Senate impeachment trial game thread

HHusky

Bendintheriver said:

HHusky said:

CuntWaffle said:

HHusky said:

Dude61 said:

Missing from Schiff's opening argument is a clear statement of the crime alleged, the elements to be proved, the structure of the case to follow.

You can't really have been listening. Day drinking? NTTAWWT.

Blah blah blah

If I was defending Daddy, I wouldn’t want to engage on the facts either.

I have asked you for the facts many times and you ran like a scalded dog each and every time. Don't be lecturing others about facts HH.

Yes, I remember your dishonest question. I’m crediting you with dishonesty because to suggest ignorance would be such an insult to a man of your advanced years. The Federalist papers can easily be accessed online. Have you bothered yet?

SFGbob

HHusky said:

UW_Doog_Bot said:

HHusky said:

RaceBannon said:

HHusky said:

UW_Doog_Bot said:

HHusky said:

UW_Doog_Bot said:

HHusky said:

UW_Doog_Bot said:

I'd be perfectly happy if good old Boy Joe and his son Hunter were subpoenaed to testify in the Senate about Burisma like they would have been if the Republicans were allowed to play by the same rules in the House as the Dems were.

Sure. And let’s have Daddy testify as well.

Why would the GOP feel required to do that? Because Schiff wants it? The House Dems played partisan politics and are now crying about partisan politics. It's Hard.

Just thought Daddy would want to explain the timing of his sudden interest in a statement Joe made three years prior.

It's not your daddy's responsibility to testify to his innocence. The burden of proof lies on the prosecution. Did you not learn that at some point in law school?

This is why you're a partisan shill.

I just assumed there was an innocent explanation and that it had nothing to do with the fact Joe had become his chief competitor for the presidency. I thought Daddy would want to clear things up. People can be so cynical about his motives, you know.

Trump cleared it up when he released the transcript.

He was making sure the aid wasn't going down a rat hole and that the corrupt Ukraine government that Obama and Biden used as an ATM was really any different. They got the aid. The military industrial complex got paid. More weapons of death are on the ground

Biden is crooked. Running for president doesn't give you a pass. Just partisan hacks like you have no interest in your frontrunner being a piece of shit Chi Com asset

Partisan hack? I just proposed Joe and Daddy testify. Read gooder!

HH thinks that witnesses just need to testify to their innocence and that the prosecution isn't required to present a case. Even @creepycoug makes a better pretend lawyer.

There are no trial settings in which the defendant can successfully block the testimony of material witnesses. Isn’t civics still required to graduate high school?

The Rats were/are free to go to court and challenge the President's claims of privilege. They chose not to. Don't blame Trump blame the Rats you fucking hack. Why should Trump surrender his rights and due process?

HHusky

SFGbob said:

HHusky said:

UW_Doog_Bot said:

HHusky said:

RaceBannon said:

HHusky said:

UW_Doog_Bot said:

HHusky said:

UW_Doog_Bot said:

HHusky said:

UW_Doog_Bot said:

I'd be perfectly happy if good old Boy Joe and his son Hunter were subpoenaed to testify in the Senate about Burisma like they would have been if the Republicans were allowed to play by the same rules in the House as the Dems were.

Sure. And let’s have Daddy testify as well.

Why would the GOP feel required to do that? Because Schiff wants it? The House Dems played partisan politics and are now crying about partisan politics. It's Hard.

Just thought Daddy would want to explain the timing of his sudden interest in a statement Joe made three years prior.

It's not your daddy's responsibility to testify to his innocence. The burden of proof lies on the prosecution. Did you not learn that at some point in law school?

This is why you're a partisan shill.

I just assumed there was an innocent explanation and that it had nothing to do with the fact Joe had become his chief competitor for the presidency. I thought Daddy would want to clear things up. People can be so cynical about his motives, you know.

Trump cleared it up when he released the transcript.

He was making sure the aid wasn't going down a rat hole and that the corrupt Ukraine government that Obama and Biden used as an ATM was really any different. They got the aid. The military industrial complex got paid. More weapons of death are on the ground

Biden is crooked. Running for president doesn't give you a pass. Just partisan hacks like you have no interest in your frontrunner being a piece of shit Chi Com asset

Partisan hack? I just proposed Joe and Daddy testify. Read gooder!

HH thinks that witnesses just need to testify to their innocence and that the prosecution isn't required to present a case. Even @creepycoug makes a better pretend lawyer.

There are no trial settings in which the defendant can successfully block the testimony of material witnesses. Isn’t civics still required to graduate high school?

The Rats were/are free to go to court and challenge the President's claims of privilege. They chose not to. Don't blame Trump blame the Rats you fucking hack. Why should Trump surrender his rights and due process?

There's no absolute Presidential privilege not to provide information to Congress, blob. And we both know that you're parroting one of the two diametrically opposed positions offered by Daddy's administration on this point.

PurpleThrobber

HHusky said:

Bendintheriver said:

HHusky said:

CuntWaffle said:

HHusky said:

Dude61 said:

Missing from Schiff's opening argument is a clear statement of the crime alleged, the elements to be proved, the structure of the case to follow.

You can't really have been listening. Day drinking? NTTAWWT.

Blah blah blah

If I was defending Daddy, I wouldn’t want to engage on the facts either.

I have asked you for the facts many times and you ran like a scalded dog each and every time. Don't be lecturing others about facts HH.

Yes, I remember your dishonest question. I’m crediting you with dishonesty because to suggest ignorance would be such an insult to a man of your advanced years. The Federalist papers can easily be accessed online. Have you bothered yet?

The United States of America is governed under the Constitution, not the Federalist papers.

Want to try to roll out the Articles of Confederation next?

SFGbob

HHusky said:

SFGbob said:

HHusky said:

UW_Doog_Bot said:

HHusky said:

RaceBannon said:

HHusky said:

UW_Doog_Bot said:

HHusky said:

UW_Doog_Bot said:

HHusky said:

UW_Doog_Bot said:

I'd be perfectly happy if good old Boy Joe and his son Hunter were subpoenaed to testify in the Senate about Burisma like they would have been if the Republicans were allowed to play by the same rules in the House as the Dems were.

Sure. And let’s have Daddy testify as well.

Why would the GOP feel required to do that? Because Schiff wants it? The House Dems played partisan politics and are now crying about partisan politics. It's Hard.

Just thought Daddy would want to explain the timing of his sudden interest in a statement Joe made three years prior.

It's not your daddy's responsibility to testify to his innocence. The burden of proof lies on the prosecution. Did you not learn that at some point in law school?

This is why you're a partisan shill.

I just assumed there was an innocent explanation and that it had nothing to do with the fact Joe had become his chief competitor for the presidency. I thought Daddy would want to clear things up. People can be so cynical about his motives, you know.

Trump cleared it up when he released the transcript.

He was making sure the aid wasn't going down a rat hole and that the corrupt Ukraine government that Obama and Biden used as an ATM was really any different. They got the aid. The military industrial complex got paid. More weapons of death are on the ground

Biden is crooked. Running for president doesn't give you a pass. Just partisan hacks like you have no interest in your frontrunner being a piece of shit Chi Com asset

Partisan hack? I just proposed Joe and Daddy testify. Read gooder!

HH thinks that witnesses just need to testify to their innocence and that the prosecution isn't required to present a case. Even @creepycoug makes a better pretend lawyer.

There are no trial settings in which the defendant can successfully block the testimony of material witnesses. Isn’t civics still required to graduate high school?

The Rats were/are free to go to court and challenge the President's claims of privilege. They chose not to. Don't blame Trump blame the Rats you fucking hack. Why should Trump surrender his rights and due process?

There's no absolute Presidential privilege not to provide information to Congress, blob. And we both know that you're parroting one of the two diametrically opposed positions offered by Daddy's administration on this point.

Then the House Rats should have challenged Trump in court. Go fuck yourself O'Keefed. Don't blame Trump because your team was either too lazy or in too much of a rush to make their case. It's not the Senate's job to clean up their mess.

HHusky

PurpleThrobber said:

HHusky said:

Bendintheriver said:

HHusky said:

CuntWaffle said:

HHusky said:

Dude61 said:

Missing from Schiff's opening argument is a clear statement of the crime alleged, the elements to be proved, the structure of the case to follow.

You can't really have been listening. Day drinking? NTTAWWT.

Blah blah blah

If I was defending Daddy, I wouldn’t want to engage on the facts either.

I have asked you for the facts many times and you ran like a scalded dog each and every time. Don't be lecturing others about facts HH.

Yes, I remember your dishonest question. I’m crediting you with dishonesty because to suggest ignorance would be such an insult to a man of your advanced years. The Federalist papers can easily be accessed online. Have you bothered yet?

The United States of America is governed under the Constitution, not the Federalist papers.

Want to try to roll out the Articles of Confederation next?

You’re free to argue that what the Framers meant by the words they used is irrelevant to the Constitution they adopted. That’s no worse than the rest of your arguments.

HHusky

SFGbob said:

HHusky said:

SFGbob said:

HHusky said:

UW_Doog_Bot said:

HHusky said:

RaceBannon said:

HHusky said:

UW_Doog_Bot said:

HHusky said:

UW_Doog_Bot said:

HHusky said:

UW_Doog_Bot said:

I'd be perfectly happy if good old Boy Joe and his son Hunter were subpoenaed to testify in the Senate about Burisma like they would have been if the Republicans were allowed to play by the same rules in the House as the Dems were.

Sure. And let’s have Daddy testify as well.

Why would the GOP feel required to do that? Because Schiff wants it? The House Dems played partisan politics and are now crying about partisan politics. It's Hard.

Just thought Daddy would want to explain the timing of his sudden interest in a statement Joe made three years prior.

It's not your daddy's responsibility to testify to his innocence. The burden of proof lies on the prosecution. Did you not learn that at some point in law school?

This is why you're a partisan shill.

I just assumed there was an innocent explanation and that it had nothing to do with the fact Joe had become his chief competitor for the presidency. I thought Daddy would want to clear things up. People can be so cynical about his motives, you know.

Trump cleared it up when he released the transcript.

He was making sure the aid wasn't going down a rat hole and that the corrupt Ukraine government that Obama and Biden used as an ATM was really any different. They got the aid. The military industrial complex got paid. More weapons of death are on the ground

Biden is crooked. Running for president doesn't give you a pass. Just partisan hacks like you have no interest in your frontrunner being a piece of shit Chi Com asset

Partisan hack? I just proposed Joe and Daddy testify. Read gooder!

HH thinks that witnesses just need to testify to their innocence and that the prosecution isn't required to present a case. Even @creepycoug makes a better pretend lawyer.

There are no trial settings in which the defendant can successfully block the testimony of material witnesses. Isn’t civics still required to graduate high school?

The Rats were/are free to go to court and challenge the President's claims of privilege. They chose not to. Don't blame Trump blame the Rats you fucking hack. Why should Trump surrender his rights and due process?

There's no absolute Presidential privilege not to provide information to Congress, blob. And we both know that you're parroting one of the two diametrically opposed positions offered by Daddy's administration on this point.

Then the House Rats should have challenged Trump in court. Go fuck yourself O'Keefed. Don't blame Trump because your team was either too lazy or in too much of a rush to make their case. It's not the Senate's job to clean up their mess.

Calm down, blob. We all know the “job” that’s expected of the GOP Senators is to acquit. Relax! That’s in the bag. Only the coverup is in question.

DJDuck

SFGbob

HHusky said:

SFGbob said:

HHusky said:

SFGbob said:

HHusky said:

UW_Doog_Bot said:

HHusky said:

RaceBannon said:

HHusky said:

UW_Doog_Bot said:

HHusky said:

UW_Doog_Bot said:

HHusky said:

UW_Doog_Bot said:

I'd be perfectly happy if good old Boy Joe and his son Hunter were subpoenaed to testify in the Senate about Burisma like they would have been if the Republicans were allowed to play by the same rules in the House as the Dems were.

Sure. And let’s have Daddy testify as well.

Why would the GOP feel required to do that? Because Schiff wants it? The House Dems played partisan politics and are now crying about partisan politics. It's Hard.

Just thought Daddy would want to explain the timing of his sudden interest in a statement Joe made three years prior.

It's not your daddy's responsibility to testify to his innocence. The burden of proof lies on the prosecution. Did you not learn that at some point in law school?

This is why you're a partisan shill.

I just assumed there was an innocent explanation and that it had nothing to do with the fact Joe had become his chief competitor for the presidency. I thought Daddy would want to clear things up. People can be so cynical about his motives, you know.

Trump cleared it up when he released the transcript.

He was making sure the aid wasn't going down a rat hole and that the corrupt Ukraine government that Obama and Biden used as an ATM was really any different. They got the aid. The military industrial complex got paid. More weapons of death are on the ground

Biden is crooked. Running for president doesn't give you a pass. Just partisan hacks like you have no interest in your frontrunner being a piece of shit Chi Com asset

Partisan hack? I just proposed Joe and Daddy testify. Read gooder!

HH thinks that witnesses just need to testify to their innocence and that the prosecution isn't required to present a case. Even @creepycoug makes a better pretend lawyer.

There are no trial settings in which the defendant can successfully block the testimony of material witnesses. Isn’t civics still required to graduate high school?

The Rats were/are free to go to court and challenge the President's claims of privilege. They chose not to. Don't blame Trump blame the Rats you fucking hack. Why should Trump surrender his rights and due process?

There's no absolute Presidential privilege not to provide information to Congress, blob. And we both know that you're parroting one of the two diametrically opposed positions offered by Daddy's administration on this point.

Then the House Rats should have challenged Trump in court. Go fuck yourself O'Keefed. Don't blame Trump because your team was either too lazy or in too much of a rush to make their case. It's not the Senate's job to clean up their mess.

Calm down, blob. We all know the “job” that’s expected of the GOP Senators is to acquit. That’s in the bag. Only the coverup is in question.

White flag. Kunt doesn't even address the fact that the House didn't challenge Trump's privilege claims in Court.

Can you imagine having this Kunt as your attorney? Do you advise your client to turn over information and give statements to opposing counsel they aren't legally required to do so O'Keefed? Do you allow opposing counsel to review all of your client's financial statements and bank records and personal information. Surely you never make any claims of privilege do you not O'Keefed? You just freely turn everything over without even being asked, right Kunt?

2001400ex

PurpleThrobber said:

HHusky said:

Bendintheriver said:

HHusky said:

CuntWaffle said:

HHusky said:

Dude61 said:

Missing from Schiff's opening argument is a clear statement of the crime alleged, the elements to be proved, the structure of the case to follow.

You can't really have been listening. Day drinking? NTTAWWT.

Blah blah blah

If I was defending Daddy, I wouldn’t want to engage on the facts either.

I have asked you for the facts many times and you ran like a scalded dog each and every time. Don't be lecturing others about facts HH.

Yes, I remember your dishonest question. I’m crediting you with dishonesty because to suggest ignorance would be such an insult to a man of your advanced years. The Federalist papers can easily be accessed online. Have you bothered yet?

The United States of America is governed under the Constitution, not the Federalist papers.

Want to try to roll out the Articles of Confederation next?

@MikeDamone true?