if you think Biden won
Comments
-
Weird how Dazzler ran away like a Kunt from this thread.SFGbob said:
Got it, so what did the FISA warrants allow them to do Dazzler?HHusky said:
Madam, Sled's allegation wasn't that FISA warrants were issued. We can agree they were. Obama didn't spy on Daddy's campaign.SFGbob said:
What were the FISA warrants for if they weren't spying on the Campaign Dazzler? Shameless liar or just ignorant fool? Take your pick Dazzler.HHusky said:
Biggest contrast: the former actually happened.Sledog said:
Please compare and contrast Nixon's Watergate with Obama's spying on the Trump campaign.HHusky said:
Destroyed for his criminality. Really unfair. Kinda mean even.DerekJohnson said:
He referenced how Nixon took the stately gentleman high road in 1960 and it didn't matter 13 years later when the media ganged up and destroyed him. I was agreeing wholeheartedly with what Race said.HHusky said:
So you responded to Race's remark about Nixon's concession in 1960 because . . .?DerekJohnson said:
This doesn't make sense and it appears that you're intentionally misrepresenting what I said. This is why I disregard most of what you post.HHusky said:
Elected to two terms as President = Run out of townDerekJohnson said:
Yes this is absolutely trueRaceBannon said:Nixon was praised in 1960 for shutting up and taking it as a true statesman. He got his reward by getting the usual full court media hate press and eventually being run out of town
60 years later the GOP still thinks this is a neat strategy.
Stalin agrees -
I think the reason that allocating resources to independent auditors hasn’t gained traction or hardly a mention is that both parties do it.creepycoug said:
Ok. But all of corporate America with publicly traded shares has to be audited and qualified opinions disclosed even though most companies are not ENRON or Worldcom. The threat of loss of faith in capital markets was so severe that we got Sarbanes-Oxley. Nothing works 100% 100% of the time, but large scale corporate fraud and baking the books is a much riskier proposition now than it was 20 years ago.HHusky said:
My biggest issue with that is that it seems to be a check on the honesty of the process based solely upon innuendo and rumor and Twitter and Facebook, etc. Never any evidence.creepycoug said:This may be a naive thought - because I've never been anywhere near the election system and don't know the mechanics - but could the government spare a few hundred million to have the big 4 accounting firms do regional audits? Is there some kind of audit by an outside party not contolled by the government already in place?
It wouldn't have to be every single vote ... just like it's not every single transaction that the independent audit firms do on their conglomerate clients. A statistically significant spot audit. Maybe you do it in states where the vote was within some number of closeness. Maybe you do it in swing states.
IDK. Seems like it's about as fundamental a process as we have in this country. Why not make an effort to ensure it's clean?
The process has many, many checks and safeguards as it is. I can't be the only one who has heard from County Elections to ask whether my now much messier signature really is my signature, for example. The story involving a supposed 118 year old Michigan voter only got identified because people already check; and it's already been explained too. The South Carolina search for the supposed 800 dead voters of several years ago concluded with a goose egg.
Same thing here. If the vote is within some range of difference, why not turn one of the firms loose on it? We piss away $$ at the government level on absolutely nonsense. Why not spend a few hundred million on this?
Wouldn't be the first time the answer to a government problem was found in the private sector.
It just happens that the vid opened up a hole bigger than 3 semis and the Dems seized advantage. While Trump was questioning this 6 months ago, He, like always, received no support to fight it from the Party.
The Party that gained many down ballot spots including a few in the House just because of his presence in the Election.
The gayme was lost months ago when the Party bent over and took it dry to allow mail in ballots to states with no infrastructure to handle it. The Party knew it. It takes at least a year to set up secure mail in elections for a State that didn’t do it. As per my County Clerk acquaintance anyway.
-
This Becker is onto something with Dominion.oregonblitzkrieg said: -
uh oh commies:
https://twitter.com/ShannonBream/status/1324876349107003393?s=20
"BREAKING FROM SCOTUS: Justice Alito has issued an Order than any ballots received after after 8pm on election day in PA be segregated and secured - and if counted, counted separately. There is a petition pending before SCOTUS. Alito orders opposing side to reply by 2p Saturday." -
Reminder to the Tug leftists that it is likely going to be the Supreme Court, not the press, that determines who won
-
I've been a part of the left-wing plot, I know about millions of Trump ballots being destroyed.oregonblitzkrieg said:
Let me just say this: O'Keefe is on the right track. If there is one thing that scares my fellow plotters it is being found out by this intrepid truth-teller.
This could legit turn the election around. I'm pissed and scared. -
Fuck!!! This is going to be big. The left was so close.PostGameOrangeSlices said:uh oh commies:
https://twitter.com/ShannonBream/status/1324876349107003393?s=20
"BREAKING FROM SCOTUS: Justice Alito has issued an Order than any ballots received after after 8pm on election day in PA be segregated and secured - and if counted, counted separately. There is a petition pending before SCOTUS. Alito orders opposing side to reply by 2p Saturday." -
No it won’t. HthPostGameOrangeSlices said:Reminder to the Tug leftists that it is likely going to be the Supreme Court, not the press, that determines who won
-
Oh okay that settles it. Damn.Duckwithabone said:
No it won’t. HthPostGameOrangeSlices said:Reminder to the Tug leftists that it is likely going to be the Supreme Court, not the press, that determines who won
