Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.
Kobe Bitch
Comments
-
It’s really because people take things out of context and we live in a society where people are trying to play GotchaTheKobeStopper said:
I didn’t intentionally take it out of context. You must know the guys here would 100% make that argument. I went with it because it stood out to me, like god damn even Tequilla believes this shit. But I was wrong, so sorry I called you a dumb fuck.Tequilla said:And @TheKobeStopper apologies for using “Bitch” in the thread title ...
I was pretty pissed in the moment (still not happy) about you taking things out of context and reacting on a different medium (which you shouldn’t do) and reacted emotionally (which I try to avoid)
Please accept my sincere apologies
I don’t really get the problem with taking things to another medium part but I won’t do it to you since you so strenuously object to it.
I really do try to see both sides of arguments and over the years have found more patience for listening
I’m aware of how some people here interpret things but I also think it’s important to not lump people together and stereotype as well ... don’t get anywhere by doing that
I’m definitely open to people reaching out and asking me something and will respond ... I’m not very thrilled though when people try to put me on blast particularly when not asking me about something directly first -
Small sample size is the pointMiley_Cyrus said:
Wait what? I think the primary term has changed from “global warming” to “climate change” for this exact reason. These extreme weather events aren’t always just warm weather events. And I think climate change activists are using this cold snap as evidence for their agenda, not dismissing it and being quiet about it.Tequilla said:
It’s called sarcasmTheKobeStopper said:I always find it amusing that you never hear anybody talk about global warming in times likes these
That’s you ^^^^
How did I misrepresent what you said?
When heat related events take place (notably hurricanes) ... everybody is really quick to point out the link between the event and temperature
Yet when really abnormal events swing the other way there’s never a recognition that things swing the other way as well
My point is that what bothers me most about climate change advocates is that they cherry pick events to their narrative ... it’s off putting
You want to show evidence that the effects of climate change results in greater volatility in weather ... I’m listening
You want to talk about observable data that we need to address ... I’m open to talking about how that is done
But I will always be critical of those that selectively use data to advance a pre-determined conclusion
I think the bigger issue is that people just can’t grasp the concept of small sample sizes. Just because the average temp is increasing over time doesn’t mean we can’t still have extreme cold snaps like this occasionally as well.
The planet is billions of years old
Oh and the climate changes. No shit
Let's start a religion -
It's snowed yesterday.RaceBannon said:
Small sample size is the pointMiley_Cyrus said:
Wait what? I think the primary term has changed from “global warming” to “climate change” for this exact reason. These extreme weather events aren’t always just warm weather events. And I think climate change activists are using this cold snap as evidence for their agenda, not dismissing it and being quiet about it.Tequilla said:
It’s called sarcasmTheKobeStopper said:I always find it amusing that you never hear anybody talk about global warming in times likes these
That’s you ^^^^
How did I misrepresent what you said?
When heat related events take place (notably hurricanes) ... everybody is really quick to point out the link between the event and temperature
Yet when really abnormal events swing the other way there’s never a recognition that things swing the other way as well
My point is that what bothers me most about climate change advocates is that they cherry pick events to their narrative ... it’s off putting
You want to show evidence that the effects of climate change results in greater volatility in weather ... I’m listening
You want to talk about observable data that we need to address ... I’m open to talking about how that is done
But I will always be critical of those that selectively use data to advance a pre-determined conclusion
I think the bigger issue is that people just can’t grasp the concept of small sample sizes. Just because the average temp is increasing over time doesn’t mean we can’t still have extreme cold snaps like this occasionally as well.
The planet is billions of years old
Oh and the climate changes. No shit
Let's start a religion
Trump's fault.
-
Climate change is a thing.
Man-made climate change is a thing.
To what degree we have an effect one way or the other is highly debatable, and weather =/= climate.
I’m not convinced that we need to take drastic measures to prevent any kind of global catastrophe in the near term, and climate activists really hurt their own cause with with the ridiculous and opportunistic fear mongering, but I am convinced that clean energy is a worthwhile endeavour to pursue, mainly because it’s difficult to argue that pollution has a negative affect on our species and those that we share the planet with.
All that said, the US has done a relatively good job over the last decade of reducing carbon emissions, and there’s room for further improvement, as the creation of markets continues to take shape along the supply/demand curve.
We aren’t too* far away from real competition with fossil fuels, as price continues to come down, but we aren’t there yet, and we probably aren’t nearly as close as people like TKS would like to dream. To that end, it makes zero sense to cut our own noses off by doing things like cancel job-producing projects like Keystone XL, which only serve to weaken our economic position in the existing dominant global energy market of O/G.
-
I am not a weather specialist nor do I claim to know anything about the detailed content of the atmosphere and how each element affects the weather. How much do humans impact the weather/climate is all a mystery to me.
What I disagree with is "a consensus of" being the determining factor in totally changing our? economy. Joining in with the Paris Accords that set guide lines that cost the US and does nothing to the other nations that join but do nothing that the accord outlined.
Follow the money and the actual estimates of the impact these changes would make. It is more like trying to pick the fly shit out of the pepper.
Climate change is not a proven science it is a best guess. Too many politicians world wide are making too much money off this science -
Kobe, why no nuclear?
-
It’s not on his Cheat Sheet
-
-
Anyone who supports the GND is not a futurist. They are a Luddite.
Almost every CO2 fossil fuel can be engineered to burn longer and cleaner, reducing their CO2 output and contribution to the Greenhouse Effect.
We will never get rid of fossil fuels as long as China, Russia, and India exist.
Effective policies focus on conservation, reduced consumption and higher efficiency and yields.
Idiots and only idiots dream of zero emission policies, which do nothing but ruin people's lives, increase suffering, foist increased energy costs upon lower classes, and fail at spectacular rates to hit their targets.
Those stupid "we believe in science" yard signs are parodies, pseudo intellectual, and cult-membership signals, nothing more. -
Renewables would create more jobs. Why would we choose to go down the path that has more serious risks, creates nuclear waste and doesn’t create enough jobs?Bob_C said:Kobe, why no nuclear?
-
Paris Accords? Paris can't even get drugs out of the Tour de France, for fuck sake. The corruption in Europe is as bad as anything Nike does in the U.S.LebamDawg said:I am not a weather specialist nor do I claim to know anything about the detailed content of the atmosphere and how each element affects the weather. How much do humans impact the weather/climate is all a mystery to me.
What I disagree with is "a consensus of" being the determining factor in totally changing our? economy. Joining in with the Paris Accords that set guide lines that cost the US and does nothing to the other nations that join but do nothing that the accord outlined.
Follow the money and the actual estimates of the impact these changes would make. It is more like trying to pick the fly shit out of the pepper.
Climate change is not a proven science it is a best guess. Too many politicians world wide are making too much money off this science
Fuck Europe and Fuck Nike. -
How do you dispose of the batteries and the old windmills and solar panels?TheKobeStopper said:
Renewables would create more jobs. Why would we choose to go down the path that has more serious risks, creates nuclear waste and doesn’t create enough jobs?Bob_C said:Kobe, why no nuclear?
And renewables creating more jobs is more bullshit
Biden is killing jobs one month in. -
Renewables cost jobs and Biden just cancelled 70K good paying union jobs so one of his donors could make billions with his train cars. By the way the pipeline is far safer and uses far less energy than transporting the oil in tank cars but then it's not really about the environment.TheKobeStopper said:
Renewables would create more jobs. Why would we choose to go down the path that has more serious risks, creates nuclear waste and doesn’t create enough jobs?Bob_C said:Kobe, why no nuclear?
-
So the GND is about jobs then? I thought it was about carbon emissions.TheKobeStopper said:
Renewables would create more jobs. Why would we choose to go down the path that has more serious risks, creates nuclear waste and doesn’t create enough jobs?Bob_C said:Kobe, why no nuclear?
Digging holes and filling them in isn’t adding actual producing anything.
-
Organic farming by hand would create more jobs and cut fossil fuels.
-
And a head of lettuce would cost $50doogie said:Organic farming by hand would create more jobs and cut fossil fuels.
-
This is just the “universal healthcare has wait lines” trick. You haven’t proven that it’s worse, just that it’s not perfect. But there is no perfect, Race. Even in my communist utopia and Trump’s white ethno state, there would still be problems.RaceBannon said:
How do you dispose of the batteries and the old windmills and solar panels?TheKobeStopper said:
Renewables would create more jobs. Why would we choose to go down the path that has more serious risks, creates nuclear waste and doesn’t create enough jobs?Bob_C said:Kobe, why no nuclear?
And renewables creating more jobs is more bullshit
Biden is killing jobs one month in. -
Does that mean you're finally going to get one?TheKobeStopper said:
Renewables would create more jobs. Why would we choose to go down the path that has more serious risks, creates nuclear waste and doesn’t create enough jobs?Bob_C said:Kobe, why no nuclear?
A job, that is.
-
There is no perfect. You are on the edge of reason and understanding. Don't stop now. Keep goingTheKobeStopper said:
This is just the “universal healthcare has wait lines” trick. You haven’t proven that it’s worse, just that it’s not perfect. But there is no perfect, Race. Even in my communist utopia and Trump’s white ethno state, there would still be problems.RaceBannon said:
How do you dispose of the batteries and the old windmills and solar panels?TheKobeStopper said:
Renewables would create more jobs. Why would we choose to go down the path that has more serious risks, creates nuclear waste and doesn’t create enough jobs?Bob_C said:Kobe, why no nuclear?
And renewables creating more jobs is more bullshit
Biden is killing jobs one month in.
Carbon is the best and you can't prove it isn't
If you are advocating bullshit solutions that leave people freezing you need to make your case. My case has been made. By science. Nothing is more efficient than carbon> Nothing
Its a little thing we like to call science
-
I, personally, don’t view battery disposal as equally bad as destroying the planet. But, hey, efficiency!RaceBannon said:
There is no perfect. You are on the edge of reason and understanding. Don't stop now. Keep goingTheKobeStopper said:
This is just the “universal healthcare has wait lines” trick. You haven’t proven that it’s worse, just that it’s not perfect. But there is no perfect, Race. Even in my communist utopia and Trump’s white ethno state, there would still be problems.RaceBannon said:
How do you dispose of the batteries and the old windmills and solar panels?TheKobeStopper said:
Renewables would create more jobs. Why would we choose to go down the path that has more serious risks, creates nuclear waste and doesn’t create enough jobs?Bob_C said:Kobe, why no nuclear?
And renewables creating more jobs is more bullshit
Biden is killing jobs one month in.
Carbon is the best and you can't prove it isn't
If you are advocating bullshit solutions that leave people freezing you need to make your case. My case has been made. By science. Nothing is more efficient than carbon> Nothing
Its a little thing we like to call science -
Destroying the planetTheKobeStopper said:
I, personally, don’t view battery disposal as equally bad as destroying the planet. But, hey, efficiency!RaceBannon said:
There is no perfect. You are on the edge of reason and understanding. Don't stop now. Keep goingTheKobeStopper said:
This is just the “universal healthcare has wait lines” trick. You haven’t proven that it’s worse, just that it’s not perfect. But there is no perfect, Race. Even in my communist utopia and Trump’s white ethno state, there would still be problems.RaceBannon said:
How do you dispose of the batteries and the old windmills and solar panels?TheKobeStopper said:
Renewables would create more jobs. Why would we choose to go down the path that has more serious risks, creates nuclear waste and doesn’t create enough jobs?Bob_C said:Kobe, why no nuclear?
And renewables creating more jobs is more bullshit
Biden is killing jobs one month in.
Carbon is the best and you can't prove it isn't
If you are advocating bullshit solutions that leave people freezing you need to make your case. My case has been made. By science. Nothing is more efficient than carbon> Nothing
Its a little thing we like to call science
Or to put it another way support 7 billion people in the highest standard of living in recorded human history
This is why you people can't be trusted to be in charge
By the way we are down to about 7 years now according to your cult leader. What difference does it make? -
Anyone who supports the GND is a pants-shitting moron. HTH
-
People I know in Canada and England would say fuck off.TheKobeStopper said:
This is just the “universal healthcare has wait lines” trick. You haven’t proven that it’s worse, just that it’s not perfect. But there is no perfect, Race. Even in my communist utopia and Trump’s white ethno state, there would still be problems.RaceBannon said:
How do you dispose of the batteries and the old windmills and solar panels?TheKobeStopper said:
Renewables would create more jobs. Why would we choose to go down the path that has more serious risks, creates nuclear waste and doesn’t create enough jobs?Bob_C said:Kobe, why no nuclear?
And renewables creating more jobs is more bullshit
Biden is killing jobs one month in. -
Yet another "Trump's a Nazi" hoax, swallowed whole by APAG.TheKobeStopper said:
This is just the “universal healthcare has wait lines” trick. You haven’t proven that it’s worse, just that it’s not perfect. But there is no perfect, Race. Even in my communist utopia and Trump’s white ethno state, there would still be problems.RaceBannon said:
How do you dispose of the batteries and the old windmills and solar panels?TheKobeStopper said:
Renewables would create more jobs. Why would we choose to go down the path that has more serious risks, creates nuclear waste and doesn’t create enough jobs?Bob_C said:Kobe, why no nuclear?
And renewables creating more jobs is more bullshit
Biden is killing jobs one month in.
Hint: Repeating dumb lies reflects poorly upon you, APAG. HTH -
You have no clue where and how Lithium is mined, do you, APAG?TheKobeStopper said:
I, personally, don’t view battery disposal as equally bad as destroying the planet. But, hey, efficiency!RaceBannon said:
There is no perfect. You are on the edge of reason and understanding. Don't stop now. Keep goingTheKobeStopper said:
This is just the “universal healthcare has wait lines” trick. You haven’t proven that it’s worse, just that it’s not perfect. But there is no perfect, Race. Even in my communist utopia and Trump’s white ethno state, there would still be problems.RaceBannon said:
How do you dispose of the batteries and the old windmills and solar panels?TheKobeStopper said:
Renewables would create more jobs. Why would we choose to go down the path that has more serious risks, creates nuclear waste and doesn’t create enough jobs?Bob_C said:Kobe, why no nuclear?
And renewables creating more jobs is more bullshit
Biden is killing jobs one month in.
Carbon is the best and you can't prove it isn't
If you are advocating bullshit solutions that leave people freezing you need to make your case. My case has been made. By science. Nothing is more efficient than carbon> Nothing
Its a little thing we like to call science
And you have no clue how damaging it is to the land and water where it's mined, either.
Google it, shill. And learn something. -
You guys suddenly pretending to care about things will never get old.TurdBomber said:
You have no clue where and how Lithium is mined, do you, APAG?TheKobeStopper said:
I, personally, don’t view battery disposal as equally bad as destroying the planet. But, hey, efficiency!RaceBannon said:
There is no perfect. You are on the edge of reason and understanding. Don't stop now. Keep goingTheKobeStopper said:
This is just the “universal healthcare has wait lines” trick. You haven’t proven that it’s worse, just that it’s not perfect. But there is no perfect, Race. Even in my communist utopia and Trump’s white ethno state, there would still be problems.RaceBannon said:
How do you dispose of the batteries and the old windmills and solar panels?TheKobeStopper said:
Renewables would create more jobs. Why would we choose to go down the path that has more serious risks, creates nuclear waste and doesn’t create enough jobs?Bob_C said:Kobe, why no nuclear?
And renewables creating more jobs is more bullshit
Biden is killing jobs one month in.
Carbon is the best and you can't prove it isn't
If you are advocating bullshit solutions that leave people freezing you need to make your case. My case has been made. By science. Nothing is more efficient than carbon> Nothing
Its a little thing we like to call science
And you have no clue how damaging it is to the land and water where it's mined, either.
Google it, shill. And learn something.
Democrat in the White House? The debt!
Renewable energy? The environment!
You’re only fooling yourselves. -
That's the lie. Economic efficiency creates wealth and jobs. If natural gas is cheaper than solar, then mandating solar doesn't create jobs. It's a job killer. That's just basic Econ 101. Like the Slobberer's labor theory of wealth, when you ignore the real theory of wealth, supply and demand, you will be North Korea or Venezuela. There is a real world economic laboratory out there and this thing called history.TheKobeStopper said:
Renewables would create more jobs. Why would we choose to go down the path that has more serious risks, creates nuclear waste and doesn’t create enough jobs?Bob_C said:Kobe, why no nuclear?
-
Fuck You, Hypocrite. If you weren't such a dumb, lazy sap, you might realize how long and hard you've been played by your own puppet-masters.TheKobeStopper said:
You guys suddenly pretending to care about things will never get old.TurdBomber said:
You have no clue where and how Lithium is mined, do you, APAG?TheKobeStopper said:
I, personally, don’t view battery disposal as equally bad as destroying the planet. But, hey, efficiency!RaceBannon said:
There is no perfect. You are on the edge of reason and understanding. Don't stop now. Keep goingTheKobeStopper said:
This is just the “universal healthcare has wait lines” trick. You haven’t proven that it’s worse, just that it’s not perfect. But there is no perfect, Race. Even in my communist utopia and Trump’s white ethno state, there would still be problems.RaceBannon said:
How do you dispose of the batteries and the old windmills and solar panels?TheKobeStopper said:
Renewables would create more jobs. Why would we choose to go down the path that has more serious risks, creates nuclear waste and doesn’t create enough jobs?Bob_C said:Kobe, why no nuclear?
And renewables creating more jobs is more bullshit
Biden is killing jobs one month in.
Carbon is the best and you can't prove it isn't
If you are advocating bullshit solutions that leave people freezing you need to make your case. My case has been made. By science. Nothing is more efficient than carbon> Nothing
Its a little thing we like to call science
And you have no clue how damaging it is to the land and water where it's mined, either.
Google it, shill. And learn something.
Democrat in the White House? The debt!
Renewable energy? The environment!
You’re only fooling yourselves.
So long as the actual costs of lithium production are poisoning the water supplies and killing children overseas, out of sight and out of mind, you can continue to pretend you're more virtuous and humane than a guy who transparently burns domestically-produced gas or diesel in his pickup to do a necessary job and provide for himself.
Keep sucking off big government, idiot. You'll be one of the first useful idiots tossed lifeless into the pit if the people you support ever take power.
Meanwhile, enjoy your blissful ignorance. -
4th Generation Nuclear plants consume their own waste on-site, thereby reducing the net generated waste footprint to zero.TheKobeStopper said:
Renewables would create more jobs. Why would we choose to go down the path that has more serious risks, creates nuclear waste and doesn’t create enough jobs?Bob_C said:Kobe, why no nuclear?
But you have to read above a 4th grade level to know this, APAG. -
Oh wow, so cool. Where are these 4th gen plants in use?TurdBomber said:
4th Generation Nuclear plants consume their own waste on-site, thereby reducing the net generated waste footprint to zero.TheKobeStopper said:
Renewables would create more jobs. Why would we choose to go down the path that has more serious risks, creates nuclear waste and doesn’t create enough jobs?Bob_C said:Kobe, why no nuclear?
But you have to read above a 4th grade level to know this, APAG.
