Tryon had potential but was overall nothing special.
Arians looks to be getting him to play to his potential.
Unless Cal and Oregon and Utahs 2019 offensive line was NFL calber.
He was awesome vs utah and not so vs cal and oregon.
He was just coming into his own and his college career ended.
It's stupid to evaluate him based on results alone unless you have an agenda. PGOS's agenda is to contradict DDY and Coker at every perceived opportunity. Others want to emulate them. Some want to cling to his slow start in 2019, others ignore that entirely and only see where he was at the end.
It all matters and everyone is party right. I thought Tryon was a future first rounder based in his general freakishness, but was still waiting for him to show it at UW. He didn't. I called him a bad early pick because he hadn't proven anything to me in the field even though I thought it was just a matter of time.
I was half wrong there, it seems. He's kicking ass.
I'm sorry but these are about as far off from the 1991 unis as you can get while trying to mimic them. I like them if they didn't call them '91 throwbacks
This Coker fella seems to be out to lunch. Logistics is not an issue. However, the team showing up on an Argosy Cruises boat would look cheesy. Unless, this Coker guy knows of some other types of boat that could haul the entire team to the stadium.
How about not worrying about the silly "greatest setting" marketing ploy and instead prioritizing winning? No one cares about the setting, view, etc. if you keep fielding mediocre teams.
Nothing is more trite than "the greatest setting in college football".
This Coker fella seems to be out to lunch. Logistics is not an issue. However, the team showing up on an Argosy Cruises boat would look cheesy. Unless, this Coker guy knows of some other types of boat that could haul the entire team to the stadium.
How about not worrying about the silly "greatest setting" marketing ploy and instead prioritizing winning? No one cares about the setting, view, etc. if you keep fielding mediocre teams.
Nothing is more trite than "the greatest setting in college football".
I’m thinking the best entry via the lake is on Higgins boats AKA landing craft. Maybe have a few walk-on players parachute into the stadium to give it an overall invasion feeling.
This Coker fella seems to be out to lunch. Logistics is not an issue. However, the team showing up on an Argosy Cruises boat would look cheesy. Unless, this Coker guy knows of some other types of boat that could haul the entire team to the stadium.
How about not worrying about the silly "greatest setting" marketing ploy and instead prioritizing winning? No one cares about the setting, view, etc. if you keep fielding mediocre teams.
Nothing is more trite than "the greatest setting in college football".
Washington State Ferry, Bezos Yacht, who says they all have to be on one boat? Husky navy would love to do it or 100k can get a Jetski for the everyone on the team.
This Coker fella seems to be out to lunch. Logistics is not an issue. However, the team showing up on an Argosy Cruises boat would look cheesy. Unless, this Coker guy knows of some other types of boat that could haul the entire team to the stadium.
How about not worrying about the silly "greatest setting" marketing ploy and instead prioritizing winning? No one cares about the setting, view, etc. if you keep fielding mediocre teams.
Nothing is more trite than "the greatest setting in college football".
Love this account, hate this point.
Yes the greatest setting thing is way overdone.
But bringing the team in off the water would be epic. Even if it were just once or twice a year it would badass.
This would be letting the setting speak for itself, completely unlike sending a helmet car around the field with a flag declaring "Greatest Setting".
With how long before the game the players arrive at the stadium, who exactly would this be broadcasting UW's awesomeness to? The tailgaters who already think UW is awesome? There would be no TV crew there yet or anything.
Comments
I only contradict them when theyre wrong.
Which, admittedly, is often
Now do the 1985 national championship unis
And we missed the 60th anniversary last season
Quite honestly I'm sure you're right
How about not worrying about the silly "greatest setting" marketing ploy and instead prioritizing winning? No one cares about the setting, view, etc. if you keep fielding mediocre teams.
Nothing is more trite than "the greatest setting in college football".
Or just you know win all the games
Yes the greatest setting thing is way overdone.
But bringing the team in off the water would be epic. Even if it were just once or twice a year it would badass.
This would be letting the setting speak for itself, completely unlike sending a helmet car around the field with a flag declaring "Greatest Setting".