I could go on but I think you get the idea. Well actually you might not get the idea. But I think anybody with an IQ over 80 does.
What about the crusades!1!!
What about Janurary
But for the fact that no minority was murdered there, and the only person who was murdered was a white woman shot by a black guy you fucking nailed it.
Not surprised. This decision didn't really matter, other than the rioting, because it's going to be appealed so LIPO. The guy wasn't going to get a fair trial. There is no way anyone can convince me he intended to kill Floyd.
The evidence is overwhelming that black people don’t get fair trials in America. But fair trials aren’t a problem until a cop puts his knee on someone’s neck for 9 minutes.
Is it possible that some people are consistent advocates of fair trials, regardless of circumstance?
Of course. I had a conservative friend express to me that he thought it was clear Chauvin was guilty but he was concerned about the fairness of the trial. Friend, not former friend.
But a lot of people on the right reject any notion that black people don’t get fair trials. If someone doesn’t think it’s possible that black people aren’t getting fair trials but they bitch about the fairness of this trial, there might be a reason for that. A crystal clear, confederate flag in the capitol, reason.
Firewall protected and what do you want to bet that they compare apples to dog shit? Black Kid with multiple priors gets busted for robbery. White Kid with no priors gets busted for robbery. See, the black kid got sent to prison and the white kids got probation. Racism!!!!
Those things are accounted for in the studies.
Since you're a proven liar and your source isn't publicly accessible I don't believe you.
Well, you also believe the people doing criminal justice studies aren’t smart enough to realize there’s different types of crimes so I can live with this.
Oh I think they're smart enough, I also know they're dishonest enough to compare apples to dogshit in order sway gullible dipshits like you.
I could go on but I think you get the idea. Well actually you might not get the idea. But I think anybody with an IQ over 80 does.
What about the crusades!1!!
What about Janurary
But for the fact that no minority was murdered there, and the only person who was murdered was a white woman shot by a black guy you fucking nailed it.
The question that started this was when will white people riot. Why are you trying to move the goal posts?
One last thought before heading to a soon to be forbidden again outdoor gathering. Socialists and communists, don’t shit on all the cops. You’re really going to need them later.
I could go on but I think you get the idea. Well actually you might not get the idea. But I think anybody with an IQ over 80 does.
What about the crusades!1!!
What about Janurary
But for the fact that no minority was murdered there, and the only person who was murdered was a white woman shot by a black guy you fucking nailed it.
The question that started this was when will white people riot. Why are you trying to move the goal posts?
Yeah because white people in the USA have no history at all of rioting, murdering minorities, and burning shit down.
Why are you? No murdered minorities and no shit burned down on Jan 6th. Next!!!!
I could go on but I think you get the idea. Well actually you might not get the idea. But I think anybody with an IQ over 80 does.
What about the crusades!1!!
What about Janurary
But for the fact that no minority was murdered there, and the only person who was murdered was a white woman shot by a black guy you fucking nailed it.
The question that started this was when will white people riot. Why are you trying to move the goal posts?
Yeah because white people in the USA have no history at all of rioting, murdering minorities, and burning shit down.
Why are you? No murdered minorities and no shit burned down on Jan 6th. Next!!!!
That wasn't the top of the quote chain.
Try harder or just admit you are a lying fuck that hates honesty.
I could go on but I think you get the idea. Well actually you might not get the idea. But I think anybody with an IQ over 80 does.
What about the crusades!1!!
What about Janurary
But for the fact that no minority was murdered there, and the only person who was murdered was a white woman shot by a black guy you fucking nailed it.
The question that started this was when will white people riot. Why are you trying to move the goal posts?
Yeah because white people in the USA have no history at all of rioting, murdering minorities, and burning shit down.
Why are you? No murdered minorities and no shit burned down on Jan 6th. Next!!!!
That wasn't the top of the quote chain.
Try harder or just admit you are a lying fuck that hates honesty.
That was the example you fucking provided. You expanded the quote beyond rioting not me. Hell my response that you initially quoted wasn't even too you. Fuck off.
If you're really interested in the topic this is pretty good source. Kobe as always is full of shit. The racial disparities in sentencing can be explained by many factors. Some have to do with gang enhancements. Not a lot of white kids in gangs. Selling drugs near a school will also get you an enhancement. Much more likely in an urban area than in a rural area. Prior criminal history is the most important, and no. Most of the studies don't take it into account when making a comparison.
When your answer to every question is "Systemic white racism" it's hardly shocking when you see ever racial disparity through that very same lens.
The fun thing about this is it’s from 2004. And most importantly before 2005. See that’s when the Supreme Court made a ruling in the United States vs Booker, that allowed judges significantly more discretion in sentencing, making it easier to impose harsher and more lenient sentences. Guess what all the reports on the USSC say since then?
Link a USSC report from the last 10 years, Bob. I fucking dare you.
I could go on but I think you get the idea. Well actually you might not get the idea. But I think anybody with an IQ over 80 does.
What about the crusades!1!!
What about Janurary
But for the fact that no minority was murdered there, and the only person who was murdered was a white woman shot by a black guy you fucking nailed it.
The question that started this was when will white people riot. Why are you trying to move the goal posts?
Yeah because white people in the USA have no history at all of rioting, murdering minorities, and burning shit down.
Why are you? No murdered minorities and no shit burned down on Jan 6th. Next!!!!
That wasn't the top of the quote chain.
Try harder or just admit you are a lying fuck that hates honesty.
That was the example you fucking provided. You expanded the quote beyond rioting not me. Hell my response that you initially quoted wasn't even too you. Fuck off.
If you're really interested in the topic this is pretty good source. Kobe as always is full of shit. The racial disparities in sentencing can be explained by many factors. Some have to do with gang enhancements. Not a lot of white kids in gangs. Selling drugs near a school will also get you an enhancement. Much more likely in an urban area than in a rural area. Prior criminal history is the most important, and no. Most of the studies don't take it into account when making a comparison.
When your answer to every question is "Systemic white racism" it's hardly shocking when you see ever racial disparity through that very same lens.
The fun thing about this is it’s from 2004. And most importantly before 2005. See that’s when the Supreme Court made a ruling in the United States vs Booker, that allowed judges significantly more discretion in sentencing, making it easier to impose harsher and more lenient sentences. Guess what all the reports on the USSC say since then?
Link a USSC report from the last 10 years, Bob. I fucking dare you.
They say the racial disparity in sentencing has decreased and that many of the same factors that explained the disparities then are still responsible for them now. Like gang enhancements and past criminal activity.
I could go on but I think you get the idea. Well actually you might not get the idea. But I think anybody with an IQ over 80 does.
What about the crusades!1!!
What about Janurary
But for the fact that no minority was murdered there, and the only person who was murdered was a white woman shot by a black guy you fucking nailed it.
The question that started this was when will white people riot. Why are you trying to move the goal posts?
Yeah because white people in the USA have no history at all of rioting, murdering minorities, and burning shit down.
Why are you? No murdered minorities and no shit burned down on Jan 6th. Next!!!!
That wasn't the top of the quote chain.
Try harder or just admit you are a lying fuck that hates honesty.
That was the example you fucking provided. You expanded the quote beyond rioting not me. Hell my response that you initially quoted wasn't even too you. Fuck off.
Not surprised. This decision didn't really matter, other than the rioting, because it's going to be appealed so LIPO. The guy wasn't going to get a fair trial. There is no way anyone can convince me he intended to kill Floyd.
The evidence is overwhelming that black people don’t get fair trials in America. But fair trials aren’t a problem until a cop puts his knee on someone’s neck for 9 minutes.
So instead of everyone getting fair trials the cop should get an unfair trial because black people get unfair trials? How about you focus on black people getting fair trials rather than retribution?
It’s not an unfair trial because you disagree with the verdict.
There’s no retribution. There’s a 9 minute video of Chauvin killing George Floyd.
You said it's fine if the cop gets an unfair trial because black people get unfair trials. Backwards logic, pal.
No I didn’t. You made up an argument in your head based on the retard shit all the retards around you say about the left.
Please expound upon your eloquent argument. I thought liberals like yourself didn't use the word retard. It's like I'm talking with a 14 year old.
Not surprised. This decision didn't really matter, other than the rioting, because it's going to be appealed so LIPO. The guy wasn't going to get a fair trial. There is no way anyone can convince me he intended to kill Floyd.
The evidence is overwhelming that black people don’t get fair trials in America. But fair trials aren’t a problem until a cop puts his knee on someone’s neck for 9 minutes.
Is it possible that some people are consistent advocates of fair trials, regardless of circumstance?
Of course. I had a conservative friend express to me that he thought it was clear Chauvin was guilty but he was concerned about the fairness of the trial. Friend, not former friend.
But a lot of people on the right reject any notion that black people don’t get fair trials. If someone doesn’t think it’s possible that black people aren’t getting fair trials but they bitch about the fairness of this trial, there might be a reason for that. A crystal clear, confederate flag in the capitol, reason.
Firewall protected and what do you want to bet that they compare apples to dog shit? Black Kid with multiple priors gets busted for robbery. White Kid with no priors gets busted for robbery. See, the black kid got sent to prison and the white kids got probation. Racism!!!!
Those things are accounted for in the studies.
Since you're a proven liar and your source isn't publicly accessible I don't believe you.
Well, you also believe the people doing criminal justice studies aren’t smart enough to realize there’s different types of crimes so I can live with this.
Your source is an opinion not facts
2% of poor white kids and 10% of rich black kids going to jail isn’t an opinion.
Whatever our fucked up relationship is now, I put it on all of our old shit that the numbers on this are really bad. That they account for income, that they account for the types of crimes and criminal records. It’s really bad. I know you can’t go here because our justice SYSTEM giving unequal outcome based on RACE, kinda hurts your whole “no systemic racism” bit but it’s real and anyone with half a brain can see it.
You just have no data to back it up
Unequal outcome based on income is provable
I have no vested interest in proving the state to be pure
I'll leave that to the statist worshippers like you who want to give the state total control of your life
Not surprised. This decision didn't really matter, other than the rioting, because it's going to be appealed so LIPO. The guy wasn't going to get a fair trial. There is no way anyone can convince me he intended to kill Floyd.
The evidence is overwhelming that black people don’t get fair trials in America. But fair trials aren’t a problem until a cop puts his knee on someone’s neck for 9 minutes.
Is it possible that some people are consistent advocates of fair trials, regardless of circumstance?
Of course. I had a conservative friend express to me that he thought it was clear Chauvin was guilty but he was concerned about the fairness of the trial. Friend, not former friend.
But a lot of people on the right reject any notion that black people don’t get fair trials. If someone doesn’t think it’s possible that black people aren’t getting fair trials but they bitch about the fairness of this trial, there might be a reason for that. A crystal clear, confederate flag in the capitol, reason.
Firewall protected and what do you want to bet that they compare apples to dog shit? Black Kid with multiple priors gets busted for robbery. White Kid with no priors gets busted for robbery. See, the black kid got sent to prison and the white kids got probation. Racism!!!!
Those things are accounted for in the studies.
Since you're a proven liar and your source isn't publicly accessible I don't believe you.
Well, you also believe the people doing criminal justice studies aren’t smart enough to realize there’s different types of crimes so I can live with this.
Your source is an opinion not facts
2% of poor white kids and 10% of rich black kids going to jail isn’t an opinion.
Whatever our fucked up relationship is now, I put it on all of our old shit that the numbers on this are really bad. That they account for income, that they account for the types of crimes and criminal records. It’s really bad. I know you can’t go here because our justice SYSTEM giving unequal outcome based on RACE, kinda hurts your whole “no systemic racism” bit but it’s real and anyone with half a brain can see it.
You just have no data to back it up
Unequal outcome based on income is provable
I have no vested interest in proving the state to be pure
I'll leave that to the statist worshippers like you who want to give the state total control of your life
Good luck
Great point. The system is racist and discriminates against black people! Lets give more power and money to the system!!!!
Not surprised. This decision didn't really matter, other than the rioting, because it's going to be appealed so LIPO. The guy wasn't going to get a fair trial. There is no way anyone can convince me he intended to kill Floyd.
The evidence is overwhelming that black people don’t get fair trials in America. But fair trials aren’t a problem until a cop puts his knee on someone’s neck for 9 minutes.
Is it possible that some people are consistent advocates of fair trials, regardless of circumstance?
Of course. I had a conservative friend express to me that he thought it was clear Chauvin was guilty but he was concerned about the fairness of the trial. Friend, not former friend.
But a lot of people on the right reject any notion that black people don’t get fair trials. If someone doesn’t think it’s possible that black people aren’t getting fair trials but they bitch about the fairness of this trial, there might be a reason for that. A crystal clear, confederate flag in the capitol, reason.
Not surprised. This decision didn't really matter, other than the rioting, because it's going to be appealed so LIPO. The guy wasn't going to get a fair trial. There is no way anyone can convince me he intended to kill Floyd.
Intention to kill is not required for 2nd degree murder.
Then how is it a murder?
You don't know what you're talking about.
That's the law. Pretty cut and dry shit. Unless you're a fucking idiot.
Not surprised. This decision didn't really matter, other than the rioting, because it's going to be appealed so LIPO. The guy wasn't going to get a fair trial. There is no way anyone can convince me he intended to kill Floyd.
Intention to kill is not required for 2nd degree murder.
Then how is it a murder?
You don't know what you're talking about.
That's the law. Pretty cut and dry shit. Unless you're a fucking idiot.
Comments
Why are you? No murdered minorities and no shit burned down on Jan 6th. Next!!!!
Try harder or just admit you are a lying fuck that hates honesty.
Link a USSC report from the last 10 years, Bob. I fucking dare you.
Or do you just have the low IQ of an average cop?
Unequal outcome based on income is provable
I have no vested interest in proving the state to be pure
I'll leave that to the statist worshippers like you who want to give the state total control of your life
Good luck
Very well read, I'm told.
By him, but still.