Kobe Bitch
Comments
-
If you could read, you'd already know the answer.TheKobeStopper said:
Oh wow, so cool. Where are these 4th gen plants in use?TurdBomber said:
4th Generation Nuclear plants consume their own waste on-site, thereby reducing the net generated waste footprint to zero.TheKobeStopper said:
Renewables would create more jobs. Why would we choose to go down the path that has more serious risks, creates nuclear waste and doesn’t create enough jobs?Bob_C said:Kobe, why no nuclear?
But you have to read above a 4th grade level to know this, APAG.
In the same vein, where is a major city powered only by wind and solar, APAG? -
Kobe taking it to the twatters? Must have forgot to take his midol.
-
Guy is a complete lying piece of shit. What makes him worse is what a fucking coward he is. He'll smear you with his lies and when you call him on it and ask him to back up his mouth with some evidence that you ever said what he claims you said, he runs and hides like a Kunt.Tequilla said:If you’re going to try to come after me on Twitter ... get your fucking facts straight
Absolutely NOTHING that you accuse me of is even remotely close to accurate -
I don't hear anyone seriously denying outright that climate change exists. What I see is nuance, legitimate questions as to causation and proportion of it that is caused by human activity, etc.
What I also see daily is the complete laziness of people like APAG who have not read the Green New Deal and do not understand how little it actually addresses climate change, versus how chock full of race-baiting and divisive bullshit it is, under the guise of equity, as though the white man is the root cause of any and all forms of pollution, climate change, environmental destruction and exploitation, and therefore must be dethroned and replaced by BIPOC people who's spiritual connection to the Earth is superior in every way, which will rightfully lead humanity back to the agrarian, organic, utopian world where people can return to mass starvation, diseases like polio and malaria, and all those other organic trappings that created such a perfect harmonious world before whitey came along and ruined it all. -
What are you talking about? If 97% isn't a consensus then you need to be forced onto a train.LebamDawg said:I am not a weather specialist nor do I claim to know anything about the detailed content of the atmosphere and how each element affects the weather. How much do humans impact the weather/climate is all a mystery to me.
What I disagree with is "a consensus of" being the determining factor in totally changing our? economy. Joining in with the Paris Accords that set guide lines that cost the US and does nothing to the other nations that join but do nothing that the accord outlined.
Follow the money and the actual estimates of the impact these changes would make. It is more like trying to pick the fly shit out of the pepper.
Climate change is not a proven science it is a best guess. Too many politicians world wide are making too much money off this science -
You mean like all the semen swallowers of Black Lives Matter who never got past the trademarked slogan and actually read that Marxist group’s manifesto and the felons behind it?TurdBomber said:I don't hear anyone seriously denying outright that climate change exists. What I see is nuance, legitimate questions as to causation and proportion of it that is caused by human activity, etc.
What I also see daily is the complete laziness of people like APAG who have not read the Green New Deal and do not understand how little it actually addresses climate change, versus how chock full of race-baiting and divisive bullshit it is, under the guise of equity, as though the white man is the root cause of any and all forms of pollution, climate change, environmental destruction and exploitation, and therefore must be dethroned and replaced by BIPOC people who's spiritual connection to the Earth is superior in every way, which will rightfully lead humanity back to the agrarian, organic, utopian world where people can return to mass starvation, diseases like polio and malaria, and all those other organic trappings that created such a perfect harmonious world before whitey came along and ruined it all.
-
Posted this dozens of times. 12,000 years ago Chicago was under a mile of ice. Happened many times in the past. Now it isn't. Not one leftard wants to deal with this most basic fact. Human CO2 emissions had nothing to do with it. Just like asking a leftard how much should the US spend on reducing CO2 emissions and what will it accomplish. Toss in the non-serious proposed solutions, none of which entail nukes or shipping US LNG to Asia. Case closed.TurdBomber said:I don't hear anyone seriously denying outright that climate change exists. What I see is nuance, legitimate questions as to causation and proportion of it that is caused by human activity, etc.
What I also see daily is the complete laziness of people like APAG who have not read the Green New Deal and do not understand how little it actually addresses climate change, versus how chock full of race-baiting and divisive bullshit it is, under the guise of equity, as though the white man is the root cause of any and all forms of pollution, climate change, environmental destruction and exploitation, and therefore must be dethroned and replaced by BIPOC people who's spiritual connection to the Earth is superior in every way, which will rightfully lead humanity back to the agrarian, organic, utopian world where people can return to mass starvation, diseases like polio and malaria, and all those other organic trappings that created such a perfect harmonious world before whitey came along and ruined it all. -
But I hear Chinese solar panels are cheap, easy to install, get you tax credits, and can power your car to go 11 miles after half a day in the sun.WestlinnDuck said:
Posted this dozens of times. 12,000 years ago Chicago was under a mile of ice. Happened many times in the past. Now it isn't. Not one leftard wants to deal with this most basic fact. Human CO2 emissions had nothing to do with it. Just like asking a leftard how much should the US spend on reducing CO2 emissions and what will it accomplish. Toss in the non-serious proposed solutions, none of which entail nukes or shipping US LNG to Asia. Case closed.TurdBomber said:I don't hear anyone seriously denying outright that climate change exists. What I see is nuance, legitimate questions as to causation and proportion of it that is caused by human activity, etc.
What I also see daily is the complete laziness of people like APAG who have not read the Green New Deal and do not understand how little it actually addresses climate change, versus how chock full of race-baiting and divisive bullshit it is, under the guise of equity, as though the white man is the root cause of any and all forms of pollution, climate change, environmental destruction and exploitation, and therefore must be dethroned and replaced by BIPOC people who's spiritual connection to the Earth is superior in every way, which will rightfully lead humanity back to the agrarian, organic, utopian world where people can return to mass starvation, diseases like polio and malaria, and all those other organic trappings that created such a perfect harmonious world before whitey came along and ruined it all. -
No scientist has ever said how much man contributes to climate change. Is it 50? Okay, then I'll bike more. If it's two percent, fuck off. I'm not going to take it that seriously until someone does.
Kobeslobber and other SJWs just ignore and deflect. -
We aren’t not dealing with the fact, we think it’s laughably stupid. Hey guys, did you know a meteor caused the climate to change 12,000 years ago therefore humans can’t cause climate change?WestlinnDuck said:
Posted this dozens of times. 12,000 years ago Chicago was under a mile of ice. Happened many times in the past. Now it isn't. Not one leftard wants to deal with this most basic fact. Human CO2 emissions had nothing to do with it. Just like asking a leftard how much should the US spend on reducing CO2 emissions and what will it accomplish. Toss in the non-serious proposed solutions, none of which entail nukes or shipping US LNG to Asia. Case closed.TurdBomber said:I don't hear anyone seriously denying outright that climate change exists. What I see is nuance, legitimate questions as to causation and proportion of it that is caused by human activity, etc.
What I also see daily is the complete laziness of people like APAG who have not read the Green New Deal and do not understand how little it actually addresses climate change, versus how chock full of race-baiting and divisive bullshit it is, under the guise of equity, as though the white man is the root cause of any and all forms of pollution, climate change, environmental destruction and exploitation, and therefore must be dethroned and replaced by BIPOC people who's spiritual connection to the Earth is superior in every way, which will rightfully lead humanity back to the agrarian, organic, utopian world where people can return to mass starvation, diseases like polio and malaria, and all those other organic trappings that created such a perfect harmonious world before whitey came along and ruined it all.
The air quality changed long before humans existed, therefore, humans can’t change the quality of the air.
Earthquakes happened long before humans existed, therefore, humans can’t cause earthquake.
You’re educationally sub-normal. -
You should post this on TwitterTheKobeStopper said:
We aren’t not dealing with the fact, we think it’s laughably stupid. Hey guys, did you know a meteor caused the climate to change 12,000 years ago therefore humans can’t cause climate change?WestlinnDuck said:
Posted this dozens of times. 12,000 years ago Chicago was under a mile of ice. Happened many times in the past. Now it isn't. Not one leftard wants to deal with this most basic fact. Human CO2 emissions had nothing to do with it. Just like asking a leftard how much should the US spend on reducing CO2 emissions and what will it accomplish. Toss in the non-serious proposed solutions, none of which entail nukes or shipping US LNG to Asia. Case closed.TurdBomber said:I don't hear anyone seriously denying outright that climate change exists. What I see is nuance, legitimate questions as to causation and proportion of it that is caused by human activity, etc.
What I also see daily is the complete laziness of people like APAG who have not read the Green New Deal and do not understand how little it actually addresses climate change, versus how chock full of race-baiting and divisive bullshit it is, under the guise of equity, as though the white man is the root cause of any and all forms of pollution, climate change, environmental destruction and exploitation, and therefore must be dethroned and replaced by BIPOC people who's spiritual connection to the Earth is superior in every way, which will rightfully lead humanity back to the agrarian, organic, utopian world where people can return to mass starvation, diseases like polio and malaria, and all those other organic trappings that created such a perfect harmonious world before whitey came along and ruined it all.
The air quality changed long before humans existed, therefore, humans can’t change the quality of the air.
Earthquakes happened long before humans existed, therefore, humans can’t cause earthquake.
You’re educationally sub-normal. -
This was a stupid postTheKobeStopper said:
We aren’t not dealing with the fact, we think it’s laughably stupid. Hey guys, did you know a meteor caused the climate to change 12,000 years ago therefore humans can’t cause climate change?WestlinnDuck said:
Posted this dozens of times. 12,000 years ago Chicago was under a mile of ice. Happened many times in the past. Now it isn't. Not one leftard wants to deal with this most basic fact. Human CO2 emissions had nothing to do with it. Just like asking a leftard how much should the US spend on reducing CO2 emissions and what will it accomplish. Toss in the non-serious proposed solutions, none of which entail nukes or shipping US LNG to Asia. Case closed.TurdBomber said:I don't hear anyone seriously denying outright that climate change exists. What I see is nuance, legitimate questions as to causation and proportion of it that is caused by human activity, etc.
What I also see daily is the complete laziness of people like APAG who have not read the Green New Deal and do not understand how little it actually addresses climate change, versus how chock full of race-baiting and divisive bullshit it is, under the guise of equity, as though the white man is the root cause of any and all forms of pollution, climate change, environmental destruction and exploitation, and therefore must be dethroned and replaced by BIPOC people who's spiritual connection to the Earth is superior in every way, which will rightfully lead humanity back to the agrarian, organic, utopian world where people can return to mass starvation, diseases like polio and malaria, and all those other organic trappings that created such a perfect harmonious world before whitey came along and ruined it all.
The air quality changed long before humans existed, therefore, humans can’t change the quality of the air.
Earthquakes happened long before humans existed, therefore, humans can’t cause earthquake.
You’re educationally sub-normal.
Do better
If you want to off several billion people and destroy the quality of life for those left you are going to have to prove your bullshit not deflect from it
The planet is billions of years old and humans aren't
Prove your theories of how much climate change humans have caused and what your remedies will actually do
Meanwhile I will enjoy my AC as usual
The burden of proof is on you and the ten year clock is ticking fast.
Pro tip for your cult - never put an end date on it. Plenty of Elmer Gantry types made that same mistake -
https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.carbonbrief.org/analysis-why-scientists-think-100-of-global-warming-is-due-to-humans/ampRaceBannon said:
This was a stupid postTheKobeStopper said:
We aren’t not dealing with the fact, we think it’s laughably stupid. Hey guys, did you know a meteor caused the climate to change 12,000 years ago therefore humans can’t cause climate change?WestlinnDuck said:
Posted this dozens of times. 12,000 years ago Chicago was under a mile of ice. Happened many times in the past. Now it isn't. Not one leftard wants to deal with this most basic fact. Human CO2 emissions had nothing to do with it. Just like asking a leftard how much should the US spend on reducing CO2 emissions and what will it accomplish. Toss in the non-serious proposed solutions, none of which entail nukes or shipping US LNG to Asia. Case closed.TurdBomber said:I don't hear anyone seriously denying outright that climate change exists. What I see is nuance, legitimate questions as to causation and proportion of it that is caused by human activity, etc.
What I also see daily is the complete laziness of people like APAG who have not read the Green New Deal and do not understand how little it actually addresses climate change, versus how chock full of race-baiting and divisive bullshit it is, under the guise of equity, as though the white man is the root cause of any and all forms of pollution, climate change, environmental destruction and exploitation, and therefore must be dethroned and replaced by BIPOC people who's spiritual connection to the Earth is superior in every way, which will rightfully lead humanity back to the agrarian, organic, utopian world where people can return to mass starvation, diseases like polio and malaria, and all those other organic trappings that created such a perfect harmonious world before whitey came along and ruined it all.
The air quality changed long before humans existed, therefore, humans can’t change the quality of the air.
Earthquakes happened long before humans existed, therefore, humans can’t cause earthquake.
You’re educationally sub-normal.
Do better
If you want to off several billion people and destroy the quality of life for those left you are going to have to prove your bullshit not deflect from it
The planet is billions of years old and humans aren't
Prove your theories of how much climate change humans have caused and what your remedies will actually do
Meanwhile I will enjoy my AC as usual
The burden of proof is on you and the ten year clock is ticking fast.
Pro tip for your cult - never put an end date on it. Plenty of Elmer Gantry types made that same mistake
However, the science on the human contribution to modern warming is quite clear. Humans emissions and activities have caused around 100% of the warming observed since 1950
https://www.google.com/amp/s/theconversation.com/amp/climate-explained-how-much-of-climate-change-is-natural-how-much-is-man-made-123604
For nearly all climate scientists, the case is proven that humans are the overwhelming cause of the long-term changes in the climate that we are observing. And that this case should be closed.
https://www.wwf.org.uk/updates/10-myths-about-climate-change
Over the course of the Earth’s 4.5-billion-year history, the climate has changed a lot. This is true. But the rapid warming we’re seeing now can't be explained by natural cycles of warming and cooling. The kind of changes that would normally happen over hundreds of thousands of years are happening in decades.
You wanted to tussle, we tussled. -
One thing that I think is important in any discussion is to leverage the past to inform us in the future ... but ultimately what I care about is what we do today forward and not about assign blame about the events of the past
The reason? I can’t change what HAS happened ... I can only change what CAN happen going forward -
I’m no denier of what caused what, frankly don’t really care. What I’m skeptical of is how big of a deal it actually is based on the proposed remedies. If it was truly the end of the world, then you need to strip the racial equity part out of the GND out immediately as it’s not relevant. It takes away any credibility from the climate portion of it.
If it was the existential threat you say it is, then we should be at war with China already over their non actions. Get them on board with an actual equal bilateral treaty before actual change is made and current jobs are cut and I’m willing to talk. Cutting off your own balls without China doing the same is going to be a disaster economically and eventually environmentally as they’ll continue to grow faster and gain market share with such a huge advantage. -
Reject the 1619 Project at your peril. Equity says flip the script.Tequilla said:One thing that I think is important in any discussion is to leverage the past to inform us in the future ... but ultimately what I care about is what we do today forward and not about assign blame about the events of the past
The reason? I can’t change what HAS happened ... I can only change what CAN happen going forward
No improvements or refinements necessary. That's just your whiteness talking. -
Without the Trojan Horse of Equity, the GND is DOA.Bob_C said:I’m no denier of what caused what, frankly don’t really care. What I’m skeptical of is how big of a deal it actually is based on the proposed remedies. If it was truly the end of the world, then you need to strip the racial equity part out of the GND out immediately as it’s not relevant. It takes away any credibility from the climate portion of it.
If it was the existential threat you say it is, then we should be at war with China already over their non actions. Get them on board with an actual equal bilateral treaty before actual change is made and current jobs are cut and I’m willing to talk. Cutting off your own balls without China doing the same is going to be a disaster economically and eventually environmentally as they’ll continue to grow faster and gain market share with such a huge advantage. -
I'm interested in your opinion and thoughts not a bunch of linked malarkey that doesn't address anything I wroteTheKobeStopper said:
https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.carbonbrief.org/analysis-why-scientists-think-100-of-global-warming-is-due-to-humans/ampRaceBannon said:
This was a stupid postTheKobeStopper said:
We aren’t not dealing with the fact, we think it’s laughably stupid. Hey guys, did you know a meteor caused the climate to change 12,000 years ago therefore humans can’t cause climate change?WestlinnDuck said:
Posted this dozens of times. 12,000 years ago Chicago was under a mile of ice. Happened many times in the past. Now it isn't. Not one leftard wants to deal with this most basic fact. Human CO2 emissions had nothing to do with it. Just like asking a leftard how much should the US spend on reducing CO2 emissions and what will it accomplish. Toss in the non-serious proposed solutions, none of which entail nukes or shipping US LNG to Asia. Case closed.TurdBomber said:I don't hear anyone seriously denying outright that climate change exists. What I see is nuance, legitimate questions as to causation and proportion of it that is caused by human activity, etc.
What I also see daily is the complete laziness of people like APAG who have not read the Green New Deal and do not understand how little it actually addresses climate change, versus how chock full of race-baiting and divisive bullshit it is, under the guise of equity, as though the white man is the root cause of any and all forms of pollution, climate change, environmental destruction and exploitation, and therefore must be dethroned and replaced by BIPOC people who's spiritual connection to the Earth is superior in every way, which will rightfully lead humanity back to the agrarian, organic, utopian world where people can return to mass starvation, diseases like polio and malaria, and all those other organic trappings that created such a perfect harmonious world before whitey came along and ruined it all.
The air quality changed long before humans existed, therefore, humans can’t change the quality of the air.
Earthquakes happened long before humans existed, therefore, humans can’t cause earthquake.
You’re educationally sub-normal.
Do better
If you want to off several billion people and destroy the quality of life for those left you are going to have to prove your bullshit not deflect from it
The planet is billions of years old and humans aren't
Prove your theories of how much climate change humans have caused and what your remedies will actually do
Meanwhile I will enjoy my AC as usual
The burden of proof is on you and the ten year clock is ticking fast.
Pro tip for your cult - never put an end date on it. Plenty of Elmer Gantry types made that same mistake
However, the science on the human contribution to modern warming is quite clear. Humans emissions and activities have caused around 100% of the warming observed since 1950
https://www.google.com/amp/s/theconversation.com/amp/climate-explained-how-much-of-climate-change-is-natural-how-much-is-man-made-123604
For nearly all climate scientists, the case is proven that humans are the overwhelming cause of the long-term changes in the climate that we are observing. And that this case should be closed.
https://www.wwf.org.uk/updates/10-myths-about-climate-change
Over the course of the Earth’s 4.5-billion-year history, the climate has changed a lot. This is true. But the rapid warming we’re seeing now can't be explained by natural cycles of warming and cooling. The kind of changes that would normally happen over hundreds of thousands of years are happening in decades.
You wanted to tussle, we tussled. -
A mile of ice. Then no ice. Seems like a lot of warming. Romans were growing wine grapes in England once upon a time. Once upon a time Greenland was green. Then it wasn't and they all died or fled. I blame the internal combustion engine.
-
Nothing I do today changes what happened over the last 400 years ...TurdBomber said:
Reject the 1619 Project at your peril. Equity says flip the script.Tequilla said:One thing that I think is important in any discussion is to leverage the past to inform us in the future ... but ultimately what I care about is what we do today forward and not about assign blame about the events of the past
The reason? I can’t change what HAS happened ... I can only change what CAN happen going forward
No improvements or refinements necessary. That's just your whiteness talking.
I’m all about solving problems ...
As with any problem, you have to want to solve the problem to actually solve the problem ... is this country really ready to address problems and come together as one? -
We got trouble....right here in River City.RaceBannon said:
This was a stupid postTheKobeStopper said:
We aren’t not dealing with the fact, we think it’s laughably stupid. Hey guys, did you know a meteor caused the climate to change 12,000 years ago therefore humans can’t cause climate change?WestlinnDuck said:
Posted this dozens of times. 12,000 years ago Chicago was under a mile of ice. Happened many times in the past. Now it isn't. Not one leftard wants to deal with this most basic fact. Human CO2 emissions had nothing to do with it. Just like asking a leftard how much should the US spend on reducing CO2 emissions and what will it accomplish. Toss in the non-serious proposed solutions, none of which entail nukes or shipping US LNG to Asia. Case closed.TurdBomber said:I don't hear anyone seriously denying outright that climate change exists. What I see is nuance, legitimate questions as to causation and proportion of it that is caused by human activity, etc.
What I also see daily is the complete laziness of people like APAG who have not read the Green New Deal and do not understand how little it actually addresses climate change, versus how chock full of race-baiting and divisive bullshit it is, under the guise of equity, as though the white man is the root cause of any and all forms of pollution, climate change, environmental destruction and exploitation, and therefore must be dethroned and replaced by BIPOC people who's spiritual connection to the Earth is superior in every way, which will rightfully lead humanity back to the agrarian, organic, utopian world where people can return to mass starvation, diseases like polio and malaria, and all those other organic trappings that created such a perfect harmonious world before whitey came along and ruined it all.
The air quality changed long before humans existed, therefore, humans can’t change the quality of the air.
Earthquakes happened long before humans existed, therefore, humans can’t cause earthquake.
You’re educationally sub-normal.
Do better
If you want to off several billion people and destroy the quality of life for those left you are going to have to prove your bullshit not deflect from it
The planet is billions of years old and humans aren't
Prove your theories of how much climate change humans have caused and what your remedies will actually do
Meanwhile I will enjoy my AC as usual
The burden of proof is on you and the ten year clock is ticking fast.
Pro tip for your cult - never put an end date on it. Plenty of Elmer Gantry types made that same mistake
Trouble with a capital "T"
And that rhymes with "P" and that stands for pool!
-
No. We are a nation of at least 50% of morons, karens and emasculated males like the Slobberer. If you actually believed in the fraud of an extinction level event of global warming we would have nukes and exporting of LNG to Asia. Do you really think that global warming is a real issue for the dazzler or the Slobberer? Hell, the dazzler just used up a pile of jet gas supposedly flying during the chicom crud event. It we were facing an extinction level event, then just Zoom the damn thing. Hell, Bill Gates is buying up a private jet rent a plane business. You think he really cares?Tequilla said:
Nothing I do today changes what happened over the last 400 years ...TurdBomber said:
Reject the 1619 Project at your peril. Equity says flip the script.Tequilla said:One thing that I think is important in any discussion is to leverage the past to inform us in the future ... but ultimately what I care about is what we do today forward and not about assign blame about the events of the past
The reason? I can’t change what HAS happened ... I can only change what CAN happen going forward
No improvements or refinements necessary. That's just your whiteness talking.
I’m all about solving problems ...
As with any problem, you have to want to solve the problem to actually solve the problem ... is this country really ready to address problems and come together as one? -
Change rarely comes from a do as I say not as I do perspectiveWestlinnDuck said:
No. We are a nation of at least 50% of morons, karens and emasculated males like the Slobberer. If you actually believed in the fraud of an extinction level event of global warming we would have nukes and exporting of LNG to Asia. Do you really think that global warming is a real issue for the dazzler or the Slobberer? Hell, the dazzler just used up a pile of jet gas supposedly flying during the chicom crud event. It we were facing an extinction level event, then just Zoom the damn thing. Hell, Bill Gates is buying up a private jet rent a plane business. You think he really cares?Tequilla said:
Nothing I do today changes what happened over the last 400 years ...TurdBomber said:
Reject the 1619 Project at your peril. Equity says flip the script.Tequilla said:One thing that I think is important in any discussion is to leverage the past to inform us in the future ... but ultimately what I care about is what we do today forward and not about assign blame about the events of the past
The reason? I can’t change what HAS happened ... I can only change what CAN happen going forward
No improvements or refinements necessary. That's just your whiteness talking.
I’m all about solving problems ...
As with any problem, you have to want to solve the problem to actually solve the problem ... is this country really ready to address problems and come together as one? -
Exactly. As Glenn Reynolds says, "I'll believe that it's a crisis when the people who claim it's a crisis start acting like it's a crisis."Tequilla said:
Change rarely comes from a do as I say not as I do perspectiveWestlinnDuck said:
No. We are a nation of at least 50% of morons, karens and emasculated males like the Slobberer. If you actually believed in the fraud of an extinction level event of global warming we would have nukes and exporting of LNG to Asia. Do you really think that global warming is a real issue for the dazzler or the Slobberer? Hell, the dazzler just used up a pile of jet gas supposedly flying during the chicom crud event. It we were facing an extinction level event, then just Zoom the damn thing. Hell, Bill Gates is buying up a private jet rent a plane business. You think he really cares?Tequilla said:
Nothing I do today changes what happened over the last 400 years ...TurdBomber said:
Reject the 1619 Project at your peril. Equity says flip the script.Tequilla said:One thing that I think is important in any discussion is to leverage the past to inform us in the future ... but ultimately what I care about is what we do today forward and not about assign blame about the events of the past
The reason? I can’t change what HAS happened ... I can only change what CAN happen going forward
No improvements or refinements necessary. That's just your whiteness talking.
I’m all about solving problems ...
As with any problem, you have to want to solve the problem to actually solve the problem ... is this country really ready to address problems and come together as one? -
“Prove your theories of how much climate change humans have caused”RaceBannon said:
I'm interested in your opinion and thoughts not a bunch of linked malarkey that doesn't address anything I wroteTheKobeStopper said:
https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.carbonbrief.org/analysis-why-scientists-think-100-of-global-warming-is-due-to-humans/ampRaceBannon said:
This was a stupid postTheKobeStopper said:
We aren’t not dealing with the fact, we think it’s laughably stupid. Hey guys, did you know a meteor caused the climate to change 12,000 years ago therefore humans can’t cause climate change?WestlinnDuck said:
Posted this dozens of times. 12,000 years ago Chicago was under a mile of ice. Happened many times in the past. Now it isn't. Not one leftard wants to deal with this most basic fact. Human CO2 emissions had nothing to do with it. Just like asking a leftard how much should the US spend on reducing CO2 emissions and what will it accomplish. Toss in the non-serious proposed solutions, none of which entail nukes or shipping US LNG to Asia. Case closed.TurdBomber said:I don't hear anyone seriously denying outright that climate change exists. What I see is nuance, legitimate questions as to causation and proportion of it that is caused by human activity, etc.
What I also see daily is the complete laziness of people like APAG who have not read the Green New Deal and do not understand how little it actually addresses climate change, versus how chock full of race-baiting and divisive bullshit it is, under the guise of equity, as though the white man is the root cause of any and all forms of pollution, climate change, environmental destruction and exploitation, and therefore must be dethroned and replaced by BIPOC people who's spiritual connection to the Earth is superior in every way, which will rightfully lead humanity back to the agrarian, organic, utopian world where people can return to mass starvation, diseases like polio and malaria, and all those other organic trappings that created such a perfect harmonious world before whitey came along and ruined it all.
The air quality changed long before humans existed, therefore, humans can’t change the quality of the air.
Earthquakes happened long before humans existed, therefore, humans can’t cause earthquake.
You’re educationally sub-normal.
Do better
If you want to off several billion people and destroy the quality of life for those left you are going to have to prove your bullshit not deflect from it
The planet is billions of years old and humans aren't
Prove your theories of how much climate change humans have caused and what your remedies will actually do
Meanwhile I will enjoy my AC as usual
The burden of proof is on you and the ten year clock is ticking fast.
Pro tip for your cult - never put an end date on it. Plenty of Elmer Gantry types made that same mistake
However, the science on the human contribution to modern warming is quite clear. Humans emissions and activities have caused around 100% of the warming observed since 1950
https://www.google.com/amp/s/theconversation.com/amp/climate-explained-how-much-of-climate-change-is-natural-how-much-is-man-made-123604
For nearly all climate scientists, the case is proven that humans are the overwhelming cause of the long-term changes in the climate that we are observing. And that this case should be closed.
https://www.wwf.org.uk/updates/10-myths-about-climate-change
Over the course of the Earth’s 4.5-billion-year history, the climate has changed a lot. This is true. But the rapid warming we’re seeing now can't be explained by natural cycles of warming and cooling. The kind of changes that would normally happen over hundreds of thousands of years are happening in decades.
You wanted to tussle, we tussled. -
Tick tick tickTheKobeStopper said:
“Prove your theories of how much climate change humans have caused”RaceBannon said:
I'm interested in your opinion and thoughts not a bunch of linked malarkey that doesn't address anything I wroteTheKobeStopper said:
https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.carbonbrief.org/analysis-why-scientists-think-100-of-global-warming-is-due-to-humans/ampRaceBannon said:
This was a stupid postTheKobeStopper said:
We aren’t not dealing with the fact, we think it’s laughably stupid. Hey guys, did you know a meteor caused the climate to change 12,000 years ago therefore humans can’t cause climate change?WestlinnDuck said:
Posted this dozens of times. 12,000 years ago Chicago was under a mile of ice. Happened many times in the past. Now it isn't. Not one leftard wants to deal with this most basic fact. Human CO2 emissions had nothing to do with it. Just like asking a leftard how much should the US spend on reducing CO2 emissions and what will it accomplish. Toss in the non-serious proposed solutions, none of which entail nukes or shipping US LNG to Asia. Case closed.TurdBomber said:I don't hear anyone seriously denying outright that climate change exists. What I see is nuance, legitimate questions as to causation and proportion of it that is caused by human activity, etc.
What I also see daily is the complete laziness of people like APAG who have not read the Green New Deal and do not understand how little it actually addresses climate change, versus how chock full of race-baiting and divisive bullshit it is, under the guise of equity, as though the white man is the root cause of any and all forms of pollution, climate change, environmental destruction and exploitation, and therefore must be dethroned and replaced by BIPOC people who's spiritual connection to the Earth is superior in every way, which will rightfully lead humanity back to the agrarian, organic, utopian world where people can return to mass starvation, diseases like polio and malaria, and all those other organic trappings that created such a perfect harmonious world before whitey came along and ruined it all.
The air quality changed long before humans existed, therefore, humans can’t change the quality of the air.
Earthquakes happened long before humans existed, therefore, humans can’t cause earthquake.
You’re educationally sub-normal.
Do better
If you want to off several billion people and destroy the quality of life for those left you are going to have to prove your bullshit not deflect from it
The planet is billions of years old and humans aren't
Prove your theories of how much climate change humans have caused and what your remedies will actually do
Meanwhile I will enjoy my AC as usual
The burden of proof is on you and the ten year clock is ticking fast.
Pro tip for your cult - never put an end date on it. Plenty of Elmer Gantry types made that same mistake
However, the science on the human contribution to modern warming is quite clear. Humans emissions and activities have caused around 100% of the warming observed since 1950
https://www.google.com/amp/s/theconversation.com/amp/climate-explained-how-much-of-climate-change-is-natural-how-much-is-man-made-123604
For nearly all climate scientists, the case is proven that humans are the overwhelming cause of the long-term changes in the climate that we are observing. And that this case should be closed.
https://www.wwf.org.uk/updates/10-myths-about-climate-change
Over the course of the Earth’s 4.5-billion-year history, the climate has changed a lot. This is true. But the rapid warming we’re seeing now can't be explained by natural cycles of warming and cooling. The kind of changes that would normally happen over hundreds of thousands of years are happening in decades.
You wanted to tussle, we tussled. -
And don't forget your solution and the cost benefit analysis
-
And how we get the chicoms on board. Don't hurt yourself, Slobberer.RaceBannon said:And don't forget your solution and the cost benefit analysis
-
I gave you evidence that climate change is man made. You demanded to hear my feelings on the issue.RaceBannon said:And don't forget your solution and the cost benefit analysis
If you’re going to deny science then there’s no point in talking solutions with you. You’re either scientifically illiterate or acting in bad faith. Either way, I’m not interested. -
What does the science say about the US raising energy costs as China builds dozens of new coal plants and increases emissions?TheKobeStopper said:
I gave you evidence that climate change is man made. You demanded to hear my feelings on the issue.RaceBannon said:And don't forget your solution and the cost benefit analysis
If you’re going to deny science then there’s no point in talking solutions with you. You’re either scientifically illiterate or acting in bad faith. Either way, I’m not interested.
You’re just very stupid. It’s who you are. By the way, what happened to the “carbon credit” scam that gave Al Gore mansions on both coasts? He sure is quiet these days as he lives in luxury.
