Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

Suck it, youngsters.

24567

Comments

  • PurpleThrobber
    PurpleThrobber Member Posts: 48,586 Standard Supporter
    Doogles said:

    Half the hall of famers from the 80s would be G League busts today

    Child, please.

    You millies act like Dominique and the rest wouldn't benefit from today's training and nutrition techniques.

  • PandaOrangeChiknDuck
    PandaOrangeChiknDuck Member Posts: 545

    Doogles said:

    Half the hall of famers from the 80s would be G League busts today

    Child, please.

    You millies act like Dominique and the rest wouldn't benefit from today's training and nutrition techniques.

    Let us not forget that breathing on a ball handler now draws a foul.
  • BleachedAnusDawg
    BleachedAnusDawg Member Posts: 13,756 Standard Supporter
    Doogles said:

    Half the hall of famers from the 80s would be G League busts today

    Please point out the would-be busts from the above list.
  • Fenderbender123
    Fenderbender123 Member Posts: 2,989
    I don't like the athleticism argument. Obviously players of today are more athletic...they've had the advantage of growing up in a time when there's better knowledge and equipment for sports training and performance.

    If Michael Jordan had been born in 1995, he'd be stronger, faster, and better at the game today than he was when he was actually 25 due to all those advantages.

    So if you want to take an older player and compare him with today's players, you have to take into account that the older player would be improved if he was born in a more modern era.
  • ThomasFremont
    ThomasFremont Member Posts: 13,325

    I don't like the athleticism argument. Obviously players of today are more athletic...they've had the advantage of growing up in a time when there's better knowledge and equipment for sports training and performance.

    If Michael Jordan had been born in 1995, he'd be stronger, faster, and better at the game today than he was when he was actually 25 due to all those advantages.

    So if you want to take an older player and compare him with today's players, you have to take into account that the older player would be improved if he was born in a more modern era.

    That’s not how this works. Watch people dribble and shoot in the 80s and before.

    Then watch now.

    It’s not just the strength and conditioning difference (which is considerable).

    Guys literally can’t shoot OR dribble.

    Sure they can take an elbow in the face and get back up, but so what? Nobody in their right mind thinks basketball is some full contact blood sport with a ball thrown in.

    But if it was, I’m pretty sure LeBron James would be even more dominant. Can you imagine Isaih Thomas trying to tackle LeBron going to the hoop?


  • Doogles
    Doogles Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 12,800 Founders Club

    I don't like the athleticism argument. Obviously players of today are more athletic...they've had the advantage of growing up in a time when there's better knowledge and equipment for sports training and performance.

    If Michael Jordan had been born in 1995, he'd be stronger, faster, and better at the game today than he was when he was actually 25 due to all those advantages.

    So if you want to take an older player and compare him with today's players, you have to take into account that the older player would be improved if he was born in a more modern era.

    That’s not how this works. Watch people dribble and shoot in the 80s and before.

    Then watch now.

    It’s not just the strength and conditioning difference (which is considerable).

    Guys literally can’t shoot OR dribble.

    Sure they can take an elbow in the face and get back up, but so what? Nobody in their right mind thinks basketball is some full contact blood sport with a ball thrown in.

    But if it was, I’m pretty sure LeBron James would be even more dominant. Can you imagine Isaih Thomas trying to tackle LeBron going to the hoop?


    THIS.

    I watched a finals game rerun of the Celtics Lakers early 80s and I was astonished at the lack of skill. They can't dribble. Just can't. It's really not the athleticism, which we know who wins there, it's the skill level and lack of creativity.

    A perfect test of this is our favorite guy to discuss, Pistol Pete. He's the one guy who actually looks like he has a clue with the basketball and has a more modern look to his game. What does he do? Absolutely shreds the league.

    The level of play is objectively dog shit.

    80s is like playing regular Nintendo, you respect it's first and the future was built from the foundation, but turn on 2k20 on PS4 and get fucked
  • PurpleThrobber
    PurpleThrobber Member Posts: 48,586 Standard Supporter
    edited May 2020

    I don't like the athleticism argument. Obviously players of today are more athletic...they've had the advantage of growing up in a time when there's better knowledge and equipment for sports training and performance.

    If Michael Jordan had been born in 1995, he'd be stronger, faster, and better at the game today than he was when he was actually 25 due to all those advantages.

    So if you want to take an older player and compare him with today's players, you have to take into account that the older player would be improved if he was born in a more modern era.

    That’s not how this works. Watch people dribble and shoot in the 80s and before.

    Then watch now.

    It’s not just the strength and conditioning difference (which is considerable).

    Guys literally can’t shoot OR dribble.

    Sure they can take an elbow in the face and get back up, but so what? Nobody in their right mind thinks basketball is some full contact blood sport with a ball thrown in.

    But if it was, I’m pretty sure LeBron James would be even more dominant. Can you imagine Isaih Thomas trying to tackle LeBron going to the hoop?


    I don't like the athleticism argument. Obviously players of today are more athletic...they've had the advantage of growing up in a time when there's better knowledge and equipment for sports training and performance.

    If Michael Jordan had been born in 1995, he'd be stronger, faster, and better at the game today than he was when he was actually 25 due to all those advantages.

    So if you want to take an older player and compare him with today's players, you have to take into account that the older player would be improved if he was born in a more modern era.

    That’s not how this works. Watch people dribble and shoot in the 80s and before.

    Then watch now.

    It’s not just the strength and conditioning difference (which is considerable).

    Guys literally can’t shoot OR dribble.

    Sure they can take an elbow in the face and get back up, but so what? Nobody in their right mind thinks basketball is some full contact blood sport with a ball thrown in.

    But if it was, I’m pretty sure LeBron James would be even more dominant. Can you imagine Isaih Thomas trying to tackle LeBron going to the hoop?


    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vbLVKdDotDU

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CExjzyTRxnQ

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lAPu4nLzDbQ

    Pot stirring. Or you're flat ass blind..


    Most likely abundance.

  • BleachedAnusDawg
    BleachedAnusDawg Member Posts: 13,756 Standard Supporter
    Things I've learned in this thread are that Doogles is a retard and Tommy should spend more time with Pumpy.
  • Doogles
    Doogles Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 12,800 Founders Club

    Things I've learned in this thread are that Doogles is a retard and Tommy should spend more time with Pumpy.