Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.
Virginia pro-gun rally draws crowds amid fears of violence
Comments
-
Avoid the Red Rider, you’ll be fine.MikeDamone said:
I'd shoot my eye outSledog said:
Well cowboy up!MikeDamone said:I don’t own any guns.
Unless you're a convicted felon then it'll be fun with Bubba the Love Sponge. -
Yeah never get your kid a BB gun. Get them a pellet gun. BB's are steel and bounce like super balls. Pellets are pure lead and flatten when hitting a hard object.
-
The tree rats in my yard agree.Sledog said:Yeah never get your kid a BB gun. Get them a pellet gun. BB's are steel and bounce like super balls. Pellets are pure lead and flatten when hitting a hard object.
-
Whynotboth.gifSledog said:Yeah never get your kid a BB gun. Get them a pellet gun. BB's are steel and bounce like super balls. Pellets are pure lead and flatten when hitting a hard object.
-
I got a Ruger M77 in .270 for my 14th birthday - I ended a number of deer and elk with that rifle.Swaye said:I still have the first 30-30 I was given for my 12th birthday. Took my first deer with that rifle. Love it. These days I primarily use a 25-06, though I just purchased a 6.5 Creedmore last year and plan to use that next season to see how it does. For a woods gun capable of thumping bear I have a Browning BLR in .358 Winchester that I quite love, though it will wake you up quick when you shoot it.
It's too bad that I lost all my weapons in a tragic boating accident years ago.
Half a dozen kids with goggles and BB guns is just a day of fun in Shelton. My brother got me in the ear lobe one tim - and let me tell you, a Red Ryder shot to the ear stings like hell.Sledog said:Yeah never get your kid a BB gun. Get them a pellet gun. BB's are steel and bounce like super balls. Pellets are pure lead and flatten when hitting a hard object.
-
I laffed for real.Southerndawg said:
Avoid the Red Rider, you’ll be fine.MikeDamone said:
I'd shoot my eye outSledog said:
Well cowboy up!MikeDamone said:I don’t own any guns.
Unless you're a convicted felon then it'll be fun with Bubba the Love Sponge. -
Oh hell yeah we had Red Rider wars! They leave a welt!dflea said:
I got a Ruger M77 in .270 for my 14th birthday - I ended a number of deer and elk with that rifle.Swaye said:I still have the first 30-30 I was given for my 12th birthday. Took my first deer with that rifle. Love it. These days I primarily use a 25-06, though I just purchased a 6.5 Creedmore last year and plan to use that next season to see how it does. For a woods gun capable of thumping bear I have a Browning BLR in .358 Winchester that I quite love, though it will wake you up quick when you shoot it.
It's too bad that I lost all my weapons in a tragic boating accident years ago.
Half a dozen kids with goggles and BB guns is just a day of fun in Shelton. My brother got me in the ear lobe one tim - and let me tell you, a Red Ryder shot to the ear stings like hell.Sledog said:Yeah never get your kid a BB gun. Get them a pellet gun. BB's are steel and bounce like super balls. Pellets are pure lead and flatten when hitting a hard object.
But when my neighboring agency started calling for a SWAT team because kids were running around with air soft guns I'd recommend against it. Besides some pansy ass liberal parent will want to file ADW charges.
Shit when I was a kid we had all the cool toy guns that actually shot stuff. I had a Johnny Eagle M14 and 1911. I was big shit in the hood. -
-
Damn! My phone kicked ass on that post!Swaye said:
And there you have it. True agenda exposed.Sledog said:Virgins dems kill bill targeting criminals with guns. Imagine that. Going to let them vote too.
https://bearingarms.com/cam-e/2020/01/22/virginia-dems-bill-criminals-guns/ -
Welp. Most people didn’t have an internet connection back then. Therefore no Twitter, Facebook and every swinging dick with a camera phone back then. So there’s that. While there was serious political division back then. It wasn’t the outrage era as now because most people only knew what was happening from TV news. And even then, they dictated the narrative. So please stop comparing 1994 to 2020. You’re better.YellowSnow said:
But I hear all this TUFF talk in the Tug about the necessity to demonstrate to the State Government of VA the willingness of patriots to die for their freedom and prevent tyranny. Where were these folks in 1994 when the Federal Assault Weapons ban went into effect? That legislation seemed like far more of an assault on the 2A than anything being proposed today. Why was there no revolt?Sledog said:
DC is still fucked and going back to the supremes as we speak.YellowSnow said:
Don't the courts have to weigh in first before we can conclude if the citizen's of VA have lost a constitutionally protected right? This is step 1 in the process which the Founders intended. Seemed to work out fine for gun owners in Washington, DC last I checked.Sledog said:
Not terrorists but yes they are saying that they will not allow the government to strip their constitutional rights from them. This is the very mechanism the founders intended when the government over reaches and it can't be resolved.DJDuck said:Democratic Governors Association Creative Director Shares Tweet Calling Peaceful Gun-Right Protesters ‘Terrorists’
https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2020/01/democratic-governors-association-creative-director-shares-tweet-calling-peaceful-gun-right-protesters-terrorists/
The left is importing voters that will vote for their free shit. It is a plan to flip the nation in one direction. Socialism is not constitutional either.
Where were the milita bros in 1994 when Clinton signed the AWB? Why didn't they take up arms to defend 2A rights then?
They haven't shot anyone. HTH -
Yes @salemcoog Moore's Law has contributed much to the "us vs them" fight to the death polarization of our body politic. That said, citizens were still engaging is massive protests on various issues of the day well before the internet. I don't recall seeing 2A defenders taking to the streets with semi-auto rifles in protest in 1994 which was my point.salemcoog said:
Welp. Most people didn’t have an internet connection back then. Therefore no Twitter, Facebook and every swinging dick with a camera phone back then. So there’s that. While there was serious political division back then. It wasn’t the outrage era as now because most people only knew what was happening from TV news. And even then, they dictated the narrative. So please stop comparing 1994 to 2020. You’re better.YellowSnow said:
But I hear all this TUFF talk in the Tug about the necessity to demonstrate to the State Government of VA the willingness of patriots to die for their freedom and prevent tyranny. Where were these folks in 1994 when the Federal Assault Weapons ban went into effect? That legislation seemed like far more of an assault on the 2A than anything being proposed today. Why was there no revolt?Sledog said:
DC is still fucked and going back to the supremes as we speak.YellowSnow said:
Don't the courts have to weigh in first before we can conclude if the citizen's of VA have lost a constitutionally protected right? This is step 1 in the process which the Founders intended. Seemed to work out fine for gun owners in Washington, DC last I checked.Sledog said:
Not terrorists but yes they are saying that they will not allow the government to strip their constitutional rights from them. This is the very mechanism the founders intended when the government over reaches and it can't be resolved.DJDuck said:Democratic Governors Association Creative Director Shares Tweet Calling Peaceful Gun-Right Protesters ‘Terrorists’
https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2020/01/democratic-governors-association-creative-director-shares-tweet-calling-peaceful-gun-right-protesters-terrorists/
The left is importing voters that will vote for their free shit. It is a plan to flip the nation in one direction. Socialism is not constitutional either.
Where were the milita bros in 1994 when Clinton signed the AWB? Why didn't they take up arms to defend 2A rights then?
They haven't shot anyone. HTH
P.S. You're better too. Donate to HH today. Don't be like the bums at Riverfront Park. -
The 2A numbers have exploded. Gun sales are massive and people who never bought are buying bigly.YellowSnow said:
Yes @salemcoog Moore's Law has contributed much to the "us vs them" fight to the death polarization of our body politic. That said, citizens were still engaging is massive protests on various issues of the day well before the internet. I don't recall seeing 2A defenders taking to the streets with semi-auto rifles in protest in 1994 which was my point.salemcoog said:
Welp. Most people didn’t have an internet connection back then. Therefore no Twitter, Facebook and every swinging dick with a camera phone back then. So there’s that. While there was serious political division back then. It wasn’t the outrage era as now because most people only knew what was happening from TV news. And even then, they dictated the narrative. So please stop comparing 1994 to 2020. You’re better.YellowSnow said:
But I hear all this TUFF talk in the Tug about the necessity to demonstrate to the State Government of VA the willingness of patriots to die for their freedom and prevent tyranny. Where were these folks in 1994 when the Federal Assault Weapons ban went into effect? That legislation seemed like far more of an assault on the 2A than anything being proposed today. Why was there no revolt?Sledog said:
DC is still fucked and going back to the supremes as we speak.YellowSnow said:
Don't the courts have to weigh in first before we can conclude if the citizen's of VA have lost a constitutionally protected right? This is step 1 in the process which the Founders intended. Seemed to work out fine for gun owners in Washington, DC last I checked.Sledog said:
Not terrorists but yes they are saying that they will not allow the government to strip their constitutional rights from them. This is the very mechanism the founders intended when the government over reaches and it can't be resolved.DJDuck said:Democratic Governors Association Creative Director Shares Tweet Calling Peaceful Gun-Right Protesters ‘Terrorists’
https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2020/01/democratic-governors-association-creative-director-shares-tweet-calling-peaceful-gun-right-protesters-terrorists/
The left is importing voters that will vote for their free shit. It is a plan to flip the nation in one direction. Socialism is not constitutional either.
Where were the milita bros in 1994 when Clinton signed the AWB? Why didn't they take up arms to defend 2A rights then?
They haven't shot anyone. HTH
P.S. You're better too. Donate to HH today. Don't be like the bums at Riverfront Park.
It is the lynch pin of the constitution and it's guarantee and more and more people see that with the recent rogue administration of Obingo.
The left still wants them all! -
I’m not. And I won’t. Thanks for asking though.YellowSnow said:
Yes @salemcoog Moore's Law has contributed much to the "us vs them" fight to the death polarization of our body politic. That said, citizens were still engaging is massive protests on various issues of the day well before the internet. I don't recall seeing 2A defenders taking to the streets with semi-auto rifles in protest in 1994 which was my point.salemcoog said:
Welp. Most people didn’t have an internet connection back then. Therefore no Twitter, Facebook and every swinging dick with a camera phone back then. So there’s that. While there was serious political division back then. It wasn’t the outrage era as now because most people only knew what was happening from TV news. And even then, they dictated the narrative. So please stop comparing 1994 to 2020. You’re better.YellowSnow said:
But I hear all this TUFF talk in the Tug about the necessity to demonstrate to the State Government of VA the willingness of patriots to die for their freedom and prevent tyranny. Where were these folks in 1994 when the Federal Assault Weapons ban went into effect? That legislation seemed like far more of an assault on the 2A than anything being proposed today. Why was there no revolt?Sledog said:
DC is still fucked and going back to the supremes as we speak.YellowSnow said:
Don't the courts have to weigh in first before we can conclude if the citizen's of VA have lost a constitutionally protected right? This is step 1 in the process which the Founders intended. Seemed to work out fine for gun owners in Washington, DC last I checked.Sledog said:
Not terrorists but yes they are saying that they will not allow the government to strip their constitutional rights from them. This is the very mechanism the founders intended when the government over reaches and it can't be resolved.DJDuck said:Democratic Governors Association Creative Director Shares Tweet Calling Peaceful Gun-Right Protesters ‘Terrorists’
https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2020/01/democratic-governors-association-creative-director-shares-tweet-calling-peaceful-gun-right-protesters-terrorists/
The left is importing voters that will vote for their free shit. It is a plan to flip the nation in one direction. Socialism is not constitutional either.
Where were the milita bros in 1994 when Clinton signed the AWB? Why didn't they take up arms to defend 2A rights then?
They haven't shot anyone. HTH
P.S. You're better too. Donate to HH today. Don't be like the bums at Riverfront Park. -
Duly noted. I'll take you off the list.salemcoog said:
I’m not. And I won’t. Thanks for asking though.YellowSnow said:
Yes @salemcoog Moore's Law has contributed much to the "us vs them" fight to the death polarization of our body politic. That said, citizens were still engaging is massive protests on various issues of the day well before the internet. I don't recall seeing 2A defenders taking to the streets with semi-auto rifles in protest in 1994 which was my point.salemcoog said:
Welp. Most people didn’t have an internet connection back then. Therefore no Twitter, Facebook and every swinging dick with a camera phone back then. So there’s that. While there was serious political division back then. It wasn’t the outrage era as now because most people only knew what was happening from TV news. And even then, they dictated the narrative. So please stop comparing 1994 to 2020. You’re better.YellowSnow said:
But I hear all this TUFF talk in the Tug about the necessity to demonstrate to the State Government of VA the willingness of patriots to die for their freedom and prevent tyranny. Where were these folks in 1994 when the Federal Assault Weapons ban went into effect? That legislation seemed like far more of an assault on the 2A than anything being proposed today. Why was there no revolt?Sledog said:
DC is still fucked and going back to the supremes as we speak.YellowSnow said:
Don't the courts have to weigh in first before we can conclude if the citizen's of VA have lost a constitutionally protected right? This is step 1 in the process which the Founders intended. Seemed to work out fine for gun owners in Washington, DC last I checked.Sledog said:
Not terrorists but yes they are saying that they will not allow the government to strip their constitutional rights from them. This is the very mechanism the founders intended when the government over reaches and it can't be resolved.DJDuck said:Democratic Governors Association Creative Director Shares Tweet Calling Peaceful Gun-Right Protesters ‘Terrorists’
https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2020/01/democratic-governors-association-creative-director-shares-tweet-calling-peaceful-gun-right-protesters-terrorists/
The left is importing voters that will vote for their free shit. It is a plan to flip the nation in one direction. Socialism is not constitutional either.
Where were the milita bros in 1994 when Clinton signed the AWB? Why didn't they take up arms to defend 2A rights then?
They haven't shot anyone. HTH
P.S. You're better too. Donate to HH today. Don't be like the bums at Riverfront Park.
