And @TheKobeStopper apologies for using “Bitch” in the thread title ...
I was pretty pissed in the moment (still not happy) about you taking things out of context and reacting on a different medium (which you shouldn’t do) and reacted emotionally (which I try to avoid)
And @TheKobeStopper apologies for using “Bitch” in the thread title ...
I was pretty pissed in the moment (still not happy) about you taking things out of context and reacting on a different medium (which you shouldn’t do) and reacted emotionally (which I try to avoid)
Please accept my sincere apologies
There’s always been a lot of twisters in this community. I’m sorry it had to happen yesterday to you too.
And @TheKobeStopper apologies for using “Bitch” in the thread title ...
I was pretty pissed in the moment (still not happy) about you taking things out of context and reacting on a different medium (which you shouldn’t do) and reacted emotionally (which I try to avoid)
Please accept my sincere apologies
Arguing with an fool until they drag you down to their level is a waste of tim.
I prefer to just skip right to it and call him a fool immediately.
Your apology is so Beta. Was it sarcasm? Why do you care what that dude thinks? It’s entertaining pushing these dunces away from reality.
And @TheKobeStopper apologies for using “Bitch” in the thread title ...
I was pretty pissed in the moment (still not happy) about you taking things out of context and reacting on a different medium (which you shouldn’t do) and reacted emotionally (which I try to avoid)
Please accept my sincere apologies
Arguing with an fool until they drag you down to their level is a waste of tim.
I prefer to just skip right to it and call him a fool immediately.
Your apology is so Beta. Was it sarcasm? Why do you care what that dude thinks? It’s entertaining pushing these dunces away from reality.
Zero BidenBros to be found.
Regardless of whether I agree with someone or not, calling them a bitch isn’t the path that I want to go down. Hence the apology.
I can’t expect others to act in a more civilized manner if I don’t take my own advice right? And the least that I can do if I make a mistake is to own it.
I always find it amusing that you never hear anybody talk about global warming in times likes these
That’s you ^^^^
How did I misrepresent what you said?
It’s called sarcasm
When heat related events take place (notably hurricanes) ... everybody is really quick to point out the link between the event and temperature
Yet when really abnormal events swing the other way there’s never a recognition that things swing the other way as well
My point is that what bothers me most about climate change advocates is that they cherry pick events to their narrative ... it’s off putting
You want to show evidence that the effects of climate change results in greater volatility in weather ... I’m listening
You want to talk about observable data that we need to address ... I’m open to talking about how that is done
But I will always be critical of those that selectively use data to advance a pre-determined conclusion
Wait what? I think the primary term has changed from “global warming” to “climate change” for this exact reason. These extreme weather events aren’t always just warm weather events. And I think climate change activists are using this cold snap as evidence for their agenda, not dismissing it and being quiet about it.
I think the bigger issue is that people just can’t grasp the concept of small sample sizes. Just because the average temp is increasing over time doesn’t mean we can’t still have extreme cold snaps like this occasionally as well.
And @TheKobeStopper apologies for using “Bitch” in the thread title ...
I was pretty pissed in the moment (still not happy) about you taking things out of context and reacting on a different medium (which you shouldn’t do) and reacted emotionally (which I try to avoid)
Please accept my sincere apologies
I didn’t intentionally take it out of context. You must know the guys here would 100% make that argument. I went with it because it stood out to me, like god damn even Tequilla believes this shit. But I was wrong, so sorry I called you a dumb fuck.
I don’t really get the problem with taking things to another medium part but I won’t do it to you since you so strenuously object to it.
And @TheKobeStopper apologies for using “Bitch” in the thread title ...
I was pretty pissed in the moment (still not happy) about you taking things out of context and reacting on a different medium (which you shouldn’t do) and reacted emotionally (which I try to avoid)
Please accept my sincere apologies
I didn’t intentionally take it out of context. You must know the guys here would 100% make that argument. I went with it because it stood out to me, like god damn even Tequilla believes this shit. But I was wrong, so sorry I called you a dumb fuck.
I don’t really get the problem with taking things to another medium part but I won’t do it to you since you so strenuously object to it.
It’s really because people take things out of context and we live in a society where people are trying to play Gotcha
I really do try to see both sides of arguments and over the years have found more patience for listening
I’m aware of how some people here interpret things but I also think it’s important to not lump people together and stereotype as well ... don’t get anywhere by doing that
I’m definitely open to people reaching out and asking me something and will respond ... I’m not very thrilled though when people try to put me on blast particularly when not asking me about something directly first
I always find it amusing that you never hear anybody talk about global warming in times likes these
That’s you ^^^^
How did I misrepresent what you said?
It’s called sarcasm
When heat related events take place (notably hurricanes) ... everybody is really quick to point out the link between the event and temperature
Yet when really abnormal events swing the other way there’s never a recognition that things swing the other way as well
My point is that what bothers me most about climate change advocates is that they cherry pick events to their narrative ... it’s off putting
You want to show evidence that the effects of climate change results in greater volatility in weather ... I’m listening
You want to talk about observable data that we need to address ... I’m open to talking about how that is done
But I will always be critical of those that selectively use data to advance a pre-determined conclusion
Wait what? I think the primary term has changed from “global warming” to “climate change” for this exact reason. These extreme weather events aren’t always just warm weather events. And I think climate change activists are using this cold snap as evidence for their agenda, not dismissing it and being quiet about it.
I think the bigger issue is that people just can’t grasp the concept of small sample sizes. Just because the average temp is increasing over time doesn’t mean we can’t still have extreme cold snaps like this occasionally as well.
I always find it amusing that you never hear anybody talk about global warming in times likes these
That’s you ^^^^
How did I misrepresent what you said?
It’s called sarcasm
When heat related events take place (notably hurricanes) ... everybody is really quick to point out the link between the event and temperature
Yet when really abnormal events swing the other way there’s never a recognition that things swing the other way as well
My point is that what bothers me most about climate change advocates is that they cherry pick events to their narrative ... it’s off putting
You want to show evidence that the effects of climate change results in greater volatility in weather ... I’m listening
You want to talk about observable data that we need to address ... I’m open to talking about how that is done
But I will always be critical of those that selectively use data to advance a pre-determined conclusion
Wait what? I think the primary term has changed from “global warming” to “climate change” for this exact reason. These extreme weather events aren’t always just warm weather events. And I think climate change activists are using this cold snap as evidence for their agenda, not dismissing it and being quiet about it.
I think the bigger issue is that people just can’t grasp the concept of small sample sizes. Just because the average temp is increasing over time doesn’t mean we can’t still have extreme cold snaps like this occasionally as well.
Climate change is a thing. Man-made climate change is a thing.
To what degree we have an effect one way or the other is highly debatable, and weather =/= climate.
I’m not convinced that we need to take drastic measures to prevent any kind of global catastrophe in the near term, and climate activists really hurt their own cause with with the ridiculous and opportunistic fear mongering, but I am convinced that clean energy is a worthwhile endeavour to pursue, mainly because it’s difficult to argue that pollution has a negative affect on our species and those that we share the planet with.
All that said, the US has done a relatively good job over the last decade of reducing carbon emissions, and there’s room for further improvement, as the creation of markets continues to take shape along the supply/demand curve.
We aren’t too* far away from real competition with fossil fuels, as price continues to come down, but we aren’t there yet, and we probably aren’t nearly as close as people like TKS would like to dream. To that end, it makes zero sense to cut our own noses off by doing things like cancel job-producing projects like Keystone XL, which only serve to weaken our economic position in the existing dominant global energy market of O/G.
I am not a weather specialist nor do I claim to know anything about the detailed content of the atmosphere and how each element affects the weather. How much do humans impact the weather/climate is all a mystery to me.
What I disagree with is "a consensus of" being the determining factor in totally changing our? economy. Joining in with the Paris Accords that set guide lines that cost the US and does nothing to the other nations that join but do nothing that the accord outlined.
Follow the money and the actual estimates of the impact these changes would make. It is more like trying to pick the fly shit out of the pepper.
Climate change is not a proven science it is a best guess. Too many politicians world wide are making too much money off this science
Anyone who supports the GND is not a futurist. They are a Luddite.
Almost every CO2 fossil fuel can be engineered to burn longer and cleaner, reducing their CO2 output and contribution to the Greenhouse Effect.
We will never get rid of fossil fuels as long as China, Russia, and India exist.
Effective policies focus on conservation, reduced consumption and higher efficiency and yields.
Idiots and only idiots dream of zero emission policies, which do nothing but ruin people's lives, increase suffering, foist increased energy costs upon lower classes, and fail at spectacular rates to hit their targets.
Those stupid "we believe in science" yard signs are parodies, pseudo intellectual, and cult-membership signals, nothing more.
Renewables would create more jobs. Why would we choose to go down the path that has more serious risks, creates nuclear waste and doesn’t create enough jobs?
Comments
I was pretty pissed in the moment (still not happy) about you taking things out of context and reacting on a different medium (which you shouldn’t do) and reacted emotionally (which I try to avoid)
Please accept my sincere apologies
Don’t be a twister.
I prefer to just skip right to it and call him a fool immediately.
Your apology is so Beta. Was it sarcasm? Why do you care what that dude thinks? It’s entertaining pushing these dunces away from reality.
Zero BidenBros to be found.
I can’t expect others to act in a more civilized manner if I don’t take my own advice right? And the least that I can do if I make a mistake is to own it.
I think the bigger issue is that people just can’t grasp the concept of small sample sizes. Just because the average temp is increasing over time doesn’t mean we can’t still have extreme cold snaps like this occasionally as well.
I don’t really get the problem with taking things to another medium part but I won’t do it to you since you so strenuously object to it.
I really do try to see both sides of arguments and over the years have found more patience for listening
I’m aware of how some people here interpret things but I also think it’s important to not lump people together and stereotype as well ... don’t get anywhere by doing that
I’m definitely open to people reaching out and asking me something and will respond ... I’m not very thrilled though when people try to put me on blast particularly when not asking me about something directly first
The planet is billions of years old
Oh and the climate changes. No shit
Let's start a religion
Trump's fault.
Man-made climate change is a thing.
To what degree we have an effect one way or the other is highly debatable, and weather =/= climate.
I’m not convinced that we need to take drastic measures to prevent any kind of global catastrophe in the near term, and climate activists really hurt their own cause with with the ridiculous and opportunistic fear mongering, but I am convinced that clean energy is a worthwhile endeavour to pursue, mainly because it’s difficult to argue that pollution has a negative affect on our species and those that we share the planet with.
All that said, the US has done a relatively good job over the last decade of reducing carbon emissions, and there’s room for further improvement, as the creation of markets continues to take shape along the supply/demand curve.
We aren’t too* far away from real competition with fossil fuels, as price continues to come down, but we aren’t there yet, and we probably aren’t nearly as close as people like TKS would like to dream. To that end, it makes zero sense to cut our own noses off by doing things like cancel job-producing projects like Keystone XL, which only serve to weaken our economic position in the existing dominant global energy market of O/G.
What I disagree with is "a consensus of" being the determining factor in totally changing our? economy. Joining in with the Paris Accords that set guide lines that cost the US and does nothing to the other nations that join but do nothing that the accord outlined.
Follow the money and the actual estimates of the impact these changes would make. It is more like trying to pick the fly shit out of the pepper.
Climate change is not a proven science it is a best guess. Too many politicians world wide are making too much money off this science
Almost every CO2 fossil fuel can be engineered to burn longer and cleaner, reducing their CO2 output and contribution to the Greenhouse Effect.
We will never get rid of fossil fuels as long as China, Russia, and India exist.
Effective policies focus on conservation, reduced consumption and higher efficiency and yields.
Idiots and only idiots dream of zero emission policies, which do nothing but ruin people's lives, increase suffering, foist increased energy costs upon lower classes, and fail at spectacular rates to hit their targets.
Those stupid "we believe in science" yard signs are parodies, pseudo intellectual, and cult-membership signals, nothing more.