fair trials, regardless of circumstance?
Of course. I had a conservative friend express to me that he thought it was clear Chauvin was guilty but he was concerned about the fairness of the trial. Friend, not former friend.
But a lot of people on the right reject any notion that black people don’t get fair trials. If someone doesn’t think it’s possible that black people aren’t getting fair trials but they bitch about the fairness of this trial, there might be a reason for that. A crystal clear, confederate flag in the capitol, reason.
They walked into the deliberation room and everyone looked at each other and were like are we going to ruin our lives for some pig? Nope.... GUILTY. They didn’t even review the evidence. Lol.
They walked into the deliberation room and everyone looked at each other and were like are we going to ruin our lives for some pig? Nope.... GUILTY. They didn’t even review the evidence. Lol.
Not surprised. This decision didn't really matter, other than the rioting, because it's going to be appealed so LIPO. The guy wasn't going to get a fair trial. There is no way anyone can convince me he intended to kill Floyd.
The evidence is overwhelming that black people don’t get fair trials in America. But fair trials aren’t a problem until a cop puts his knee on someone’s neck for 9 minutes.
So instead of everyone getting fair trials the cop should get an unfair trial because black people get unfair trials? How about you focus on black people getting fair trials rather than retribution?
It’s not an unfair trial because you disagree with the verdict.
There’s no retribution. There’s a 9 minute video of Chauvin killing George Floyd.
Not surprised. This decision didn't really matter, other than the rioting, because it's going to be appealed so LIPO. The guy wasn't going to get a fair trial. There is no way anyone can convince me he intended to kill Floyd.
The evidence is overwhelming that black people don’t get fair trials in America. But fair trials aren’t a problem until a cop puts his knee on someone’s neck for 9 minutes.
Is it possible that some people are consistent advocates of fair trials, regardless of circumstance?
Of course. I had a conservative friend express to me that he thought it was clear Chauvin was guilty but he was concerned about the fairness of the trial. Friend, not former friend.
But a lot of people on the right reject any notion that black people don’t get fair trials. If someone doesn’t think it’s possible that black people aren’t getting fair trials but they bitch about the fairness of this trial, there might be a reason for that. A crystal clear, confederate flag in the capitol, reason.
Who are the people that reject the notion that black people don't get fair trials? Name, names Kunt. People of all races don't receive fair trials. Poor people often don't receive fair trials. Fuck off with you lying bullshit.
They walked into the deliberation room and everyone looked at each other and were like are we going to ruin our lives for some pig? Nope.... GUILTY. They didn’t even review the evidence. Lol.
This is probably the worst take in this thread thus far.
They walked into the deliberation room and everyone looked at each other and were like are we going to ruin our lives for some pig? Nope.... GUILTY. They didn’t even review the evidence. Lol.
Not surprised. This decision didn't really matter, other than the rioting, because it's going to be appealed so LIPO. The guy wasn't going to get a fair trial. There is no way anyone can convince me he intended to kill Floyd.
The evidence is overwhelming that black people don’t get fair trials in America. But fair trials aren’t a problem until a cop puts his knee on someone’s neck for 9 minutes.
regurgitating SJW talking point number 56 sans evidence. Good job comrade
TIL that statistical facts are “sjw talking points”.
Not surprised. This decision didn't really matter, other than the rioting, because it's going to be appealed so LIPO. The guy wasn't going to get a fair trial. There is no way anyone can convince me he intended to kill Floyd.
The evidence is overwhelming that black people don’t get fair trials in America. But fair trials aren’t a problem until a cop puts his knee on someone’s neck for 9 minutes.
Is it possible that some people are consistent advocates of fair trials, regardless of circumstance?
Yes. And I think the Democrats, including Joe, who couldn't hold their tongues before a verdict have helped to add to a narrative of unfairness that the RW was going to spout anyway, but there was no need to help them. Unforced error.
I actually agree with most of that. Those would-be trial meddlers should have kept their mouths shut.
Not surprised. This decision didn't really matter, other than the rioting, because it's going to be appealed so LIPO. The guy wasn't going to get a fair trial. There is no way anyone can convince me he intended to kill Floyd.
The evidence is overwhelming that black people don’t get fair trials in America. But fair trials aren’t a problem until a cop puts his knee on someone’s neck for 9 minutes.
Is it possible that some people are consistent advocates of fair trials, regardless of circumstance?
Of course. I had a conservative friend express to me that he thought it was clear Chauvin was guilty but he was concerned about the fairness of the trial. Friend, not former friend.
But a lot of people on the right reject any notion that black people don’t get fair trials. If someone doesn’t think it’s possible that black people aren’t getting fair trials but they bitch about the fairness of this trial, there might be a reason for that. A crystal clear, confederate flag in the capitol, reason.
Who are the people that reject the notion that black people don't get fair trials? Name, names Kunt. People of all races don't receive fair trials. Poor people often don't receive fair trials. Fuck off with you lying bullshit.
Comments
But a lot of people on the right reject any notion that black people don’t get fair trials. If someone doesn’t think it’s possible that black people aren’t getting fair trials but they bitch about the fairness of this trial, there might be a reason for that. A crystal clear, confederate flag in the capitol, reason.
There’s no retribution. There’s a 9 minute video of Chauvin killing George Floyd.