Attn Trumptards: time to let it go

Sledog

Bob_C said:

insinceredawg said:

I never thought doogie would be the voice of reason for the Trumptards. What a plot twist.

I

Give him his intelligence briefings, who cares.

What does giving up even mean? Does it mean quit asking questions?

Biden is going to win. Some fraud it seems, who knows the scale or impact. There is zero doubt that there are some insanely shitty processes out there, digging more exposes those and will hopefully fix things going forward. Do you disagree with that?

I do. Allowing a cheated win sets precedent. It's OK cheat all you want precedent. Letting the cheaters control the system isn't going to make it better it'll make it far worse as they will ensure they can do it again to hold power.

doogie

Sledog said:

Bob_C said:

insinceredawg said:

I never thought doogie would be the voice of reason for the Trumptards. What a plot twist.

I

Give him his intelligence briefings, who cares.

What does giving up even mean? Does it mean quit asking questions?

Biden is going to win. Some fraud it seems, who knows the scale or impact. There is zero doubt that there are some insanely shitty processes out there, digging more exposes those and will hopefully fix things going forward. Do you disagree with that?

I do. Allowing a cheated win sets precedent. It's OK cheat all you want precedent. Letting the cheaters control the system isn't going to make it better it'll make it far worse as they will ensure they can do it again to hold power.

And?

PurpleThrobber

dflea said:

This reminds me of the "Diebold!!" cries of yesteryear.

Those folks wound up pretty disappointed as I recall.

Don't twist.

Very simple question:

Why would the election software developer push down an ‘update’ in the middle of the one night where the software is most needed to be most protected against access to and the integrity of the system?

RaceBannon

@doogie 's @MittRomneyDawg impersonation has passed 23 times

Sledog

doogie said:

Sledog said:

Bob_C said:

insinceredawg said:

I never thought doogie would be the voice of reason for the Trumptards. What a plot twist.

I

Give him his intelligence briefings, who cares.

What does giving up even mean? Does it mean quit asking questions?

Biden is going to win. Some fraud it seems, who knows the scale or impact. There is zero doubt that there are some insanely shitty processes out there, digging more exposes those and will hopefully fix things going forward. Do you disagree with that?

I do. Allowing a cheated win sets precedent. It's OK cheat all you want precedent. Letting the cheaters control the system isn't going to make it better it'll make it far worse as they will ensure they can do it again to hold power.

And?

We need to know and we need to bring those responsible to justice. We also need to secure the system.

What's your point? That cheating is good? What is good about not pursuing it?

doogie

Mitt is a clown.

I just call it as I see it.

Now, if Mitt and his band of merry men throw down the Gauntlet on Election Fraud and mount a serious challenge? I could be persuaded this ain’t over.

Instead? We have Trump, alone, mounting a fight leaking out #2024 rumors. Embarrassing.

GrundleStiltzkin

dflea said:

This reminds me of the "Diebold!!" cries of yesteryear.

Those folks wound up pretty disappointed as I recall.

Don't twist.

Forgot about that one.

dflea

PurpleThrobber said:

dflea said:

This reminds me of the "Diebold!!" cries of yesteryear.

Those folks wound up pretty disappointed as I recall.

Don't twist.

Very simple question:

Why would the election software developer push down an ‘update’ in the middle of the one night where the software is most needed to be most protected against access to and the integrity of the system?

I'm not an election official. You should probably ask those folks.

Chances are, someone already did. Or will.

PurpleThrobber

dflea said:

PurpleThrobber said:

dflea said:

This reminds me of the "Diebold!!" cries of yesteryear.

Those folks wound up pretty disappointed as I recall.

Don't twist.

Very simple question:

Why would the election software developer push down an ‘update’ in the middle of the one night where the software is most needed to be most protected against access to and the integrity of the system?

I'm not an election official. You should probably ask those folks.

Chances are, someone already did. Or will.

Take a guess. Speculate if you shall. One hit of sativa/one indica....what possible answer might there be?

RaceBannon

GrundleStiltzkin said:

dflea said:

This reminds me of the "Diebold!!" cries of yesteryear.

Those folks wound up pretty disappointed as I recall.

Don't twist.

Forgot about that one.

Not me

DarthRepublikan was a big proponent along with a lot of folks here who would prefer it was forgotten

Diebold was the key to the GOP stealing elections

Nothing really changes and the democrats will be back and ALL IN on fraud the next time they lose